高级检索

    几种辅助提取方式对蓝莓原花青素浸提效果及抗氧化活性的影响

    Effects of several assisted extraction methods on extraction effect and antioxidant activity of proanthocyanins from blueberry

    • 摘要:
        目的  以大兴安岭野生蓝莓为原料,研究有机溶剂浸提法、超声波辅助、微波辅助和光波辅助提取方式对蓝莓原花青素和酚类物质的浸提效果、化学结构以及抗氧化活性的影响。
        方法  采用分光光度法分别测定4种方式处理后浸提液中的原花青素、总酚、总黄酮和花青素等酚类物质含量,通过红外光谱分析4种方式提取溶液的结构变化,通过扫描电镜观察原料蓝莓经不同方式处理后残渣的微观结构,并测定4种提取液的总还原能力、DPPH•、ABTS+•和•OH的清除能力。
        结果  微波辅助法提取原花青素得率最高为(15.72 ± 0.03)mg/g。通过红外光谱发现4种方式提取的蓝莓原花青素在化学结构上没有明显变化,扫描电镜观察发现,微波辅助法处理后的提取残渣表面孔隙和褶皱较明显。微波辅助法和光波辅助法提取液中总酚、总黄酮、花青素和原花青素含量较高,与普通溶剂浸提法相比差异显著(P < 0.05)。将不同方式提取液的蓝莓原花青素调至相同浓度30 μg/mL,总还原能力和DPPH•清除能力差异不显著(P > 0.05),DPPH•清除率均在97%以上。•OH清除能力的大小顺序为:溶剂浸提法 > 微波辅助提取法 > 光波辅助提取法 > 超声辅助提取法。超声波辅助法对ABTS+•清除效果最差,溶剂浸提法最强。
        结论  同一浓度下溶剂浸提法的提取液的抗氧化活性较强,但微波辅助法提取的原花青素得率最高且抗氧化活性与溶剂浸提法的差异不显著(P > 0.05)。微波由于具有较强的离子极化和偶极旋转作用,因此可以在较短的时间内促进原花青素的浸提,并且微波处理后的原花青素的化学结构和抗氧化功能变化差异不显著,因此4种方式中微波辅助法较为适合提取蓝莓原花青素。通过对比超声波、微波、光波处理单独进行时的得率和超声波、微波、光波处理后再次浸提的得率,发现超声波、微波、光波处理在提取过程中处于主导作用。

       

      Abstract:
        Objective  Using wild blueberries from Daxinganling Area, northeastern China as raw materials, the effects of organic solvent extraction, ultrasonic-assisted, microwave-assisted, and light-wave-assisted extraction methods on the extraction effects, chemical structure, and antioxidant function of proanthocyanidins and phenols from blueberries were studied.
        Method  The contents of proanthocyanidins, total phenols, total flavonoids and anthocyanins in the four kinds of extraction solution were determined by spectrophotometry. The structural changes of the four kinds of extraction solution were analyzed by infrared spectrum. The microstructure of the residues of blueberry treated by different ways was observed by scanning electron microscope. The total reducing capacity and the scavenging ability of DPPH, ABTS as well as hydroxyl radicals of the four kinds of extraction solution were also measured.
        Result  The maximum yield of proanthocyanidins extracted by microwave-assisted method was (15.72 ± 0.03) mg/g. The results showed that there was no obvious change in the chemical structure of proanthocyanidins extracted by four methods through infrared spectrum, and the pores and folds on the surface of the residue after microwave-assisted extraction were obvious by SEM (P < 0.05). When the blueberry proanthocyanidins extracted by the four methods was adjusted to the same concentration of 30 μg/mL, there was no significant difference in total reduction ability and DPPH free radical scavenging ability (P > 0.05). The free radical scavenging percentage of DPPH was above 97%. The order of scavenging capacity of hydroxyl radicals was general solvent extraction > microwave-assisted extraction > light wave assisted extraction > ultrasonic assisted extraction. The ultrasonic assisted method had the worst scavenging effect on ABTS radicals, and the solvent extraction method had the strongest.
        Conclusion  At the same concentration, the antioxidant activity of the solution from the solvent extraction is stronger, but the microwave-saaisted extraction method has the highest yield of proanthocysnins and the antioxidant activity is not significantly different from that of the solvent extraction method (P > 0.05). Microwave can promote the extraction of proanthocyanidins in a short time because of its strong ion polarization and dipole rotation, and there is no significant difference in the chemical structure and antioxidant function of proanthocyanidins after microwave treatment, so the microwave assisted method is more suitable for the extraction of proanthocyanidins from blueberry. By comparing the yields obtained when ultrasonic, microwave, and light wave treatments are performed separately and the yields after re-extraction after ultrasonic, microwave, and light wave treatments, it is found that ultrasonic, microwave, and light wave treatments dominate the extraction.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回