高级检索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

泥石流频发区不同林龄新银合欢土壤抗蚀性评价

陈爱民 严思维 林勇明 邓浩俊 杜锟 孙凡 王道杰 吴承祯 洪伟

陈爱民, 严思维, 林勇明, 邓浩俊, 杜锟, 孙凡, 王道杰, 吴承祯, 洪伟. 泥石流频发区不同林龄新银合欢土壤抗蚀性评价[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(9): 62-70. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150530
引用本文: 陈爱民, 严思维, 林勇明, 邓浩俊, 杜锟, 孙凡, 王道杰, 吴承祯, 洪伟. 泥石流频发区不同林龄新银合欢土壤抗蚀性评价[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(9): 62-70. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150530
CHEN Ai-min, YAN Si-wei, LIN Yong-ming, DENG Hao-jun, DU Kun, SUN Fan, WANG Dao-jie, WU Cheng-zhen, HONG Wei. Evaluation of soil anti-erodibility at different ages of Leucaena leucocephala forests in the area with high-frequency debris flow.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(9): 62-70. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150530
Citation: CHEN Ai-min, YAN Si-wei, LIN Yong-ming, DENG Hao-jun, DU Kun, SUN Fan, WANG Dao-jie, WU Cheng-zhen, HONG Wei. Evaluation of soil anti-erodibility at different ages of Leucaena leucocephala forests in the area with high-frequency debris flow.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(9): 62-70. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150530

泥石流频发区不同林龄新银合欢土壤抗蚀性评价

doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150530
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金项目(41201564)、福建农林大学林学院青年科研基金项目(6112C039Q)。

详细信息
    作者简介:

    陈爱民。主要研究方向:恢复生态学。Email:99340709@qq.com地址:350002福建省福州市仓山区上下店路福建农林大学林学院。责任作者:林勇明,博士,副教授。主要研究方向:恢复生态学。Email:monkey1422@163.com地址:同上。

    陈爱民。主要研究方向:恢复生态学。Email:99340709@qq.com地址:350002福建省福州市仓山区上下店路福建农林大学林学院。责任作者:林勇明,博士,副教授。主要研究方向:恢复生态学。Email:monkey1422@163.com地址:同上。

Evaluation of soil anti-erodibility at different ages of Leucaena leucocephala forests in the area with high-frequency debris flow.

  • 摘要: 土壤抗蚀性是评价土壤抵抗侵蚀能力的重要参数之一,植被恢复过程可引起土壤抗蚀性变化。本文通过野外调查与室内分析,运用主成分分析法对不同林龄新银合欢人工林土壤抗蚀性进行综合研究。结果表明:1)随着林龄的增长,新银合欢人工林土壤的通透性和结构稳定性变差,土壤细颗粒含量增加,土壤的养分含量有所降低;2)不同林龄新银合欢人工林土壤抗蚀性综合指数大小表现为:10年生 16年生 27年生,这说明随着林龄的增长,蒋家沟泥石流频发区新银合欢人工林土壤抗蚀性呈下降的趋势;3)表征土壤抗蚀性的13个指标可简化为:土壤密度、最大持水量、 0.25 mm水稳性团聚体含量、黏粒含量、粉粒含量5个指标,以此为自变量,以土壤抗蚀性综合指数为因变量,进行回归分析得出的评价模型为Y=-8.691X1+0.054X2+0.700X3-0.425X4-0.189X5-12.511,线性拟合程度较好。研究结果可为泥石流频发区土壤抗蚀性的后续研究及评价指标体系的构建提供参考。

     

  • [1] 王云琦, 王玉杰, 朱金兆. 重庆缙云山典型林分林地土壤抗蚀性分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 775-780.
    [1] BOUYOUCOS G J. The clay ratio as a criterion of susceptibility of soil to erosion [J]. Journal of American Society of Agronomy, 1935, 27: 738-741.
    [2] WANG Y Q, WANG Y J, ZHU J Z. Anti-erodibility analysis in forest soil of typical forests in Jinyun mountain in Chongqing city [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2005, 14(6): 775-780.
    [3] 沈慧, 姜凤岐, 杜晓军, 等. 水土保持林土壤抗蚀性能评价研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2000, 11(3): 345-348.
    [4] SHEN H, JIANG F Q, DU X J, et al. Evaluation on soil anti-erodibility of soil and water conservation forest [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2000, 11(3): 345-348.
    [5] MARTIJKR M B, GOVERS G, VAN DOORN A M, et al. The response of soil erosion and sediment export to land-use change in four areas of Europe: the importance of landscape pattern [J]. Geomorphology, 2008, 98(3): 213-226.
    [6] 丛日亮, 黄进, 张金池, 等. 苏南丘陵区主要林分类型土壤抗蚀性分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2010, 19(8): 1862-1867.
    [7] CONG R L, HUANG J, ZHANG J C, et al. Analysis of soil anti-erodibility of main forest types in the south hilly region of Jiangsu province [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2010, 19(8): 1862-1867.
    [8] LE BISSONNAIS Y. Aggregate stability and assessment of soil crust ability and erodibility: I. theory and methodology [J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 1996, 47(4): 425-437.
    [9] 阮伏水, 吴雄海. 关于土壤可蚀性指标的讨论[J]. 水土保持通报, 1996, 16(6): 68-72.
    [10] RUAN F S, WU X H. A review on the indexes of soil erodibility [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 1996, 16(6): 68-72.
    [11] 王玉杰, 王云琦, 夏一平. 重庆缙云山典型林分的林地土壤抗蚀抗冲性能[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2006, 4(1): 20-27.
    [12] WANG Y J, WANG Y Q, XIA Y P. Soil erosion resistance of typical forests in Jinyun mountain in Chongqing city [J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006, 4(1): 20-27.
    [13] 薛萐, 李占斌, 李鹏, 等. 不同植被恢复模式对黄土丘陵区土壤抗蚀性的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(增刊1): 69-72.
    [14] XUE S, LI Z B, LI P, et al. Effects of different vegetation restoration models on soil anti-erodibility in loess hilly area [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2009, 25(Suppl.1): 69-72.
    [15] 张超, 刘国彬, 薛萐, 等. 黄土丘陵区不同林龄人工刺槐林土壤抗蚀性演变特征[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2010, 8(2): 1-7.
    [16] ZHANG C, LIU G B, XUE S, et al. Evolution of soil anti-erodibility of Robinia pseudoacacia L. plantation at different ages in Hilly-gully region of Loess Plateau [J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010, 8(2): 1-7.
    [17] 付允, 贾亚男, 蓝家程. 岩溶区不同土地利用方式土壤抗蚀性分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2011, 18(5): 5-9.
    [18] FU Y, JIA Y N, LAN J C. Analysis of soil anti-erodibility of slope farmland in karst mountain area based on tillage erosion [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 18(5): 5-9.
    [19] 史东梅, 陈晏. 紫色丘陵区农林混作模式的土壤抗冲性影响因素[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(5): 1400-1409.
    [20] SHI D M, CHEN Y. The influencing factors of soil anti-scouribility of tree-crop intercropping land in purple soil hilly region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 41(5): 1400-1409.
    [21] 吴丽丽, 张仁陟, 康立军. 紫色丘陵区坡耕地生物梗的土壤抗蚀性综合评价[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2014, 22(11): 1310-1317.
    [22] WU L L, ZHANG R S, KANG L J. Comprehensive evaluation of soil erosion durability of bio-banks on slope lands in purple hilly areas [J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2014, 22(11): 1310-1317.
    [23] 陈瑜. 四川盆周山地杉木人工混交林土壤的抗蚀性能[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2010.
    [24] CHEN Y. Study on the land erosion resistance for the mixed artificial Chinese fir forest of mountain areas around Sichuan basin [D]. Yaan: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2010.
    [25] 崔鹏, 王道杰, 韦方强. 干热河谷生态修复模式及其效应以中国科学院东川泥石流观测研究站为例[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2005, 3(3): 60-64.
    [26] CUI P, WANG D J, WEI F Q. Model and effect of ecological restoration of dry-hot valley: a case study of the CAS Dongchuan debris flow observation station [J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2005, 3(3): 60-64.
    [27] 廖超林, 何毓蓉, 徐佩. 泥石流源地土壤团聚体抗蚀特征研究:以蒋家沟为例[J]. 地球与环境, 2005, 33(4): 65-69.
    [28] LIAO C L, HE Y R, XU P. A study on anti-erodibility of soil aggregates in debris flow provenance: a case study in Jiangjiagou [J]. Earth and Environment, 2005, 33(4): 65-69.
    [29] 郭灵辉, 王道杰, 陈东, 等. 蒋家沟泥石流区新银合欢细根固土效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2011, 31(5): 85-89,214.
    [30] GUO L H, WANG D J, CHEN D, et al. Effect of Leucaena leucocephala fine root on soil fixation in debris flow area of Jiangjia gully [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 31(5): 85-89,214.
    [31] 林勇明, 崔鹏, 葛永刚, 等. 泥石流频发区人工恢复新银合欢林种内竞争:以云南东川蒋家沟流域为例[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2008, 30(3): 13-17.
    [32] LIN Y M, CUI P, GE Y G, et al. Intraspecific competition of Leucaena leucocephala plantation in the area of high frequency debris flow: taking the Jiangjiagou Gully as an example [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30(3): 13-17.
    [33] 张有富. 云南蒋家沟泥石流区干热退化山地引种拟金茅的技术与效果[J]. 山地学报, 2000, 18(6): 563-567.
    [34] ZHANG Y F. Technique and results of common Eulaliopsis application on xerothermic degraded mountain in Jiang jia gou debris flow gully [J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2000, 18(6): 563-567.
    [35] 吴积善, 康志成, 田连权, 等. 云南蒋家沟泥石流观测研究[M]. 北京:科技出版社, 1990: 238-239.
    [36] WU J S, KANG Z C, TIAN L Q, et al. Observation study in Jiangjia gully in Yunnan province [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1990: 238-239.
    [37] 郭灵辉, 王道杰, 张云红, 等. 泥石流源区新银合欢林地土壤微团聚体分形特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2010, 24(5): 243-247.
    [38] GUO L H, WANG D J, ZHANG Y H, et al. Fractal features of soil micro-aggregates under Leucaena leucocephala forest in debris flow source area [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010, 24(5): 243-247.
    [39] 邓浩俊, 陈爱民, 严思维, 等. 不同林龄新银合欢重吸收率及其C∶N∶P化学计量特征[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2015, 21(3): 522-527.
    [40] DENG H J, CHEN A M, YAN S W, et al. Nutrient resorption efficiency and C∶N∶P stoichiometry in different ages of Leucaena leucocephala [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Environment Biology, 2015, 21(3): 522-527.
    [41] 中国林业科学研究院林业研究所森林土壤研究室. 森林土壤水分-物理性质的测定:LY/T 12151999[S]. 北京:国家林业局, 1999.
    [42] Forest Soil Laboratory of Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry. Determination of forest soil water-physical properties: LY/T 12151999[S]. Beijing: State Forestry Administration, 1999.
    [43] 杜锟, 严思维, 张广帅, 等. 蒋家沟泥石流滩地不同堆积时期土壤肥力质量演变特征[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2015, 21(4): 762-769.
    [44] DU K, YAN S W, ZHANG G S, et al. Soil quality evolution characteristics of debris flow waste-shoal land indifferent deposit periods in Jiangjia Gully [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Environment Biology, 2015, 21(4): 762-769.
    [45] 景可, 王万忠, 郑粉莉. 中国土壤侵蚀与环境[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005.
    [46] JING K, WANG W Z, ZHENG F L. Soil erosion and its environment in China [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2005.
    [47] 张建辉, 刘刚才, 倪师军, 等. 紫色土不同土地利用条件下的土壤抗冲性研究[J]. 中国科学E辑, 2003, 33(增刊): 61-68.
    [48] ZHANG J H, LIU G C, NI S J, et al. Study on soil anti-scouribility of different land uses in purple area [J]. Science in China Series Edition, 2003, 33(Suppl.): 61-68.
    [49] 黄冠华, 詹卫华. 土壤颗粒的分形特征及其应用[J]. 土壤学报, 2002, 39(4): 490-497.
    [50] HUANG G H, ZHAN W H. Fractal property of soil particle size distribution and its application [J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2002, 39(4): 490-497.
    [51] 张社奇, 王国栋, 时新玲, 等. 黄土高原油松人工林地土壤水分物理性质研究[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2005, 23(1): 60-64.
    [52] ZHANG S Q, WANG G D, SHI X L, et al. Improvement of soil hydro-physical properties by artificial Robinia Pinus Tabulaeformis carr forests in the Loess Plateau [J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2005, 23(1): 60-64.
    [53] 陈明, 陈继平, 陈昌利. 土壤最大持水量与环境因子的关系[J]. 西南科技大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 1991, 8(4): 26-30.
    [54] CHEN M, CHEN J P, CHEN C L. Study on relationship between maximum capacity of soil moisture and environmental factors [J]. Journal of Southeast of Science and Technology(Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 1991, 8(4): 26-30.
    [55] 涂淑萍, 周桂香, 郭晓敏, 等. 赣县稀土采矿区巨桉林地土壤抗蚀性评价[J]. 林业科学研究, 2013, 26(6): 752-758.
    [56] TU S P, ZHOU G X, GUO X M, et al. Evaluation of soil anti-erodibility of Eucalyptus grandis forest land in rare earth mining area [J]. Forest Research, 2013, 26(6): 752-758.
    [57] 林勇明, 崔鹏, 王道杰, 等. 泥石流频发区人工新银合欢群落特征[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2009, 7(6): 63-67.
    [58] LIN Y M, CUI P, WANG D J, et al. Community characteristic of plantation of Leucaena leucocephala in the area with high-frequency debris flow [J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 7(6): 63-67.
    [59] 王道杰, 崔鹏, 朱波, 等. 金沙江干热河谷植被恢复技术及生态效应:以云南小江流域为例[J]. 水土保持学报, 2004, 18(5): 95-98.
    [60] WANG D J, CUI P, ZHU B, et al. Vegetation rehabilitation techniques and ecological effects in dry-hot valley of Jinsha River: case study in Xiaojiang basin, Yunnan province [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2004, 18(5): 95-98.
    [61] 郑子成, 杨玉梅, 李廷轩. 不同退耕模式下土壤抗蚀性差异及其评价模型[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(10): 199-205.
    [62] ZHENG Z C, YANG Y M, LI T X. Difference and evaluation model of soil anti-erodibility with different de-farming patterns [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2011, 27(10): 199-205.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1291
  • HTML全文浏览量:  130
  • PDF下载量:  11
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2016-01-08
  • 刊出日期:  2016-09-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回