Ecosystem carbon storage of natural secondary birch forests in Xiaoxing’an Mountains of China
-
摘要: 采用相对生长方程与碳/氮分析测定法,测定小兴安岭天然白桦林在7个立地类型(阳坡上、中、下部和阴坡上、中、下部及谷地)的生态系统碳储量(植被和土壤)、净初级生产力与年净固碳量,揭示立地类型对白桦林碳汇功能的影响规律。结果表明:1)小兴安岭白桦林植被碳储量((49.39±3.09)~(89.20±10.17)t/hm2)在谷地、阳坡下部和阴坡上、中部4个立地类型显著高于阳坡上、中部及阴坡下部3个立地类型(38.2%~80.6%,P＜0.05)。2)其土壤有机碳储量((147.30±21.39)~(273.67±22.67)t/hm2)在阴坡上、中部和谷地最高,显著高于阳坡上、中部和阴坡下部(27.9%~85.8%,P＜0.05),阳坡下部居中,仅显著高于阴坡下部(53.3%,P＜0.05),阳坡上、中部和阴坡下部相对较低。3)其生态系统碳储量((207.88±16.07)~(357.85±20.80)t/hm2)在谷地、阳坡下部和阴坡上、中部4个立地类型显著高于阳坡上、中部和阴坡下部3个立地类型(33.2%~72.1%,P＜0.05)。4)其植被净初级生产力((5.80±0.26)~(8.87±1.17 )t/(hm2·a))在阳坡下部和阴坡上、中部3个立地类型相对较高,显著高于阴坡下部(31.2%~52.9%,P＜0.05),阳坡上、中部与谷地3个立地类型居中,高于阴坡下部(15.5%~26.4%,P＞0.05),阴坡下部最低。5)其年净固碳量((2.76±0.10)~(4.15±0.32)t/(hm2·a))在阳坡下部和阴坡上、中部3个立地类型相对较高,显著高于阴坡下部(27.9%~50.4%,P＜0.05),阳坡上、中部与谷地3个立地类型居中,高于阴坡下部(12.3%~23.9%,P＞0.05),阴坡下部最低。因其植被年净固碳量低于我国陆地植被平均固碳量(15.3%~43.7%),故小兴安岭天然白桦林属于碳汇功能相对较低的森林类型。
-
关键词:
- 小兴安岭 /
- 天然白桦林 /
- 生态系统碳储量 /
- 净初级生产力与年固碳量 /
- 立地类型影响
Abstract: The ecosystem carbon storage (vegetation and soil), net primary productivity, and annual net carbon sequestration of natural secondary birch forests on seven site types (the top, middle, and bottom of the sunny slope and shady slope, and the valley floor) were studied by use of relative growth equations and carbon/nitrogen analytical approach in Xiaoxing'an Mountains of China, in order to probe into the influence of site type on the carbon sinks in birch forest and provide scientific basis for the management of forest carbon sink in northeast China. The results showed that: 1) The vegetation carbon storages ((49.39±3.09)-(89.20±10.17)t/ha) at the valley floor, the bottom of the sunny slope, and the top and middle of the shady slope were significantly higher than those at the middle and top of the sunny slope and the bottom of the shady slope (38.2%-80.6%, P0.05); 2) The soil organic carbon storages ((136.28±21.39)-(273.67±22.67))t/ha at the middle and top of the shady slope and the valley floor were the highest (which were significantly higher than that at the middle and top of the sunny slope and the bottom of the shady slope (27.9%-85.8%, P0.05), followed by the storages at the bottom of the sunny slope (which was only significantly higher than that at the bottom of the shady slope (53.3%, P0.05), yet they were the lowest at the middle and top of the sunny slope and the bottom of the shady slope; 3) The ecosystem carbon storages ((207.88±16.07)-(357.85±20.80) t/ha) in four of the seven site types (the valley floor, the bottom of sunny slope, the top and middle of the shady slope) were significantly higher than those at the middle and top of the sunny slope and the bottom of the shady slope (33.2%-72.1%, P0.05); 4) The net primary productivities of vegetation ((5.80±0.26)-(8.87±1.17) t/(ha·a)) at the bottom of sunny slope and the top and middle of shady slope were the highest (which were significantly higher than it at the bottom of the shady slope (31.2%-52.9%,P0.05)), followed by the net primary productivities in the middle at the top and middle of sunny slope and the valley floor (which were higher than that at the bottom of shady slope (15.5%-26.4%,P＞0.05), and it was the lowest at the bottom of shady slope; 5) The annual net carbon sequestration ((2.76±0.10)-(4.15±0.32)t/(ha·a)) also were highest at the bottom of the sunny slope and the top and middle of the shady slope (which were significantly higher than it at the bottom of the shady slope (27.9%-50.4%,P0.05), they were in the middle at the top and middle of sunny slope and the valley floor (which were higher than that at the bottom of shady slope (12.3%-23.9%,P＞0.05), and it was the lowest at the bottom of shady slope. Overall, this kind of natural secondary birch forest in Xiaoxing'an Mountains took on a relatively low carbon sink function because their carbon sequestration decreased (15.3%-43.7%)) compared to the average carbon sequestration of terrestrial vegetation in China. -
-
[1] MCCARTHY J J. Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability: contribution of Working Group Ⅱ to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[1] LI W H, ZHOU X F, LIU X T. Northeast forest and wetland conservation and forestry development strategy research[M].Beijing:Science Press, 2007.
[2] BATJES N. Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world[J]. European Journal of Soil Science,1996,47:151-163.
[2] LI J W. Korean pine mixed forest ecology and management[M].Harbin: The Northeast Forestry University Press, 1997.
[3] WANG P,WANG S L,WANG Q C,et al.Suitable site conditions for Betula platyphylla in Maoer shan Forest Heilongjiang Province[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2010, 38(10): 9-11.
[3] SIX J, CALLEWAERE P, GRYZE L S, et al. Measuring and understanding carbon storage in afforested soils by physical fractionation[J]. Soil Science Society America Journal,2002,66: 1981-1987.
[4] SHI Y C,SUN Z H. Comparison of growing progress of betula platyphylla in different natural habitats[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research,2010,30(4): 485-489.
[4] BROWN S, SATHAYE J, CANNELL M. Management of forest for mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
[5] GUO Y P,ZHANG L M. Study on the growth laws of Betula platyphylla Suk. secondary forest[J]. Hebei Journal of Forestry and Orchard Research, 2011, 26(3): 227-230.
[5] 李文华, 周晓峰, 刘兴土. 东北地区森林与湿地保育及林业发展战略研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2007. [6] 李景文. 红松混交林生态与经营[M]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学出版社, 1997. [6] SHI Z G. The growth dynamics of natural birch forest in southern part of the Daxing’anling Mountains[J]. Forest Resources Management, 2014(1): 62-66.
[7] CHAI Y X. The feature and management of natural birch forest[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2000, 28(5): 31-34.
[7] 王鹏, 王石磊, 王庆成, 等. 帽儿山实验林场白桦适生立地条件[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2010, 38(10): 9-11. [8] WANG C,GAO H Z. Birch forest biomass per plant research[J]. Forestry Science Technology, 2010, 35(1): 8-10.
[8] 史永纯, 孙志虎. 水分条件对白桦天然林生长影响的研究[J]. 植物研究,2010,30(4): 485-489. [9] 郭延朋, 张立民. 白桦天然次生林生长规律研究[J]. 河北林果研究, 2011, 26(3): 227-230. [9] SONG X L. Biomass and carbon storage of Betula platyphylla natural secondary forests in Mulan Forest Farm,Hebei Province of northern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(6): 33-36.
[10] YAN P. Study on carbon storage in four types of natural secondary forests of Maor Mountain Forest Farm[J]. Forest Resources Management, 2006(4): 61-65.
[10] 史忠阁. 大兴安岭南部天然白桦生长规律研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2014(1): 62-66. [11] 柴一新. 天然白桦林的特点与经营[J]. 东北林业大学学报,2000, 28(5): 31-34. [11] JIANG H Q,ZHANG H R. Above-ground carbon storage a llocations of main tree species in broad-leaved natural secondary forest of Changbai Mountains[J]. Forest Resources Management, 2009(5): 58-63.
[12] 王超, 高红真. 白桦林木单株生物量的研究[J]. 林业科技, 2010, 35(1): 8-10. [12] YANG J Y,WANG C K. Soil carbon storage and flux of temperate forest ecosystems in northeastern China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(11): 2875-2882.
[13] 宋熙龙. 木兰林管局白桦次生林生物量与碳储量研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2010, 32(6): 33-36. [13] ZHANG D X. Zhe influence of natural geographical condition of dialing area in Yichun City to the distribution of plant community[J]. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, 1983(2):229-236.
[14] WU J L,WANG M,LIN F, et al. Effects of precipitation and interspecific competition on Quercus mongolica and Pinus koraiensis seedlings growth[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2009, 20(2): 235-240.
[14] 闫平. 帽儿山林场4类天然次生林碳储量研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2006(4): 61-65. [15] 姜慧泉, 张会儒. 长白山阔叶次生林主要乔木地上碳储量分布[J]. 林业资源管理, 2009(5): 58-63. [15] MA L. Xiaoxing'anling birch natural forest ecosystem carbon storage research[D]. Harbin:Northeast Forestry University, 2012.
[16] ZHANG P. Study on forest carbon stoek in Beijing of China[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University,2009.
[16] 杨金艳, 王传宽. 东北东部森林生态系统土壤碳贮量和碳通量[J]. 生态学报, 2005, 25(11): 2875-2882. [17] JIAO Y,HU H Q. Carbon storage and its dynamics of forest vegetations in Heilongjiang Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005,16(12):2248-2252.
[17] 张迪祥. 伊春市带岭地区自然地理条件对植物群落分布的影响[J].武汉植物学研究,1983(2):229-236. [18] WANG C K. Biomass allometric equations for 10 co-occurring tree species in Chinese temperate forests[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006,222:9-16.
[18] LIU S R,WANG H,LUAN J W. A review of research progress and future prospective of forest soil carbon stock and soil carbon process in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(19): 5437-5448.
[19] TAKASHI OTODA. Influences of anthropogenic disturbances on the dynamics of white birch (Betula platyphylla) forests at the southern boundary of the Mongolian forest-steppe [J]. Journal of Forest Research,2013(18):82-92.
[19] WANG X C, QI G,YU D P, et al. Carbon storage,density,and distribution in forest ecosystems in Jilin Province of Northeast China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(8):2013-2020.
[20] ZHOU G S,ZHANG X S. Study on NPP of natural vegetation in China under global climate change[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica,1996,20(1) :11-19.
[20] MU C C,LU H C,WANG B,et al.Short-term effects of harvesting on carbon storage of boreal Larix gmelinii-Carex schmidtii forested wetlands in Daxing'anling,northeast China [J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2013,293(1) : 140-148.
[21] GIESE L A B,AUST W M,KOLKA R K,et al. Biomass and carbon pools of disturbed riparian forests[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2003,180(1/3): 493-508.
[21] MAO D H,WANG Z M,LUO L,et al. Dynamic changes of vegetation net primary productivity in permafrost zone of Northeast China in 1982—2009 in response to global change[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2012,23(6) : 1511-1519.
[22] 武静莲,王淼,蔺菲,等.降水变化和种间竞争对红松和蒙古栎幼苗生长的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2009, 20(2): 235-240. [22] HE H,PAN Y Z,ZHU W Q,et al. Measurement of terrestrial ecosystem service value in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2005,16(6) : 1122-1127.
[23] LI Y P,JI J J. Simulations of carbon exchange between global terrestrial ecosystem and the atmosphere[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,2001,56(4): 379-389.
[23] 马林.小兴安岭白桦天然林生态系统碳储量的研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学, 2012. [24] 张萍.北京森林碳储量研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2009. [25] 焦燕,胡海清. 黑龙江省森林植被碳储量及其动态变化[J].应用生态学报, 2005,16(12):2248-2252. [26] 刘世荣, 王晖, 栾军伟. 中国森林土壤碳储量与土壤碳过程研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(19): 5437-5448. [27] 王新闯, 齐光, 于大炮, 等. 吉林省森林生态系统的碳储量、碳密度及其分布[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(8):2013-2020. [28] ZHANG X Z. Estimating and distribution of the vegetation net primary productivity in China[J].Resources Science,1993,1: 15-21.
[29] 周广胜,张新时.全球气候变化的中国自然植被的净第一性生产力研究[J].植物生态学报,1996,20(1):11-19. [30] 毛德华,王字明,罗玲,等.1982—2009年东北多年冻土区植被净初级生产力动态及其对全球变化的响应[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(6):1511-1519. [31] 何浩,潘耀忠,朱文泉,等. 中国陆地生态系统服务价值测量[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(6):1122-1127. [32] 李银鹏,季劲钧.全球陆地生态系统与大气之间碳交换的模拟研究[J].地理学报,2001,56(4):379-389. -
期刊类型引用(12)
1. 杨文卓，杨琳瑄，王远，陈辉，苏锦，刘燕. 水利工程生态产品价值核算体系研究——以福建山美水库为例. 海峡科学. 2024(06): 84-91 . 
百度学术
2. 任万杰，司振江，李铁男，郭微微，杨阿龙. 水生态产品价值核算研究综述. 黑龙江水利科技. 2024(09): 34-39 . 百度学术
3. 陈默，林育青，张建云，陈求稳，李沁园. 水生态系统生产总值核算体系及应用. 水资源保护. 2023(01): 234-242 . 百度学术
4. 张先起，路晓斌. 南水北调中线工程沿线水库生态系统服务价值演变解析. 海河水利. 2023(01): 43-47+54 . 百度学术
5. 张然. 河流生态系统文化服务研究现状及发展建议. 环境与发展. 2023(02): 32-38+56 . 百度学术
6. 张宪宇，郄晗彤，杨文杰. 基于模糊综合评价法的北京永定河水源地生态脆弱性评价. 环境保护科学. 2021(03): 159-163 . 百度学术
7. 孟翠婷，郎琪，雷坤，程全国，李秀. 永定河京津冀段底栖动物群落结构特征及水生态健康评价. 沈阳大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(04): 307-313 . 百度学术
8. 昝欣，张玉玲，贾晓宇，熊广森. 永定河上游流域水生态系统服务价值评估. 自然资源学报. 2020(06): 1326-1337 . 百度学术
9. 熊文，孙晓玉，彭开达，黄羽. 汉江下游平原典型区域水生态系统服务价值评价. 人民长江. 2020(08): 71-77 . 百度学术
10. 刘璐，刘志成，杨瑞莹，张任菲，李豪，许晓明. 永定河干涸段(卢梁段)河流廊道植物群落数量分类及多样性特征. 生态学报. 2020(24): 9129-9137 . 百度学术
11. 万超，王迎春，李雨璇，吕斐，孙美. 永定河综合治理市场化运作模式探讨. 北京水务. 2018(03): 50-52 . 百度学术
12. 慕林青，张海萍，赵树旗，刘培斌，高晓薇，李玉臣，渠晓东. 永定河底栖动物生物完整性指数构建与健康评价. 环境科学研究. 2018(04): 697-707 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(13)
计量
- 文章访问数: 1994
- HTML全文浏览量: 148
- PDF下载量: 65
- 被引次数: 25
下载:
