高级检索
    姚杰, 丁易, 周超凡, 田立新, 臧润国. 海南热带天然林木本植物多样性对地上生物量的影响及其尺度效应[J]. 北京林业大学学报. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20240237
    引用本文: 姚杰, 丁易, 周超凡, 田立新, 臧润国. 海南热带天然林木本植物多样性对地上生物量的影响及其尺度效应[J]. 北京林业大学学报. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20240237
    Yao Jie, Ding Yi, Zhou Chaofan, Tian Lixin, Zang Runguo. Effects of woody plant diversity on aboveground biomass and its scale dependence in tropical natural forest in Hainan Island[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20240237
    Citation: Yao Jie, Ding Yi, Zhou Chaofan, Tian Lixin, Zang Runguo. Effects of woody plant diversity on aboveground biomass and its scale dependence in tropical natural forest in Hainan Island[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20240237

    海南热带天然林木本植物多样性对地上生物量的影响及其尺度效应

    Effects of woody plant diversity on aboveground biomass and its scale dependence in tropical natural forest in Hainan Island

    • 摘要:
      目的 阐明海南热带天然林木本植物α-多样性和β-多样性对地上生物量的影响、相对重要性及其尺度效应,以期丰富生物多样性与生态系统功能关系研究的理论框架。
      方法 基于海南热带天然林内建立的30个1 hm2动态监测样地,利用植被调查、树木空间分布和环境因子测定等数据,采用空间多尺度设计和多元线性回归模型探讨热带天然林中木本植物多样性、环境异质性与地上生物量之间的关系及其随不同空间尺度的变化规律。
      结果 (1)30个1 hm2样地中α-多样性和β-多样性均值分别为(10.85 ± 3.63)和(0.30 ± 0.16)。α-多样性在不同空间尺度上未表现出显著的变化;β-多样性表现出随空间尺度增大而增加的趋势。(2)α-多样性和β-多样性对地上生物量的影响均为显著的正效应且多样性的影响强度随空间尺度表现出较为一致的变化趋势。(3)木本植物多样性对地上生物量的影响随空间尺度的增加表现为先增加(较小尺度400 ~ 3 600 m2)、然后趋于平缓(中尺度3 600 ~ 6 400 m2),最后下降(较大尺度6 400 ~ 10 000 m2)的趋势。(4)α-多样性对地上生物量的正效应显著强于β-多样性。(5)环境因子对地上生物量的影响均为正效应,且影响强度随空间尺度的增加而增加。
      结论 本研究证实了生物多样性与生态系统功能关系存在明显的尺度依赖性,表明影响BEF关系的主要机制可能会因不同的空间尺度而变化。单一的空间尺度或局域小尺度的研究不足以充分、全面地理解BEF关系的影响机制。尽管在解释地上生物量变异方面,β-多样性的作用低于α-多样性,但本研究通过实证分析,揭示了β-多样性在促进生态系统功能中的重要作用。这为进一步探索跨空间尺度的生物多样性与生态系统功能关系提供了新的思路和分析视角。未来的研究应充分考虑β-多样性与多种生态系统功能(生态系统多功能性)之间的关系,以及β-多样性在不同空间尺度(如局域、区域和景观尺度)上对生态系统多功能性的影响机制。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective This study aims to elucidate the effects of woody plant diversity (in terms of α-diversity and β-diversity) on aboveground biomass in tropical natural forests of Hainan, and to investigate the relative importance and the scale dependence, in order to enrich the theoretical framework of biodiversity and ecosystem function relationships.
      Method This study, based on 30 1.0-hectare (ha) forest dynamic plots established in the tropical natural forests of Hainan, utilized data from vegetation surveys, tree spatial distribution, and environmental factor measurements. By employing a spatial multi-scale design and multiple linear regression models, we explored the relationships between woody plant diversity, environmental heterogeneity, and aboveground biomass in tropical natural forests, as well as their variation across different spatial scales.
      Result (1) The mean values of α-diversity and β-diversity in the 30 1.0-ha plots were (10.85 ± 3.63) and (0.30 ± 0.16), respectively. α-diversity did not show significant variation across different spatial scales. While β-diversity exhibited an increasing trend with spatial scales. (2) The effects of α-diversity and β-diversity on aboveground biomass were all significantly positive, and the strength of the diversity effects showed a consistent trend with spatial scale. (3) The impact of woody plant diversity on aboveground biomass increased with spatial scale initially (from smaller scales of 400 m2 to 3 600 m2), then plateaued (at intermediate scales of 3 600 m2 to 6 400 m2), and finally decreased (at larger scales of 6 400 m2 to 10 000 m2). (4) The positive effects of α-diversity on aboveground biomass were significantly stronger than that of β-diversity. (5) Environmental factors had positive effects on aboveground biomass, and the strength of these effects increases with the spatial scale.
      Conclusion This study confirms a significant scale dependency in the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem function, indicating that the main mechanisms influencing the BEF relationship may vary across different spatial scales. Research limited to a single spatial scale or at a local small scale is insufficient for a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms affecting the BEF relationship. Although β-diversity has a lower explanatory power for variations in aboveground biomass compared to α-diversity, this empirical study highlights the important role of β-diversity in promoting ecosystem functions. This provides new insights and analytical perspectives for further exploration of the relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem function across spatial scales. Future research should thoroughly consider the relationships between β-diversity and multiple ecosystem functions (i.e., ecosystem multifunctionality), as well as the mechanisms by which β-diversity affects ecosystem multifunctionality at different spatial scales (such as local, regional, and landscape scales).

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回