高级检索

    人工智能(AI)算法在风景园林规划设计中的演进与适配

    Evolution and adaptation of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in landscape architecture planning and design

    • 摘要: 人工智能(AI)技术的迅猛迭代正推动风景园林规划设计由经验驱动走向算法赋能。伴随从早期专家系统到当下生成式人工智能的演进,AI 在应对复杂风景园林问题时,其潜力与优势日益凸显。本文依托国内外文献与行业实践,以“识别、优化、生成、理解”4条能力主线,梳理各算法在场地分析评价、方案设计、效果表达及知识管理中的发展历程、应用现状与适配性。生成式算法,尤其是人工智能生成内容(AIGC),在方案设计与快速渲染方面适用性高;判别式与优化算法则在评估与优化环节具备优势。然而,AI 仍难以应对场地独特性、定性因素量化、动态系统模拟、复杂人类体验与审美、高精度方案生成及数据获取等核心难题。AI 的介入不仅重塑了传统设计流程,也加剧了“算法、议题、设计师”之间的张力:算法黑箱使控制权和设计责任难以明确,技术迭代速度快于设计师知识更新,风景园林专用数据集稀缺,极速生成削弱设计师的深度思考,并促使设计师从执行者转变为引导者、整合者和判断者。未来需从技术、问题约束与设计师能动性这3方面协同发力:技术层面强化AIGC、多模态与混合智能系统,发展可解释 AI 与 AI 智能体,提升决策透明度与可控性,促进人机信任下的高效共创;问题约束层面整合规划设计算法,运用小样本优化、知识增强等手段提高 AI 对风景园林问题的适应性;设计师能动性层面突出其核心价值,合理分配 AI 与设计师任务,构建涵盖地方性知识与公众感知的共享数据库,推进风景园林教育体系改革,拓展能力认知与行业标准建设。

       

      Abstract: The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) technology is driving a transformation in landscape architecture planning and design, shifting from experience-driven approaches to algorithm-enabled solutions. As AI has progressed from early expert systems to contemporary generative AI, its potential and advantages in addressing complex landscape architecture challenges have become increasingly evident. This paper synthesizes domestic and international literature and industry practices, focusing on four core capabilities, i.e. identification, optimization, generation and understanding to trace the development, current applications and suitability of various algorithms in site analysis and evaluation, schematic design, visualization and knowledge management. Generative algorithms, particularly AI-generated content (AIGC), demonstrated high applicability in scheme design and rapid rendering. Discriminative and optimization algorithms, meanwhile, hold advantages in assessment and optimization phases. However, AI still struggles with core challenges, including accounting for site-specific uniqueness, quantifying qualitative factors, simulating dynamic systems, representing complex human experiences and aesthetic values, producing high-precision design solutions and obtaining sufficient high-quality data. The integration of AI has not only reshaped traditional design processes, but also intensified tensions among AI algorithms, design problems, and designers. The black-box nature of AI algorithms complicates the assignment of control and responsibility for design decisions, the pace of technological iteration outstrips designers’ knowledge updates, specialized datasets for landscape architecture remain scarce, rapid generation undermines designers’ deep thinking, and it drives designers to transition from executors to guides, integrators and evaluators. Future efforts should concentrate on three areas: technology development, problem constraints and designer agency. Technologically, we should strengthen AIGC, multimodal, and hybrid intelligent systems, develop explainable AI and AI Agents, enhance decision-making transparency and controllability, and promote efficient human-AI co-creation under conditions of mutual trust. In terms of problem constraints, we should integrate planning and design algorithms and use techniques like small-sample optimization and knowledge enhancement to improve AI’s adaptability to landscape architecture issues. In terms of designer agency, it is important to emphasize designers’ core value, reasonably allocate tasks between AI and designers, build a shared database encompassing local knowledge and public perception, advance the education system of landscape architecture reforms, and expand capability recognition and industry standard development.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回