高级检索
    孔雷, 万铭萱, 吴落军, 纪志芳, 宋祥源, 丁志, 杨金江, 何冰, 石光. 基于拉绳传感器的单株立木树高提取方法[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2023, 45(4): 156-164. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210483
    引用本文: 孔雷, 万铭萱, 吴落军, 纪志芳, 宋祥源, 丁志, 杨金江, 何冰, 石光. 基于拉绳传感器的单株立木树高提取方法[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2023, 45(4): 156-164. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210483
    Kong Lei, Wan Mingxuan, Wu Luojun, Ji Zhifang, Song Xiangyuan, Ding Zhi, Yang Jinjiang, He Bing, Shi Guang. A method for extracting the height of a single tree based on the draw-wire sensor[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(4): 156-164. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210483
    Citation: Kong Lei, Wan Mingxuan, Wu Luojun, Ji Zhifang, Song Xiangyuan, Ding Zhi, Yang Jinjiang, He Bing, Shi Guang. A method for extracting the height of a single tree based on the draw-wire sensor[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(4): 156-164. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210483

    基于拉绳传感器的单株立木树高提取方法

    A method for extracting the height of a single tree based on the draw-wire sensor

    • 摘要:
        目的  开发一种伸缩式测高仪,以解决基于三角函数原理设计的测高仪器测量落点范围受限的问题,以及实现垂直生长和倾斜生长立木树高精确测量。
        方法  基于拉绳传感器测高原理,以光电编码器、无刷直流电机、卷盘和钢绳为主要结构,研发了伸缩式测高仪。以皮尺为测量伐倒木树高为真值,利用伸缩式测高仪、布鲁莱斯测高器和森林罗盘仪,分别测量了20株垂直生长样木和11株倾斜生长样木树高精度结果,比较各仪器测高的准确度、方差和t检验结果;用4种仪器分别连续6次测量8号样木(垂直生长样木)和26号样木树高(倾斜生长样木),比较各仪器测高的精密度。
        结果  结果显示:伸缩式测高仪测量垂直生长林木树高和倾斜生长林木树高的精准度分别为0.034和0.028 m,方差分别为5.60和9.94,精密度分别为0.028和0.015 m。布鲁莱斯测高器测量垂直生长林木树高和倾斜生长林木树高的精准度分别为0.154和0.267 m,方差分别为5.76和10.00,精密度分别为0.150和0.125 m。森林罗盘仪测量垂直生长林木树高和倾斜生长林木树高的精准度分别为0.059和0.183 m,方差分别为5.66和10.02,精密度分别为0.056和0.066 m。
        结论  伸缩式测高仪各项测量精度结果要优于布鲁莱斯测高器和森林罗盘仪,不仅解决外业调查与内业录入脱节的问题,还能够有效满足国家森林资源连续清查和森林资源规划设计调查等项目对立木测高的要求。

       

      Abstract:
        Objective  A scalable altimeter was developed to solve the limited landing range of measuring tree height based on trigonometric function and to realize accuracy measurement of vertical and inclined growth tree height.
        Method  Based on the principle of draw-wire sensor measuring tree height, the scalable altimeter was developed, of which main structure contained optical electricity encoder, brushless DC motor, coil and rope. The tree height measured by linen tape was taken as true value. A total of 20 vertical growth trees and 11 inclined growth trees were measured by scalable altimeter, Blume-Leiss altimeter and forest compass to compare the measurement precision, variance and t result, respectively. We measured the height of sample wood No. 8 (vertically growing sample wood) and sample wood No. 26 (obliquely growing sample wood) six consecutive times using four instruments, and compared the precision of height measurement by various instruments.
        Result  The accuracy of the scalable altimeter in measuring the height of vertically growing trees and obliquely growing trees was 0.034 and 0.028 m, respectively, with variances of 5.60 and 9.94, and precision of 0.028 and 0.015 m, respectively. The accuracy of measuring the height of vertically growing trees and obliquely growing trees using the Blume-Leiss altimeter was 0.154 and 0.267 m, respectively, with variances of 5.76 and 10.00, and precision of 0.150 and 0.125 m, respectively. The accuracy of measuring the height of vertically growing trees and obliquely growing trees with a forest compass was 0.059 and 0.183 m, respectively, with variances of 5.66 and 10.02, and precision of 0.056 and 0.066 m, respectively.
        Conclusion  The measurement accuracy results of scalable altimeter are superior to those of Blume-Leiss altimeter and forest compass. It not only solves the problem of disconnection between field surveys and indoor input, but also effectively meets the requirements of national forest resource continuous inventory and forest resource planning and design surveys for measuring the height of opposing trees.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回