基于SRAP分子标记的流苏树天然群体遗传多样性研究

曲凯; 国浩平; 王宝锐; 周文玲; 侯丽丽; 李琴; 李际红; 程甜甜

doi:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200212

基于SRAP分子标记的流苏树天然群体遗传多样性研究

1.
山东农业大学林学院，山东泰山森林生态系统国家定位研究站，黄河下游森林培育国家林业局重点实验室，山东泰安 271018
2.
山东方大工程有限责任公司嘉祥林场，山东济宁 272400
3.
泰安市泰山林业科学研究院，山东泰安 271000

基金项目: 山东省农业良种工程项目（2016LZGC036），山东省林业科技创新项目（LYCX02-2018-11），泰安市农业良种工程（2018）40号

详细信息

作者简介:
曲凯。主要研究方向：林木种质资源。Email：17661212306@163.com　地址：271000 山东省泰安市泰山区岱宗大街61号山东农业大学林学院

责任作者:
李际红，教授。主要研究方向：林木分子生物学及林木种质资源收集利用。Email：jhli@sdau.edu.cn　地址：同上

计量
- 文章访问数: 1615
- HTML全文浏览量: 586
- PDF下载量: 77
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-07-12
- 修回日期: 2020-08-14
- 网络出版日期: 2020-10-30
- 发布日期: 2021-01-06

Genetic diversity analysis of Chionanthus retusus natural population based on SRAP molecular markers

1.
College of Forestry, Shandong Agricultural University, Mountain Tai Forest Ecosystem Research Station of State Forestry and Grassland Administration, State Forestry and Grassland Administration Key Laboratory of Silviculture in Downstream Areas of The Yellow River, Taian 271018, Shandong, China
2.
Jiaxiang Forest Farm of Shandong Fangda Engineering Co., Ltd. Jining 272400, Shandong, China
3.
Taishan Forestry Science Institute, Taian 271000, Shandong, China

摘要

摘要:
目的揭示我国不同地区流苏树（Chionanthus retusus）天然群体的遗传多样性，更好地为合理保护和开发利用提供科学依据。
方法采用相关序列扩增多态性（SRAP）分子标记技术对不同地区的7个流苏树天然群体的62份样品进行了遗传多样性和群体遗传结构研究。
结果（1）7个流苏树天然群体具有较高的遗传多样性，8对SRAP引物共扩增出1 728条清晰条带，其中1 649条具有多态性，PPB（多态性条带比例）为95.43%；群体间的有效等位基因数为 1.213 7，Nei’s基因多样性指数为 0.153 7，Shannon’s信息多样性指数为0.268 0。（2）流苏树天然群体存在较高水平的种群内遗传变异和较低水平的群体间遗传变异（Gst = 0.133 6），7个流苏树天然群体间存在较高水平的基因交流（Nm = 3.243 7）。（3）流苏树群体间的遗传相似系数介于0.898 0 ~ 0.973 6之间，平均值为0.934 4，经Mantel检验（r = 0.288，P = 0.205）及群体间的聚类证明群体间的遗传距离与地理距离之间无明显相关性；62份流苏树初级种质聚类结果表明大部分种质表现为同一群体的多数个体聚在一起，部分种质存在不同群体间的个体聚在一起的现象，表现出群体间遗传变异相对稳定而种群内的遗传变异水平相对较高的特点，与基因多样性分析结果一致。
结论综合多因素分析推测，太行山地区可能是我国流苏树种质资源的主要产区。
- 流苏树 /
- SRAP /
- 遗传多样性 /
- 遗传结构
Abstract:
Objective This paper aims to reveal the genetic diversity of natural populations of Chionanthus retusus in different regions of China, and to provide a scientific basis for rational protection development and utilization.
Method The genetic diversity and population genetic structure of 62 samples from 7 Chionanthus retusus natural populations in different regions were studied using sequence related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) molecular marker technique.
Result Seven natural populations of Chionanthus retusus had higher genetic diversity, and 8 pairs of SRAP primers amplified a total of 1 728 clear bands, of which 1 649 were polymorphic, and the percentage of polymorphic bands (PPB) was 95.43%. The number of effective alleles between populations was 1.213 7, the diversity of Nei’s gene was 0.153 7, and the information diversity index of Shannon’s was 0.268 0. There were higher levels of intra-population genetic variation and lower levels of inter-population genetic variation among natural populations of Chionanthus retusus (Gst = 0.133 6), and higher levels of gene flow among seven natural populations of Chionanthus retusus (Nm = 3.243 7). The genetic similarity coefficient between Chionanthus retusus populations ranged from 0.898 0 to 0.973 6, with an average of 0.934 4. The Mantel test (r = 0.288, P = 0.205) and the clustering among populations proved that there was no significant correlation between genetic distance and geographical distance among populations. The clustering results of 62 primary germplasm showed that most of the germplasms were characterized by the fact that most individuals in the same population came together, and some germplasms had the phenomenon that individuals of different populations gathered together, showing that the genetic variation between populations was relatively stable and the level of genetic variation within the populations was relatively high, which was consistent with the results of genetic diversity analysis.
Conclusion Comprehensive multi-factor analysis speculated that Taihang Mountain area may be the main producing area of Chinese Chionanthus retusus germplasm resources.
- Chionanthus retusus /
- SRAP /
- genetic diversity /
- genetic structure

HTML全文

图 1 不同流苏树天然群体间遗传关系聚类分析图

Figure 1. Dendrogram of UPGMA analysis of seven Chionanthus retusus natural populations

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 7个流苏树天然群体间遗传距离与地理距离的相关性分析

Figure 2. Correlation analysis between genetic distance and geographic distance of seven Chionanthus retusus natural populations

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 62份流苏树初级种质资源基于SRAP分析的UPGMA聚类结果

Figure 3. UPGMA dendrogram of primary collection of 62 Chionanthus retusus germplasm based on SRAP

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 62份流苏树资源SRAP标记的主坐标分析图

Figure 4. Principal coordinate analysis for 62 samples of Chionanthus retusus

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 流苏树天然群体采样地位置和生境

Table 1 Location and habitat of natural population sampling of Chionanthus retusus

群体及编号 Population and No.	取样株数 Sampling plant number	海拔 Altitude/m	纬度 Latitude (N)	经度 Longitude (E)
北京市怀柔区 Huairou District, Beijing City (B-H)	10	40	116°38′	40°17′
河北省保定市 Baoding City, Hebei Province (H-B)	5	20	115°28′	38°55′
河南省南阳市桐柏县 Tongbai County, Nanyang City, Henan Province (H-T)	10	240	113°17′	32°27′
山东省青州市 Qingzhou City, Shandong Province (S-Q)	10	250	118°18′	36°41′
山西省临汾市安泽县 Anze County, Linfen City, Shanxi Province (S-A)	10	260	112°14′	36°08′
江苏省宿迁市沭阳县 Shuyang County, Suqian City, Jiangsu Province(J-S)	10	10	118°39′	34°09′
湖北省安陆市 Anlu City, Hubei Province (H-A)	7	130	113°41′	31°15′

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 7个流苏树天然群体间的地理距离

Table 2 Geographic distance of seven Chionanthus retusus natural populations km

群体 Population	H-T	H-A	S-A	S-Q	J-S	B-H	H-B
H-T	—
H-A	246	—
S-A	609	752	—
S-Q	856	966	672	—
J-S	698	795	799	373	—
B-H	1 039	1 204	736	512	809	—
H-B	862	993	547	448	710	221	—

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 试验所用SRAP引物信息

Table 3 Information of SRAP primers used in the experiment

上游引物 Forward primer	引物序列 Primer sequence (5′→3′)	下游引物 Reverse primer	引物序列 Primer sequence (5′→3′)
T-ATA	TGAGTCCAAACCGGATA	G-AAT	GACTGCGTACGAATTAAT
T-AGC	TGAGTCCAAACCGGAGC	G-TGC	GACTGCGTACGAATTTGC
T-AAT	TGAGTCCAAACCGGAAT	G-GAC	GACTGCGTACGAATTGAC
T-ACC	TGAGTCCAAACCGGACC	G-TGA	GACTGCGTACGAATTTGA
T-AAG	TGAGTCCAAACCGGAAG	G-AAC	GACTGCGTACGAATTAAC
T-TAA	TGAGTCCAAACCGGTAA	G-GCA	GACTGCGTACGAATTGCA
T-ACA	TGAGTCCAAA CCGG ACA	G-CAA	GACTGCGTACG AATT CAA
T-TGT	TGAGTCCAAA CCGG TGT	G-AGC	GACTGCGTACG AATT AGC

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 基于SRAP选择性扩增引物产生的条带多态性

Table 4 Polymorphism of SRAP bands obtained by selective amplification based on the primer combinations

引物组合 Primer combination	总带数 Total number of band	多态性条带数 Polymorphic band number	多态性条带比例 Percentage of polymorphic band/%
T-AGC/G-AAT	216	202	93.52
T-AGC/G-GCA	216	203	93.98
T-AGC/G-CAA	216	206	95.37
T-ACC/G-AAT	216	212	98.15
T-TAA/G-AAT	216	206	95.37
T-TAA/G-GCA	216	211	97.69
T-TAA/G-CAA	216	214	99.07
T-ACA/G-TGA	216	195	90.28
合计 Sum	1 728	1 649	—
平均 Mean	216	206.13	95.43

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 基于不同引物组合的流苏树遗传多样性水平

Table 5 Genetic diversity level of Chionanthus retusus based on different primer combinations

引物组合 Primer combination	有效等位基因数 Number of effective allele (Ne)	Nei’s基因多样性指数 Nei’s gene diversity (H)	Shannon多态性信息指数 Shannon polymorphism information index (I)
T-AGC/G-AAT	1.216 6	0.151 6	0.261 1
T-AGC/G-GCA	1.235 6	0.163 3	0.278 4
T-AGC/G-CAA	1.237 4	0.163 9	0.277 8
T-ACC/G-AAT	1.227 3	0.164 8	0.286 7
T-TAA/G-AAT	1.162 6	0.122 7	0.224 4
T-TAA/G-GCA	1.221 2	0.168 5	0.298 7
T-TAA/G-CAA	1.215 9	0.159 0	0.280 5
T-ACA/G-TGA	1.193 2	0.135 6	0.236 3
平均 Mean	1.213 7	0.153 7	0.268 0

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 7个流苏树天然群体内遗传多样性水平和显著性分析

Table 6 Analysis of genetic diversity and significance of the seven Chionanthus retusus natural populations

群体 Population	Ne	H	I
B-H	1.220 4a	0.146 1ab	0.238 9a
H-B	1.204 3a	0.131 5b	0.207 7b
H-T	1.195 0a	0.134 2ab	0.224 1ab
S-Q	1.206 1a	0.138 5ab	0.228 2ab
S-A	1.210 3a	0.143 7ab	0.238 9a
J-S	1.226 5a	0.150 4a	0.245 2a
H-A	1.207 4a	0.137 9ab	0.223 7ab
注：同列不同小写字母表示种群间差异显著(P < 0.05)。 Note: different lowercase letters in same column indicate significant differences among populations (P < 0.05).

下载: 导出CSV

表 7 7个流苏树天然群体遗传分化分析

Table 7 Genetic differentiation of the seven Chionanthus retusus natural populations

所有群体 All population	总基因多样性指数 Total gene diversity index (Ht)	群体内基因多样性 Genetic diversity within the population (Hs)	群体间基因多样性 Genetic diversity between populations (Dst)	基因分化系数 Coefficient of gene differentiation (Gst)	基因流 Gene flow (Nm)
平均数 Mean	0.408 6	0.354 0	0.054 6	0.133 6	3.243 7
标准差 Standard deviation	0.027 6	0.012 0	—	—	—

下载: 导出CSV

表 8 基于SRAP检测的7个流苏树天然群体间遗传一致度和遗传距离

Table 8 Genetic identity and genetic distance between seven Chionanthus retusus natural populations based on SRAP

群体 Population	H-T	H-A	S-A	S-Q	J-S	B-H	H-B
H-T	—	0.958 3	0.973 6	0.965 8	0.920 0	0.918 9	0.907 4
H-A	0.042 6	—	0.964 5	0.951 7	0.911 0	0.909 9	0.895 1
S-A	0.026 7	0.036 1	—	0.960 6	0.931 0	0.933 2	0.898 0
S-Q	0.034 8	0.049 5	0.040 2	—	0.954 7	0.947 2	0.935 8
J-S	0.083 4	0.093 3	0.071 5	0.046 4	—	0.957 8	0.904 1
B-H	0.084 5	0.094 4	0.069 2	0.054 2	0.043 1	—	0.922 8
H-B	0.097 2	0.110 8	0.107 5	0.066 3	0.100 9	0.080 4	—
注：右上部为遗传一致度，左下部为遗传距离。Notes: Nei’s genetic identity is showed above diagonal and genetic distance is showed below diagonal.

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(58)

[1]	中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会. 中国植物志[M]. 1版. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004. Flora of China Editorial Committee of the Academy of Sciences of China. Flora of China [M]. 1st ed. Beijing: Science Press, 2004.
[2]	方丽. 流苏树的综合利用价值及栽培管理技术[J]. 现代农业科技, 2017(18):123−124. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2017.18.086. Fang L. Comprehensive utilization value and cultivation and management technology of Chionanthus retusus[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017(18): 123−124. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2017.18.086.
[3]	胡世才. 优良饮料植物—流苏树及其枝叶泡制法[J]. 林业科技开发, 1991(3):16. Hu S C. Excellent beverage plants: Chionanthus retusus and its leaf and branch soaking method[J]. China Forestry Science and Technology, 1991(3): 16.
[4]	马震亚. 流苏树栽培技术[J]. 青海农林科技, 2015(4):72−73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9967.2015.04.022. Ma Z Y. Cultivation technique of Chionanthus retusus[J]. Science and Technology of Qinghai Agriculture and Forestry, 2015(4): 72−73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9967.2015.04.022.
[5]	Gill J D, Fogge F L. Chionanthus retusus L.[M]//Seeds of woody plant in the United States. Washington: USDA Agri Handbook, 1974, 450: 323−325.
[6]	Gulcin I, Elias R, Gepdiremen A, et al. Antioxidant secoiridoids from fringe tree (Chionanthus virginicus L.)[J]. Wood Science Technology, 2009, 43(3−4): 195−212. doi: 10.1007/s00226-008-0234-1.
[7]	Lee Y G, Lee H, Jung J W, et al. Flavonoids from Chionanthus retusus (Oleaceae) flowers and their protective effects against glutamate-induced cell toxicity in HT22 cells[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2019, 20(14): 3517. doi: 10.3390/ijms20143517.
[8]	Saeki I. Application of aerial survey for detecting a rare maple species and endangered wetland ecosystems[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2005, 216(1): 283−294.
[9]	Song J H, Kong M J, Hong S P, et al. Morphological characteristics, distribution and taxonomic consideration of Chionanthus retusus Lindl & Paxton in Korea[J]. Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy, 2011, 41(2): 156−163. doi: 10.11110/kjpt.2011.41.2.156.
[10]	Soejima A, Maki M, Ueda K. Genetic variation in relic and isolated populations of Chionanthus retusus (Oleaceae) of Tsushima Island and the Tono Region, Japan[J]. Genes & Genetic Systems, 1998, 73(1): 29−37.
[11]	刘棠瑞. 台湾木本植物图志:下卷 [M]. 台北: 台湾大学, 1991: 1061. Liu T R. Woody flora of Taiwan: Vol. 2 [M]. Taibei: Taiwan University, 1991: 1061.
[12]	樊莉丽, 党远, 樊巍, 等. 珍稀树种流苏研究进展与保护利用策略[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(6):20−24. Fan L L, Dang Y, Fan W, et al. Research progress and protection and utilization strategies of rare tree species Chionanthus retusus[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 44(6): 20−24.
[13]	李际红. 山东省流苏古树资源[M]. 1版. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2018. Li J H. Ancient tree resources of Chionanthus retusus in Shandong Province[M]. 1st ed. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2018.
[14]	吴东旭. 辽西青龙河流域流苏树种子繁育技术[J]. 江西农业, 2016(19):72. Wu D X. Seed breeding techniques of Chionanthus retusus in Qinglong River Basin, western Liaoning Province[J]. Jiangxi Agriculture, 2016(19): 72.
[15]	贾明财, 温保龙, 张璐, 等. 北京怀柔流苏树资源调查及繁育[J]. 中国花卉园艺, 2017(24):36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8496.2017.24.017. Jia M C, Wen B L, Zhang L, et al. Investigation and breeding of Chionanthus retusus in Beijing Huairou District[J]. China Flowers & Horticulture, 2017(24): 36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8496.2017.24.017.
[16]	Lee Y N, Jeong C H, Shim K H. Isolation of antioxidant and antibrowning substance from Chionanthus retusa leaves[J]. Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition, 2004, 33(9): 1419−1425. doi: 10.3746/jkfn.2004.33.9.1419.
[17]	缴丽莉. 流苏和青榨槭耐荫性与抗寒性研究[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2006. Jiao L L. The study on shading-tolerance and freezing-resistance of Chionanthus retusus and Acer davidii[D]. Baoding: Agricultural University of Hebei, 2006.
[18]	邓瑞雪, 卢宗元, 张创峰, 等. 流苏花的化学成分研究[J]. 河南科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 34(6):92−95. Deng R X, Lu Z Y, Zhang C F, et al. Chemical constituents from flowers of Chionanthus retusa[J]. Journal of Henan University of Science and Technology (Natural Science), 2013, 34(6): 92−95.
[19]	邹莉. 流苏树的栽培管理技术[J]. 农业与技术, 2018, 38(21):98−99. Zou L. Cultivation and management techniques of Chionanthus retusus[J]. Agriculture and Technology, 2018, 38(21): 98−99.
[20]	禹霖, 柏文富, 李建辉, 等. ‘彩虹’彩桂高位嫁接技术研究[J]. 湖南林业科技, 2018, 45(6):19−23, 28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5710.2018.06.004 Yu L, Bai W F, Li J H, et al. Study on high-position grafting technology of Osmanthus fragrans var. semperflorens ‘Rainbow’[J]. Hunan Forestry Science & Technolog, 2018, 45(6): 19−23, 28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5710.2018.06.004
[21]	Gardens R B. World checklist of selected plant families [EB/OL] [2016−04−14]. http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/Retrieved.
[22]	曹福亮, 花喆斌, 汪贵斌, 等. 野生银杏资源群体遗传多样性的RAPD分析[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2008, 25(1):22−27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0756.2008.01.005. Cao F L, Hua Z B, Wang G B, et al. Genetic diversity in wild populations of Ginkgo biloba using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 2008, 25(1): 22−27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0756.2008.01.005.
[23]	王凯, 韦善忠, 罗江, 等. DNA分子标记及其进展[J]. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报, 2003, 15(1):39−43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2090.2003.01.010. Wang K, Wei S Z, Luo J, et al. DNA molecular markers and their advances[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang BaYi Agricultural University, 2003, 15(1): 39−43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2090.2003.01.010.
[24]	Li G, Quiros C F. Sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP), a new marker system based on a simple PCR reaction:its application to mapping and gene tagging in Brassica[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2001, 103(2−3): 455−461. doi: 10.1007/s001220100570.
[25]	贺蕤, 余学琼, 杨志建, 等. 河南省南召县玉兰遗传多样性SRAP分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2019, 17(13):4320−4330. He R, Yu X Q, Yang Z J, et al. SRAP analysis of Yulania genetic diversity in Nanzhao County, Henan Province[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2019, 17(13): 4320−4330.
[26]	郭彩杰, 侯丽霞, 崔娜, 等. 番茄耐低温相关基因的SRAP标记筛选[J]. 植物生理学报, 2011, 47(1):102−106. Guo C J, Hou L X, Cui N, et al. Identification of the specific SRAP marker associated with cold resistance of Tamoto[J]. Plant Physiology Communications, 2011, 47(1): 102−106.
[27]	王茂芊, 李博, 王华忠. 甜菜遗传连锁图谱初步构建[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(2):222−230. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.00222. Wang M Q, Li B, Wang H Z. Construction of molecular genetic linkage map of Sugarbeet[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014, 40(2): 222−230. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.00222.
[28]	Budak H, Shearman R C, Parmaksiz I, et al. Molecular characterization of Buffalograss germplasm using sequence-related amplified polymorphism markers[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2004, 108(2): 328−334. doi: 10.1007/s00122-003-1428-4.
[29]	王萱. 玉铃花遗传多样性的AFLP分析[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2016. Wang X. Genetic diversity of Styrax obassia Sieb & Zucc based on AFLP markers[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2016.
[30]	曲凯. 流苏种质资源的收集评价及遗传多样性的分析[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2019. Qu K. Collection and evaluation of Chionanthus retusus resources and analysis of genetic diversity[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2019.
[31]	Rohlf F J. NTSYSpc: numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system [M]. New York: Exeter Software, Setauket, 1988.
[32]	Nei M. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals[J]. Genetics, 1978, 89(3): 583−590.
[33]	沈浩, 刘登义. 遗传多样性概述[J]. 生物学杂志, 2001, 18(3):4, 5−7 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1736.2001.03.002. Shen H, Liu D Y. Summary of genetic diversity[J]. Journal of Biology, 2001, 18(3): 4, 5−7 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1736.2001.03.002.
[34]	Zietkiewicz E, Rafalski A, Labuda D. Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification[J]. Genomics, 1994, 20(2): 176−183. doi: 10.1006/geno.1994.1151.
[35]	Fang D Q, Roose M L. Identification of closely related citrus cultivars with inter-simple sequence repeat markers[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1997, 95(3): 408−417. doi: 10.1007/s001220050577.
[36]	Esselman E J, Li J Q, Crawford D J, et al. Clonal diversity in the rare Calamagrostis porteri ssp. insperata (Poaceae): comparative results for allozymes and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and intersimple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers[J]. Molecular Ecology, 1999, 8(3): 443−451. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.1999.00585.x.
[37]	钱韦, 葛颂, 洪德元. 采用RAPD和ISSR标记探讨中国疣粒野生稻的遗传多样性[J]. 植物学报, 2000, 42(7):741−750. Qian W, Ge S, Hong D Y. Assessment of genetic variation of Oryza granulata detected by RAPDs and ISSRs[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2000, 42(7): 741−750.
[38]	马朝芝, 傅廷栋, Stine Tuevesson, 等. 用ISSR标记技术分析中国和瑞典甘蓝型油菜的遗传多样性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2003, 36(11):1403−1408. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2003.11.031. Ma C Z, Fu T D, Tuevesson S, et al. Genetic diversity of Chinese and Swedish rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) analysed by inter-simple sequence repeats(ISSRs)[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2003, 36(11): 1403−1408. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2003.11.031.
[39]	陈良华, 胡庭兴, 张帆. 四川干旱干热河谷核桃资源遗传多样性分析[J]. 果树学报, 2009, 26(1):48−54. Chen L H, Hu T X, Zhang F. AFLP analysis on genetic diversity of Juglans populations in dry and dryhot valleys of Sichuan Province[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2009, 26(1): 48−54.
[40]	Hickey R J, Vincent M A, Guttman S I. Genetic variation in running buffalo clover Trifolium stoloniferum Fabaceae[J]. Conservation Biology, 1991, 5(3): 309−316. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00142.x.
[41]	Swensen S M, Allan G J, Howe M, et al. Genetic analysis of the endangered island endemic Malacothamnus fasciculatus (Nutt.) Greene var. nesioticus (Rob.) Kearn. (Malvaceae)[J]. Conservation Biology, 1995, 9(2): 404−415. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.9020404.x.
[42]	Ayres D R, Ryan F J. Genetic diversity and structure of the narrow endemic Wyethia reticulate and its congener W. bolanderi (Asteraceae) using RAPD and allozyme techniques[J]. American Journal of Botany, 1999, 86(3): 344−353. doi: 10.2307/2656756
[43]	Kang U, Chang C S, Kim Y S. Genetic structure and conservation considerations of rare endemic Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai (Oleaceae) in Korea[J]. Journal of Plant Reserach, 2000, 113(2): 127−138. doi: 10.1007/PL00013923.
[44]	肖龙骞, 葛学军, 龚洵, 等. 贵州苏铁遗传多样性研究[J]. 植物分类与资源学报, 2003, 25(6):648−652. Xiao L Q, Ge X J, Gong X, et al. Genetic diversity of Cycas guizhouensis[J]. Plant Diversity, 2003, 25(6): 648−652.
[45]	明军, 顾万春. 紫丁香天然群体遗传多样性的AFLP分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2006, 33(6):1269−1274. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0513-353X.2006.06.018. Ming J, Gu W C. Genetic diversity in natural populations of Syringa oblata detected by AFLP markers[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2006, 33(6): 1269−1274. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0513-353X.2006.06.018.
[46]	孟宪婷. 东北地区不同种源水曲柳遗传分化的研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2009. Meng X T. Study on genetic differentiation of Fraxinus Mandshurica Rupr. in different provenances, northeast of China[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2009.
[47]	李梅, 侯喜林, 郝日明. 基于SRAP分子标记的桂花品种亲缘关系研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2009, 36(11):1667−1675. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0513-353X.2009.11.015. Li M, Hou X L, Hao R M. Analysis of genetic relationships of Osmanthus fragrans based on SRAP markers[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2009, 36(11): 1667−1675. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0513-353X.2009.11.015.
[48]	葛颂, 陈家宽, 杨继. 植物进化生物学[M]. 1版. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 1994. Ge S, Chen J K, Yang J. Plant evolutionary biology[M]. 1st ed. Wuhan: Wuhan University Press, 1994.
[49]	何艳霞, 孔令茜, 陈鹏臻, 等. 雄全异株流苏树的花部特征及繁育系统研究[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(24):8467−8476. He Y X, Kong L Q, Chen P Z, et al. Floral syndrome and reproductive strategy of an androdioecious species, Chionanthus retusus (Oleaceae)[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(24): 8467−8476.
[50]	Frankham R, Briscoe D A. Introduction to conservation genetics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010: 309−336.
[51]	Turpein T, Tehola T, Manninen O, et al. Microsatellite diversity associated with ecological factors in Hordeum spontaneum populations in Israel[J]. Molecular Ecology, 2001, 10(6): 1577−1591. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.01281.x.
[52]	苏晓华, 张绮纹, 郑先武, 等. 利用RAPD分析大青杨天然群体的遗传结构[J]. 林业科学, 1997, 33(6):504−512. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.1997.06.004. Su X H, Zhang Q W, Zheng X W, et al. Genetic structure in Populus ussuriensis Kom. confirmed by RAPD markers[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 1997, 33(6): 504−512. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.1997.06.004.
[53]	邱英雄, 黄爱军, 傅承新. 明党参的遗传多样性研究[J]. 植物分类学报, 2000, 38(2):111−120. Qiu Y X, Huang A J, Fu C X. Studies on genetic diversity in Changium smyrnioides Wolff (Umbelliferae)[J]. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 2000, 38(2): 111−120.
[54]	Govindaraju D R. Relationship between dispersal ability and levels of gene flow in plants[J]. Oikos, 1988, 52(1): 31−35. doi: 10.2307/3565978.
[55]	庞广昌, 王军厚. 胡杨群体遗传结构及其与自然环境关系的研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 1992, 12(4):295−302. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.1992.04.008. Pang G C, Wang J H. Study on population genetic structure geographical provenance of Populus euphratica Oliv. and their interaction with environment[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 1992, 12(4): 295−302. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.1992.04.008.
[56]	Heywood J S. Spatial analysis of genetic variation in plant population[J]. Annals Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 1991, 22(1): 335−355. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.22.110191.002003.
[57]	江亚雯, 孙小琴, 罗火林, 等. 基于ISSR标记的江西野生寒兰居群遗传多样性研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2017, 44(10):1993−2000. Jiang Y W, Sun X Q, Luo H L, et al. Studies on genetic diversity of Cymbidium kanran populations from the main mountains in Jiangxi Province based on ISSR marker[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2017, 44(10): 1993−2000.
[58]	穆立蔷, 刘赢男. 不同地理分布区紫椴种群的遗传多样性变化[J]. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(6):1190−1198. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0148. Mu L Q, Liu Y N. Genetic diversity of Tilia Amurensis populations in different geographical distribution regions[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2007, 31(6): 1190−1198. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0148.

施引文献(29)

期刊类型引用(16)

1.	钟思琪，宁金魁，黄锦程，陈鼎泸，欧阳勋志，臧颢. 基于混合效应的杉木人工林冠幅模型. 森林与环境学报. 2024(02): 127-135 . 百度学术
2.	段平，王云川，晋秋梅，李佳. 基于无人机可见光影像的单木胸径估算方法. 测绘与空间地理信息. 2023(01): 14-17 . 百度学术
3.	魏智海，魏姿芃. 基于单木分割及点云特征提取的单木胸径估测. 陕西林业科技. 2023(02): 18-23 . 百度学术
4.	王杰芬，夏磊，林露花，胡璐璐，徐怀兴，王聚中，徐小军. 结合放射线法和无人机影像提取冠幅估算杉木碳储量研究. 浙江林业科技. 2023(05): 42-50 . 百度学术
5.	夏洪涛，郭晓斌，张珍，田相林，郭福涛，孙帅超. 基于不同立地质量评价指标的杉木大径材林分树高-胸径模型. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2023(10): 80-88 . 百度学术
6.	肖德卿，罗芊芊，范辉华，邱群，周志春. 栽植模式对木荷幼林生长和形质性状家系变异影响. 林业科学. 2022(05): 85-92 . 百度学术
7.	王志波，季蒙，李永乐，李银祥，马世明，张海东. 华北落叶松人工林差分地位指数模型构建. 林业资源管理. 2021(01): 156-163 . 百度学术
8.	杨洋，尤龙辉，叶功富，聂森，程分生，余锦林. 沙质海岸基干林木麻黄幼林模拟抚育预测. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(02): 206-215 . 百度学术
9.	田红灯，申文辉，谭一波，郑威，何琴飞，朱慧，甘国娟. 不同林龄杉木人工林冠幅与生长因子的关系. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2021(05): 93-101 . 百度学术
10.	朱晋梅，朱光玉，易烜，杨琬珑，牟村，王琢玙. 湖南省栎类次生林冠幅—胸径模型模拟研究. 湖南林业科技. 2021(03): 46-51 . 百度学术
11.	赵保国，朱江，艾训儒，姚兰，郭秋菊，洪建峰. 水杉原生种群胸径树高与树冠的通径分析. 东北林业大学学报. 2021(10): 16-20 . 百度学术
12.	于晓池，李凤，欧阳，张鹏，郭小龙，肖遥，赵秋玲，杨桂娟，王军辉，麻文俊. 基于表型的灰楸核心种质构建. 林业科学研究. 2021(06): 38-45 . 百度学术
13.	贾鹏刚，夏凯，董晨，冯海林，杨垠晖. 基于无人机影像的银杏单木胸径预估方法. 浙江农林大学学报. 2019(04): 757-763 . 百度学术
14.	张冬燕，王冬至，范冬冬，张健东，李大勇. 不同立地类型华北落叶松人工林冠幅与胸径关系研究. 林业资源管理. 2019(04): 69-73 . 百度学术
15.	伍小敏，徐春，杨汉波，陈炙，郭洪英，黄振，王泽亮. 四川桤木天然林和人工林的单木生长模型研究. 四川林业科技. 2018(04): 8-11+44 . 百度学术
16.	周凤艳. 沙地樟子松不同林龄树高、胸径等生长指标的关系研究. 吉林林业科技. 2017(01): 12-15 . 百度学术