高级检索
    孔静, 吕文华, 徐诗雨, 杨志一. 木材压缩吸能特性的尺寸与形状效应[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2023, 45(11): 152-160. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230252
    引用本文: 孔静, 吕文华, 徐诗雨, 杨志一. 木材压缩吸能特性的尺寸与形状效应[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2023, 45(11): 152-160. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230252
    Kong Jing, Lü Wenhua, Xu Shiyu, Yang Zhiyi. Size and shape effects of wood compression energy absorption characteristics[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(11): 152-160. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230252
    Citation: Kong Jing, Lü Wenhua, Xu Shiyu, Yang Zhiyi. Size and shape effects of wood compression energy absorption characteristics[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(11): 152-160. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230252

    木材压缩吸能特性的尺寸与形状效应

    Size and shape effects of wood compression energy absorption characteristics

    • 摘要:
      目的 解析试样尺寸和形状对木材压缩吸能特性的影响,指导木材压缩吸能特性的科学测试和评价。
      方法 通过准静态大变形压缩试验,分别考察了毛白杨、杉木、泡桐和轻木4种木材,在不同截面尺寸(20 mm × 20 mm、50 mm × 50 mm)、不同截面形状(圆形Φ 20 mm、方形20 mm × 20 mm)下的压缩力学响应和吸能特性,并通过t检验分析其差异显著性。
      结果 (1)木材“三段式”压缩应力–应变曲线不受试样尺寸和形状影响。(2)木材顺纹压缩破坏强度尺寸效应显著,强度随试样尺寸增大而减小,泡桐和轻木的顺纹压缩强度由小尺寸试样的30.94和14.56 MPa,分别减小至大尺寸试样的26.06和13.37 MPa,尺寸效应系数分别为0.84和0.92;木材横纹压缩强度、顺纹和横纹的破坏特征与吸能特性无明显尺寸效应。(3)木材顺纹压缩强度形状效应显著,圆形试样强度低于方形试样,形状效应系数为0.88 ~ 0.93;木材压缩破坏特征和吸能特性的形状效应与树种特性相关,杉木、泡桐和轻木的破坏模式以及吸能特性均不受形状影响;毛白杨吸能性能形状效应显著,圆形试样吸能性能优于方形试样。(4)木材密度越大,其尺寸和形状效应越明显。
      结论 低密度轻软木材的吸能特性无尺寸和形状效应,建议采用取材易、加工简便、耗材少、成本低的小尺寸方形试样进行压缩吸能测评。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective The research aimed to investigate the influence of specimen size and shape on wood compression energy absorption characteristics and guide the scientific test and evaluation of wood compression energy absorption properties.
      Method Through a quasi-static large deformation compression test, the compressive response and energy absorption characteristics of Populus tomentosa, Chinese fir, paulownia and balsa wood under the different cross-sectional dimensions (20 mm × 20 mm, 50 mm × 50 mm), different cross-sectional shapes (20 mm round and 20 mm × 20 mm square) were investigated, and analyzed by t-test.
      Result (1) The stress-strain curve of wood under compression was unaffected by specimen size and shape, following a “three-stage” pattern. (2) The size effect of wood compressive crushing strength along grain was significant, and the crushing strength decreased with the increase of specimen size. The crushing strength along the grain of paulownia and balsa wood decreased from 30.94 and 14.56 MPa for small-sized specimens to 26.06 and 13.37 MPa for large-sized specimens, and the size effect coefficients were 0.84 and 0.92, respectively. The transverse compressive strength, the failure mode and compressive energy absorption performance of wood along grain and cross grain were all not affected by specimen size. (3) The compressive crushing strength along the grain of wood had a significant shape effect. The compressive strength of four kinds wood along the grain of round specimens was smaller than that of square specimens, and the shape effect coefficient ranged from 0.88 to 0.93. The specimen shape effect of wood compression failure mode and energy absorption performance was related to tree species characteristics. The failure mode and energy absorption performance of Chinese fir, paulownia and balsa wood were not influenced by the specimen shape. The energy absorption performance of the round specimens of Populus tomentosa wood was significantly greater than those of the square specimens, which had an obvious shape effect. (4) The compressive strength of wood increased with an increase in wood density and compressive strength, with a more apparent size and shape effect.
      Conclusion The energy absorption characteristics of low-density wood have no size and shape effects, so it is recommended to use small-size square specimens with easy sampling, simple processing, fewer consumables and low cost for compression energy absorption evaluation.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回