高级检索

    基于邻体干扰模型的草花混播群落竞争模拟

    Competition simulation of flower meadow community based on neighborhood interference model

    • 摘要:
        目的  草花混播是城市中人工模拟草地群落景观的尝试。混播群落中物种的竞争影响着不同时期的景观效果,但目前研究较少。因此,本研究基于邻体干扰模型,为探索草花混播群落内的竞争提供科学依据。
        方法  (1)以物种数不同的一年生混播组合为例,生长季每间隔半个月采用样方法调查物种多度、花期并测定地上部分生物量。(2)选取四个邻体干扰备选模型,在Matlab中计算和模拟群落竞争强度,模型拟合后获得最佳竞争模型,以此计算和分析群落内的竞争强度和模拟群落时序变化。
        结果  (1)拟合最佳的邻体干扰模型与基株、邻株的大小及距离有关,其拟合优度为0.718 9。(2)草花混播的竞争压力约有90%来自于种间竞争,群落下层植物的竞争强度随着时间增强,且显著高于群落上层和中层的植物,以致于在群落下层的部分物种不能正常开花。(3)混播群落内的竞争强度在生长季均逐渐变大,物种多样性先增加后降低,播种种类数少的组合对应的总竞争强度及多样性较低,物种株高和蓬径较大。(4)在一定范围内,群落内物种多样性增加可降低竞争强度,当群落Patrick指数为8 ~ 10、Pielou均匀度指数为0.46、Shannon-Wiener指数为2.1、Simpson优势度指数为0.82时,混播群落内的竞争强度最小,此时群落中层和下层物种的竞争强度为1:3,群落疏密有致,色彩丰富,并近似天然草地的多样性景观。
        结论  邻体干扰模型可用于草花混播群落竞争计算和景观模拟,能达到较好的精度,并能预测混播群落空间分布及外貌。本研究首次从群落竞争的角度为草花混播的景观设计提供科学指导。

       

      Abstract:
        Objective  Flower meadow is an attempt to simulate natural grassland community in urban. The competition of species in the meadow influences the presentation of community appearance during different periods, but here are few studies at present. Therefore, based on neighborhood interference model,our research tried to provide scientific support for competition in flower meadow community.
        Method  (1) Taking the annual mixed sowing combinations with different species numbers as an example, the species abundance and flowering period were investigated by sampling method every half month in the growing season, and the aboveground biomass was measured. (2) Four alternative models of neighborhood interference were selected to calculate and simulate the community competition intensity in Matlab software, the fitting accuracy of the models was compared and analyzed to obtain the best competition model, and competition intensity was calculated and the seasonal simulation and analysis were carried out.
        Result  (1) The best model of neighborhood interference was related to the size and distance of the object individual and neighboring plants, and the goodness of fit coefficient was 0.718 9. (2) About 90% of competition pressure in flower meadows was interspecific competition, the competition intensity of plants in underlying canopy of the community was increased gradually, and significantly higher than that in the tall overlying canopy and middle layer of the community, resulting in some species could not bloom normally. (3) The competition of communities became fiercer, and the species diversity increased firstly and then decreased, competition intensity and diversity of the mixtures with less richness were low, but the plant height and crown width of the species were larger. (4) Within a certain range, the increase of species diversity can reduce competition intensity of community, when the Patrick index was 8 to 10, Pielou evenness was about 0.46, Shannon-Wiener index was 2.1 and Simpson index was 0.82, the competition index in the flower meadow was the lowest, at this time, ratio of competition intensity in the middle and lower canopy of the community was 1∶3, the community was moderate-density, colorful and similar to the richness of natural grassland. Reliable guidance was provided in the study initially for the design of flower meadows from the perspective of community competition.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回