高级检索
    卢梦, 王鹤松, 荀雪. 阿勒泰地区生境质量的时空演变及其驱动因素[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2024, 46(3): 27-39. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230189
    引用本文: 卢梦, 王鹤松, 荀雪. 阿勒泰地区生境质量的时空演变及其驱动因素[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2024, 46(3): 27-39. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230189
    Lu Meng, Wang Hesong, Xun Xue. Spatial-temporal evolution of habitat quality in Altay area and its driving factors[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(3): 27-39. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230189
    Citation: Lu Meng, Wang Hesong, Xun Xue. Spatial-temporal evolution of habitat quality in Altay area and its driving factors[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(3): 27-39. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230189

    阿勒泰地区生境质量的时空演变及其驱动因素

    Spatial-temporal evolution of habitat quality in Altay area and its driving factors

    • 摘要:
      目的 揭示阿勒泰地区生境质量时空变化特征及其驱动机制,为当地生态环境保护和可持续发展提供科学支撑。
      方法 基于1990—2021年逐年土地利用数据,运用ArcGIS和 InVEST模型定量分析了阿勒泰地区土地利用和生境质量的时空变化特征,并探究生境质量指数的驱动因子。
      结果 (1)阿勒泰地区土地利用类型以裸地和草地为主,主要分布于中部和南部,森林主要分布在研究区西北部,1990—2021年土地利用类型发生较大的变化,主要表现为裸地和草地之间的相互转化以及二者转化为耕地、森林和建筑用地,其间草地面积大幅度下降,而耕地、森林、建筑用地面积有较大上升。(2)空间格局上,阿勒泰地区的生境质量呈现出西北和北部地区高、南部地区低的空间特征,生境质量高值区主要分布在西北部森林、草地以及水体区域,低值区主要分布在南部裸地区域。同时,1990—2021年间生境质量平均值由0.513降至0.508。(3)土地利用程度和潜在蒸散发是驱动阿勒泰地区生境质量的两个主要因子,二者均与生境质量呈现显著负相关关系,年均温及年降水量与生境质量的相关性则较弱。
      结论 阿勒泰地区生境质量整体呈轻度下降趋势,且与土地利用程度显著相关。未来应继续推进林草生态治理,优化土地利用结构。研究结果有助于增进对当地生境质量长时间序列动态变化过程的理解,可为阿勒泰地区以及其他西北干旱区的生态建设和产业发展评估提供决策支持。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective The objective of this study was to reveal the spatial-temporal evolution and driving factors of habitat quality in Altay area, and to provide scientific supports for ecological environment protection and sustainable development.
      Method Using a year-by-year land-use dataset ranging from 1990 to 2021, ArcGIS and InVEST models were employed to evaluate the habitat quality, and explore the driving factors of habitat quality index.
      Result (1) Bare land and grassland were dominant land-use types, mainly distributed in the central and southern areas. While forests were mainly distributed in the northern part of the study area. From 1990 to 2021, there was a significant change in land-use types, mainly occurred between bare land and grassland, both of them were transferred to cropland, forests and build-up areas. The area of grassland decreased significantly, while the areas of cropland, forest, and build-up areas increased significantly. (2) In terms of spatial pattern, the habitat quality in Altay area was high in the northwest and the north region, and low in the southeast and the south region. The areas with high habitat quality were mainly distributed in the forest and waters areas of the northwestern part, and the low value areas were mainly distributed in the bare land of the southern part. The average value of habitat quality index for the Altay area decreased from 0.513 to 0.508 in 1990 to 2021. (3) The degree of land use and potential evapotranspiration were the two main driving factors that had the highest impact on habitat quality in the study area, both of them showed significant negative correlations with habitat quality. Both of annual temperature and annual precipitation had weak correlations with habitat quality.
      Conclusion The habitat quality of Altay area generally showed a slight decreasing trend and was significantly correlated with the degree of land use. In future, ecological governance on forest and grassland should be enhanced and the structure of land use should also be optimized. The results will be benefit to enhance the understanding of the long-term dynamic changes in habitat quality, and to provide decision-making support for ecological construction and industrial development evaluation in the Altay area and other arid areas in Northwest China.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回