高级检索

    基于卫星日光诱导叶绿素荧光的中国东部森林物候期估算

    Estimation of forest phenology in eastern China based on satellite sunlight-induced chlorophyll fluorescence

    • 摘要:
      目的 本研究旨在探究日光诱导叶绿素荧光(SIF)在不同森林类型物候研究的适用性,为更准确地揭示植被光合作用动态和监测植被物候提供新的方法和科学依据。
      方法 以中国东部3个不同典型森林类型的森林站点(长白山、千烟洲、鼎湖山)为研究对象,利用2003—2010年日光诱导叶绿素荧光(SIF)遥感数据集,通过双逻辑生长模型来估算各森林类型的物候期(物候开始期SOS、物候结束期EOS),并通过增强型植被指数(EVI)遥感数据集和基于ChinaFlux的台站数据集(总初级生产力GPP、生态系统净碳交换NEE)来对比分析SIF的物候期估算结果,评估SIF估算不同森林类型物候期的潜力;通过相关性分析,研究春季、秋季环境因子对物候期的影响。
      结果 (1)SIF遥感指数(GOSIF、CSIF)和EVI、GPP、NEE在各森林类型中的时间序列变化曲线变化特征基本一致。(2)相较于GOSIF,CSIF与GPP、NEE的相关性更强;相较于NEE,GOSIF、CSIF、EVI 3种遥感指数与GPP的相关性更强。(3)在长白山、千烟洲和鼎湖山,CSIF估算的SOS和EOS均更接近于NEE估算结果;GPP估算的SOS都早于NEE估算结果,GPP估算的EOS都滞后于NEE估算结果。(4)在长白山站点中,SOS主要受空气温度与土壤温度的影响,EOS主要受土壤温度和饱和水气压的影响;在千烟洲站点中,SOS和EOS均主要受太阳辐射的影响;在鼎湖山站点中,SOS主要受太阳辐射的影响,EOS主要受太阳辐射和空气湿度的影响。
      结论 时空分辨率更高的CSIF能够更准确地捕捉植被在不同生长阶段的细微变化,对植被物候动态的监测更为精细。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective The purpose of this study was to explore the applicability of sunlight-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) in phenology of different forest types, and to provide a new method and scientific basis for more accurately revealing the dynamics of vegetation photosynthesis and monitoring vegetation phenology.
      Method Taking three forest stations of different typical forest types in eastern China (Changbai Mountain, Qianyanzhou and Dinghu Mountain) as the research object, using the SIF remote sensing dataset from 2003 to 2010, we estimated the phenological period (SOS at the beginning of phenology and EOS at the end of phenology) of each forest type through a dual-logic growth model. Then using EVI remote sensing dataset and station dataset based on ChinaFlux (gross primary productivity, GPP; ecosystem net carbon exchange, NEE), we compared and analyzed the estimation results using SIF, furtherly assessing the potential of SIF in estimating phenological periods of different forest types. Using correlation analysis, the effects of environmental factors on phenological periods in spring and autumn were explored.
      Result (1) The variation characteristics of time series curves of SIF (GOSIF, CSIF) and EVI, GPP, NEE in each forest type were basically the same. (2) Compared with GOSIF, CSIF had a stronger correlation with GPP and NEE. Compared with NEE, the correlation between three remote sensing indices and GPP was stronger. (3) In the three forest types (Changbai Mountain, Qianyanzhou and Dinghu Mountain), the CSIF estimation results of SOS and EOS were both close to NEE estimation results; the beginning of growing season estimated by GPP was earlier than NEE estimate, and the end of growing season estimated by GPP was lagging behind NEE estimation. (4) In Changbai Mountain station, SOS was mainly affected by air temperature and soil temperature, and EOS was mainly affected by soil temperature and saturated water pressure. In the Qianyanzhou site, both SOS and EOS were mainly affected by solar radiation. In the Dinghu Mountain site, SOS was mainly affected by solar radiation, and EOS was mainly affected by solar radiation and air humidity.
      Conclusion CSIF with higher spatiotemporal resolution can more accurately capture the subtle changes of vegetation at different growth stages, and monitor vegetation phenology dynamics more finely.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回