Runoff and sediment effects in erosive rainfall of typical plant conservation practice in the upper reach of Guanting Reservoir, Beijing
-
摘要: 为了研究官厅水库上游地区水土保持典型植物措施的减水减沙效益,选取5个标准样地,通过分析该地区侵蚀性降雨特性和植物多样性程度,研究不同典型植物措施的减水减沙效益随雨量、雨强和时间的变化,并评估不同植被盖度对径流深、产沙量的影响,得出在官厅水库上游布设水土保持典型植物措施的有效方法。结果表明:1)草坡盖度越高减水减沙效益越好,在大暴雨和特大暴雨条件下时效果明显,但盖度在45%~60%的草坡即可以达到水土保持典型植物措施的有效盖度,因此这一盖度适宜在北京山区范围内推广。灌草结合可在减少径流和泥沙方面达到较好效果,在官厅水库上游布设较草坡安全。2)合理的植被群落配置可以增强该群落自身对不良环境的抵抗力,其中多样性程度是关键,可促进坡面植被的盖度和稳定性保持在一定水平。保证植物盖度的同时,多样性程度越高,其退化速度越慢,从而可以保证植物的盖度和正常生理活动,减少径流和泥沙的产生。在进行水土保持植物措施的布设时,需要考虑到植物种类的多样性,将盖度与多样性指数、丰富度指数、均匀度指数作为布设措施时需要考虑的因素,并逐年进行补植。该研究为比较相应措施的水土保持效益打下基础,从而为北京山区生态安全的研究提供一定理论基础。Abstract: To study the runoff and sediment reduction benefits from typical plant conservation practices in the upper reach of the Guanting Reservoir of northern Beijing, we selected five standard plots and analyzed the characteristics of erosive rainfall and plant diversity. Then the changes of runoff and sediment reduction benefits with precipitation, rainfall intensity and duration in different measures of typical plant preparation were studied, and the effects of different plant coverages on the runoff depth and the amount of sediment were evaluated, so as to explore the effective measure of plant conservation in the upper reach of the Guanting Reservoir. The results showed that: 1) the higher the grass coverage is, the better the runoff and sediment reduction benefits are, especially in torrential rains. The grassland with a coverage of 45%-60% can be effective for water and soil conservation plant measure, and this is recommended to be applied in Beijing mountainous areas. The combination of brush and high-coverage grass is proved to be rather effective in reducing runoff and sediment, and it is safer than sole grassland measure in the upper reach of Guanting Reservoir. 2) Reasonable vegetation configuration can strengthen the resistance to poor environment, and vegetation diversity is the key, which can increase plant coverage and maintain stability at certain level. When plant coverage is ensured, the higher the degree of diversity is, the slower the plant degeneration is, which can keep plant coverage and physiological activity normal, and reduce runoff and sediment. When designing plant conservation practice, diversity of plants should be concerned, diversity index, richness index and evenness index should be taken into account, and complementary-planting should be carried out year by year after the project finishing. Our study lays the foundation for comparison of runoff and sediment reduction benefits under varying measures, which could provide theoretical basis for the research of ecological security in Beijing mountainous area.
-
-
[1] 李靖洁. 官厅水土流域水污染控制对策研究[D]. 石家庄: 河北科技大学, 2011. [1] LI J J. Study on water pollution control countermeasures of Guanting Reservior [D]. Shijiazhuang: Hebei University of Science and Technology, 2011.
[2] LI H F, WEI W, DENG J L, et al. Characteristics of precipitation and soil erosion from 1995 to 2010 Guanchuan River Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 33(6): 84-93.
[2] 李海防, 卫伟, 邓居礼, 等. 关川河流域1995—2010年降雨特征及其水土流失效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2013, 33(6): 84-93. [3] YAO Y C. Study on the relationship between soil and water loss and rainfall characteristics in Pinus massoniana forest in red soil region of southern China[D]. Nanchang: Jiangxi University of Agriculture,2012.
[3] 姚毅臣. 南方红壤区马尾松林下水土流失与降雨特性关系研究[D]. 南昌: 江西农业大学, 2012. [4] WANG H, KONG X Z, ZHANG Y, et al. Influence of the rainfall on soil and water loss in the dry-hot valleys of the Jinsha River[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2014, 34(4): 70-74.
[4] 王洪, 孔祥周, 张瑜, 等. 金沙江干热河谷地区降雨对水土流失的影响[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2014, 34(4): 70-74. [5] LI G J, CUI M, ZHOU J X, et al. Research of soil and water conservation benefits from forests soil erosion control measures in red soil region of southern China[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014, 25(5): 1-5.
[5] 李桂静, 崔明, 周金星, 等. 南方红壤区林下土壤侵蚀控制措施水土保持效益研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2014, 25(5): 1-5. [6] 王士永. 北京怀柔东台沟小流域坡面径流与产沙特征研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2011. [6] WANG S Y. Study on the characteristics of slope runoff and sediment yield in Dongtaigou Watershed of Huairou, Beijing [D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2011.
[7] 黄茹. 三峡库区林草治理措施对土壤理化特征及坡面水沙的影响[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2013. [7] HUANG R. Effects of biological regulated measures on soil physicochemical properties and runoff-sediment yield in Three Gorges Reservoir Region[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2013.
[8] BETRIE G D, MOHAMED Y A, VAN GRIENSVEN A, et al. Sediment management modelling in the Blue Nile Basin using SWAT model[J] . Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2011,15: 807-818.
[8] MA L, ZUO C Q. Major factors affecting erosion and runoff on red soil slope based on WEPP Model[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012, 32(6): 26-33.
[9] LIN B, LIU Q J, SHANG H, et al. Application of coupled MIKE11/NAM model in Naoli River Basin, northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014, 36(5): 99-108.
[9] 马良, 左长清. 基于水蚀预测模型的红壤坡面侵蚀主要影响因素研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2012, 32(6): 26-33. [10] 林波, 刘琪璟, 尚鹤, 等. MIKE 11/NAM模型在挠力河流域的应用[J], 北京林业大学学报, 2014, 36(5): 99-108. [10] FAN D X. Study on slope soil erosion response and model simulation in Beijing Mountains Area[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2014.
[11] LI T, LIU K, HU S, et al. Soil erosion and ecological benefits evaluation of Qingling Mountains based on the InVest model[J]. Resource and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2014, 23(9): 1242-1250.
[11] 樊登星. 北京山区坡面土壤侵蚀响应特征及模型模拟研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2014. [12] 李婷, 刘康, 胡胜, 等. 基于InVEST模型的秦岭山地土壤流失及土壤保持生态效益评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(9): 1242-1250. [12] YAN J C, LIANG C Z, FU X Y, et al. The responses of annual plant trials to rainfall variation in steppe and desert regions[J]. Acta Pratacultrrae Sinica, 2013, 22(1): 68-76.
[13] 闫建成, 梁存柱, 付晓玥, 等. 草原与荒漠一年生植物性状对降水变化的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(1): 68-76. [13] ZHENG K, YUAN J L, WANG L, et al. Seasonal and inter-annual variations of plant community and the impact of climate change in the Anxi Extra-arid Desert National Nature Reserve[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University: Natural Sciences, 2013, 49(5): 651-657.
[14] ZHANG G L, XU X L, ZHOU C P, et al. Responses of vegetation changes to climatic variations in Hulun Buir Grassland in past 30 years[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2011, 66(1): 47-58.
[14] 郑凯, 袁建立, 王亮, 等. 安西极旱荒漠自然保护区植物群落的季节变化和年际变化以及气候对变化的影响[J]. 兰州大学学报:自然科学版, 2013, 49(5): 651-657. [15] 张戈丽, 徐兴良, 周才平, 等. 近30年来呼伦贝尔地区草地植被变化对气候变化的响应[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(1): 47-58. [15] LU B J, DUAN S H, YUAN A P, et al. Quantitative analysis of the effect of vegetation cover on non-point pollution in upper reaches of the Guangting Reservoir[J]. Resources Science, 2006, 28(5): 196-200.
[16] 路炳军, 段淑怀, 袁爱萍, 等. 官厅水库上游地区植被覆盖对面源污染影响的定量研究[J]. 资源科学, 2006, 28(5): 196-200. [16] QIAO Y F, JIANG D W, TIAN Y Z. Discuss on design of the synthetic science demonstration plot of water and soil conservation[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006, 26(1): 85-88.
[17] JIAO J Y, WANG W Z, LI J. Effective cover rate of woodland and grassland for soil and water conservation[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2000, 24(5): 608-612.
[17] 乔彦芬, 姜德文, 田玉柱. 综合型水土保持科技示范园的规划设计:以北京市延庆县水土保持科技示范园为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2006, 26(1): 85-88. [18] SONG Y C. Vegetation ecology[M]. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press, 2001:45-51.
[18] 焦菊英, 王万中, 李靖. 黄土高原林草水土保持有效盖度分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2000, 24(5): 608-612. [19] 宋永昌. 植被生态学[M]. 上海:华东师范大学出版社, 2001:45-51. [19] LIN P. Plant communities[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Press, 1986: 68-80.
[20] ZHAO Z M, GUO Y Q. Principle and methods of community ecology[M]. Chongqing: Science and Technology Publishing House of Chongqing Branch, 1990: 147-154.
[20] 林鹏. 植物群落学[M]. 上海:上海科学技术出版社, 1986: 68-80. [21] ZHAO Y Q, PENG D L. Diversity of the main plantation communities in Jiufeng Forest Park[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry College, 2008, 28(1): 17-22.
[21] 赵志模, 郭依泉. 群落生态学原理与方法[M]. 重庆:科学技术出版社重庆分社, 1990: 147-154. [22] ZHAO X L, QI D H. Biodiversity of tree populations in a soil and water conservation forest during ecological restoration[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2008, 28(4):113-117.
[22] 赵永泉, 彭道藜. 北京鹫峰公园主要人工林群落多样性研究[J]. 西南林学院学报, 2008, 28(1): 17-22. [23] 赵晓莅, 齐代华. 生态恢复过程中水土保持林乔木层多样性研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2008, 28(4):113-117. [23] FU S H, LIU B Y, LU B J, et al. Effect of soil conservation practice on runoff and sediment in upper reach of Guanting Reservoir[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 7(2): 18-23.
[24] Department of Water and Soil Conservation. SL 190—2007 The classification standard of soil erosion classification[S]. Beijing: Chinese Water Conservancy and Hydropower Press, 2007.
[24] 符素华, 刘宝元, 路炳军,等. 官厅水库上游水土保持措施的减水减沙效益[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2009, 7(2): 18-23. [25] LI M, YAO W Y, LI Z B. Progress of the effect of grassland vegetation for conserving soil and water on Loess Plateau[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2005, 20(1): 74-80.
[25] BOWMAN D M J S, WALSH A, MILNE D J. Forest expansion and grassland contraction within a Eucalyptus savanna matrix between 1941 and 1994 at Litchfield National Park in the Australian monsoon tropics [J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2001, 10(5): 535-548.
[26] LIU Z, NOTARO M, GALLIMORE R. Indirect vegetation-soil moisture feedback with application to Holocene North Africa climate [J]. Global Change Biology, 2010, 16: 1733-1743.
[27] 水利部水土保持司. SL 190—2007 土壤侵蚀分类分级标准[S]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2007. [28] 李勉, 姚文艺, 李占斌. 黄土高原草本植被水土保持作用研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2005, 20(1): 74-80. [29] SVORAY T, KARNIELI A. Rainfall, topography and primary production relationships in a semiarid ecosystem[J]. Ecohydrology, 2001, 4(1): 56-66.
[30] ISTANBULLUOGLU E, BRAS R L. Vegetation-modulated landscape evolution:effects of vegetation on landscape processes, drainage density, and topography [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2012, 110(F2): 1-19.
-
期刊类型引用(4)
1. 张苗苗,罗于洋,王树森,张丽娜,马成功,于胜利,王景圆. 内蒙古旺业甸华北落叶松人工林空间结构分析及其优化. 西北林学院学报. 2024(01): 81-87+107 . 百度学术
2. 荆媛,魏爽,史文辉,马梓贺,王德宇,戎可. 天然次生林中小斑啄木鸟的取食偏好. 野生动物学报. 2024(01): 84-94 . 百度学术
3. 孙宇,刘盛,田佳歆,程福山,赵士博,王诗俊. 基于空间结构优化的长白落叶松人工林分间伐模型构建. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2023(01): 72-83 . 百度学术
4. 刘鑫,黄浪,卿东升,李建军. 基于Voronoi空间单元的林分空间结构智能优化研究. 林业资源管理. 2023(04): 27-35 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 1425
- HTML全文浏览量: 268
- PDF下载量: 20
- 被引次数: 6