Comparative analysis of five kinds of rosewood by infrared spectra
-
摘要: 为了提供识别花梨木品种的新思路和新方法,采用红外光谱分析方法,对越柬紫檀、刺猬紫檀、印度紫檀、大果紫檀、鸟足紫檀5种花梨木的一维红外光谱(FTIR)、二阶导数光谱(SDIR)、二维相关红外光谱(2DIR)进行对比分析。结果表明:1)在FTIR谱图中,5种花梨木在781 cm-1处的差异可以把越柬紫檀和刺猬紫檀与其他3种花梨木区分开;2)在SDIR 谱图中,刺猬紫檀在1 179 cm-1处存在1个吸收峰;大果紫檀在781 cm-1处存在吸收峰;鸟足紫檀在1 351、1 299、1 147、1 131、938 cm-1处都有明显的吸收峰,而印度紫檀没有吸收峰;3)在2DIR谱图中,1 100、1 150、1 258 cm-1处的差异可以将刺猬紫檀与其他4种花梨木区分开,1 467、1 518 cm-1处的差异可以把越柬紫檀、刺猬紫檀与鸟足紫檀区分开来。单独使用2DIR识别方法并不能把5种花梨木完全区分,但将FTIR、SDIR、2DIR这3种方法结合可以实现5种花梨木的区分,也有助于红木树种的无损识别。Abstract: In this paper we proposed the infrared spectrum analysis method in order to provide a new idea for identification of rosewood species. Five kinds of rosewood, Pterocarpus cambodianus, P. erinaceus, P. indicus, P. macarocarpus and P. pedatus were explored by FTIR, second derivative IR (SDIR) and two dimensional correlation infrared (2DIR) spectroscopy. The results showed that: 1) The difference at 781 cm-1 in the FTIR spectrum could differentiate P. cambodianus and P. erinaceus from the other three kinds of rosewood. 2) In the SDIR, an absorption peak at 1 179 cm-1 existed for P. erinaceus, that of P. macarocarpus occurred at 781 cm-1, P. pedatus had obvious absorption peaks at 1 351, 1 299, 1 147, 1 131 and 938 cm-1, while P. indicus had no absorption peaks. 3) In the 2DIR, the differences at 1 100, 1 150 and 1 258 cm-1 could separate P. erinaceus from the other rosewood; the differences at 1 467 and 1 518 cm-1 could distinguish P. cambodianus, P. erinaceus and P. pedatus. Applying SDIR solely could not distinguish these rosewood completely, but a combination of FTIR, SDIR and 2DIR could identify all these five kinds of rosewood and provide a new way for non-destructive detection of rosewood.
-
-
[1] 红木: GB/T 18107—2000[S].北京:中国质检出版社,2000. [1] Hongmu: GB/T 18107—2000[S]. Beijing: China Quality Inspection Press, 2000.
[2] 汪杭军,张广群,祁亨年,等.木材识别方法研究综述[J].浙江林学院学报,2009,26(6):896- 902. [2] WANG H J, ZHANG G Q, QI H N, et al. A review of research on wood recognition technology[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College,2009,26(6):896- 902.
[3] ZOU Y L, ZHAO J G. The research on wood recognition technology[J].Journal of Green Science and Technology,2013(6):289- 290.
[3] 邹云龙,赵家刚.木材识别方法研究[J].绿色科技,2013(6):289- 290. [4] XU B,TAO W X. Application of a hand held slicing method for wood species identification[J]. China Wood Industry,2006,20(1):41- 43.
[4] 徐斌,陶武先.徒手切片法在进口材木材识别中的应用[J].木材工业,2006,20(1):41- 43. [5] 张蓉,殷亚方,徐魁梧,等.基于DNA的木材树种识别研究进展[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2014,38(1): 151- 156. [5] ZHANG R,YIN Y F, XU K W, et al. Progress of wood identification based on DNA methods[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition),2014,38(1):151- 156.
[6] 余敏,张浩,刘盛全,等.降香黄檀木材DNA提取及rDNA-ITS序列条形码分子鉴定[J].林产化学与工业,2014,34(5):103- 108. [6] YU M, ZHANG H, LIU S Q, et al. DNA extraction and ribosomal DNA-ITS sequence molecule barcode identification from wood tissue of Dalbergia odorifera T. Chen[J].Chemistry and Industry of Forest Products,2014,34(5):103- 108.
[7] YANG S P,YANG X, ZHANG X, et al. Chromatographic fingerprint identification of active components in cultivated Taxus chinensis var. mairei[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2010,32(4):110- 113.
[7] DEV S A, MURALIDHARAN E M, SUJANAPAL P, et al. Identification of market adulterants in East Indian sandalwood using DNA barcoding[J].Annals of Forest Science,2014,71(4):517- 522.
[8] YANG L, FANG C R, YU H X, et al. Identification of Dalbergia cochinchinenses and Dalbergia retusa by headspace gas chromatography-mass spectrometry[J].Journal of Central South University of Forestry Technology,2013,33(12):151- 156.
[8] JIAO L C, YIN Y F, CHENG Y M , et al. DNA barcoding for identification of the endangered species Aquilaria sinensis: comparison of data from heated or aged wood samples[J].Holzforschung,2014,68(4):487- 49.
[9] SHEN M Y, ZHANG Q Y, ZHU Z L, et al. HPLC and pattern recognition for the identification of four species of Hongmu[J].Scientia Silve Sinicae,2012,48(5):168- 172.
[9] WATANABE U, ABE H, YOSHIDA K, et al. Quantitative evaluation of properties of residual DNA in Cryptomeria japonica wood[J].Journal of Wood Science,2015,61(1):1- 9.
[10] LI Y Y, SUN D Y, ZHU Z L, et al. Study on the classification and recognition of mahogany based on gas chromato-graph-principle component analysis[J].Computers and Applied Chemistry,2010,27(2):231- 240.
[10] 杨水平,杨宪,张雪,等.南方红豆杉人工林药材活性成分指纹图谱鉴别研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2010,32(4):110- 113. [11] 杨柳,方崇荣,于海霞,等.顶空/气质联用鉴别交趾黄檀与微凹黄檀[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2013, 33(12):151- 156. [11] ZHANG R,XU K W,ZHANG L S, et al. Identification of five rosewood species by infrared spectrum characteristics[J].China Forestry Science and Technology,2014,28(2):95- 99.
[12] 沈明月,章启元,朱仲良,等.基于HPLC技术及模式识别方法鉴别4种红木[J].林业科学,2012,48(5):168- 172. [12] ZHUANG L, HUANG Q, XU Y H. Fourkinds of Phoebe and Machilus wood infrared absorption spectrum identification[J]. Jour of Fujian Forestry Sci and Tech,2014,41(4):21- 25.
[13] XUE X M, NAN C H, WU X K, et al. Comparativelystuding the FTIR spectra of three kinds of sandalwood[J].Hubei Agricultural Sciences,2014,53(17):4096- 4099.
[13] 李艳艳,孙多永,朱仲良,等.基于气相色谱:主成分分析的红木分类识别方法研究[J].计算机与应用化学,2010,27(2):231- 240. [14] ZHANG F D, LI M Y, HUANG A M, et al. Thestudy of content difference of calcium oxalate in Pterocarpus santalinus and Dalbergia louvelii[J].Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis,2014,34(10):187- 188.
[14] 张蓉,徐魁梧,张丽沙,等.基于红外光谱的5种红木树种识别探讨[J].林业科技开发,2014,28(2):95- 99. [15] 庄琳,黄群,徐燕红.楠属和润楠属4种木材的红外光谱鉴别[J].福建林业科技,2014,41(4):21- 25. [15] HUANG D L, CHEN X K, XU Y Q. Identification offour original species of xihuangcao by 2D infrared correlation spectroscopy[J].The Journal of Light Scattering,2015,27(1):64- 68.
[16] 薛晓明,南程慧,吴显坤,等.三种檀香木的红外光谱比较研究[J].湖北农业科学,2014,53(17):4096- 4099. [16] ZHANG Z Y, ZHANG F D, HUANG A M, et al. Identification of Pterocarpus santalinus and Dalbergia louvelii by FTIR and 2D correlation IR spectroscopy[J].Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis,2014,34(10):135- 136.
[17] 张方达,李明玉,黄安民,等.檀香紫檀与卢氏黑黄檀草酸钙含量的差异研究[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2014,34(10):187- 188. [18] ZHOU Q, SUN S Q, ZUO L. Study on traditional Chinese medicine ‘Qing Kai Ling’ injections from different manufactures by 2D-IR correlation spectroscopy[J].Vibrational Spectroscopy,2004,36(2):207- 212.
[19] 黄冬兰,陈小康,徐永群.溪黄草四种基源植物的二维相关红外光谱鉴别研究[J].光散射学报,2015,27(1):64- 68. [20] 张郅悦,张方达,黄安民,等.基于红外光谱技术的檀香紫檀与卢氏黑黄檀的鉴别研究[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2014,34(10):135- 136. [21] HUANG A M, ZHOU Q, LIU J L, et al. Distinction of three wood species by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and two-dimensional correlation IR spectroscopy[J].Journal of Molecular Structure,2008,883:160- 166.
[22] ZHANG F D, XU C H, LI M Y, et al. Rapid identification of Pterocarpus santalinus and Dalbergia louvelii by FTIR and 2D correlation IR spectroscopy[J].Journal of Molecular Structure,2014,1069:89- 95.
-
期刊类型引用(3)
1. 韩丽冬，沃晓棠，张苏，刁云飞，毕连东. 环境胁迫下雌雄异株植物的生理差异响应特征. 中国林副特产. 2021(05): 75-77 . 
百度学术
2. 唐学玺. 环境胁迫下雌雄异株植物的差异响应特征及研究进展. 中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版). 2020(07): 74-81 . 百度学术
3. 史全萍. 高温及持续时间对华北落叶松SOD、POD活性的影响. 中国农学通报. 2018(19): 33-38 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(8)
计量
- 文章访问数: 1998
- HTML全文浏览量: 128
- PDF下载量: 33
- 被引次数: 11
下载:
