高级检索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

兴安落叶松林细根解剖结构和化学组分对N沉降的响应

闫国永,  王晓春,  邢亚娟,  韩士杰,  王庆贵

downloadPDF
文章导航 > 北京林业大学学报  > 2016 >  38(4): 36-43
闫国永, 王晓春, 邢亚娟, 韩士杰, 王庆贵. 兴安落叶松林细根解剖结构和化学组分对N沉降的响应[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(4): 36-43. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150433
引用本文: 闫国永, 王晓春, 邢亚娟, 韩士杰, 王庆贵. 兴安落叶松林细根解剖结构和化学组分对N沉降的响应[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(4): 36-43. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150433
shu
YAN Guo-yong, WANG Xiao-chun, XING Ya-juan, HAN Shi-jie, WANG Qing-gui. Response of root anatomy and tissue chemistry to nitrogen deposition in larch forest in the Great Xing’an Mountains of northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(4): 36-43. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150433
Citation: YAN Guo-yong, WANG Xiao-chun, XING Ya-juan, HAN Shi-jie, WANG Qing-gui. Response of root anatomy and tissue chemistry to nitrogen deposition in larch forest in the Great Xing’an Mountains of northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(4): 36-43. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150433
shu

兴安落叶松林细根解剖结构和化学组分对N沉降的响应

doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150433
  • 1.

    1 东北林业大学生态研究中心

  • 2.

    2 黑龙江大学农业资源与环境学院

  • 3.

    3 中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所

基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金项目(31170421、41575137、31370494、31070406)、黑龙江省自然科学基金重点项目(ZD201406)

详细信息
    作者简介:

    闫国永。主要研究方向:气候变化背景下的生态系统响应。Email:244692216@qq.com 地址:150040 黑龙江省哈尔滨市和兴路26 号东北林业大学生态研究中心。
    责任作者: 王庆贵,博士,教授。主要研究方向:气候变化背景下的生态系统响应。Email:qgwang1970@163.com 地址:150080 黑龙江省哈尔滨市南岗区学府路74号黑龙江大学农业资源与环境学院。

    闫国永。主要研究方向:气候变化背景下的生态系统响应。Email:244692216@qq.com 地址:150040 黑龙江省哈尔滨市和兴路26 号东北林业大学生态研究中心。
    责任作者: 王庆贵,博士,教授。主要研究方向:气候变化背景下的生态系统响应。Email:qgwang1970@163.com 地址:150080 黑龙江省哈尔滨市南岗区学府路74号黑龙江大学农业资源与环境学院。

Response of root anatomy and tissue chemistry to nitrogen deposition in larch forest in the Great Xing’an Mountains of northeastern China

  • 1.

    1 Center for Ecological Research, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150040, P. R. China;

  • 2.

    2 College of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Heilongjiang University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150086, P. R. China;

  • 3.

    3 State Key Laboratory of Forest and Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110015, P. R. China.

  • 摘要: 大气N沉降逐渐加强,可能会改变地下C循环和土壤C状态,促使细根结构及其化学组分发生变化。N沉降对细根动态和形态影响方面的研究较多,但对细根结构和组分的影响还没有系统的研究。于2012年5月,在大兴安岭北方森林统一立地条件下建立4个水平N肥处理,分别为对照(CK,0 g/(m· a))、低N处理(TL, 2.5 g/(m·a))、中N处理(TM, 5 g/(m·a))和高N处理(TH , 7.5 g/(m·a))。在2014年7月,植物生长季,利用挖掘法获取兴安落叶松完整根系,测定其1~5级细根在不同N沉降处理下皮层厚度、维管束直径、根系直径、维根比以及化学组分变化,旨在探讨不同水平N沉降对细根解剖结构和化学组分的影响。结果表明:落叶松细根直径、皮层厚度和维管束直径均随根序的增加而增加,而相同根序、不同水平N沉降处理之间细根直径、皮层厚度、维管束直径和维根比之间存在差异,不同直径等级根系化学组分差异显著。上述实验结果说明,N沉降可能通过影响细根直径、皮层厚度、维管束直径、维根比和化学组分来影响细根生理功能和活性,进而可能影响植物地上和地下C循环。
    Abstract: The increase of nitrogen deposition may change the underground carbon cycle and soil carbon pool, and thus influence the structure and chemical components of fine roots. A number of researches have been done on fine root dynamics and morphological structure, but little is known of effects of nitrogen deposition on fine root structure and components. In the Great Xing’an Mountains, northeastern China, four sampling sites were set in a Larix gmelinii forest in May, 2012, i.e., controlling site (CK,0 g/(m·a)), low nitrogen treatment (TL, 2.5 g/(m·a)), medium nitrogen treatment (TM, 5.0 g/(m·a)) and high nitrogen treatment (TH, 7.5·g/(m·a)). In the growing season in July, 2014, the complete root system was dug out, and cortical thickness, stele diameter, root diameter, ratio of stele to root diameter of first five orders, and tissue chemistry (N, C and P) under different nitrogen treatments were measured. The influence of nitrogen deposition on morphological structure and chemical component of fine roots was analyzed. It showed that, with the ascending root order, indices such asroot diameter, cortical thickness and stele diameter increased accordingly. However, there were significant differences in cortical thickness, stele diameter, root diameter and ratio of stele to root diameter in the same root order under different levels of N treatment, and root tissue chemistry also had significant difference in different diameter classes. In conclusion, nitrogen deposition may impact cortical thickness, stele diameter, root diameter, ratio of stele to root diameter of first five orders and tissue chemistry (N, C and P), thus influences the physiological functions of fine roots, and finally has impact on above- and underground carbon cycle of plants.
  • [1] JACKSON R B, MOONEY H A, SCHULZE E D. A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1997, 94:7362-7366.
    [2] WANG X R, WANG Z Q, HAN Y Z, et al. Variations of fine root diameter with root order in Manchurian ash and Dahurian larch plantations [J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2005, 29(6): 871-877.
    [3] SHI W, WANG Z Q, LIU J L, et al. Fine root morphology of twenty hardwood species in Maoershan natural secondary forest in northeast in northeastern China [J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2008, 32(6):1217-1226.
    [4] EISSENSTAT D M, YANAI R D. The ecology of root lifespan [J]. Advances in Ecological Research, 1997, 27: 1-60.
    [5] GU J C, ZHAO Y L, WANG W N, et al. Effects of cortical thickness and stele diameter on variations of root diameter in Fraxinus mandshurica and Larix gmelinii[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(10):59-66
    [6] PREGITZER K S, DE FOREST J L, BURTON A J, et al. Fine root architecture of nine North American trees [J]. Ecological Monographs, 2002, 72:293-309.
    [7] LIU S Q, SONG F B. A comparison of root anatomical structure of maize genotypes with different drought tolerance [J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2007, 25(2): 86-91.
    [8] 王向荣, 王政权, 韩有志, 等. 水曲柳和落叶松不同根序之间细根直径的变异研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(6): 871-877.
    [9] 师伟, 王政权, 刘金梁, 等. 帽儿山天然次生林20个阔叶树种细根形态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(6):1217-1226.
    [10] WEI X, LIU Y, CHEN H B. Anatomical and functional heterogeneity among different root orders of Phellodendron amurense[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2008, 32(6): 1238-1247.
    [11] XU Y, GU J C,DONG X Y, et al. Fine root morphology, anatomy and tissue nitrogen and carbon contents of the first five orders in four tropical hardwood species in Hainan Island, China [J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2011, 35(9):955-964.
    [12] YANAI R D, EISSENSTAT D M. Coping with herbivores and pathogens: a model of optimal root turnover [J].Functional Ecology, 2002, 16: 865-869.
    [13] WELLS C E, GLENN D M, EISSENSTAT D M. Changes in the risk of fine root mortality with age: a case study in peach, Prunus persica (Rosaceae) [J].American Journal of Botany, 2002, 89:79-87.
    [14] 谷加存, 赵妍丽, 王文娜, 等. 皮层和中柱对水曲柳和落叶松吸收根直径变异的影响[J].林业科学, 2014, 50(10):59-66.
    [15] HISHI T. Heterogeneity of individual roots within the fine root architecture: causal links between physiological and ecosystem functions [J]. Journal of Forest Research, 2007, 12:126-133.
    [16] REAY D S, DENTENER F, SMITH P, et al. Global nitrogen deposition and carbon sinks [J]. Nature Geoscience, 2008, 1(7): 430-437.
    [17] LIU X, ZHANG Y, HAN W, et al. Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China [J]. Nature, 2013, 494: 459-462.
    [18] FL>Ü, CKIGER W, BRAUN S. Nitrogen deposition in Swiss forests and its possible relevance for leaf nutrient status, parasite attacks and soil acidification [J]. Environmental Pollution, 1998, 102(1): 69-76.
    [19] LIU K H, FANG Y T, YU F M, et al. Soil acidification in response to acid deposition in three subtropical forests of subtropical China [J]. Pedosphere, 2010, 20(3): 399-408.
    [20] VESTGARDEN L S, SELLE L T, STUANEST A O. In situ soil nitrogen mineralisation in a Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stand: effects of increased nitrogen input [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2003, 176(1-3): 205-216.
    [21] LEPPLAMMI-KUJANSUU J, OSTONEN I, STRMGREN M, et al. Effects of long-term temperature and nutrient manipulation on Norway spruce fine roots and mycelia production [J]. Plant and Soil, 2013, 366(1-2): 287-303.
    [22] RICHARD W, ZOBEL T B, KINRAIDE V C, et al. Fine root diameters can change in response to changes in nutrient concentrations [J]. Plant and Soil, 2007(1-2), 297: 243-254.
    [23] MATAMALA R, GONZALEZ-MELER M A, JASTROW J D, et al. Impacts of fine root turnover on forest NPP and soil C sequestration potential [J]. Science, 2003, 302: 1385-1387.
    [24] BADDELEY J A, WATSON C A. Influences of root diameter, tree age, soil depth and season on fine root survivorship in Prunus avium[J]. Plant and Soil, 2005, 276(1): 15-22.
    [25] JIA S, MCLAUGHLIN N B, GU J, et al. Relationships between root respiration rate and root morphology, chemistry and anatomy in Larix gmelinii and Fraxinus mandshurica[J]. Tree Physiology, 2013, 33(6): 579-589.
    [26] 刘胜群, 宋凤斌. 不同耐旱性玉米根系解剖结构比较研究[J].干旱地区农业研究, 2007, 25(2): 86-91.
    [27] GUO D L, XIA M X, WEI X, et al. Anatomical traits associated with absorption and mycorrhizal colonization are linked to root branch order in twenty-three Chinese temperate tree species [J]. New Phytologist, 2008, 180(3): 673-683.
    [28] MCCORMACK M L, ADAMS T S, SMITHWICK E A, et al. Predicting fine root lifespan from plant functional traits in temperate trees [J]. New Phytologist, 2012, 195: 823-831.
    [29] WANG C, HAN S, ZHOU Y, et al. Responses of fine roots and soil N availability to short-term nitrogen fertilization in a broad-leaved Korean pine mixed forest in northeastern China [J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7:e31042.
    [30] HELMISAARI H S, SAARSALMI A, KUKKOLA M. Effects of wood ash and nitrogen fertilization on fine root biomass and soil and foliage nutrients in a Norway spruce stand in Finland [J]. Plant and Soil, 2009, 314(1):121-132.
    [31] TU L H, PENG Y, CHEN G, et al. Direct and indirect effects of nitrogen additions on fine root decomposition in a subtropical bamboo forest [J]. Plant and Soil, 2014, 389(1-2): 273-288.
    [32] TAYLOR B N, STRAND A E, COOPER E R, et al. Root length, biomass, tissue chemistry and mycorrhizal colonization following 14 years of CO2 enrichment and 6 years of N fertilization in a warm temperate forest [J/OL]. Tree Physiology, 2014, [2014-07-22]. http:∥treephys.oxfordjournals.org/contet/early/2014107/22/treephys.tpu058.full.
    [33] FITTER A H, STICKLAND T R. Architectural analysis of plant root systems Ⅲ: Studies on plants under field conditions [J]. New Phytologist, 1992, 121(2): 243-248.
    [34] 卫星, 刘颖, 陈海波. 黄波罗不同根序的解剖结构及其功能异质性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(6): 1238-1247.
    [35] TAYLOR B N, BEIDLER K V, COOPER E R, et al. Sampling volume in root studies: the pitfalls of under-sampling exposed using accumulation curves [J]. Ecology Letters, 2013, 16:862-869.
    [36] RYSER P, LAMBERS H. Root and leaf attributes accounting for the performance of fast-and slow-growing grasses at different nutrient supply [J]. Plant and Soil, 1996, 170(2): 251-265.
    [37] RYSER P. Intra-and inter specific variation in root length, root turnover and the underlying parameters[M]∥LAMBERS H, POORTER H, VAN VUUREN M M I. Inherent variation in plant growth, physiological mechanisms and ecological consequences. Leiden: Backhuys, 1998:441-465.
    [38] KONÔPKA B, NOGUCHI K, SAKATA T, et al. Effects of simulated drought stress on the fine roots of Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) in a plantation forest on the Kanto Plain eastern Japan [J]. Journal of Forest Research, 2007, 12:143-151.
    [39] HISHI T, TAKEDA H. Dynamics of heterorhizic root systems: protoxylem groups within the fine-root system of Chamaecyparis obtusa [J]. New Phytologist, 2005, 167(2):509-521.
    [40] HOEBERG P, FAN H, QUIST M, et al. Tree growth and soil acidification in response to 30 years of experimental nitrogen loading on boreal forest [J]. Global Change Biology, 2006, 12: 489-499.
    [41] BLANCAFLOR E B, JONES D L, GILROY S. Alterations in the cytoskeleton accompany aluminum-induced growth inhibition and morphological changes in primary roots of maize [J]. Plant Physiology, 1998, 118(1):159-172.
    [42] LI W, JIN C, GUAN D, et al. The effects of simulated nitrogen deposition on plant root traits: a meta-analysis [J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2015, 82: 112-118.
    [43] PREGITZER K S, LASKOWSKI M J, BURTON A J, et al. Variation in sugar maple root respiration with root diameter and soil depth [J]. Tree Physiology, 1998, 18:665-670.
    [44] GUO D L, MITCHELL R J, HENDRICKS J J. Fine root branch orders respond differentially to carbon source-sink manipulations in a longleaf pine forest [J]. Oecologia, 2004, 140:450-457.
    [45] 许旸, 谷加存, 董雪云, 等. 海南岛4个热带阔叶树种前5级细根的形态、解剖结构和组织CN含量[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(9):955-964.
    [46] BURTON A J, JARVEY J C, JARVI M P, et al. Chronic N deposition alters root respiration-tissue N relationship in northern hardwood forests [J]. Global Change Biology, 2014, 18: 258-266.
    [47] HYVONEN R, PERSSON T, ANDERSSON S, et al. Impact of long-term nitrogen addition on carbon stocks in trees and soils in northern Europe [J]. Biogeochemistry, 2008, 89: 121-137.
    [48] ADAMS T S, MCCORMACK M L, EISSENSTAT D M. Foraging strategies in trees of different root morphology: the role of root lifespan [J]. Tree Physiology, 2013, 33: 940-948.
  • [1] 韩朝, 冀晓东, 刘小光, 张晓, 赵东晖.  北方5种常见乔木根−土摩擦锚固性能研究 . 北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(9): 80-91. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190432
    [2] 张亦弛, 郭素娟, 孙传昊.  生长延缓剂对板栗叶片解剖结构及非结构性碳水化合物的影响 . 北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(1): 46-53. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20180437
    [3] 王元敏, 王燕, 王思远, 高国强, 谷加存.  中国东北温带3种木质藤本植物细根解剖和形态性状研究 . 北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(5): 42-49. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190419
    [4] 席本野.  杨树根系形态、分布、动态特征及其吸水特性 . 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(12): 37-49. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190400
    [5] 童龙, 张磊, 李彬, 耿养会, 谢锦忠, 张玮, 陈丽洁.  钩梢对麻竹叶片C、N、P化学计量特征的影响 . 北京林业大学学报, 2018, 40(11): 69-75. doi: 10.13332/j.1000--1522.20180216
    [6] 刘家霖, 满秀玲.  生态系统尺度水汽通量分配——以寒温带兴安落叶松林为例 . 北京林业大学学报, 2018, 40(1): 46-56. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170202
    [7] 钟悦鸣, 董芳宇, 王文娟, 王健铭, 李景文, 吴波, 贾晓红.  不同生境胡杨叶片解剖特征及其适应可塑性 . 北京林业大学学报, 2017, 39(10): 53-61. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170089
    [8] 张敏, 张唯, 宫再欣, 郑彩霞.  油松大孢子叶球发生发育的形态与解剖学观察 . 北京林业大学学报, 2017, 39(6): 1-12. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160411
    [9] 韩士杰, 袁志友, 方运霆, 王智平.  中国北方森林和草地生态系统碳氮耦合循环与碳源汇效应研究 . 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(12): 128-130. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160384
    [10] 王存国, 陈正侠, 马承恩, 林贵刚, 韩士杰.  细根异速分解的3个可能影响途径 . 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(4): 123-128. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150437
    [11] 夏延国, 董芳宇, 吕爽, 王键铭, 井家林, 李景文.  极端干旱区胡杨细根的垂直分布和季节动态 . 北京林业大学学报, 2015, 37(7): 37-44. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150082
    [12] 赵延霞, 骆有庆, 宗世祥, 王荣, 罗红梅, .  不同沙棘品种雌雄株叶片解剖结构及抗旱性比较 . 北京林业大学学报, 2012, 34(6): 34-41.
    [13] 骆宗诗, 向成华, 章路, 谢大军, 罗晓华.  花椒林细根空间分布特征及椒草种间地下竞争 . 北京林业大学学报, 2010, 32(2): 86-91.
    [14] 马长明, 翟明普, 刘春鹏, .  单作与间作条件下核桃根系分布特征研究 . 北京林业大学学报, 2009, 31(6): 181-186.
    [15] 杨成, 刘丛强, 宋照亮, 刘占民, 郑厚义.  贵州喀斯特山区植物土壤C、N、S的分布特征 . 北京林业大学学报, 2008, 30(1): 45-51.
    [16] 肖洋, 陈丽华, 余新晓, 王小平, 秦永胜, 陈俊崎, .  北京密云麻栎--侧柏林生态系统N、P、K的生物循环 . 北京林业大学学报, 2008, 30(supp.2): 67-71.
    [17] 肖洋, 陈丽华, 余新晓, 王小平, 秦永胜, 陈俊崎, .  北京密云油松人工林生态系统N、P、K养分循环 . 北京林业大学学报, 2008, 30(supp.2): 72-75.
    [18] 徐双民, 杨振德, 李绍才, 王玉杰, 金小娟, 时尽书, 张宇清, 谭伟, 肖生春, 高峻, 朱教君, 南海龙, 胡晓丽, 李世东, 范丙友, 吕建雄, 孙晓梅, 窦军霞, 李发东, 颜容, 张冰玉, 潘存德, 翟明普, 陈文汇, 刘俊昌, 韩海荣, 苏晓华, 张守攻, 康宏樟, 冯仲科, 三乃, 孟平, 张一平, 刘红霞, 胡诗宇, 朱清科, 宋献方, 肖洪浪, 师瑞峰, 谢益民, 李建章, 王云琦, 孙海龙, 骆秀琴, 田小青, 周春江, 马钦彦, 姜伟, 岳良松, 陆海, 杨志荣, 吴斌, 齐实, 刘昌明, 李义良, 张雁, 蔡怀, 赵双菊, 周文瑞, 蒋佳荔, 赵博光, 齐实, 李智辉, 王笑山, 何磊, 赵有科, 葛颂, 张德荣, 蒲俊文, 朱金兆, 蒋湘宁, 姚山, 齐力旺, 宋清海, 张岩, 张劲松, 伊力塔, 张永安, 于静洁, 石丽萍, 马超德, 康峰峰, 吕守芳, 褚建民, 刘元, 杨聪, 崔保山, 吴庆利, 曲良建, 刘相超, 王玉珠, 王建华, 朱林峰, 刘鑫宇, 田颖川, 胡堃, 唐常源.  梯田生物埂几种灌木根系的垂直分布特征 . 北京林业大学学报, 2006, 28(2): 34-38.
    [19] 徐国良, 莫江明, 周国逸.  N沉降下土壤动物群落的响应：1年研究结果总述2681258920 . 北京林业大学学报, 2006, 28(3): 1-7.
    [20] 旷远文, 杨丽韫, 李贤军, 刘海军, 程万里, 王发国, 罗辑, 徐秋芳, 王鸿斌, 李艳华, 郝朝运, 陈永亮, 宋瑞清, 张占宽, 张志, 吴娟, 王安志, 毕华兴, 赵廷宁, 卜崇峰, 明军, 马忠明, 张真, 马洁, 姜培坤, 程根伟, 郭卫东, 李文华, 刘国彬, 骆有庆, 陈天全, 刘建梅, 朱金兆, 习宝田, 张启翔, 温达志, 张璧光, 叶华谷, 谭秀英, 刘一星, 曹子龙, 冀瑞卿, 李伟, 李文军, 刘鹏, 陈玉福, 温俊宝, 邢福武, 郑翠玲, 沈泉, 裴铁, 朱清科, 康向阳, 孔祥波, 敏朗, 程放, 李笑吟, 周国逸, 兰彦平, 金昌杰, 孙保平, 则元京, 马其侠, 何祖慰, 张宇清, 沈佐锐, 刘世忠, 李延军, 张志明, 金幼菊, 丁国栋, 陈红锋, 张德强, 冯继华, 姚爱静, 曹刚, 陶万强, 魏铁.  长白山原始阔叶红松林细根分布及其周转的研究 . 北京林业大学学报, 2005, 27(2): 1-5.
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  604
  • HTML全文浏览量:  96
  • PDF下载量:  19
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-11-20
  • 刊出日期:  2016-04-30

兴安落叶松林细根解剖结构和化学组分对N沉降的响应

doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150433
  • 1. 1 东北林业大学生态研究中心
  • 2. 2 黑龙江大学农业资源与环境学院
  • 3. 3 中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所
    • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金项目(31170421、41575137、31370494、31070406)、黑龙江省自然科学基金重点项目(ZD201406)

    作者简介:

    闫国永。主要研究方向:气候变化背景下的生态系统响应。Email:244692216@qq.com 地址:150040 黑龙江省哈尔滨市和兴路26 号东北林业大学生态研究中心。
    责任作者: 王庆贵,博士,教授。主要研究方向:气候变化背景下的生态系统响应。Email:qgwang1970@163.com 地址:150080 黑龙江省哈尔滨市南岗区学府路74号黑龙江大学农业资源与环境学院。

    闫国永。主要研究方向:气候变化背景下的生态系统响应。Email:244692216@qq.com 地址:150040 黑龙江省哈尔滨市和兴路26 号东北林业大学生态研究中心。
    责任作者: 王庆贵,博士,教授。主要研究方向:气候变化背景下的生态系统响应。Email:qgwang1970@163.com 地址:150080 黑龙江省哈尔滨市南岗区学府路74号黑龙江大学农业资源与环境学院。

  • 收稿日期: 2015-11-20
  • 刊出日期: 2016-04-30

摘要: 大气N沉降逐渐加强,可能会改变地下C循环和土壤C状态,促使细根结构及其化学组分发生变化。N沉降对细根动态和形态影响方面的研究较多,但对细根结构和组分的影响还没有系统的研究。于2012年5月,在大兴安岭北方森林统一立地条件下建立4个水平N肥处理,分别为对照(CK,0 g/(m· a))、低N处理(TL, 2.5 g/(m·a))、中N处理(TM, 5 g/(m·a))和高N处理(TH , 7.5 g/(m·a))。在2014年7月,植物生长季,利用挖掘法获取兴安落叶松完整根系,测定其1~5级细根在不同N沉降处理下皮层厚度、维管束直径、根系直径、维根比以及化学组分变化,旨在探讨不同水平N沉降对细根解剖结构和化学组分的影响。结果表明:落叶松细根直径、皮层厚度和维管束直径均随根序的增加而增加,而相同根序、不同水平N沉降处理之间细根直径、皮层厚度、维管束直径和维根比之间存在差异,不同直径等级根系化学组分差异显著。上述实验结果说明,N沉降可能通过影响细根直径、皮层厚度、维管束直径、维根比和化学组分来影响细根生理功能和活性,进而可能影响植物地上和地下C循环。

English Abstract

闫国永, 王晓春, 邢亚娟, 韩士杰, 王庆贵. 兴安落叶松林细根解剖结构和化学组分对N沉降的响应[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(4): 36-43. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150433
引用本文: 闫国永, 王晓春, 邢亚娟, 韩士杰, 王庆贵. 兴安落叶松林细根解剖结构和化学组分对N沉降的响应[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(4): 36-43. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150433
shu
YAN Guo-yong, WANG Xiao-chun, XING Ya-juan, HAN Shi-jie, WANG Qing-gui. Response of root anatomy and tissue chemistry to nitrogen deposition in larch forest in the Great Xing’an Mountains of northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(4): 36-43. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150433
Citation: YAN Guo-yong, WANG Xiao-chun, XING Ya-juan, HAN Shi-jie, WANG Qing-gui. Response of root anatomy and tissue chemistry to nitrogen deposition in larch forest in the Great Xing’an Mountains of northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(4): 36-43. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150433
shu

    全文HTML

参考文献 (48)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    版权所有 © 2013 《北京林业大学学报》编辑部

    地址：北京市海淀区清华东路35号邮政编码：100083

    电话：010-62337673Email：bldxed@bjfu.edu.cn 京ICP备05066833号-1

    本系统由 北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司 开发   百度统计