高级检索

    沙盖黄土坡面产流产沙对坡长和覆沙厚度的响应

    Response of runoff and sediment production on sand-covered loess slopes to slope length and sand covering thickness

    • 摘要:
      目的 沙盖黄土坡面是黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区多动力综合作用下形成的特殊地貌单元,存在特殊侵蚀方式。研究该类坡面产流产沙过程对坡长和覆沙厚度的响应,可为该区内水土流失预防预报提供理论依据。
      方法 基于室内模拟降雨试验,以未覆沙黄土坡面为对照,定量分析坡长(1 和3 m)和覆沙厚度(2、5和10 cm)对坡面产流产沙变化的影响。
      结果 (1)覆沙较未覆沙黄土坡面初始产流时间延长3 ~ 30.72倍,平均产流速率降低25% ~ 84%,平均产沙速率增大3.03 ~ 15.91倍,含沙量增加3.38 ~ 18.07倍,且都随覆沙厚度增加而加强。(2)1 m坡长10 cm覆沙对产流速率减少作用强烈,3 m坡长平均产流速率在不同覆沙厚度下变化较小;不管是否覆沙,3 m坡长平均产沙速率和含沙量明显高于1 m坡长。(3)降雨过程中,坡长和覆沙厚度的增加能够协同增强产流产沙过程的变异性,1 m坡长未覆沙坡面瞬时产流速率高于覆沙,3 m坡长较厚覆沙坡面产流产沙陡增陡降,有明显峰值,瞬时径流系数出现大于1的现象。(4)结构方程模型分析表明,坡长对产流速率影响最大(路径系数为0.65),覆沙厚度对产沙速率影响最大(路径系数为0.71),坡长通过产流以间接正效应(路径系数为0.40)影响产沙。
      结论 坡长增加了坡面产流产沙率,覆沙厚度减少了产流率,增加了产沙率。坡长和覆沙厚度协同增强了产流产沙过程的变异性,使得降雨过程中产流产沙模式发生了明显变化。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective Aeolian sand-covered loess slope is a special geomorphic landscape with a unique erosion pattern formed by multi-dynamic forces within the wind-water erosion crisscross region of the Loess Plateau. Objectives of this study are to investigate the response of runoff and sediment production processes to slope length and thickness of sand covering on the aeolian sand-covered loess slopes, which can provide essential explanation for preventing and predicting soil erosion in this region.
      Method The quantitative analysis was based on observations of runoff and sediment production in indoor simulated rainfall experiments with the slope length (between 1 and 3 m) and thickness of sand covering (2, 5 and 10 cm). The effects of slope length and thickness of sand covering were analysed against a control group without sand covering.
      Result (1) Compared with the loess slope without sand covering, the time to runoff generation on the sand-covered slope was significantly extended by 3 to 30.72 times, the average runoff rate was reduced by 21% to 84%, the average sediment yield rate was increased by 2.99 to 10.66 times, and the sediment concentration was increased by 3.38 to 18.07 times, all of which were intensified as the thickness of sand covering increased. (2) The 1 m slope with a 10 cm sand layer exhibited a significant effect on reducing the runoff rate, while the average runoff rate with a 3 m slope demonstrated minor variations among different thicknesses of sand covering. Whether covered by sands or not, the average sediment yield rate and sediment concentration from 3 m slope were significantly higher than those from the 1 m slope. (3) The increases in slope length and thickness of sand covering enhanced the variability of instantaneous runoff and sediment yields during rainfall events. The instantaneous runoff rate of 1 m slope without sand covering was found to be higher than that with sand covering during rainfall. Notably, both runoff and sediment yields from 3 m slopes with a thicker sand covering showed a distinct peak, and some instantaneous runoff coefficients exceeded 1 during the rainfall events. (4) The structural equation model revealed that the slope length had the greatest influence on runoff rate (path coefficient = 0.65), and the sand thickness had the greatest influence on sediment yield rate (path coefficient = 0.71). The slope length exhibited an indirect positive effect (path coefficient = 0.40) on sediment yield through runoff production.
      Conclusion The slope length increases both runoff and sediment yield rates, while the thickness of sand covering reduces the runoff rate and increases sediment yield rate. The synergy of slope length and thickness of sand covering enhances the variability of runoff and sediment production processes, which makes the runoff and sediment production more changeable during rainfall.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回