高级检索
    张孟库, 姜立春. 基于机器学习的落叶松树皮厚度预测[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2022, 44(6): 54-62. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210097
    引用本文: 张孟库, 姜立春. 基于机器学习的落叶松树皮厚度预测[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2022, 44(6): 54-62. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210097
    Zhang Mengku, Jiang Lichun. Prediction of bark thickness for Larix gmelinii based on machine learning[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(6): 54-62. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210097
    Citation: Zhang Mengku, Jiang Lichun. Prediction of bark thickness for Larix gmelinii based on machine learning[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(6): 54-62. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210097

    基于机器学习的落叶松树皮厚度预测

    Prediction of bark thickness for Larix gmelinii based on machine learning

    • 摘要:
        目的  研究多个机器学习算法在树皮厚度预测中的应用,对比分析不同单木因子对树皮厚度预测的影响,为树皮厚度预测提供新的方法。
        方法  以大兴安岭天然林落叶松为研究对象,基于树皮厚度数据,构建4个机器学习算法(神经网络ANN、支持向量回归SVR、决策树CART、随机森林RF),并将其在预测树皮厚度方面的性能与6个传统树皮厚度模型比较。采用决定系数(R2)、均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)和赤池信息准则(AIC)来评价不同模型和算法。
        结果  (1)在6个基础模型中Model5预测效果较好。基础模型与机器学习模型比较中,除CART4模型,其他机器学习模型拟合精度均好于传统模型Model5;(2)机器学习模型中ANN4和SVR3拟合和预测精度相似,RF4拟合效果最好。(3)RF4的输入变量为胸径(DBH)、树高(H)、相对树高(Hr)。基于训练样本,与Model5相比,随机森林的R2从0.675 2提高到0.723 4,RMSE从0.575 5降低到0.531 0。随机森林检验结果与Model5相比R2从0.666 9调高到0.710 5,RMSE从0.616 9降低到0.544 6。
        结论  相对于基础树皮厚度模型,机器学习算法中的随机森林,支持向量回归和人工神经网络都能提高树皮厚度的预测精度,其中随机森林的预测效果最好,适合该区域落叶松树皮厚度的预测。

       

      Abstract:
        Objective  This paper aims to study the application of multiple machine learning algorithms in the prediction of bark thickness, to compare and analyze the influence of different individual tree factors on the prediction of bark thickness, and to provide new methods for the prediction of bark thickness.
        Method  Four machine learning algorithms (neural network, support vector regression, decision tree, random forest) were constructed based on the bark thickness data of Dahurian larch (Larix gmelinii) in Daxing’anling Mountains of northeastern China. Their performance in predicting bark thickness was compared with six traditional bark thickness models. The determination coefficient (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE) and Akaike information criterion (AIC) were used to evaluate different models and algorithms.
        Result  (1) Among the six basic models, Model 5 showed better prediction results. In the comparison between the basic model and the machine learning models, all the machine learning models fitted better accuracy than the traditional model Model 5 except for the CART4 model. (2) Among the machine learning models, the fitting and prediction accuracy of ANN4 and SVR3 were similar, and RF4 was the best. (3) The input variables of RF4 were diameter at breast height (DBH), tree height (H), and relative tree height (Hr). Based on the training samples, the R2 of random forest increased from 0.675 2 to 0.723 4, RMSE decreased from 0.575 5 to 0.531 0 compared with Model5. Based on the testing samples, the R2 of random forest increased from 0.666 9 to 0.710 5, RMSE decreased from 0.616 9 to 0.544 6 compared with Model 5.
        Conclusion  Compared with the basic bark thickness model, random forest, support vector machine regression and artificial neural network in machine learning algorithm can improve the prediction accuracy of bark thickness. The prediction effect of random forest is slightly better and suitable for the prediction of bark thickness of Dahurian larch in this region.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回