高级检索

    辽宁仙人洞国家级自然保护区森林生态服务物质量评估及权衡与协同

    Material quality assessment and trade-off synergies of forest ecological service in Xianrendong National Nature Reserve, Liaoning Province of northeastern China

    • 摘要:
        目的  摸清辽宁省仙人洞国家级自然保护区森林生态系统服务功能底数,能够有效提高区域环境质量,增强区域生态服务功能。
        方法  以自然保护区主要森林生态系统为研究对象,根据辽宁辽东半岛森林生态系统国家定位观测研究站2018年实测数据和森林规划调查数据,采用模型量化、分布式测算、相关分析等方法,选择支持、调节和供给3大服务6个功能类别,研究了自然保护区森林生态服务的物质量及权衡与协同作用。
        结果  (1)森林生态服务物质量:支持服务644.42 × 103 t/a,包含保育土壤量644.10 × 103 t/a、林木养分积累量323.85 t/a;调节服务41.61 × 103 t/a,包括固碳释氧量40.16 × 103 t/a、大气净化量1 454.87 t/a;供给服务中,提供水源量148.27 × 107 m3/a、供给负氧离子量274.97 × 1020个/a;表现为:保育土壤量 > 固碳释氧量 > 大气净化量> 林木养分积累量。(2)各评价指标物质量:森林保育土壤中,固土量555.15 × 103 t/a,保肥量88.95 × 103 t/a;森林积累营养量为氮固持(291.02 t/a) > 钾固持(25.33 t/a) > 磷固持(7.50 t/a);森林吸收碳28.56 × 103 t/a、释放氧11.60 × 103 t/a;森林吸收气体污染物量为二氧化硫(817.50 t/a) > 氮氧化物(255.80 t/a) > 氟化物(242.00 t/a),阻滞TSP、PM10和PM2.5分别为82.3、46.7和10.6 t/a。(3)优势树种(组)生态服务物质量前三的树种(组)有天然次生栎类林、赤松林和落叶松林,生态服务物质量与林分面积、蓄积量有显著协同性(r > 0,P < 0.05),与胸径、树高和郁闭度为协同作用(r > 0)。(4)保护区行政村生态服务物质量是管理局最高,而三架山村最低;支持与调节服务存在权衡作用(r < 0),支持与供给服务存在协同作用(r > 0),调节与供给服务同时存在协同和权衡作用。
        结论  保护区森林生态系统的保育土壤、固碳释氧、提供水源和供给负氧离子服务量突出;森林面积和蓄积量对生态服务物质量起重要作用;生态服务之间普遍存在协同和权衡作用。空间上,封山育林、防止林业用地流失;林分上,保护珍稀树种,增加树种类型,促进林分更新演替,就地保护和植树造林相结合;多措并举、遵循自然规律是提高生态服务的有效措施。

       

      Abstract:
        Objective  The purpose of this study was to clarify the material quality of forest ecological multi-functions in Xianrendong National Nature Reserve in Liaoning Province of northeastern China, which can effectively improve the regional environmental quality and enhance the regional ecological service function.
        Method  Taking the forest ecosystem in the nature reserve as the research object, according to the 2018 observation data of the Liaodong Peninsula Forest Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station in Liaoning and survey data of the forests, using the methods of model quantification, distributed calculation and correlation analysis, three major service categories and six functional categories of support, regulation and supply were selected to study the material quality of forest ecological services in nature reserves and their trade-offs and synergies.
        Result  (1) The material quantity of forest ecological service function was as follows: support service 644.42 × 103 t/year, including conservation soil volume 644.10 × 103 t/year, tree nutrient accumulation 323.85 t/year. Regulation service 41.61 × 103 t/year, including carbon sequestration and oxygen release of 40.16 × 103 t/year, and the air purification amount of 1 454.87 t/year. Among the material amount of the supply service, the amount of water supply was 148.27 × 107 m3/year, and the amount of negative ions supplied was 274.97 × 1020 year−1, showing as soil conservation > carbon fixation and oxygen release > air purification > forest nutrient fixation. (2) Substances of each evaluation index: the amount of forest conservation soil was 555.15 × 103 t/year for soil consolidation and 88.95 × 103 t/year for fertilizer retention; the accumulation of nutrients in forests was in the order of nitrogen retention (291.02 t/year) > potassium retention (25.33 t/year) > phosphorus retention (7.50 t/year); forest absorb carbon of 28.56 × 103 t/year and release oxygen of 11.60 × 103 t/year; forest absorb gas pollutants from large to small was sulfur dioxide (817.50 t/year) > nitrogen oxidation compound (255.80 t/year) > fluoride (242.00 t/year), blocking TSP, PM10 and PM2.5 were 82.3 t/year, 46.7 t/year and 10.6 t/year, respectively. (3) The dominant tree species (groups) with larger amounts of ecological service function substances included natural secondary oak forests, red pine forests and larch forests. The material quality of service function was significantly positively correlated with stand area and stock volume (r > 0, P < 0.05), and positively correlated with DBH, tree height and canopy density (r > 0). (4) The quality of ecological service functions in the administrative division of the protected area was the highest in the administrative department, while the lowest in Sanjiashan Village; there was a trade-off between support and adjustment services, synergy between support and supply services, and synergy and trade-off between adjustment and supply services.
        Conclusion  The forest ecosystem has outstanding quality of soil conservation, carbon sequestration and nutrient release, water supply and negative oxygen ion supply. Forest area and stock volume play an important role in the quality of ecological service. Synergies and trade-offs are common among ecological services. In terms of space, closing mountains for afforestation and preventing the loss of forestry land; on the stand, protect rare tree species, increase tree species types, promote forest regeneration and succession, and combine on-site protection with afforestation. Taking multiple measures and following natural laws is an effective measure to improve ecological services.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回