高级检索
    王义平, 郭瑞1, 张真. 4种国产引诱剂对松墨天牛诱捕效果的比较分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2012, 34(3): 142-144.
    引用本文: 王义平, 郭瑞1, 张真. 4种国产引诱剂对松墨天牛诱捕效果的比较分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2012, 34(3): 142-144.
    WANG Yi-ping, GUO Rui, ZHANG Zhen. Comparison and analysis on attracting effects of four kinds of Chinese trapping attractants on Monochamus alternatus.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2012, 34(3): 142-144.
    Citation: WANG Yi-ping, GUO Rui, ZHANG Zhen. Comparison and analysis on attracting effects of four kinds of Chinese trapping attractants on Monochamus alternatus.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2012, 34(3): 142-144.

    4种国产引诱剂对松墨天牛诱捕效果的比较分析

    Comparison and analysis on attracting effects of four kinds of Chinese trapping attractants on Monochamus alternatus.

    • 摘要: 在固定的剂量下和相同的时间段内,对国产4种引诱剂在浙江富阳林间对松墨天牛成虫进行了诱捕试验。结果表明,4种引诱剂对松墨天牛都有一定的引诱效果。其中,浙江产的ZGHC-M-99和上海产的HYP-SH引诱剂的引诱效果显著高于福建产的FJ-Ma-05引诱剂,但与广东产的A-3引诱剂差异不大。基于所诱捕到的松墨天牛成虫个体数,4种引诱剂的诱捕效果由强到弱依次是ZGHC-M-99引诱剂、HYP-SH引诱剂、A-3引诱剂、FJ-Ma-05引诱剂。诱捕结果分析表明,4种引诱剂的引诱效果具有一定的地理差异性。

       

      Abstract: Using identically timed and defined doses, four kinds of attractants, ZGHC-M-99, HYP-SH, A-3, and FJ-Ma-05, which were made in China, were used for baiting Monochamus alternatus in the fields of Fuyang in Zhejiang Province, eastern China. The results indicated that the four test attractants had a certain ability to trap M. alternatus, among which, ZGHC-M-99 and HYP-SH had a comparatively stronger effect than FJ-Ma-05. Compared with A-3, ZGHC-M-99 and HYP-SH did not display distinct difference on attraction effect on M. alternatus. Based on the number of adult M. alternatus captured by attractants, ZGHC-M-99 had the highest efficiency, followed by HYP-SH, A-3, and FJ-Ma-05, respectively. The chemical attractants seem to have different efficacies in different geographical areas.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回