模拟石漠化异质生境中桑树的生长和叶绿素荧光特性

黄小辉; 冯大兰; 刘芸; 朱恒星; 陈道静; 耿养会

doi:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150324

模拟石漠化异质生境中桑树的生长和叶绿素荧光特性

doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150324

1.
1 重庆市林业科学研究院
2.
2 西南大学资源环境学院

基金项目:

重庆市基本科研业务费(2013cstc-jbky-00702)、国家自然科学基金项目(31370602)。

详细信息

作者简介:
黄小辉。主要研究方向:城市林业与森林生态。 Email: huangxiaohui4260@163.com 地址:400036重庆市沙坪坝区重庆市林业科学研究院。
责任作者: 冯大兰,高级工程师。主要研究方向:土壤营养。 Email:fengdalang@163.com 地址:同上。

黄小辉。主要研究方向:城市林业与森林生态。 Email: huangxiaohui4260@163.com 地址:400036重庆市沙坪坝区重庆市林业科学研究院。
责任作者: 冯大兰,高级工程师。主要研究方向:土壤营养。 Email:fengdalang@163.com 地址:同上。

Growth and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of mulberry trees in simulated environment of heterogeneous habitats of a rocky desertification area.

1.
1 Chongqing Academy of Forestry, Chongqing, 400036, P. R. China;
2.
2 College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400716, P. R. China.

摘要: 模拟石漠化生境不同的土壤水肥条件,设置H(水分差异)、F(肥力差异)、HF(水肥差异)和 CK组(对照)4个异质处理组,观察桑树根系在石漠化异质生境中的生长情况,探讨其根系活动对地上部分的生长及叶绿素荧光特性的影响。结果表明:桑树根系在土壤异质条件中具有明显的向水性和向肥性,但在干旱少水的条件下根系未有向肥性;H和HF组桑树根系发生了明显的向性运动,以此获得充足的水分,而F和CK组桑树的根系无向水性和向肥性运动,以致长期处于干旱条件中,但未发现死亡现象;各处理组地上和地下部分的总体生长情况以HF组最好,其次是H、F和CK组明显较差;F和CK组叶片的光合色素含量、最大光化学效率(Fv/Fm)、有效光化学效率(F′v/F′m)、电子传递速率(ETR)、实际光化学效率(ΦPSII)和光化学猝灭系数(qP)等参数均显著低于HF和H组,且前两者NPQ值较高。可见,在石漠化异质生境中,水分是制约桑树存活及生长的关键因子,但桑树根系能够通过向性生长,获得充足的水分和营养以维持良好的生长。
- 石漠化 /
- 干旱 /
- 桑树 /
- 向水性 /
- 向肥性 /
- 叶绿素荧光参数
Abstract: The tropic growth of mulberry roots in response to different water and nutrient conditions was studied in a simulated rocky desertification habitat. Four treatment groups were compared, including group H (variable moisture), group F (variable nutrients), group HF (both moisture and nutrients varying) and group CK (control), which were designed to simulate the heterogeneous soil conditions associated with rocky desertification. The experiment was conducted to study the influence of root tropisms on the growth and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of mulberry trees that grew in the stressful environment. The results showed that: 1) the roots of mulberry trees showed obvious hydro-tropism and fertilizer-tropism, but the fertilizer-tropism of mulberry roots did not occur in the condition of moisture shortage. 2) The mulberry roots in group H and HF both showed obvious tropic growth that promoted absorption to water for its growth, while in the group F and CK, roots showed no tropism characteristics and the trees grew under the drought conditions for a long term, maintaining a high root-shoot ratio. 3) Root surface area, total root length, number of root tips, root biomass, leaf area, plant height, basal diameter, crown width, and above-ground biomass of mulberry trees in each group were measured and compared, and these indices showed that the growth status of mulberry trees in group HF was the best, followed by those in group H. Group F and CK were significantly poorer. 4) The photosynthetic pigment contents, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoid of mulberry trees in group F and CK were both significantly lower than those in group H and HF. Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (Fv/Fm, F′v/F′m, ΦPSII and ETR) of mulberry trees in group F and CK were significantly lower than those in group H and HF. The photochemical quenching coefficients (qP) of mulberry trees in group F and CK were significantly lower than those in group H and HF, by contrast with the non-photochemical quenching coefficients (NPQ), which were higher. These results indicated that in the rocky desertification area, water is the key factor that restricts live and growth of mulberry trees. Nevertheless, the mulberry trees can get enough water and nutrients due to root tropism and they show favorable growth characteristics.
- rocky desertification /
- drought /
- mulberry trees /
- hydro-tropism /
- fertilizer-tropism /
- chlorophyll fluorescence parameters

[1]	CHEN W J,REN X D, XIONG K N. Analysis on carbon fixation potentiality of rocky desert land:a case in Guizhou[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2011,30(2):163-168.
[2]	TUYET D. Characteristics of karst ecosystems of Vietnam and their vulnerability to human impact[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2001,75(3):325-329.
[3]	陈伟杰,任晓冬,熊康宁.石漠化土地固碳潜力分析:以贵州为例[J].中国岩溶, 2011,30(2):163-168.
[4]	ZHANG Z H, HU G, ZHU J D, et al. Spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrients and its impact on tree species distribution in a karst forest of Southwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2011,35(10):1038-1049.
[5]	张忠华,胡刚,祝介东,等.喀斯特森林土壤养分的空间异质性及其对树种分布的影响[J].植物生态学报, 2011,35(10):1038-1049.
[6]	SHEN G F. The eco-environmental construction in the great west development strategy[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2001,37(1):1-6.
[7]	沈国舫.西部大开发中的生态环境建设问题:代笔谈小结[J].林业科学,2001,37(1):1-6.
[8]	KE Y Z, ZHOU J X, LU N, et al. Effects of salinity on photosynthetic physiology and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of mulberry(Morus alba) seedlings[J]. Forest Research, 2009,22(2):200-206.
[9]	LIU Y, WILLISON J H M. Prospects for cultivating white mulberry (Morus alba) in the drawdown zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2013, 20(10):7142-7151.
[10]	HE X B, XIE Z Q, NAN H W. Developing ecological economy of sericulture and vegetation restoration in the water-level-fluctuating zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. Science Technology Review, 2007, 25(23):59-63.
[11]	MIAO C Y, CHEN T F, HE B H. Study on mulberry effect of soil and water conservation applying in purple soil[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2005, 19(1):117-123.
[12]	柯裕州,周金星,卢楠,等.盐胁迫对桑树幼苗光合生理及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].林业科学研究,2009,22(2):200-206.
[13]	贺秀斌,谢宗强,南宏伟.三峡库区消落带植被修复与蚕桑生态经济发展模式[J]. 科技导报,2007,25(23):59-63.
[14]	HUANG X H, LIU Y, LI J X. Effects of water stress on physiological characteristics of mulberry(Morus alba) seedlings in the hydro-fluctuation belt of the Three Gorges Reservoir area[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2012,48(12):122-127.
[15]	缪驰远,陈田飞,何丙辉.桑树在紫色土水土保持效应方面研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(1):117-123.
[16]	QIN J, HE N J, HUANG X Z, et al. Development of mulberry ecological industry and sericulture[J]. Science of Sericulture,2010, 36(6):984-989.
[17]	DU X L, WANG S J, RONG L. Characteristics of foliar δ13C values of common shrub species in various microhabitats with different karst rocky desertification degrees[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(12): 3094-3100.
[18]	黄小辉,刘芸,李佳杏.水分胁迫对三峡库区消落带桑树幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 林业科学,2012, 48(12):122-127.
[19]	ZHU S Q, YANG S Y. A preliminary analysis of the Maolan karst forest∥ZHOU Z X. Scientific investigation of karst forest in Maolan[M]. Guiyang: Guizhou Peoples Publishing House,1987: 210-224.
[20]	秦俭,何宁佳,黄先智,等.桑树生态产业与蚕丝业的发展[J].蚕业科学,2010,36(6):984-989.
[21]	CHEN M G, JIN P H, LU X M. Preliminary evaluation on sericultural ecosystem services and their value[J]. Science of Sericulture, 2005,31(3):316-320.
[22]	杜雪莲,王世杰,容丽.喀斯特石漠化区不同小生境常见灌木种叶片δ13C值特征[J]. 应用生态学报,2011,22(12):3094-3100.
[23]	朱守谦,杨世逸.茂兰喀斯特森林初析∥周政贤.茂兰喀斯特森林科学考察集[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1987:210-224.
[24]	ZHANG G C, YANG J H, ZHAO X M. Study on distribution characteristics and soil and water conservation of mulberry root system[J].Science of Sericulture,1996, 23(1):59-60.
[25]	ZHANG L. Evaluation of drought resistance of mulberry germplasm[J]. Foreign Agriculture: Sericulture, 1992(1):34-36.
[26]	陈敏刚,金佩华,鲁兴萌. 蚕桑生态系统服务功能价值的初步评估[J]. 蚕业科学,2005,31(3):316-320.
[27]	张光灿,杨吉华,赵新明. 桑树根系分布及水土保持特性的研究[J]. 蚕业科学,1996,23(1):59-60.
[28]	ZHANG W P, LIU J N, LI B G. Simulation of tropisms of three tropisms of root system growth based on feedbacks between functions and structures[J]. Transactions of the CSAE,2009,25(Suppl.2) :110-117.
[29]	Ministry of Water Resources of the Peoples Republic of China. Standard of classification for drought severity SL424-2008[S]. Beijing: China Water Power Press, 2009.
[30]	张林. 桑树种质的抗旱性评估[J]. 国外农学:蚕业,1992(1):34-36.
[31]	DUAN S S, GU W X. Relationship between root system characteristics and drought resistance of wheat populations in semiarid region[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1997, 8(2):134-138.
[32]	张吴平,刘建宁,李保国. 结构与功能反馈机制下根系生长向性模拟[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009,25(增刊2):110-117.
[33]	WANG Z. Plant physiology[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000.
[34]	FILIPPENKO V N. Gravi- and chemotropisms of the primary maize roots when affected by lead and cadmium[J].Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2001, 48(1): 12-18.
[35]	SUN J W, YANG Y, HUANG Z A, et al. Reason for photosynthetic declination in rice from water stress induced by polyethylene glycol (PEG) [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2004, 18(6):539-543.
[36]	TAKAHASHI H. Hydrotropism: the current state of our knowledge[J]. Journal of Plant Research,1997, 110(2): 163-169.
[37]	NEWCOMBE F C, RHODES A L. Chemotropism of roots[J]. Botanical Gazette, 1997, 37(1):22-35.
[38]	JAFFE M J, TAKAHESHI H, BIRO R L. A pea mutant for the study of hydrotropism in roots[J]. Science, 1985,230: 445-447.
[39]	KRAUSE G H, WEIS E. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basics[J]. Annual Review of Plant Physiology Plant Molecular Biology, 1991, 42:313-349.
[40]	中华人民共和国水利部.旱情等级标准SL424—2008[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2009.
[41]	LIU Y, WANG G D, LIU G B. Difference and inherent linkage of root characteristics in different root classification of Pinus tabulaeformis seedlings[J].Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2011, 12:1386-1393.
[42]	EAPEN D, BARROSO M L, PONCE G. Hydrotropism: root growth responses to water[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2005, 10(1):44-50.
[43]	段舜山,谷文祥.半干旱地区小麦群体的根系特征与抗旱性的关系[J].应用生态学报,1997,8(2):134-138.
[44]	王忠.植物生理学[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2000.
[45]	TAKAHASHI H, MIYAZAWA Y, FUJII N. Hormonal interactions during root tropic growth: hydrotropism versus gravitropism[J]. Plant Molecular Biology,2009,69(4): 489-502.
[46]	BANO A, ULLAH F, NOSHEEN A. Role of abscisic acid and drought stress on the activities of antioxidant enzymes in wheat[J]. Plant Soil and Environment, 2012, 58(4):181-185.
[47]	XIONG L, ZHU J. Regulation of abscisic acid biosynthesis[J]. Plant Physiology, 2003, 133(1): 29-36.
[48]	HUANG X H, LIU Y, LI J, et al. The response of mulberry trees after seedling hardening to summer drought in the hydro-fluctuation belt of Three Gorges Reservoir Areas[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2013, 20(10):7103-7111.
[49]	孙骏威,杨勇,黄宗安,等.聚乙二醇诱导水分胁迫引起水稻光合下降的原因探讨[J].中国水稻科学, 2004,18(6):539-543.
[50]	KRAUSE G H, WEIS E. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basics[J]. Annual Review of Plant Physiology Plant Molecular Biology, 1991,42:313-349.
[51]	ZHANG S R. A discussion on chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics parameters and their significance[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 1999, 16(4):444-448.
[52]	LU C M, ZHANG J H. Effects of water stress on photosystem II photochemistry and its thermostability in wheat plants[J].Journal of Experimental Botany, 1999, 50: 1199-1206.
[53]	KOOTEN O, SNEL J F H. The use of chlorophyll fluorescence nomenclature in plant stress physiology[J].Photosynthesis Research, 1990, 25(3): 147-150.
[54]	LU Q, LI W, JIANG G, et al. Studies on the characteristics of chlorophyll fluorescence of winter wheat flag leaves at different developing stages[J]. Acta Botanica Sinica, 2001, 43(8): 801-804.
[55]	RUBAN A V, HORTON P. Regulation of non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence in plants[J].Functional Plant Biology, 1995,21(2): 221-230.
[56]	EHLERS W, HAMBLIN A P, TENNANT D, et al. Root system parameters determining water uptake of field crops[J]. Irrigation Science, 1991, 12:115-124.
[57]	HURD E A. Phenotype and drought to tolerance in wheat[J].Agricultural Meteorology, 1974, 14(1-2):25-39.
[58]	EAPEN D, BARROSO M L, CAMPOS M E. A no hydrotropic response root mutant that responds positively to gravitropism in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Physiol, 2003,131(2): 536-546.

[1]	崔万晶, 侯巍, 杨睿智, 赵云杰. 北京城市森林生态系统能量分配的季节动态研究 . 北京林业大学学报, 2021, 43(1): 27-36. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190392
[2]	魏巍, 王百田, 张克斌. 基于SPEI的中亚地区1901—2015年干旱时空趋势分析 . 北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(4): 113-121. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190055
[3]	乔永, 周金星, 王小平. Pb、Cd复合胁迫对桑树种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响 . 北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(4): 32-40. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190244
[4]	靳川, 查天山, 贾昕, 田赟, 周文君, 杨双宝, 郭子繁. 干旱环境3种荒漠灌木叶绿素荧光参数动态 . 北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(8): 72-80. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190316
[5]	张勇, 胡晓晴, 李豆, 刘雪梅. 白桦BpSPL8启动子的克隆及异源过表达BpSPL8对拟南芥耐旱性的影响 . 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(8): 67-75. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20190137
[6]	李双, 苏艳艳, 王厚领, 李惠广, 刘超, 夏新莉, 尹伟伦. 胡杨miR1444b在拟南芥中正调控植物抗旱性 . 北京林业大学学报, 2018, 40(4): 1-9. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180043
[7]	张嘉桐, 关颖慧, 司莉青, 彭霞薇, 孟丙南, 周金星. Pb²⁺、Cd²⁺复合胁迫对桑树光合作用的影响 . 北京林业大学学报, 2018, 40(4): 16-23. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170332
[8]	张靖宙, 吴秀芹, 肖桂英. 云南省建水县不同石漠化治理模式下碳储量功能评估 . 北京林业大学学报, 2018, 40(8): 72-81. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180069
[9]	宋金凤, 李金博, 曹楷, 桑英, 崔晓阳. 草酸和柠檬酸提高长白落叶松对Pb胁迫的适应性 . 北京林业大学学报, 2017, 39(11): 18-27. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170146
[10]	李昂, 王云琦, 张会兰, 王彬, 黎宏祥. 广西石漠化地区水土保持效应评价指标体系研究 . 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(11): 67-78. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160077
[11]	王丛鹏, 贾伏丽, 刘沙, 刘超, 夏新莉, 尹伟伦. 干旱对欧美杨气孔发育的影响 . 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(6): 28-34. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160050
[12]	冯大兰, 黄小辉, 刘芸, 朱恒星, 向仲怀. 4种木本植物在石漠化地区的生长状况及光合特性 . 北京林业大学学报, 2015, 37(5): 62-69. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20130531
[13]	韩朝, 董慧, 常智慧. 污泥对干旱条件下高羊茅氮素利用的影响 . 北京林业大学学报, 2014, 36(4): 82-87. doi: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2014.04.016
[14]	赵曦阳, 王军辉, 张金凤, 张守攻, 张增顺, 马建伟, 贠慧玲, 李奎友. 楸树无性系叶绿素荧光及生长特性变异研究 . 北京林业大学学报, 2012, 34(3): 41-47.
[15]	施征, 史胜青, 张志翔, 高荣孚, 肖文发. 干旱与高盐对梭梭叶绿素荧光特性的影响 . 北京林业大学学报, 2012, 34(3): 20-25.
[16]	陈志强, 李庆贱, 时瑞亭, 张建秋, 王国柱, 张玉玲, 李悦. 苏打盐碱胁迫对西伯利亚白刺光合和生长的影响 . 北京林业大学学报, 2011, 33(3): 31-37.
[17]	陈明涛, 赵忠. 干旱对4种苗木根系特征及各部分物质分配的影响 . 北京林业大学学报, 2011, 33(1): 16-22.
[18]	张会慧, 张秀丽, 朱文旭, 许楠, 李鑫, 岳冰冰, 王良再, 孙广玉. 桑树叶片光系统Ⅱ对NaCl和Na2CO3胁迫的响应 . 北京林业大学学报, 2011, 33(6): 15-20.
[19]	黄华宏, 陈奋学, 童再康, 朱玉球. 矮生杉木光合特性及叶绿素荧光参数研究 . 北京林业大学学报, 2009, 31(2): 69-73.
[20]	冶民生, 李云成, 何磊, 蒋佳荔, 谢响明, 张学俭, 王盛萍, 盖颖, 孙宇瑞, 罗菊春, 侯旭, 李绍才, 张金凤, 贺庆棠, 柳新伟, 李永慈, 朱妍, 王岩, 高鹏, 张文娟, 唐守正, 张志强, 李吉跃, 康向阳, 崔保山, 冯仲科, 昌明, 何静, 张华丽, 吕建雄, 关文彬, 吴玉英, 马道坤, 孙海龙, 申卫军, 王文棋, 廖学品, 陆佩玲, 成仿云, 王军辉, 何权, 静洁, 关毓秀, 史剑波, 吴斌, 于晓南, 张平冬, 张桂莲, 孙阁, 杨志荣, 赵广杰, 路婷, 蒋湘宁, 李小飞, 石碧, 汪燕, 王尚德, 彭少麟, 孙晓霞, 蒲俊文, 陈永国, 张满良, 马克明, 赵燕东, 余新晓, 刘国华, 胡文忠, 林威, 汪西林, . 中国岩溶山地石漠化问题与对策研究 . 北京林业大学学报, 2006, 28(1): 117-120.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 691
HTML全文浏览量: 49
PDF下载量: 9
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

留言板

模拟石漠化异质生境中桑树的生长和叶绿素荧光特性

doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150324

Growth and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of mulberry trees in simulated environment of heterogeneous habitats of a rocky desertification area.

计量

模拟石漠化异质生境中桑树的生长和叶绿素荧光特性

doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150324

1. 1 重庆市林业科学研究院

2. 2 西南大学资源环境学院

English Abstract

Growth and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of mulberry trees in simulated environment of heterogeneous habitats of a rocky desertification area.

1. 1 Chongqing Academy of Forestry, Chongqing, 400036, P. R. China;

2. 2 College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400716, P. R. China.

全文HTML

目录

留言板

模拟石漠化异质生境中桑树的生长和叶绿素荧光特性

doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150324

Growth and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of mulberry trees in simulated environment of heterogeneous habitats of a rocky desertification area.

计量

出版历程

模拟石漠化异质生境中桑树的生长和叶绿素荧光特性

doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150324

1. 1 重庆市林业科学研究院 2. 2 西南大学资源环境学院

English Abstract

Growth and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of mulberry trees in simulated environment of heterogeneous habitats of a rocky desertification area.

1. 1 Chongqing Academy of Forestry, Chongqing, 400036, P. R. China; 2. 2 College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400716, P. R. China.

全文HTML

目录

1. 1 重庆市林业科学研究院

2. 2 西南大学资源环境学院

1. 1 Chongqing Academy of Forestry, Chongqing, 400036, P. R. China;

2. 2 College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400716, P. R. China.