高级检索

    树干横力弯曲中性轴的数值模拟

    Numerical simulation of neutral axis in transverse bending of tree trunk

    • 摘要:
      目的 为了评估树木的风载安全性,研究树木在风力作用下的横力弯曲,确定树干横截面形状、树轮、缺陷等因素对树干弯曲中性轴的影响。
      方法 采用欧拉–伯努利梁假设,推导了通用弯曲中性轴倾斜角计算公式。随后设计了树干模型,模型包括3种外轮廓(圆形、椭圆形、随机形状)和两种内部结构(多层同心、圆形缺陷),并采用不同的弹性模量模拟材料属性的变化。最后进行数值模拟,采用随机森林算法分析、预测数值模拟的结果,确定各个因素的重要性。
      结果 在树轮模型中,质形偏心距 < 4 mm的比例超过97%,各因素影响质形偏心距的重要性为早晚材弹性模量比 > 树轮数量 > 偏心距与基圆半径之比 > 截面圆度;偏转角(实际弯曲中性轴倾斜角相对均匀截面弯曲中性轴倾斜角的偏转角)均 < 0.5°,且< 0.08°的比例高于97%,影响树干弯曲中性轴倾斜角的重要性为载荷方位角 > 截面圆度 > 偏心距与基圆半径之比 > 树轮数量 > 早晚材弹性模量比。在缺陷模型中,质形偏心距 < 5 mm的数量约占总数的80%,在5 ~ 15 mm之间的约为15%,> 15 mm的约为5%,各因素影响质形偏心距的重要性为缺陷半径 > 缺陷树干与正常树干弹性模量之比 > 偏心距与基圆半径之比 > 截面圆度;偏转角 < 1°的比例超过90%,但在极限情况下偏转角也可达到50°,影响弯曲中性轴倾斜角的重要性为载荷方位角 > 截面圆度 > 偏心距与基圆半径之比 > 缺陷半径 > 缺陷树干与正常树干弹性模量之比。
      结论 树轮对树干弯曲中性轴的影响很小,横截面轮廓形状、缺陷对其影响较大。在进行树干受力检测计算时,可忽略树轮的影响,但要考虑树干横截面形状和缺陷的影响。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective In order to assess the wind load safety of trees, the transverse force bending of trees under wind force was studied to determine the effect of factors such as trunk cross-sectional shape, tree ring, and defects on the neutral axis of trunk bending.
      Method In this study, the Euler-Bernoulli beam assumption was used to deduce a generalized formula for the slope of neutral axis. Then, trunk models were designed with three types of contours (circle, ellipse, and random), two internal structures (multi-layer concentric structure and circular defects). And different moduli of elasticity were used to simulate variations in material properties. Finally, numerical simulations were performed, the results of numerical simulations were analyzed and predicted using the random forest model, and the relative contribution of each factor was identified.
      Result In tree-ring models, the probability that the distance from mass center to form center of the tunk cross-section was less than 4 mm exceeded 97%, and the importance affecting the distance was ratio of the elasticity modulus of the early wood to the late wood > tree-ring number > ratio of the eccentricity distance to the basal circle radius > cross-section roundness. The deflection angles (from the actual neutral axis to the neutral axis of uniform section) were all less than 0.5°, and more than 97% of the total number was less than 0.08°. The importance affecting the slope angle of neutral axis in trunk bending was load azimuth > cross-section roundness > ratio of the eccentricity distance to the basal circle radius > tree-ring number > ratio of the elasticity modulus of the early wood to the late wood. In the circular defect model, there was about 80% of all cases where the distance from mass center to form center was less than 5 mm, about 15% of all cases between 5−15 mm, and about 5% of all cases greater than 15 mm. The importance affecting the distance was the defect radius > ratio of the elasticity modulus of the trunk with defects to the normal trunk > ratio of the eccentricity distance to the basal circle radius > cross-section roundness. More than 90% of all cases had a deflection angle less than 1°, but in some extreme cases, the deflection angle may reach 50°. The importance affecting the slope angle was load azimuth > cross-section roundness > ratio of the eccentricity distance to the basal circle radius > the defect radius > ratio of the elasticity modulus of the trunk with defects to the normal trunk.
      Conclusion Tree-ring have a small effect on bending neutral axis of a tree trunk, while defects and cross-section shapes have a large effect on it. In the calculation and detection of trunk stress, the tree-ring can be ignored, but the cross-section shape and defects inside a trunk need to be taken into account.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回