Variation and probability grading of quantitative characters of traditional chrysanthemum cultivars
-
摘要: 对栽培植物品种进行鉴别和分类是品种保护和应用的基础。中国传统大菊品种是菊花中一类变异极为丰富而独特的品种类群,对其数量性状进行合理分级可以在数量化和规范化的基础上对这类菊花品种资源进行评价,建立更为具体精确的评价标准。本研究观测了400个中国传统大菊品种的18个数量性状,采用数量性状变异分析和概率分级进行分析。结果表明,这18个数量性状变异系数均在15%以上,其中筒状小花数(101.85%)、舌状小花数(70.02%)和花瓣宽(59.49%)变异系数较大,说明花部性状具有丰富的遗传变异。K-S检验分析发现:13个数量性状符合正态分布,其余5个性状呈偏态分布;对符合正态分布的性状进行概率分级发现,13个数量性状可以分为5级,对不符合正态分布和偏态分布的性状根据数据按实际分布状况分级,获得了新的分级标准。使用这一标准为400个大菊品种的数量性状赋值,合并成数字编码,通过比较分析发现,利用其中的9个数量性状便可以将400个品种一一区分开来。这一研究结果不仅可以补充和完善菊花品种分类和鉴定的评价标准,还可以为其他观赏植物种质资源评价中观测数据的规范化和标准化处理提供参考。Abstract: Identification and classification of cultivated plants is fundamental to the protection and application of plant varieties. Chrysanthemum × morifolium Ramat. is a cultivar with abundant variations, and rational grading of its quantitative characters may help us evaluate the cultivar resources from the quantitative and standard perspectives, and establish more detailed evaluation standards for the chrysanthemum. In this study, we tested and analyzed the variation of the 18 quantitative characters in 400 large-flowered chrysanthemums. The result showed that coefficients of variation of the 18 quantitative characters were all above 15%. Among them, the coefficients of variation were high in the number of disc florets (101.85%) and ray florets (70.02%), and floret width (59.49%), suggesting that some of flower traits have abundant genetic variation. The K-S test results indicated that 13 characters conformed to the normal distribution, whereas the other 5 characters followed skewed distribution. The values of 13 normally distributed characters could be divided, in a unified way, into 5 grades by 4 dividing points. The grading criteria of the other 5 characters were calculated. By applying the probability grading method of the new classification standards, the 400 chrysanthemum varieties are assigned and merged into digital codes. Through comparative analysis of these digital codes, we found that nine quantitative characters can distinguish 400 varieties. The assignment of these 400 cultivars according to the probability grading criteria can differentiate all the cultivars, and therefore, the new criteria of main ornamental characters could be regarded as the criteria of cultivars classification. The results of the probability grading would provide reference for the classification, identification and database construction.
-
-
[1] 雒新艳,戴思兰.大菊品种表型性状的分类学价值[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2010,32(3):135- 140. [1] LUO X Y, DAI S L. Taxonomic analysis of morphological characters of large-flowered chrysanthemum cultivars[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(3): 135- 140.
[2] ZHANG F, CHEN S, CHEN F, et al. Genetic analysis and associated SRAP markers for flowering traits of chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium)[J]. Euphytica, 2011, 177 (1): 15- 24.
[2] LI R W, WANG C, DAI S L, et al. The association analysis of phenotypic traits with SRAP markers in chrysanthemum[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45 (7): 1355- 1364.
[3] JING S X. On some problems concerned with compiling the descriptors of fruit germplasm in China[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sincia, 1993, 20 (4): 353- 357.
[3] 李仁伟,王晨,戴思兰,等. 菊花品种表型性状与SRAP分子标记的关联分析[J]. 中国农业科学,2012,45(7):1355- 1364. [4] ZHAO H J, LIU W S, LIU N, et al. Variation and probability grading of main quantitative traits of apricot (Armeniaca vulgaris) germplasm[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2013, 30 (1): 37- 42.
[4] 景士西. 关于编制我国果树种质资源评价系统若干问题的商榷[J]. 园艺学报,1993,20(4):353- 357. [5] 赵海娟,刘威生,刘宁,等. 普通杏(Armeniaca vulgaris)种质资源果实主要数量性状变异及概率分级 [J]. 果树学报,2013,30(1):37- 42. [5] LIU M J. Study on the variations and grading standards of several economic characters of peach[J]. Journal of Beijing Agricultural College, 1992, 7 (2): 98- 104.
[6] LIU M J. Studies on the variations and probability gradings of major quantitative characters of Chinese Jujube[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sincia, 1996,23 (2):105- 109.
[6] 刘孟军. 桃树部分经济性状的种内变异及其分级标准研究[J]. 北京农学院学报,1992,7(2):98- 104. [7] YANG J X, GUO B L. Studies on the variations and probability gradings of of major quantitative characters of Morus alba L[J]. Canye Kexue, 1998, 24 (2): 122- 124.
[7] 刘孟军. 枣树数量性状的概率分级研究[J].园艺学报,1996,23(2):105- 109. [8] LIU P, LIU M J, ZHOU J Y, et al. Distribution and probability grading index system of quantitative character of Chinese Jujube[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2003, 39 (6): 77- 82.
[8] 杨俊霞,郭宝林. 桑树数量性状的概率分级研究[J]. 蚕业科学,1998,24(2):122- 124. [9] YANG L, YANG L, LI L, et al. Variation and probability grading of main quantitative characters of fruit in strawberry germplasm resource[J].Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2007, 20 (5): 1067- 1069.
[9] 刘平,刘孟军,周俊义,等. 枣树数量性状的分布类型及其概率分级指标体系[J]. 林业科学,2003,39(6):77- 82. [10] CHI H Y, LIU J, HU D H, et al. Variation and probability grading of main quantitative traits of Canarium album Fruit[J]. Guangdong Forestry Science and Technology, 2008, 24(4): 25- 29.
[10] 杨雷,杨莉,李莉,等.草莓种质资源果实主要数量性状变异及概率分级[J]. 西南农业科学,2007,20(5):1067- 1069. [11] 池辉云,柳军,胡德活,等.橄榄果实主要数量性状的变异及概率分级[J]. 广东林业科技,2008,24(4):25- 29. [11] MA Z S, WANG Y H, JIA Y Y, et al. Variation and probability grading of fruit firmness in peach germplasm resource[J].Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 22 (1): 167- 169.
[12] 马之胜,王越辉,贾云云,等. 桃种质资源果实硬度评价及概率分级[J]. 西南农业学报,2009,22(1):167- 169. [12] NI Z G, ZHANG L H, XIE D H, et al. Variation and probability grading of main quantitative characteristics of mango germplasm resource in Nujiang Valley, Yunnan province[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2009, 26 (4): 492- 497.
[13] 尼章光,张林辉,解德宏,等.怒江流域杧果种质资源主要数量性状变异及概率分级[J]. 果树学报,2009,26(4):492- 497. [13] ZHANG S Y, NING H J, FAN Y R. Variation and probability grading of main quantitative traits of Cymbidium hubridum[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2013(9): 1118- 1121.
[14] 张韶伊,宁惠娟,范义荣.大花蕙兰主要数量性状的变异及概率分级[J]. 浙江农业科学,2013(9):1118- 1121. [14] MA X H, ZHAO Q F, DONG Z G, et al. Variation and probability grading of main quantitative traits of table grape resources[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2013, 14 (6): 1185- 1189.
[15] LI H J, SHAO J W. Investigation collection and classification of chrysanthemum cultivars in China[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 1990, 13 (1):30- 36.
[15] 马小河,赵旗峰,董志刚,等. 鲜食葡萄品种资源果实数量性状变异及概率分级[J]. 植物遗传资源学报,2013,14(6):1185- 1189. [16] International Union for the Protection of New Plant Varieties (UPOV). Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, homogeneity and stability, chrysanthemum spec[Z]. Geneva: UPOV,1979.
[16] TIAN Y, LUO X Y, DAI S L. RAPD analysis of sporting and similar cultivars in chrysanthemum[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2008, 6 (6): 1223- 1232.
[17] The Ministry of Agriculture of the People s Republic of China. Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability: chrysanthemum[Z].Beijing: The Ministry of Agriculture of the People s Republic of China,2002.
[17] 李鸿渐,邵建文. 中国菊花品种资源的调查收集和分类[J]. 南京农业大学学报,1990,13(1):30- 36. [18] JING S X, LI B J. Study on description system of hawthorn germplasm resources[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sincia, 1990, 17(2): 81- 88.
[18] 田赟,雒新艳,戴思兰. 菊花芽变和相似品种的RAPD分析[J]. 分子植物育种,2008,6(6):1223- 1232. [19] SONG X B, HUANG H, ZHANG Y, et al. Studies on numerical taxonomy of cultivated Chinese and Japanese chrysanthemum[C]∥Advances in Ornamental Horticulfure of China.Beijing: Chinese Society for Horticultural Science, 2014: 1- 11.
[19] 中华人民共和国农业部. 植物新品种特异性、一致性和稳定性的测试指南:菊花[Z].北京:中华人民共和国农业部,2002. [20] ZHANG S L, DAI S L. Chinese chrysanthemum book[M].Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2013.
[20] 景士西,李宝江. 山楂种质资源性状描述系统的研究[J]. 园艺学报,1990,17(2):81- 88. [21] ZHANG Y, LUO X Y, ZHU J, et al. A classification study for chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum × grandiflorum Tzvelv.) cultivars based on multivariate statistical analyses[J]. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 2014, 52(5): 612- 628.
[21] XUE S J. China chrysanthemum mapping [M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2004.
[22] 宋雪彬,黄河,张辕,等. 中日两国部分大菊品种的数量分类研究[C]∥中国观赏园艺研究进展.北京:中国园艺学会,2014:1- 11. [23] ZHANG Y, ZHU M L, DAI S L. Analysis of karyotype diversity of 40 Chinese chrysanthemum cultivars[J]. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 2013, 51(3): 335- 352.
[24] ZHANG F, CHEN S M, CHEN F D, et al. SRAP-based mapping and QTL detection for in florescence-related traits in chrysanthemum (Dendranthema morifolium)[J]. Molecular Breeding, 2011, 27(1): 11- 23.
[25] 张树林,戴思兰.中国菊花全书[M].北京:中国林业出版社.2013. [26] 薛守纪.中国菊花图谱[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2004. -
期刊类型引用(23)
1. 谢倩，赵晴晴，江来，陈清西. 橄榄果实表型性状分级及挥发性化合物鉴定与特征香气分析. 食品科学. 2024(10): 175-185 . 
百度学术
2. 闵筱筱，高佳音，岳建华，王志勇，李佩玲. 不同品种传统菊花对盐胁迫的生理响应及耐盐性评价. 山东农业科学. 2024(08): 62-73 . 百度学术
3. 雒宏佳，田果，郭小梅，张兴莹，刘洋辛，李建红. 甘肃省实生核桃单株数量性状的概率分级. 现代农业科技. 2024(19): 50-54 . 百度学术
4. 赵志慧，张玉鸽，高康，田园凯，张秋玲，方志军，王朔，刘昊，季玉山，戴思兰. 大菊品种花期和主要观赏性状的变异及相关性分析. 植物科学学报. 2023(02): 214-223 . 百度学术
5. 朱莹，刘恒星，邓莲，闫帅，王东军，全晗，宋华. 有髯鸢尾数量性状的变异及分级研究. 种子. 2023(06): 136-145 . 百度学术
6. 张永超，解德宏，张翠仙，陈于福，柏天琦，易怀锋，尼章光，章勇，王美存. 红河流域杧果种质资源主要数量性状变异与概率分级. 中国农学通报. 2022(16): 68-73 . 百度学术
7. 郭春晓，孔德元，马海燕，郑成淑. 菊花杂交一代叶片形态数量性状分析. 山东林业科技. 2022(03): 1-6+24 . 百度学术
8. 陈永忠，许彦明，张震，马力，王湘南，陈隆升，彭邵锋，王瑞，彭映赫，李志钢，唐炜，李美群. 油茶果实主要数量性状分析及育种指标体系筛选. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2021(03): 1-9 . 百度学术
9. 钟声远，罗宇婷，赵勇，王振兴，管志勇，房伟民，陈发棣，王海滨. 切花菊品种资源表型多样性分析. 植物资源与环境学报. 2021(05): 22-33 . 百度学术
10. 郭晓亮，王红娟，段媛媛，阮芝艳. 重齿当归形态数量性状的分级研究. 热带亚热带植物学报. 2021(06): 688-693 . 百度学术
11. 钟海丰，钟声远，陈剑锋，陈宇华，刘中华，张荟，钟淮钦，林兵，邱思鑫，黄敏玲. 建兰种质资源主要数量性状变异与概率分级研究. 东南园艺. 2021(05): 8-16 . 百度学术
12. 方超，唐轩，胡桂兵，刘洪，马强，陈孟强，饶得花，徐振江. 荔枝DUS测试数量性状分级研究. 果树学报. 2020(05): 635-644 . 百度学术
13. 刘娜，成仿云. 紫斑牡丹果实性状变异及其产量分级标准研究. 植物科学学报. 2020(03): 378-389 . 百度学术
14. 梁乃鹏，吕曼芳，廖维建，郝丙青. 来宾地区岑溪软枝油茶果实数量性状概率分级. 广西林业科学. 2020(02): 181-185 . 百度学术
15. 郭方其，吕萍，吴超，彭娟，秦德辉，黎侠，丁晓瑜. 基于表型性状的切花多头菊种质资源遗传多样性分析. 分子植物育种. 2020(18): 6205-6215 . 百度学术
16. 傅巧娟，李春楠，张晓莹，赵福康. 基于表型性状的春兰种质遗传多样性分析. 农学学报. 2020(11): 65-71 . 百度学术
17. 杜庆鑫，庆军，王璐，刘攀峰，何凤，朱利利，杜红岩. 杜仲种质资源果实主要数量性状变异及概率分级. 植物研究. 2019(03): 387-394 . 百度学术
18. 杨玲娟，杨国辉，杨金凤，罗世雄，徐爱兰，李一婧，呼丽萍. 天水花牛苹果品质评价指标研究. 中国果树. 2019(05): 29-34 . 百度学术
19. 于树涛，王传堂，于国庆，崔雪艳，孙泓希，王虹，任亮. 花生荚果与种仁主要数量性状变异及概率分级. 花生学报. 2019(03): 19-24 . 百度学术
20. 陆国泉，彭琳. 基于数量分类的植物鉴别算法研究. 江苏农业科学. 2018(01): 157-160 . 百度学术
21. 陈影，唐杰，彭卫红，甘炳成，黄忠乾，王勇，刘天海，刘理旭. 梯棱羊肚菌种质资源数量性状变异及概率分级. 食用菌学报. 2017(01): 27-32 . 百度学术
22. 杜庆鑫，刘攀峰，庆军，魏艳秀，杜红岩. 杜仲种质资源雄花主要数量性状变异及概率分级. 北京林业大学学报. 2016(11): 42-49 . 本站查看
23. 王小国. 河南茶藨子属植物表型性状的数量分类. 黑龙江农业科学. 2016(07): 92-96 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(14)
计量
- 文章访问数: 2387
- HTML全文浏览量: 161
- PDF下载量: 29
- 被引次数: 37
下载:
