高级检索

    塔里木盆地典型荒漠灌木枝叶异速生长关系

    Allometry relationship of branches and leaves of typical desert shrubs in the Tarim Basin, Xinjiang of northwestern China

    • 摘要:
      目的 通过分析塔里木盆地典型荒漠灌木枝叶异速生长关系,揭示其形态与结构的生境适应策略。
      方法 于2023年7—8月,以3种无同化枝灌木(黑果枸杞、泡泡刺、白刺)和4种具有同化枝的灌木(刚毛柽柳、多枝柽柳、塔里木柽柳、沙生柽柳)为研究对象,利用标准主轴回归分析了叶性状间、枝性状间以及枝−叶性状间异速生长关系,并重点检验异速生长指数(b)在两类群间和种间的差异。
      结果 (1)叶面积与叶干质量生长关系在类群间和物种间差异不显著,均呈等速生长。(2)枝体积与干质量的b值在类群间和无同化枝物种间均差异显著;而在具有同化枝的物种间无显著差异,共同斜率为1.125,枝体积的生长速度显著快于枝干质量。(3)荒漠灌木枝长度与枝直径的b在类群间和种间均无显著差异,共同斜率为1.490,枝长度的生长速度显著快于枝直径。(4)荒漠灌木枝干质量生长速度总体上显著快于叶干质量(b = 0.876),个别物种(泡泡刺、沙生柽柳)表现出等速生长,而塔里木柽柳叶干质量与枝干质量无显著相关性。
      结论 荒漠灌木叶面积−叶干质量、枝长度−枝直径、叶干质量−枝干质量异速生长关系不受光合器官形态影响,而枝体积−枝干质量异速生长关系在有无同化枝的类群间差异显著,总体反映了植物形态与结构在适应环境中的趋同和分化特征。研究结果加深了对荒漠植物生长规律和环境适应机制的认识,为荒漠地区开展植被生态建设提供了科学依据。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective This paper examines allometry relationship of branches and leaves of typical desert shrub species in the Tarim Basin, Xinjiang of northwestern China, aiming to reveal their morphological and structural adaptation strategies.
      Method During July−August 2023, we investigated three shrub species (Lycium ruthenicum, Nitraria sphaerocarpa, N. tangutorum), which had assimilative branches, and four shrub species (Tamarix hispida, T. ramosissima, T. tarimensis, T. taklamakanensis), which did not have assimilative branches. We used the standardized major axis regression analysis (SMA) to examine the allometry relationship among leaves, branches, and branch-leaf traits, with a particular focus on testing differences in allometric scaling exponent (b) between the two functional groups and among species.
      Result (1) The relationship between leaf area and leaf dry mass growth showed no significant differences between groups and species, with all showing isometric growth. (2) The relationship between branch volume and dry mass showed significant differences among groups and between species with and without assimilating branches. Groups with assimilating branches exhibited higher b values. However, no significant difference in b was found among species with assimilating branches, with a common value of 1.125, indicating that branch volume increased significantly faster than branch dry mass. (3) There was no significant difference in length and diameter of desert shrub branches between groups and species, with b consistently estimated at 1.490. The growth rate of branch length was significantly faster than that of branch diameter. (4) Overall, branch dry mass grew significantly faster than leaf dry mass (b = 0.876) for desert shrubs, although some species (N. sphaerocarpa and T. taklamakanensis) exhibited isometric growth, while there was no significant correlation between leaf dry mass and branch dry mass for T. tarimensis.
      Conclusion The allometry relationship of leaf area-leaf dry mass, branch length-branch diameter, and leaf dry mass-branch dry mass are not influenced by morphology of photosynthetic organs. However, the allometry relationship between branch volume and branch dry mass differs significantly between functional groups based on the presence or absence of assimilative branches. These findings highlight both convergent and divergent morphological and structural adaptations of desert shrubs in response to their environment. The research results have deepened our understanding of growth patterns and environmental adaptation mechanisms of desert plants, providing a scientific basis for vegetation ecological construction in desert areas.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回