大兴安岭主要林型土壤Zn、Mn形态及潜在生态风险分析

刘玉杰; 满秀玲

doi:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140482

大兴安岭主要林型土壤Zn、Mn形态及潜在生态风险分析

刘玉杰,
满秀玲^,

东北林业大学林学院

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(31170420)

详细信息

作者简介:
刘玉杰.主要研究方向:森林水文。Email:1103639954@qq.com 地址:150040黑龙江省哈尔滨市和兴路26号东北林业大学林学院。

责任作者:
满秀玲,博士,教授。主要研究方向:水土保持与土地荒漠化防治。Email:mannefu@163.com 地址:同上。

计量
- 文章访问数: 1637
- HTML全文浏览量: 298
- PDF下载量: 28
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-02-06
- 修回日期: 2015-02-06
- 发布日期: 2015-07-30

Morphology of soil Zn and Mn in main forest types and potential ecological risk in the Great Xing'an Mountains

LIU Yu-jie,
MAN Xiu-ling^,

College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150040, P. R. China.

摘要

摘要: 使用BCR连续提取法和重金属形态评价方法(RSP),分别对大兴安岭北部3种主要林型(落叶松、樟子松和白桦)土壤重金属Zn、Mn的形态特征及其潜在生态风险进行分析。BCR连续提取法是将重金属分为以下4种形态:可交换态及弱酸可提取态(EX)、可还原态(RED)、可氧化态(OXI)和残渣态(RES)。RSP表示重金属的污染程度,并将其分为4个等级:无污染,轻度污染,中度污染,重度污染,其值为土壤中次生相中的重金属含量(Msec)与原生相中的重金属含量(Mprim)的比值。研究结果表明:土壤全Mn含量显著高于土壤全Zn含量。3种林型中,落叶松林土壤全Mn含量最高(1169.01±0.74)mg/kg,白桦林最低(470.62±0.65)mg/kg,且3种林型间差异达极显著水平(P<0.01);土壤全Zn含量按降序排列为樟子松林(103.09±0.40)mg/kg>落叶松林(61.02±0.14)mg/kg>白桦林(46.15±0.15)mg/kg。土壤Mn的主要赋存形态为RED-Mn,而土壤Zn的主要存在状态为RES-Zn和OXI-Zn,2种重金属的可提取态比例均大于40%,具有较高的二次释放潜力,且主要分布于表层土壤中。2种重金属的RSP指数为Mn(18.24)>Zn(1.32),均表现为白桦林>樟子松林>落叶松林,且空间分布特征明显。
- 大兴安岭 /
- 森林土壤 /
- Zn /
- Mn /
- 化学形态 /
- 风险评价
Abstract: This study was designed to analyze morphological characteristics of heavy metals in soil such as Zn and Mn and to evaluate their potential ecological risk by methods of BCR and RSP (rations secondary phase and primary phase) in three typical forest types, namely, Larix gmelinii, Betula platyphylla and Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica in the Great Xing'an Mountains, northeastern China. Heavy metals were divided into the following four morphologies by BCR, extractable, bound to carbonates, bound to Fe-Mn oxides and residual morphology. RSP which indicates the degree of heavy metals pollution was divided into four levels: no pollution, light pollution, moderate pollution, and severe pollution. The value of RSP is expressed by the ratio of the soil heavy metals content (Msec) at secondary phase to that (Mprim) at the primary phase. The results showed that: soil Mn content was significantly higher than soil Zn content. Soil Mn content in L. gmelinii forest was the highest (1169.01±0.74) mg/kg, while it was the lowest in B. platyphylla forest (470.62±0.65) mg/kg, and their difference was highly significant (P<0.01); Soil Zn content was ranked in the decreasing order of P. sylvestris var. mongolica forest (103.09±0.40mg/kg), L. gmelinii (61.02±0.14) mg/kg, B. platyphylla (46.15±0.15) mg/kg. The main existing morphology of soil Mn was RED-Mn, and those of soil Zn were RES-Zn and OXI-Zn. Their proportion of extractable form was both over 40%, with high potential of twice releasing, and was distributed mainly in topsoil. RSP index of Mn (18.24) was higher than that of Zn (1.32), and decreased in the order of B. platyphylla, P. sylvestris var. mongolica forest, L. gmelinii, with apparent characteristics in spatial distribution.
- Great Xing'an Mountains /
- forest soil /
- Zn /
- Mn /
- chemical morphology /
- risk evaluation

HTML全文

参考文献(35)

[1]	LEI M, LIAO B H, QIN P F, et al. Bioavailability chemical fractionation contaminated soil heavy metal[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2007,16(5):1551-1556.
[1]	BONELL M. Progress in the understanding of runoff generation dynamics in forests[J].Journal of Hydrology,1993, 150:217-275.
[2]	WANG Y, CAI T J, ZHANG G B. Speciation distribution of Cu and effects of disturbance in main wetland types soil in Xiaoxinganling[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,24(6):153-158.
[2]	BORMANN F H, LIKENS G E. Pattern and processes in a forested ecosystem [M]. New York: Springer Verlag, 1979: 1-120.
[3]	BOSCH J M, HEWLETT J D. A review of catchment experiments to determine the effect of vegetation changes on water yield and evaportranspiration[J]. Hydrology,1982, 55: 3-23.
[3]	YANG Z P, LU W X, XIN X, et al. Chemical morphological features of Pb, Cu, Zn, Cd and Cr in urban soil of Changchun City, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2011,42(5):1247-1255.
[4]	XU S Y,YE L L,ZHU Y, et al. Chemical speciation of heavy metals from Chaohu Lake sediments using BCR procedure[J].Environmental Science &Technology,2008,31(9):20-28.
[4]	BURT T P, SWANK W T. Flow frequency responses to grass conversion and subsequent succession[J].Hydrology Proccess,1992,6(2):179-188.
[5]	HAN C M, WANG L S, GONG Z Q, et al. Chemical forms of soil heavy metals and their environmental significance[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2005,24(12):1499-1502.
[5]	雷鸣,廖柏寒,秦普丰.土壤重金属化学形态的生物可利用性评价[J].生态环境,2007,16(5):1551-1556.
[6]	王妍,蔡体久,张功宝.小兴安岭典型湿地土壤Cu化学形态空间分布及干扰对其影响[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(6):153-158.
[6]	CHEN C X, JIANG X, ZHAN Y Z, et al. Speciation distribution and potential ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in sediments of Taihu Lake[J]. China Environmental Science, 2011, 31(11):1842-1848.
[7]	杨忠平,卢文喜,辛欣,等.长春市城区土壤中Pb、Cu、Zn、Cd及Cr化学形态特征[J].土壤通报,2011,42(5):1247-1255.
[7]	JIA Y, FANG M, WU Y J, et al. Pollution characteristics and potential ecological risk of heavy metals in river sediments of Shanghai[J]. China Environmental Science, 2013,33(1):147-153.
[8]	徐圣友,叶琳琳,朱燕,等.巢湖沉积物中重金属的BCR形态分析[J].环境科学与技术,2008,31(9):20-28.
[8]	JIANG H Y. Study on hydrological characteristics of forest ecosystem in Daxinganling[D].Harbin: Northeast Forestry University,2008.
[9]	SINGH K P, MOHAN D, SINGH V K, et al. Studies on distribution and fractionation of heavy metals in Gomti river sediments atributary of the Ganges, India[J].Journal of Hydrology,2005,312:14-27.
[9]	GU J F, CAI T J, YANG S, et al. Chemical forms of soil heavy metals and pollution assessment on rouge ditch gold mine of Daxing'an Mountain[J].Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2013,44(5):1259-1265.
[10]	韩春梅,王林山,巩宗强,等.土壤中重金属形态分析及其环境学意义[J].生态学杂志,2005,24(12):1499-1502.
[10]	The State Environmental Protection Agency. The state environmental protection agency background value of soil element background value of soil element[M]. Beijing:China Environmental Science Press,1990
[11]	WU X M, PAN G X .The correlation analysis between the content of heavy metals and the factors influencing the pollution of heavy metals in Urban soils in Nanjing City[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2003,40(6):921-929.
[11]	陈春宵,姜霞,战玉柱,等.太湖表层沉积物中重金属形态分布及其潜在生态风险分析[J]. 中国环境科学,2011,31(11):1842-1848
[12]	SHI W J, WANG J K, BIAN Z X, et al. Distribution and evaluation of main heavy metals and available microelements in soils in the Northern Area of Heilongjiang Province[J].Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2005,36(6):880-883.
[12]	贾英,方明,吴友军,等.上海河流沉积物重金属的污染特征与潜在生态风险[J].中国环境科学,2013,33(1):147-153.
[13]	LI Q L, WEI Z F, WANG D Y,et al. Environmental response and behavior of heavy metal in soil[J].Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2008,39(2):441-447.
[13]	姜海燕.大兴安岭森林生态系统水文特性的研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2008.
[14]	谷金锋,蔡体久,杨肃,等.大兴安岭胭脂沟金矿土壤中Mn、Pb、Cu和Zn化学形态分析和污染评价[J].土壤通报,2013,44(5):1259-1265.
[14]	WANG H, WANG C X,WANG Z J, et al. Speciations of heavy metals in surface sediment of Taihu lake[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2002,21(5):430-435.
[15]	CHEN J S, DONG L, DENG B S, et al. Modeling study on copper partitioning in sediments a case study of Poyang lake[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 1987, 7(2):140-149.
[15]	国家环境保护局.中国土壤元素背景值[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1990.
[16]	吴新民,潘根兴.影响城市土壤重金属污染因子的关联度分析[J].土壤学报,2003,40(6):921-929.
[17]	史文娇,汪景宽,边振兴,等.黑龙江北部土壤中主要重金属和微量元素状况及其评价[J].土壤通报,2005,36(6):880-883.
[18]	李其林,魏朝富,王定勇,等.重金属在土壤载体中的行为和环境响应[J].土壤通报,2008,39(2):441-447.
[19]	王海,王春霞,王子健.太湖表层沉积物中重金属的形态分析[J].环境化学,2002,21(5):430-435.
[20]	陈静生,董林,邓宝山,等.铜在沉积物各相中分配的实验模拟与数值模拟研究:以鄱阳湖为例[J].环境科学学报,1987,7(2):140-149.

施引文献(7)

期刊类型引用(2)

1.	武舒，王洲，张明艳，钟姗辰，王黎，苏晓华，张冰玉. PagHK3a基因敲除对银腺杨抗旱性的影响. 林业科学研究. 2023(05): 1-11 . 百度学术
2.	梁青兰，韩友吉，乔艳辉，谢孔安，李双云，董玉峰，李善文，张升祥. 干旱胁迫对黑杨派无性系生长及生理特性的影响. 北京林业大学学报. 2023(10): 81-89 . 本站查看