高级检索

    晋西黄土区沟谷不同部位植物多样性

    Plant diversity in different positions of gullies and valleys in the loess region of western Shanxi Province, northern China

    • 摘要:
      目的 为了对黄土丘陵沟壑区小流域沟谷进行更精准的保护和修复,从植物多样性和生态位宽度等方面,对沟谷不同地貌部位(沟底、沟阳坡和沟阴坡)的自然恢复能力进行了研究。
      方法 通过在山西吉县森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站进行野外实地调查,分析不同部位植物的群落生长特征及其多样性,比较不同地貌部位植物群落间的相似性。
      结果 (1)研究区灌草植物共有40科76属98种,其中灌木17科27属34种,草本29科51属64种。灌木层科属种总数表现为沟阳坡 > 沟阴坡 > 沟底,草本层为沟底 > 沟阴坡 > 沟阳坡。(2)灌木层优势种为:黄刺玫、荆条、木蓝。草本层优势种为:芦苇、黄花蒿、披针薹草。在灌木层,沟底黄刺玫和杠柳的生态位宽度较大,沟阳坡和沟阴坡中荆条和木蓝的生态位宽度较大。在草本层,沟底芦苇和白莲蒿的生态位宽度较大,沟阳坡和沟阴坡中披针薹草的生态位宽度较大。(3)在沟底、沟阳坡和沟阴坡间Margalef 指数、Shannon-Wiener指数、Simpson指数和Pielou指数并未表现出显著差异(P > 0.05)。各群落间Jaccard系数0.50 ≤ q < 0.75。Jaccard 系数在沟阳坡和沟阴坡间达到最大,为0.630。
      结论 整体来看,沟谷的自然恢复能力强,地貌部位中沟阳坡和沟阴坡自然植被恢复能力比沟底强。不同地貌部位的群落组成复杂度表现为沟阳坡 > 沟阴坡 > 沟底。沟谷不同地貌部位优势种不同,从沟阳坡到沟阴坡再到沟底,随着光照的减少和水分的增加,优势种由耐旱喜阳植物发展为耐阴植物。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective In order to provide more precise protection and restoration of small watershed gullies in loess hills and gullies, the natural restoration capacity of different geomorphic parts of gullies (gully floor, gully sunny slope and gully shady slope) was investigated in terms of plant diversity and ecological niche width.
      Method Through field investigation at the National Field Scientific Observatory of Forest Ecosystems in Jixian County, Shanxi Province of northern China, we analyzed the growth characteristics of plant communities and their diversity in different parts of the landscape, and compared the similarities between plant communities in different parts of the landscape.
      Result (1) There were 98 species of shrub and grass in 40 families and 76 genera in the study area, including 34 species of shrub in 17 families and 27 genera, and 64 species of herb in 29 families and 51 genera. Total number of family species in the shrub layer was showed as gully sunny slope > gully shady slope > gully floor, while in the herb layer, it was showed as gully floor > gully shady slope > gully sunny slope. (2) The dominant species in shrub layer was Rosa xanthina, Vitex negundo var. heterophylla, and Indigofera tinctoria. The dominant species in the herbaceous layer were Phragmites australis, Artemisia annua, and Carex lancifolia. In the shrub layer, Rosa xanthina and Periploca sepium in the gully floor had larger width of ecological niches, and Vitex negundo var. heterophylla and Indigofera tinctoria in the gully sunny slope and gully shady slope had larger width of ecological niches. In the herb layer, Phragmites australis and Artemisia stechmanniana in the gully floor had larger width of ecological niches, and Carex lancifolia in the gully sunny slope and gully shady slope had larger width of ecological niches. (3) Margalef index, Shannon-Wiener index, Simpson index and Pielou index were not significantly different (P > 0.05) among varied geomorphological parts (gully floor, gully sunny slope, gully shady slope). Jaccard’s coefficient between communities was 0.50 ≤ q < 0.75. The Jaccard coefficient reached a maximum of 0.630 between gully sunny slope and gully shady slope.
      Conclusion Overall, the gully is found to be naturally resilient, with the gully sunny slope and gully shady slope among the geomorphological sites being more resilient to natural vegetation than the gully floor. The complexity of community composition at different landscape sites is shown as gully sunny slope > gully shady slope > gully floor. The dominant species varies in different geomorphological parts of the gully, from gully sunny slope, gully shady slope to gully floor, and the dominant species evolved from drought-tolerant sun-loving plants to shade-tolerant plants as light decreases and water increases.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回