高级检索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

改变凋落物输入对喀斯特森林主要演替群落土壤呼吸的影响

吴鹏,  崔迎春,  赵文君,  舒德远,  杨文斌,  丁访军

downloadPDF
文章导航 > 北京林业大学学报  > 2015 >  37(9): 17-27
吴鹏, 崔迎春, 赵文君, 舒德远, 杨文斌, 丁访军. 改变凋落物输入对喀斯特森林主要演替群落土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2015, 37(9): 17-27. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150052
引用本文: 吴鹏, 崔迎春, 赵文君, 舒德远, 杨文斌, 丁访军. 改变凋落物输入对喀斯特森林主要演替群落土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2015, 37(9): 17-27. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150052
shu
WU Peng, CUI Ying-chun, ZHAO Wen-jun, SHU De-yuan, YANG Wen-bin, DING Fang-jun. Effects of litter exclusion and addition on soil respiration of major forest communities at two successional stages in Maolan karst forest of southwestern China.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(9): 17-27. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150052
Citation: WU Peng, CUI Ying-chun, ZHAO Wen-jun, SHU De-yuan, YANG Wen-bin, DING Fang-jun. Effects of litter exclusion and addition on soil respiration of major forest communities at two successional stages in Maolan karst forest of southwestern China.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(9): 17-27. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150052
shu

改变凋落物输入对喀斯特森林主要演替群落土壤呼吸的影响

doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150052
  • 1.

    1 中国林业科学研究院荒漠化研究所;

  • 2.

    2 贵州省林业科学研究院

基金项目: 

贵州省高层次人才科研条件特助经费项目(TZJF-2011-14)、贵州省科技厅基金项目(黔科合J字[2010]2054)、贵州省科技厅社会发展科技攻关计划项目(黔科合SY字[2014]3039号)。

详细信息
    作者简介:

    吴鹏,博士生,副研究员。主要研究方向:喀斯特森林生态系统定位观测。Email:zuishaoxu@163.com 地址:550005贵州省贵阳市富源南路382号贵州省林业科学研究院。

    通讯作者:

    丁访军,博士,研究员。主要研究方向:森林生态。Email:ding3920034@163.com 地址:同上。

Effects of litter exclusion and addition on soil respiration of major forest communities at two successional stages in Maolan karst forest of southwestern China.

  • 1.

    1 Institute of Desertification Studies, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, 100091, P. R. China;

  • 2.

    2 Guizhou Academy of Forestry, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550005, P. R. China.

  • 摘要: 以贵州茂兰国家级自然保护区内的喀斯特原生乔木林和次生林为研究对象,利用LI-Cor-6400-09(土壤呼吸叶室)连接LI-6400便携式CO2/H2O分析系统,通过改变凋落物输入,研究了2种群落类型添加和去除凋落物对其土壤呼吸速率以及5 cm深度土壤温度的影响。结果表明:改变凋落物输入对2种群落类型5 cm深度土壤温度产生的差异不显著(P0.05),但均表现为:添加凋落物对照去除凋落物。喀斯特原生乔木林和次生林添加凋落物的年均土壤呼吸速率分别为2.98和3.31 mol/(m2s),分别比对照的年均增加了32.21%和26.20%;去除凋落物的年均土壤呼吸速率分别为2.07和2.14 mol/(m2s),比对照的年均分别降低了17.41%和22.36%;可见,凋落物是影响森林CO2通量的一个重要因子。不同凋落物处理下2种群落类型的土壤呼吸速率与其5 cm深度土壤温度均呈显著的指数相关关系(P0.001),能解释土壤呼吸速率变化的85%以上(R2在0.877 0～0.957 7之间)。原生乔木林和次生林添加、去除凋落物和对照的土壤呼吸的温度敏感系数Q10值分别为2.97、3.89、3.82和2.74、3.29、2.87,均表现为去除凋落物对照添加凋落物。
    Abstract: With communities at two successional stages, i.e., primary forest (PF) and secondary forest (SF), in karst region of Maolan National Nature Reserve as the research object, and using the portable system of infrared gas exchange analyzer (LI-Cor-6400-09), we studied the effect of litter exclusion and addition on soil respiration rate and soil temperature at the depth of 5 cm by changing the litter input. The results showed that there was no significant difference in soil temperature (P0.05) between two successional stages when changing the litter input, both following the order of litter additioncontrollitter exclusion. In the litter addition experiment, the annual soil respiration rate was 2.98 mol/(m2s) in PF and 3.31 mol/(m2s) in SF, which was 32.21% and 26.20% higher than that of control. In the litter exclusion treatment, the annual soil respiration rate was 2.07 mol/(m2s)in PF and 2.14 mol/(m2s) in SF, which was 17.41% and 22.36% lower than control, respectively. The results demonstrated that forest litter was an important factor affecting forest CO2 flux. At both successional stages, there was a significantly exponential correlation between soil respiration rate and soil temperature at 5 cm depth (P0.001), which could explain more than 85% of variation in soil respiration rate (R2 ranged from 0.877 0-0.957 7). The temperature sensitivity coefficient of soil respiration Q10 of litter exclusion, litter addition and control treatment were 2.97, 3.89, 3.82 in PF and 2.74, 3.29, 2.87 in SF, respectively, and they all presented the order of litter exclusioncontrollitter addition.
  • [1] LIU S R, WANG H, LUAN J W. A review of research progress and future prospective of forest soil carbon stock and soil carbon process in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(19): 5437-5448.
    [2] 刘世荣, 王晖, 栾军伟. 中国森林土壤碳储量与土壤碳过程研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(19): 5437-5448.
    [3] RAICH J W, SCHIESINGER W H. The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate[J]. Tellus B, 1992, 44(2): 81-99.
    [4] LUNDEGARDH H. Carbon dioxide evolution of soil and crop growth[J]. Soil Science, 1927, 23(6): 417-453.
    [5] WOODWELL G M, WHITTAKER R H, REINERS W A,et al. The biota and world carbon budget[J]. Science, 1978, 199(4325): 141-146.
    [6] SEDJO R A. The carbon cycle and global forest ecosystem[J]. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 1993, 70(1): 295-307.
    [7] POST W M, EMANUEL W R, ZINKE P J,et al. Soil pool and world life zones[J]. Nature, 1982, 298(5870): 156-159.
    [8] DIXON R K, SOLMON A M, BROWN S,et al. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems[J]. Science, 1994, 263(5144): 185-190.
    [9] LAL R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security[J]. Science, 2004, 304(5677): 1623-1627.
    [10] 刘绍辉, 方精云. 土壤呼吸的影响因素及全球尺度下温度的影响[J]. 生态学报, 1997, 17(5): 469-476.
    [11] LIU S H, FANG J Y. Effect factors of soil respiration and the temperatures effects on soil respiration in the global scale[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1997, 17(5): 469-476.
    [12] SINGH J S, GUPTA S R. Plant decomposition and soil respiration in terrestrial ecosystems[J]. The Botanical Review, 1997, 44(4): 449-528.
    [13] 胡进耀, 吴庆贵, 杨冬生, 等. 巴山水青冈林生态系统土壤呼吸作用及与温度的关系[J]. 水土保持学报, 2009, 23(2): 244-248.
    [14] HU J Y, WU Q G, YANG D S,et al. Soil respiration in Fagus pashanica forest ecosystems and the relationships between soil respiration and temperature[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 23(2): 244-248.
    [15] 吴鹏, 崔迎春, 杨婷, 等. 茂兰喀斯特森林主要演替群落土壤呼吸研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2013, 37(4): 57-62.
    [16] WU P, CUI Y C, YANG T,et al. Soil respiration of major successional communities in the Maolan Nature Reserve of karst areas[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2013, 37(4): 57-62.
    [17] 蔡艳, 丁维新, 蔡祖聪. 土壤-玉米系统中土壤呼吸强度及各组分贡献[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(12): 4273-4280.
    [18] CAI Y, DING W X, CAI Z C. Soil respiration in a maize-soil ecosystem and contribution of rhizosphere respiration[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(12): 4273-4280.
    [19] RAICH J W, POTTER C S. Global patterns of carbon dioxide emissions from soils[J]. Global Biochemical Cycles, 1995, 9(1): 23-36.
    [20] SCHLESINGER W H, ANDREWS J A. Soil respiration and the global carbon cycle[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2000, 48(1): 7-20.
    [21] 杨兰芳, 蔡祖聪. 不同生长期盆栽大豆的土壤呼吸昼夜变化及其影响因子[J]. 生态学报, 2004, 24(12): 2955-2960.
    [22] YANG L F, CAI Z C. Diurnal variation of soil respiration in soil-potted with soybean (Glycine max L.) at various growth stages and its affecting factors[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2004, 24(12): 2955-2960.
    [23] DAVIDSON E A, JANSSENS I A. Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change[J]. Nature, 2006, 440(7081): 165-173.
    [24] 赵娜, 孟平, 张劲松, 等. 华北低丘山地不同土地利用条件下的土壤呼吸比较[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(2): 1-7.
    [25] ZHAO N, MENG P, ZHANG J S,et al. Comparison of soil respiration under various land uses in hilly area of Northern China[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(2): 1-7.
    [26] 张超, 闫文德, 郑威, 等. 凋落物对樟树和马尾松混交林土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2013, 28(3): 22-27.
    [27] ZHANG C, YAN W D, ZHENG W,et al. Influence of litter on soil respiration in camphor tree-masson pine mixed forest[J]. Journal of Northwest Forest University, 2013, 28(3): 22-27.
    [28] 武传胜, 沙丽清, 张一平. 哀牢山中山湿性常绿阔叶林凋落物对土壤呼吸及其温度敏感性的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2012, 40(6): 37-40.
    [29] WU C S, SHA L Q, ZHANG Y P. Effect of litter on soil respiration and its temperature sensitivity in amontane evergreen broad-leaved forest in Ailao Mountains, Yunnan[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2012, 40(6): 37-40.
    [30] PRESCOTT C E. Do rates of litter decomposition tell us anything we really need to know? [J].Forest Ecology and Management, 2005, 220(1): 66-74.
    [31] TWITCHETT R J, LOOY C V, MORANTE R, et al. Rapid and synchronous collapse of marine and terrestrial ecosystems during the end-Permian biotic crisis[J]. Geology, 2001, 29(4): 351-359.
    [32] 李学斌, 陈林, 吴秀玲, 等. 荒漠草原4 种典型植物群落枯落物输入对土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2012, 34(5): 80-85.
    [33] LI X B, CHEN L, WU X L,et al. Effects of litter input of four typical plant communities on soil respiration in desert steppe[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2012, 34(5): 80-85.
    [34] 汪金松, 赵秀海, 张春雨, 等. 改变C源输入对油松人工林土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(9): 2768-2777.
    [35] WANG J S, ZHAO X H, ZHANG C Y,et al. Changes of carbon input influence soil respiration in a Pinus tabulaeformis plantation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(9): 2768-2777.
    [36] SAYER E J, TANNER V J, LACEY A L. Effects of litter manipulation on early-stage decomposition and meso-arthropod abundance in a tropical moist forest[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006, 229(1):285-293.
    [37] CROW S E, LAJTHA K, BOWDEN R D, et al. Increased coniferous needle inputs accelerate decomposition of soil carbon in an old-growth forest[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2009, 258(10): 2224-2232.
    [38] 王光军, 田大伦, 闫文德, 等. 改变凋落物输入对杉木人工林土壤呼吸的短期影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(4): 739-747.
    [39] WANG G J, TIAN D L, YAN W D, et al. Effects of aboveground litter exclusion and addition on soil respiration in a Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2009, 33(4): 739-747.
    [40] 王光军, 田大伦, 闫文德, 等. 马尾松林土壤呼吸对去除和添加凋落物处理的响应[J]. 林业科学, 2009, 45(1): 27-30.
    [41] WANG G J, TIAN D L, YAN W D,et al. Response of soil respirations to litterfall exclusion and addition in Pinus massoniana plantation in Hunan, China[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2009, 45(1): 27-30.
    [42] 王光军, 田大伦, 闫文德, 等. 去除和添加凋落物对枫香(Liquidambar formosana)和樟树林(Cinnamomum camphora) 土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(2):643-652.
    [43] WANG G J, TIAN D L, YAN W D,et al. Impact of litter addition and exclusion on soil respiration in a Liquidambar formosana forest and a nearby Cinnamomum camphora forest of central southern China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(2):643-652.
    [44] 骆土寿, 陈步峰, 李意德, 等. 海南岛尖峰岭热带山地雨林土壤和凋落物呼吸研究[J]. 生态学报, 2001, 21(12): 2013-2017.
    [45] LUO T S, CHEN B F, LI Y D,et al. Litter and soil respiration in a tropical mountain rain forest in Jianfengling, Hainan Island[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2001, 21(12): 2013-2017.
    [46] 黄靖宇, 宋长春, 张金波, 等. 凋落物输入对三江平原弃耕农田土壤基础呼吸和活性碳组分的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(7): 3417-3424.
    [47] HUANG J Y, SONG C C, ZHANG J B,et al. Influence of litter importation on basal respiration and labile carbon in restored farm land in Sanjiang Plain[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(7): 3417-3424.
    [48] 杨继松, 刘景双, 孙丽娜. 三江平原草甸湿地土壤呼吸和枯落物分解的CO2释放[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(2): 807-810.
    [49] YANG J S, LIU J S, SUN L N. CO2-release rate of soil respiration and litter decomposition of meadow marshes in Sanjiang Plain[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(2): 807-810.
    [50] 王丽丽, 宋长春, 郭跃东, 等. 三江平原不同土地利用方式下凋落物对土壤呼吸的贡献[J]. 环境科学, 2009, 30(11): 3130-3135.
    [51] WANG L L, SONG C C, GUO Y D,et al. Contribution of litter to soil respiration under different land-use types in Sanjiang Plain[J]. Environmental Science, 2009, 30(11): 3130-3135.
    [52] 周小刚, 郭胜利, 车升国, 等.黄土高原刺槐人工林地表凋落物对土壤呼吸的贡献[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(7): 2150-2157.
    [53] ZHOU X G, GUO S L, CHE S G,et al. Aboveground litter contribution to soil respiration in a black locust plantation in the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(7): 2150-2157.
    [54] 邓琦, 刘世忠, 刘菊秀, 等. 南亚热带森林凋落物对土壤呼吸的贡献及其影响因素[J]. 地球科学进展, 2007, 22(9): 976-986.
    [55] DENG Q, LIU S Z, LIU J X,et al. Contributions of litter-fall to soil respiration and its affecting factors in southern subtropical forests of China[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2007, 22(9): 976-986.
    [56] 刘尚华, 吕世海, 冯朝阳, 等. 京西百花山区六种植物群落凋落物及土壤呼吸特性研究[J]. 中国草地学报, 2008, 30(1): 78-86.
    [57] LIU S H, L S H, FENG C Y,et al. Study on soil and litter respiration characteristics of six communities in Baihua mountainous area in west Beijing[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2008, 30(1): 78-86.
    [58] 黄石德. 降水和凋落物对木荷马尾松混交林土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(2): 218-225.
    [59] HUANG S D. Soil respiration with precipitation and litter treatments in Schima superba and Pinus massoniana mixed forest[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A ＆ F University, 2012, 29(2): 218-225.
    [60] 俞国松, 王世杰, 容丽, 等. 茂兰喀斯特森林主要演替群落的凋落物动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(10): 1019-1028.
    [61] YU G S, WANG S J, RONG L, et al. Litter dynamics of major successional communities in Maolan karst forest of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2011, 35(10): 1019-1028.
    [62] 吴鹏, 陈骏, 崔迎春, 等. 茂兰喀斯特植被主要演替群落土壤有机碳研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2012, 32(12): 181-186.
    [63] WU P,CHEN J, CUI Y C, et al. Study of soil organic carbon of major successional communities in Maolan Nature Reserve of karst[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forest ＆ Technology, 2012, 32(12): 181-186.
    [64] 吴鹏, 崔迎春, 丁访军, 等. 茂兰喀斯特森林主要演替群落枯落物的水文特性[J]. 林业科技开发, 2012, 26(5): 62-66.
    [65] WU P, CUI Y C,DING F J, et al. Study on hydrological characteristics of litter in major successional communities in the Maolan Nature Reserve of karst areas[J]. China Forestry Science and Technology, 2012, 26(5): 62-66.
    [66] 杨瑞, 喻理飞, 安明态. 喀斯特区小生境特征现状分析:以茂兰自然保护区为例[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2008, 36(6): 168-169.
    [67] YANG R, YU L F, AN M T. Analysis on microhabitat characteristic in karst region: taking Maolan Nature Reserve as an example[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2008, 36(6):168-169.
    [68] 冉景丞, 何师意, 曹建华, 等. 亚热带喀斯特森林土壤CO2排放量动态研究[J]. 贵州科学, 2002, 20(2): 42-47.
    [69] RAN J C, HE S Y,CAO J H, et al. A preliminary research on CO2 release in subtropical karst forest soil[J]. Guizhou Science, 2002, 20(2): 42-47.
    [70] LUO Y Q, WAN S Q, HUI D F, et al. Acclimatization of soil respiration to warming in a tall grass prairie[J]. Nature, 2001, 413(6856): 622-625.
    [71] XU M, QI Y. Spatial and seasonal variations of Q10 determined by soil respiration measurements at a sierra Nevadan forest[J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2001, 15(3): 687-696.
    [72] WARING R H, SCHLESINGER W H. Forest ecosystems: concepts and management[M]. New York: Academic Press, 1985: 115-160.
    [73] BOWDEN R D, NADELHOFFER K J, BOONE R D, et al. Contributions of aboveground litter, below ground litter and root respiration to total soil respiration in a temperate hardwood forest[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1993, 23 (7): 1402-1407.
    [74] SULZMAN E W, BRANT J B, BOWDEN R D, et al. Contribution of aboveground litter, belowground litter, and rhizosphere respiration to total soil CO2 efflux in an old growth coniferous forest[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2005, 73(1): 231-256.
    [75] BOONE R D, NADELHOFFER K J, CANARY J D, et al. Roots exert a strong influence on the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration[J]. Nature, 1998, 396(6711): 570-572.
    [76] CHEN G S, YANG Y S, GUO J F, et al. Relationships between carbon allocation and partitioning of soil respiration across world mature forests[J]. Plant Ecology, 2011, 212(2): 195-206.
    [77] YAN J H, WANG Y P, ZHOU G Y, et al. Estimates of soil respiration and net primary production of three forests at different succession stages in South China[J]. Global Change Biology, 2006, 12(5): 810-821.
    [78] ZIMMERMANN M, MEIR P, BIRD M, et al. Litter contribution to diurnal and annual soil respiration in a tropical montane cloud forest[J]. Soil Biology Biochemistry, 2009, 41(6): 1338-1340.
    [79] NGAO J, EPRON D, BRECHET C, et al. Estimating the contribution of leaf litter decomposition to soil CO2 efflux in a beech forest using 13C-depleted litter[J]. Global Change Biology, 2005, 11(10): 1768-1776.
    [80] MAIER C A, KRESS L W. Soil CO2 evolution and root respiration in 11-year-old loblolly pine(Pinus taeda)plantations as affected by moisture and nutrient availability[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2000, 30(2): 347-359.
    [81] KUZYAKOV Y, FRIEDEL J K, STAHR K. Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2000, 32(11-12): 1485-1498.
    [82] 陈四清, 崔骁勇, 周广胜, 等.内蒙古锡林河流域大针茅草原土壤呼吸和凋落物分解的CO2排放速率研究[J]. 植物学报, 1999, 41(6): 645-650.
    [83] CHEN S Q, CUI X Y, ZHOU G S,et al. Study on the CO2-release rate of soil respiration and litter decomposition in Stipa grandis steppe in Xilin River Basin, Inner Mongolia[J]. Acta Botanica Sinica, 1999, 41(6): 645-650.
    [84] 潘开文, 何静, 吴宁. 森林凋落物对林地微生境的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2005, 15 (1): 153-158.
    [85] PAN K W, HE J, WU N. Effect of forest litter on microenvironment conditions of forestland[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005, 15 (1): 153-158.
    [86] 陈进, 肖以华, 陈步峰, 等. 珠江三角洲四种森林类型土壤CO2通量特征研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2011, 20 (5): 860-864.
    [87] CHEN J, XIAO Y H, CHEN B F,et al. The study of soil CO2 flux of four forest types in Pearl River Delta[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2011, 20 (5): 860-864.
    [88] 王国兵, 唐燕飞, 阮宏华, 等. 次生栎林与火炬松人工林土壤呼吸的季节变异及其主要影响因子[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29 (2): 966-975.
    [89] WANG G B, TANG Y F, RUAN H H,et al. Seasonal variation of soil respiration and its main regulating factors in a secondary oak forest and a pine plantation in north-subtropical area in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29 (2): 966-975.
    [90] ERLAND B, HAKAN W. Soil and rhizosphere microorganisms have the same Q10 for respiration in a model system[J]. Global Change Biology, 2003, 9(12): 1788-1791.
    [91] CONANT R T, STEINWEG J M, HADDIX M L, et al. Experimental warming shows that decomposition temperature sensitivity increases with soil organic matter recalcitrance[J]. Ecology, 2008, 89(9): 2384-2391.
  • [1] 周磊, 王树力.  阔叶树对红皮云杉人工林土壤营养状况的改善作用 . 北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(3): 46-53. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190113
    [2] 王鑫, 同小娟, 张劲松, 孟平, 解晗, 胡海洋, 李俊.  太行山南麓栓皮栎人工林光合作用对土壤呼吸的影响 . 北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(): 66-76. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200010
    [3] 向云西, 潘萍, 陈胜魁, 欧阳勋志, 宁金魁, 吴自荣, 纪仁展.  天然马尾松林土壤碳氮磷特征及其与凋落物质量的关系 . 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(11): 95-103. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20190029
    [4] 吴建召, 严思维, 崔羽, 罗清虎, 林勇明, 王道杰, 吴承祯.  地震灾区2种气候生态治理区恢复初期土壤呼吸动态及其影响因子 . 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(3): 93-104. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180192
    [5] 吴鹏, 崔迎春, 赵文君, 舒德远, 侯贻菊, 丁访军, 杨文斌.  喀斯特森林植被自然恢复过程中土壤化学计量特征 . 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(3): 80-92. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180136
    [6] 徐昳晅, 同小娟, 张劲松, 孟平, 李俊.  太行山南麓刺槐人工林土壤呼吸与土壤温度间的滞后关系 . 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(4): 78-87. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180398
    [7] 秦随涛, 龙翠玲, 吴邦利.  地形部位对贵州茂兰喀斯特森林群落结构及物种多样性的影响 . 北京林业大学学报, 2018, 40(7): 18-26. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170466
    [8] 段北星, 满秀玲, 宋浩, 刘家霖.  大兴安岭北部不同类型兴安落叶松林土壤呼吸及其组分特征 . 北京林业大学学报, 2018, 40(2): 40-50. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170215
    [9] 邵英男, 田松岩, 刘延坤, 陈瑶, 孙志虎.  密度调控对长白落叶松人工林土壤呼吸的影响 . 北京林业大学学报, 2017, 39(6): 51-59. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170029
    [10] 左强, 何怀江, 张春雨, 赵秀海, 张君, 李金功.  采伐对蛟河阔叶红松混交林土壤呼吸的影响 . 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(4): 71-76. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160055
    [11] 刘博奇, 牟长城, 邢亚娟, 韩士杰, 姜思领, 王庆贵.  小兴安岭典型温带森林土壤呼吸对强降雨的响应 . 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(4): 77-85. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150431
    [12] 李思思, 贺康宁, 田赟, 左巍, 王玮璐, 唐达, 张潭, 李倩.  青海高寒区5种典型林分土壤呼吸季节变化及其影响因素 . 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(10): 95-103. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160073
    [13] 黄小辉, 冯大兰, 朱恒星, 耿养会, 陈道静.  三峡库区马尾松林土壤有机碳的组成及含量 . 北京林业大学学报, 2014, 36(2): 38-43.
    [14] 段亮亮, 满秀玲, 刘玉杰, 刘海亮, 田野宏, 刘茜.  大兴安岭北部天然落叶松林土壤水分空间变异及影响因子分析 . 北京林业大学学报, 2014, 36(4): 36-41. doi: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2014.04.010
    [15] 赵冰清, 王云琦, 王彬, 王玉杰, 张会兰.  环境因子对重庆缙云山林地土壤呼吸动态特征的作用 . 北京林业大学学报, 2014, 36(3): 83-89. doi: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2014.03.012
    [16] 李学斌, 陈林, 吴秀玲, 张硕新, 谢应忠.  荒漠草原4种典型植物群落枯落物输入对土壤呼吸的影响 . 北京林业大学学报, 2012, 34(5): 80-85.
    [17] 邓华平, 王光军, 耿赓.  樟树人工林土壤氮矿化对改变凋落物输入的响应 . 北京林业大学学报, 2010, 32(3): 47-51.
    [18] 王小国, 朱波, 美荣, 艳强, 循华, .  川中丘陵区桤柏混交林地土壤CO2释放与Forest-DNDC模型模拟 . 北京林业大学学报, 2008, 30(2): 27-32.
    [19] 冯朝阳, 吕世海, 高吉喜, 刘尚华, 林栋, .  华北山地不同植被类型土壤呼吸特征研究 . 北京林业大学学报, 2008, 30(2): 20-26.
    [20] 李红, 包仁艳, 谢力生, 赵东, 王跃思, 李利平, 贺康宁, 孙仁山, 吕建雄, 王继强, 周存宇, 高莉萍, 程广有, 姜春宁, 包满珠, 邢韶华, 向仕龙, 李文彬, 周国逸, 于志明, 李世荣, 李吉跃, 高林, 高峰, 孙扬, 殷亚方, 田勇臣, 孙磊, 郑彩霞, 曹全军, 王迎红, 赵勃, 赵有科, 刘娟娟, 史常青, 葛春华, 王清春, 丁坤善, 张德强, 唐晓杰, 孙艳玲, 华丽, 周心澄, 高亦珂, 姜笑梅, 刘世忠, 张启翔, 崔国发, .  鼎湖山针阔叶混交林土壤呼吸的研究 . 北京林业大学学报, 2005, 27(4): 23-27.
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1057
  • HTML全文浏览量:  59
  • PDF下载量:  6
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-03-04
  • 刊出日期:  2015-09-30

改变凋落物输入对喀斯特森林主要演替群落土壤呼吸的影响

doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150052
  • 1. 1 中国林业科学研究院荒漠化研究所;
  • 2.  2 贵州省林业科学研究院
    • 基金项目:

    贵州省高层次人才科研条件特助经费项目(TZJF-2011-14)、贵州省科技厅基金项目(黔科合J字[2010]2054)、贵州省科技厅社会发展科技攻关计划项目(黔科合SY字[2014]3039号)。

    作者简介:

    吴鹏,博士生,副研究员。主要研究方向:喀斯特森林生态系统定位观测。Email:zuishaoxu@163.com 地址:550005贵州省贵阳市富源南路382号贵州省林业科学研究院。

    通讯作者: 丁访军,博士,研究员。主要研究方向:森林生态。Email:ding3920034@163.com 地址:同上。
  • 收稿日期: 2015-03-04
  • 刊出日期: 2015-09-30

摘要: 以贵州茂兰国家级自然保护区内的喀斯特原生乔木林和次生林为研究对象,利用LI-Cor-6400-09(土壤呼吸叶室)连接LI-6400便携式CO2/H2O分析系统,通过改变凋落物输入,研究了2种群落类型添加和去除凋落物对其土壤呼吸速率以及5 cm深度土壤温度的影响。结果表明:改变凋落物输入对2种群落类型5 cm深度土壤温度产生的差异不显著(P0.05),但均表现为:添加凋落物对照去除凋落物。喀斯特原生乔木林和次生林添加凋落物的年均土壤呼吸速率分别为2.98和3.31 mol/(m2s),分别比对照的年均增加了32.21%和26.20%;去除凋落物的年均土壤呼吸速率分别为2.07和2.14 mol/(m2s),比对照的年均分别降低了17.41%和22.36%;可见,凋落物是影响森林CO2通量的一个重要因子。不同凋落物处理下2种群落类型的土壤呼吸速率与其5 cm深度土壤温度均呈显著的指数相关关系(P0.001),能解释土壤呼吸速率变化的85%以上(R2在0.877 0～0.957 7之间)。原生乔木林和次生林添加、去除凋落物和对照的土壤呼吸的温度敏感系数Q10值分别为2.97、3.89、3.82和2.74、3.29、2.87,均表现为去除凋落物对照添加凋落物。

English Abstract

吴鹏, 崔迎春, 赵文君, 舒德远, 杨文斌, 丁访军. 改变凋落物输入对喀斯特森林主要演替群落土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2015, 37(9): 17-27. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150052
引用本文: 吴鹏, 崔迎春, 赵文君, 舒德远, 杨文斌, 丁访军. 改变凋落物输入对喀斯特森林主要演替群落土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2015, 37(9): 17-27. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150052
shu
WU Peng, CUI Ying-chun, ZHAO Wen-jun, SHU De-yuan, YANG Wen-bin, DING Fang-jun. Effects of litter exclusion and addition on soil respiration of major forest communities at two successional stages in Maolan karst forest of southwestern China.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(9): 17-27. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150052
Citation: WU Peng, CUI Ying-chun, ZHAO Wen-jun, SHU De-yuan, YANG Wen-bin, DING Fang-jun. Effects of litter exclusion and addition on soil respiration of major forest communities at two successional stages in Maolan karst forest of southwestern China.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(9): 17-27. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150052
shu

    全文HTML

参考文献 (91)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    版权所有 © 2013 《北京林业大学学报》编辑部

    地址：北京市海淀区清华东路35号邮政编码：100083

    电话：010-62337673Email：bldxed@bjfu.edu.cn 京ICP备05066833号-1

    本系统由 北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司 开发   百度统计