Non-linear scenic beauty model of scenic Platycladus orientalis plantations based on in-forest color patches
-
摘要: 利用景观生态学的景观空间格局分析原理,以照片的色彩斑块结构为基础,开展风景林林内景观质量评价研究。分析美景度等级和14个斑块指数的关系,利用简相关法筛选出对美景度影响大的SPLIT、SHDI、DIV、SIEI、ACOV和LPI 6个指数,研究表明:随着美景度等级的降低,DIV、SIEI、ACOV和LPI呈曲线变化趋势;SPLIT、SHDI呈线性增大的变化趋势。依据6个指标,利用聚类方法将侧柏人工林分为4种类型。以指数为自变量分别构建了线性和非线性美景度模型。对比结果表明:非线性模型拟合精度高于线性模型,所以选用二次多项式逐步回归模型从总体上较好地反映出景观指数与美景度间的关系。Abstract: We applied the theory of landscape spatial pattern analysis in landscape ecology to evaluate the quality of landscape by analyzing the structure of color patches in photos. The relationships between SBE grades and 14 patch indexes were studied.Six indexes among them, i.e.,SPLIT, SHDI, DIV, SIEI, ACOV and LPI,which influence scenic degree significantly, were selected by using correlation analysis. Results showed that the relationships between DIV, SIEI, ACOV, LPI and SBE grades were in multiple ways rather than merely in a linear way; SPLIT and SHDI changed in a positively linear trend with the decrease of SBE grade.Based on the six indexes, the scenic Platycladus orientalis plantations could be classified into four types by using cluster analysis. The indexes were used as the dependent variables to establish linear and non-linear models. Comparison showed that fitting accuracy of the non-linear model was higher than that of the linear model. The relationships between SBE value and landscape index could be well reflected by quadratic polynomial regression models.
-
Keywords:
- in-forest landscape /
- patch index /
- color of photo /
- scenic beauty model
-
-
[1] SILVENNOINEN H, ALHO J, KOLEHMAINEN O, et al. Prediction models of landscape preferences at the forest stand level[J]. Landscape Urban Plan,2001, 56: 11-20.
[1] ZHAI M P, ZHANG R, YAN H P. Review on the studies on scenic evaluation and its application in scenic forest construction both at home and abroad[J]. World Forestry Research, 2003, 16(6): 16-19.
[2] SILVENNOINEN H, PUKKALA T, TAHVANAINEN L. Effect of cuttings on the scenic beauty of a tree stand[J]. Scand J For Res,2002, 17:263-273.
[2] LI J Y, YAN H W, TANG Q,et al. Relationship between in-forest scenic beauty and the plant community structure in Shenyang[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2011, 26(2): 212-219.
[3] LI B. Assessment on scenic forest quality in west mountain in Beijing on middle- and far-distance landscape[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2011.
[3] 翟明普, 张荣, 阎海平. 风景评价在风景林建设中应用研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2003, 16(6): 16-19. [4] MAO B, XU C Y, LI L, et al. Tree classification for Pinus tabulaeformis scenic plantation[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(10): 49-58.
[4] BUHYOFF G J, LEUSEHNER W A. Estimating psychological disutility from damaged forest stands[J]. Forest Science, 1978, 24(3): 242-432.
[5] CHEN Y. Study on morphological characteristics and grading of individual tree in natural scenic forest in Changbai Mountain[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2014.
[5] 李俊英,闫红伟,唐强,等. 沈阳森林植物群落结构与其林内景观美景质量关系研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2011, 26(2): 212-219. [6] LI C C. Assessment on landscape quality in stands of typical scenic and recreation forests in suburbs in Beijing[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2010.
[6] RILBE R G. The aesthetics of forestry: what has empirical preference research taught us[J]. Environmental Management, 1989: 13(1): 55-74.
[7] HOLLENHORST S J, BROCK S M, FREIMUND W A, et al. Predicting the effects of gypsy moth on near-view aesthetic preferences and recreation appeal[J]. Forest Science,1993, 39(1):28-40.
[7] ZHANG Z D. Quality assessing and key adjusting technologies for scenic-recreational forests in the lower mountains of suburban in Beijing[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2010.
[8] 李波. 北京西山风景林中、远景景观质量评价研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2011. [8] LI X W. Studies on tending technology model of the main scenic and recreation forests in Beijing lower mountainous areas[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2008.
[9] NIU J L. Study on attribute system of quality assessment for scenic and recreational forest in Beijing[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2008.
[9] LOTHIAN A. Amenity value of scattered and isolated trees[R]∥Report to South Australian Native Vegetation Council. Unley, Adelaide, Australian: Australian University, 2004: 1-78.
[10] 毛斌, 徐程阳, 李乐, 等. 人工油松风景林的林木分级技术[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(10): 49-58. [10] HUANG G Y. Studies on species composition and landscape aesthetics evaluation of urban forest in Beijing[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2012.
[11] MAO B, XU C Y, LI C C, et al. Effects of pruning intensity on in-forest landscape of Platycladus orientalis and Pinus tabulaeformis plantations[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2013, 28(3): 123-125.
[11] 陈瑜. 长白山天然风景林林木形态特征与分级研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学,2014. [12] BROWN T C. Production and cost of scenic beauty: examples for a ponderosa pine forest [J]. Forest Science, 1987, 33(2): 394-410.
[12] DONG J W, ZHAI M P, XU C Y. Effect of the characters of species composition on scenic beauty of in-forest landscape of Platycladus orientalis - Robinia pseudoacaciaplantation forest in the suburbs of Beijing[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2007, 29(5): 756-761.
[13] LIAO W M, NOGAMI K. Prediction of near-view scenic beauty in artificial stands of Hinoki[J]. Journal of Forest Research, 1999, 4: 93-98.
[14] BISHOP I D. Comparing regression and neural net based approaches to modeling of scenic beauty[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1996, 34: 125-134.
[15] 李翠翠. 京郊典型风景游憩林林内景观质量评价技术研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2010. [16] 章志都. 京郊低山风景游憩林质量评价及调控关键技术研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2010. [17] 李效文. 北京低山主要风景游憩林抚育技术模式研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2008. [18] 牛君丽. 北京风景游憩林质量评价的指标体系研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2008. [19] 黄广远. 北京市城区城市森林结构及景观美学评价研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2012. [20] 毛斌,徐程扬,李翠翠,等. 不同修枝强度对侧柏、油松人工林林内景观美景度的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2013, 28(3):123-125. [21] 董建文, 翟明普, 徐程杨. 京郊侧柏刺槐混交林植物物种组成特征对林内景观美景度的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2007, 29(5): 756-761. [22] SHAFER E L, HAMILTON J F, SCHMIDT E A. Natural landscape preferences: a predictive model[J]. Journal of Leisure Research,1969, 1(1): 1-18.
[23] SCHROEDER H W, BROWN T C. Alternative functional forms for an inventory based landscape perception model[J].Journal of Leisure Research, 1983, 15(2): 156-163.
-
期刊类型引用(20)
1. 林文月，王锦，张喆. 基于视觉吸引的森林景观色彩要素识别及影响因素研究——以云南轿子山自然保护区为例. 西部林业科学. 2024(02): 133-141 . 
百度学术
2. 刘帅健，邓华锋. 基于PSPNet深度学习网络景观要素语义分割的春季森林景观质量评价. 西北林学院学报. 2024(03): 231-238 . 百度学术
3. 尹佳仪，甘德欣. 长株潭绿心视觉美学质量及视觉异质性研究. 农业与技术. 2024(23): 93-98 . 百度学术
4. 郎博帅，刘叶凡，韩阳媚，欧阳嗣航，李玉灵，程顺. 林内色彩斑块分布格局对秋季生态景观林美景度的影响——以塞罕坝机械林场为例. 林业与生态科学. 2023(01): 98-105 . 百度学术
5. 陆子婧，王锦，张喆，刁秀丽，王钰，林文月. 植物色彩量化方法研究. 现代农业科技. 2022(02): 127-132 . 百度学术
6. 张菲，李玉灵. 塞罕坝机械林场生态景观林空间结构对夏季景观质量的影响. 林业与生态科学. 2022(02): 206-212+216 . 百度学术
7. 马薛骑，裘鸿菲，张群. 景观结构要素与色彩因子对滨水景观视觉质量的影响——以武汉东湖磨山景区为例. 西北林学院学报. 2022(03): 231-238+280 . 百度学术
8. 贾娜，史久西，秦一心，格日勒图，张龙. 森林色彩景观格局指数与色彩属性指标对观赏效应的影响. 林业科学. 2021(02): 12-21 . 百度学术
9. 贾娜，闫伟，史久西，格日乐图，车晓雨. 秋色叶树木树冠色彩特性对其观赏效应的影响. 林业科学. 2021(11): 37-48 . 百度学术
10. 钟姝，赵曜，李雄，姚朋. 基于SBE法的北京植物园月季园植物组群美学评价. 中国城市林业. 2020(01): 66-70 . 百度学术
11. 韩丽，马长乐. 基于SBE法的滨江公园美景度调查研究——以昆明市滨江公园为例. 江苏农业科学. 2020(10): 137-142 . 百度学术
12. 李雨薇，彭培好，汪平. 森林景观色彩研究进展. 四川林业科技. 2020(03): 153-160 . 百度学术
13. 赵凯，李金航，徐程扬. 侧柏人工林林分结构与色彩斑块间的耦合关系. 北京林业大学学报. 2019(01): 82-91 . 本站查看
14. 马冰倩，徐程扬，刘江，常成，赵凯，孔祥琦，龙嘉翼. 城镇森林视觉景观异质性对美学质量的影响. 浙江农林大学学报. 2019(02): 366-374 . 百度学术
15. 宋世杰，颜立红，颜玉娟，赖小连，雷佳伟. 基于SBE法的宅间植物景观美学评价研究. 中国城市林业. 2019(02): 17-21 . 百度学术
16. 曹瑜娟，徐程扬，崔义，岳阳，任雅雪. 观景距离和光照条件对黄栌林景观色彩的影响. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2019(05): 22-29+48 . 百度学术
17. 李苹，毛斌，许丽娟，吴鞠，刘海轩，徐程扬. 密度、灌草盖度和树干形态对油松人工风景林林内景观指数的影响. 北京林业大学学报. 2018(10): 115-122 . 本站查看
18. 马冰倩，徐程扬，崔义. 八达岭秋季景观整体色彩组成对美景度的影响. 西北林学院学报. 2018(06): 258-264 . 百度学术
19. 王子，荣媛，李明阳，钱春花. 森林景观色彩评价研究. 世界林业研究. 2017(03): 41-45 . 百度学术
20. 张喆，郄光发，王成，姜莎莎. 多尺度植物色彩表征及其与人体响应的关系. 生态学报. 2017(15): 5070-5079 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(15)
计量
- 文章访问数: 2143
- HTML全文浏览量: 364
- PDF下载量: 28
- 被引次数: 35
下载:
