高级检索
    朱兆廷, 孙玉军, 梁瑞婷, 马佳欣, 李佳怡. 基于树冠和竞争因子的杉木胸径估测[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2023, 45(9): 42-51. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230011
    引用本文: 朱兆廷, 孙玉军, 梁瑞婷, 马佳欣, 李佳怡. 基于树冠和竞争因子的杉木胸径估测[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2023, 45(9): 42-51. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230011
    Zhu Zhaoting, Sun Yujun, Liang Ruiting, Ma Jiaxin, Li Jiayi. Estimating DBH of Cunninghamia lanceolata based on crown and competition factors[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(9): 42-51. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230011
    Citation: Zhu Zhaoting, Sun Yujun, Liang Ruiting, Ma Jiaxin, Li Jiayi. Estimating DBH of Cunninghamia lanceolata based on crown and competition factors[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(9): 42-51. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230011

    基于树冠和竞争因子的杉木胸径估测

    Estimating DBH of Cunninghamia lanceolata based on crown and competition factors

    • 摘要:
        目的  无人机遥感的迅速发展为胸径预估提供了新方向,本研究适用于通过无人机遥感技术提取样地单木树冠因子后,估算胸径及林分每公顷断面积等指标,实现精准高效的森林资源监测与管理。
        方法  根据福建省将乐国有林场33块杉木人工林地面调查数据,利用10种传统模型与2种机器学习方法分别对单木胸径进行估测,并基于不同的自变量组合形式来分析不同因子对胸径估测的影响。
        结果  根据传统模型参数拟合结果可以看出,树冠半径与胸径呈显著正相关,林分密度、偏冠因子及竞争指数与胸径均呈显著负相关。传统模型建模过程中所引入最优竞争指数为树冠重叠内角相关的CI2,模型逻辑斯蒂模型拟合结果最优,幂函数(有截距)模型次之。而在使用检验数据进行估测时,幂函数(有截距)有着最好的估测效果。随机森林模型均具有较好的拟合效果,使用检验数据进行估测,不同竞争指数对模型拟合提升程度不同,与树冠重叠面积相关的竞争指数CI3取得了最好的效果。支持向量回归模型拟合优度小于随机森林,略大于传统模型。对胸径进行估测时,包含与竞争木大小相关的竞争指数CI4的模型为最优模型。
        结论  传统模型和机器学习模型在拟合与估测单木胸径上均取得了一定的效果,利用机器学习模型效果更优。在模型的不同自变量组合中,加入有关树冠的竞争指数能使模型预测精度提高,决定系数R2增加,EMAERMSAIC减小。传统模型的最优竞争指数为重叠内角相关的竞争指数CI2,在机器学习方法中与对象木和竞争木大小相关的竞争指数CI3和CI4也取得了较好的效果。此外,偏冠指数对于胸径估测的提升效果仍需进一步验证。

       

      Abstract:
        Objective  The rapid development of unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing has provided a new direction for diameter at breast height (DBH) prediction. This study was suitable for extracting individual tree crown factors from sample plots through unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing technology, estimating indicators such as DBH and stand basal area per hectare, and achieving accurate and efficient forest resource monitoring and management.
        Method  Based on the ground survey data of 33 Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations in Jiangle National Forest Farm, Fujian Province of eastern China, ten traditional models and two machine learning methods were used to estimate the individual DBH. Based on different combinations of independent variables, the impact of different factors on the estimation of DBH was analyzed.
        Result  According to the fitting results of traditional model parameters, it can be seen that the crown radius was significantly positively correlated with DBH, while the stand density, crown deviation factor, and competition index were all significantly negatively correlated with DBH. The optimal competition index introduced in the traditional model modeling process was CI2, which was related to the overlapping internal angles of tree crowns, and the fitting result of model power logistic model was the best, followed by the power function model (with intercept). The power function model (with intercept) had the best estimation effect when using test data for estimation. RF models all had high fitting effect. Using test data to estimate, different competition indices had varying degrees of improvement in model fitting, and the competition index CI3, which was related to the overlapping area of tree crowns, achieving the best effect. The goodness of fit of SVR model was less than that of random forest and slightly greater than traditional model. When estimating the DBH, the model containing competition index CI4 related to the size of competing trees was the optimal model.
        Conclusion  Both traditional models and machine learning models have achieved certain results in fitting and estimating the DBH of individual trees, and the use of RF models is more effective. Adding competition indices related to tree crowns to different combinations of independent variables in the model can improve the prediction accuracy, increase the R2 and reduce EMA, ERMS, and AIC. The optimal competition index introduced for different models is the competition index CI2 related to overlapping internal angles, and in the machine learning methods, the competition indexes CI3 and CI4 related to the size of target trees and competing trees also achieve good results. The improvement effect of CAI on DBH estimation still needs further verification.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回