高级检索

    透光抚育强度对长白山“栽针保阔”林分凋落物截留和土壤蓄水动态的影响

    Effects of release cutting intensity on dynamics of litter interception and soil water storage in “planting conifer and preserving broadleaved tree” stand in Changbai Mountain, northeastern China

    • 摘要:
      目的 “栽针保阔”是恢复东北温带地带性顶极植被——阔叶红松林的重要途径,透光抚育能够加速其演替进程,但对其水文生态功能的影响尚不明确。本研究旨在探讨透光抚育强度对“栽针保阔”林分凋落物截留和土壤蓄水这两个关键水文生态过程的影响规律。
      方法 采用野外连续取样与室内浸泡法,测定长白山不同透光抚育强度(对照、轻度、中度、强度和全透光抚育)中期“栽针保阔”林分(次生林内栽植红松42年,透光抚育26年)生长季各月凋落物现存量、组成、持水过程、最大持水量、最大拦蓄量、有效拦蓄量和土壤蓄水量,揭示透光抚育强度对其凋落物截留量和土壤蓄水量生长季月动态过程的影响规律及机制。
      结果 (1)透光抚育26年后,中度和全透光抚育使其生长季月均凋落物现存量(3.80 ~ 5.41 t/hm2)增幅达27.7% ~ 42.4%(p < 0.05)。仅全透光抚育改变了凋落物组成,未分解层与半分解层占比由对照组的3∶2转变为1∶1,且凋落物主体由阔叶(53.5%)转变为针叶(56.1%)。此外,中度和强度透光抚育显著削弱了凋落物现存量在生长季各月份之间的波动性。(2)全透光抚育显著提高了凋落物月均最大持水量(12.91 ~ 17.83 t/hm2)、最大拦蓄量(6.37 ~ 8.46 t/hm2)、有效拦蓄量(4.43 ~ 5.80 t/hm2)和土壤蓄水量,增幅分别为22.8%、22.8%、17.5%和17.9%;而轻度透光抚育仅显著提高了凋落物的有效拦蓄量(17.9%)。(3)各透光抚育强度虽未改变凋落物最大持水量生长季动态过程(以6月和10月为峰值的双峰型),但全透光抚育增强了其在雨季(7—8月)的最大持水量(37.3% ~ 45.7%),而轻度和中度透光抚育使其在7—9月趋于恒定。各透光抚育强度均增加了凋落物最大拦蓄量和有效拦蓄量的一个5/6月春季峰值,并使两者生长季月动态过程由对照的单峰型转化为双峰型。此外,各透光抚育强度均改变了土壤蓄水量生长季动态过程的总体规律(双峰转化为三峰),并改变了峰值大小(全透光抚育增大7月峰值约1/3,轻度抚育强度增大10月峰值约1/4)。(4)生长季凋落物的最大持水量主要受凋落物量促进;最大拦蓄量主要受凋落物量促进和自然含水率抑制;有效拦蓄量仅受自然含水率抑制;土壤蓄水量受凋落物最大持水量促进。
      结论 透光抚育26年后,全透光抚育提高了凋落物量,改变了凋落物组成,进而增强其凋落物截留(1/6 ~ 1/5)和土壤蓄水能力(约1/6),显著提升了对降水调节和土壤水源涵养功能的作用。因此,全透光抚育是一种适宜的东北温带顶极植被恢复经营方式。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective “Planting conifer and preserving broadleaved tree” (PCPBT) is an effective way to restore broadleaved Korean pine forest of temperate zone climax vegetation in northeastern China. Release cutting can speed up the succession process, however the impact on its hydrological and ecological functions is still unclear. The purpose of this paper is to explore the influence of release cutting intensity on the two key hydrological and ecological processes of litter interception and soil water storage in stand by PCPBT.
      Method The litter accumulation, composition structure, litter water holding process, maximum water storage capacity, maximum interception capacity and effective interception capacity were measured by field monthly sampling method and indoor soaking method in stand by PCPBT (42 years of planting Korean pine in secondary forest and 26 years of release cutting) under different release cutting intensities (control, low-intensity release cutting, moderate-intensity release cutting, heavy-intensity release cutting, and full release cutting) during the growing season in Changbai Mountain of northeastern China, to explore the law and mechanism of the influence of release cutting intensity on monthly dynamic process of litter interception and soil water storage in the growing season.
      Result (1) After 26 years of release cutting, moderate-intensity release cutting and full release cutting significantly increased the monthly average litter accumulation (3.80−5.41 t/ha) by 27.7%−42.4% (p < 0.05) during growing season. Only full release cutting had changed litter composition, in which the ratio of undecomposed layer and semi-decomposed layer was converted from 3∶2 in control to 1∶1, and the main component of litter was changed from broadleaved (53.5%) to coniferous (56.1%). In addition, moderate-intensity release cutting and low-intensity release cutting obviously weakened the fluctuation of litter accumulation between different months of the growing season. (2) Full release cutting significantly increased the average monthly maximum water storage capacity (12.91−17.83 t/ha), maximum interception capacity (6.37−8.46 t/ha), effective interception capacity (4.43−5.80 t/ha) and soil water storage capacity of litter by 22.8%, 22.8%, 17.5% and 17.9%, respectively, low-intensity release cutting significantly increased litter effective interception capacity by 17.9%. (3) The dynamic process of the maximum water storage capacity of litter in the growing season was not changed by each release cutting intensities (bimodal pattern with the peaks in June and October). However, Full release cutting had increased its maximum water storage capacity (37.3% to 45.7%) during rainfall (July to August). However, low-intensity release cutting and moderate-intensity release cutting tended to be constant from July to September. The maximum and effective interception capacity of litter were increased by each release cutting intensities in May/June, and the monthly dynamic process of the both was transformed from unimodal pattern to bimodal pattern during growing season. The overall regularity of dynamic process of soil water storage during the growing season was changed by each release cutting intensities (double peaks transformed into three peaks), and the size of its peak value was changed (full release cutting increased by about 1/3 in July; low-intensity release cutting increased the October peak by about 1/4). (4) The maximum water storage capacity of litter was mainly promoted by accumulation of litter during the growing season. The maximum interception capacity was mainly promoted by litter accumulation and inhibited by natural water content. The effective interception capacity was inhibited only by the natural moisture content. While soil water storage was only promoted by the maximum water storage capacity of litter.
      Conclusion Therefore, after 26 years of release cutting, full release cutting increased litter accumulation, changed litter composition structure, and enhanced litter interception ability (about 1/6−1/5) and soil water storage ability (about 1/6) in the growing season, thus enhancing its function of precipitation regulation and soil water conservation. So full release cutting is a more suitable management mode of temperate zone climax vegetation in northeastern China restoration.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回