高级检索
    孙莉茹, 毕华兴, 马志瑾, 赵丹阳, 王宁, 刘泽晖, 王鑫. 1951—2020年黄河上中游径流变化特征及归因分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2024, 46(1): 82-92. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230077
    引用本文: 孙莉茹, 毕华兴, 马志瑾, 赵丹阳, 王宁, 刘泽晖, 王鑫. 1951—2020年黄河上中游径流变化特征及归因分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2024, 46(1): 82-92. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230077
    Sun Liru, Bi Huaxing, Ma Zhijin, Zhao Danyang, Wang Ning, Liu Zehui, Wang Xin. Runoff variation characteristics and attribution analysis of the upper and middle reaches of the Yellow River from 1951 to 2020[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(1): 82-92. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230077
    Citation: Sun Liru, Bi Huaxing, Ma Zhijin, Zhao Danyang, Wang Ning, Liu Zehui, Wang Xin. Runoff variation characteristics and attribution analysis of the upper and middle reaches of the Yellow River from 1951 to 2020[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(1): 82-92. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230077

    1951—2020年黄河上中游径流变化特征及归因分析

    Runoff variation characteristics and attribution analysis of the upper and middle reaches of the Yellow River from 1951 to 2020

    • 摘要:
      目的 河川径流是地表重要的水资源,对其变化特征和原因进行解析,是流域水资源科学管理规划的前提。
      方法 本文采用Mann-Kendall趋势检验、Pettitt突变检验、Budyko弹性系数法等方法分析了黄河上游和中游近70年(1951—2020年)径流变化的趋势和成因。
      结果 (1)1951—2020年黄河上游年降水量呈不显著增加趋势(4.04 mm/(10 a),P > 0.05),中游呈不显著减少趋势(4.90 mm/(10 a),P > 0.05);上游、中游年潜在蒸散发均呈不显著增加趋势(1.77、2.23 mm/(10 a),P > 0.05);(2)黄河上游和中游1980—2020年土地利用/覆盖变化明显,主要表现在林草面积的增加,上游、中游年NDVI分别以0.025/(10 a)、0.042/(10 a)的速率显著增加(P < 0.01);(3)1951—2020年,上游和中游年径流量分别以3.46、7.46 mm/(10 a)的速率显著减少(P < 0.01),并分别在1986年、1990年发生突变;(4)上游和中游径流对降水变化最为敏感,其次是土地利用/覆盖变化、潜在蒸散发变化,且径流对各影响因子的敏感性逐年增强,即气候和土地利用/覆盖的变化将更容易引起径流的变化;(5)土地利用/覆盖变化是导致黄河上游和中游径流减少的主要原因,其次是降水和潜在蒸散,但各影响因子对径流变化的影响性质和程度在上游和中游不同区间存在一定的差异。其中,上游地区降水、潜在蒸散发、土地利用/覆盖变化对径流的影响性质和程度分别为−14.04%、1.30%、112.73%;中游地区分别为21.54%、3.63%、74.83%。
      结论 1951—2020年黄河上游和中游径流变化是气候变化和土地利用/覆盖变化共同作用的结果,但主要影响因素为人类活动主导的土地利用/覆盖变化,且各因子对径流的影响在不同区间存在一定的差异。本研究结果可为黄河上游和中游不同区间的水资源管理和综合治理提供理论支持。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective River runoff is an important water resource on the surface of the earth, and the analysis of the characteristics and causes of its change is a prerequisite for the scientific management and planning of water resources in the basin.
      Method This study used Mann-Kendall trend test, Pettitt mutation test, Budyko elasticity coefficient method and other methods to analyze trends and causes of runoff variation in the upper and middle reaches of the Yellow River in recent 70 years (1951−2020).
      Result (1) From 1951 to 2020, the annual precipitation in the upper reaches of the Yellow River increased 4.04 mm/(10 year) (P > 0.05) and decrease 4.90 mm/(10 year) (P > 0.05) in the middle reaches of the Yellow River. The potential evapotranspiration in the upper and middle reaches showed no significant increase trend (1.77 mm/(10 year), 2.23 mm/(10 year), P > 0.05). (2) From 1980 to 2020, the changes of landuse/cover in the upper and middle reaches of the Yellow River are obvious, mainly in the increase of forest and grass area, and the NDVI in the upper and middle reaches of the Yellow River increased significantly at the rates of 0.025/(10 year) (P < 0.01) and 0.042/(10 year) (P < 0.01), respectively. (3) From 1951 to 2020, the runoff of upper and middle reaches decreased at the rate of 3.46 mm/(10 year) (P < 0.01) and 7.46 mm/(10 year) (P < 0.01), respectively, and changed abruptly in 1986 and 1990, respectively. (4) Runoff in the upper and middle reaches is most sensitive to precipitation change, followed by land use/cover change and potential evapotranspiration change, and the sensitivity of runoff to each influencing factor increased year by year, which showed that the change of climate and land use will easily cause runoff change. (5) Land use/cover change was the main cause of runoff decrease in the upper and middle reaches of the Yellow River, followed by precipitation and potential evapotranspiration, but there were some differences in the nature and degree of influencing factors on runoff change in different regions of the upper and middle reaches. Among them, the nature and degree of influence of precipitation, potential evapotranspiration, and land use/cover change on runoff in the upstream area were −14.04%, 1.30%, and 112.73%, respectively; the midstream area was 21.54%, 3.63%, and 74.83%, respectively.
      Conclusion The runoff change in the upper and middle reaches of the Yellow River from 1951 to 2020 is the result of climate change and land use/cover change, but the main influencing factor is land use/cover change dominated by human activities, and the influence of each factor on runoff is different in varied intervals. The results of this study can provide theoretical support for water resource management and comprehensive control in different sections of the upper and middle reaches of the Yellow River.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回