Wood decay performance of strobilurins preservatives

Zhang Jingpeng; Jiang Mingliang; Ma Xingxia; Zhang Bin

doi:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210010

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2021 > 43(3): 131-137. > DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210010

Zhang Jingpeng, Jiang Mingliang, Ma Xingxia, Zhang Bin. Wood decay performance of strobilurins preservatives[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(3): 131-137. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210010

Citation:

PDF (569 KB)

Wood decay performance of strobilurins preservatives

Research Institute of Wood Industry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China

More Information

Received Date: January 10, 2021
Revised Date: February 18, 2021
Available Online: March 05, 2021
Published Date: April 15, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective Wood preservative treatment is an effective way to prolong the lifespan of wood, reduce deforestation and further improve the ecological environment. In this study, in order to provide a basis for the development of eco-friendly wood preservatives and enrich the wood preservative system, the decay performance of a series of methoxyacrylate fungicides, iodopropynyl butyl carbamate (IPBC) and 4, 5-dichloro-N-octyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (DCOIT) has been systematically screened.
Method In order to discover novel agents with high-activity to control wood rot fungus, the inhibition zone method was used to test the antifungal activity of 5 candidate agents (azoxystrobin, kresoxim-methyl, pyraclostrobin, IPBC and DCOIT) against wood rot fungus. Then the high-activity agents were prepared into water-based formulations, and the method for lab sand block test was used to evaluate interior decay resistance of treated materials at different levels of drug retention.
Result The inhibition zone results indicated that azoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin, DCOIT and IPBC showed good inhibitory effects on brown rot fungi and white rot fungi. Especially, pyraclostrobin and IPBC exhibited high antibacterial effects, which were higher than the control agent propiconazole. For the preservative treated radiata pine material under the chemical retention of about 0.21−0.46 kg/m³, the mass loss rates of treatment material by azoxystrobin and pyraclostrobin for white rot fungi and brown rot fungi were 3.1%−7.9% and 3.5%−7.8%, respectively. Moreover, the mass loss rate of IPBC treatment radiata pine material was 0.9%−5.6% under the chemical retention of about 0.2 kg/m³. The lab sand block test of the preservative treated Populus tomentosa results showed that the decay resistance of all the treated samples at different chemical retention levels was much better than that of the untreated samples. However, their mass loss rate was still large. It is not recommended to use this kind of fungicides for the preservative treatment of Populus tomentosa.
Conclusion In this study, the antifungal activity of pyraclostrobin and azoxystrobin formulations is equivalent to the control agent propiconazole, and antifungal effect of IPBC is better than propiconazole. So they could be further developed and utilized as a novel wood preservative.
- wood,
- strobilurins,
- iodopropynyl butyl carbamate,
- zone of inhibition,
- interior decay resistance

FullText(HTML)

References (26)

References

[1]	孙芳利, Prosper N K, 吴华平,等. 木竹材防腐技术研究概述[J]. 林业工程学报, 2017, 2(5):1−8. Sun F L, Prosper N K, Wu H P, et al. A review on the development of wood and bamboo preservation[J]. Journal of Forestry Engineering, 2017, 2(5): 1−8.
[2]	Goodell B, Nicholas D D, Suchultz T P. Wood deterioration and preservation: advances in our changing world[M]. Washington: American Chemical Society, 2003.
[3]	杨忠, 江泽慧, 费本华. 木材初期腐朽研究综述[J]. 林业科学, 2006, 42(3):99−103. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20060319 Yang Z, Jiang Z H, Fei B H. Review of literature on incipient decay in wood[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2006, 42(3): 99−103. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20060319
[4]	葛晓雯, 王立海, 侯捷建, 等. 褐腐杨木微观结构、力学性能与化学成分的关系研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(10):112−122. Ge X W, Wang L H, Hou J J, et al. Relationship among microstructure, mechanical properties and chemical compositions in Populus cathayana sapwood during brown-rot decay[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(10): 112−122.
[5]	马星霞, 王艳华, 贺大龙. 古建筑木结构病害与保护[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2021. Ma X X, Wang Y H, He D L. Diseases and protection of ancient wooden structure[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2021.
[6]	曹金珍. 国外木材防腐技术和研究现状[J]. 林业科学, 2006, 42(7):120−126. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2006.07.021 Cao J Z. A review on wood preservation technologies and research[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2006, 42(7): 120−126. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2006.07.021
[7]	Williams G, Cornfield J A, Brown J, et al. Preservatives for wood and other cellulosic materials: U. S. Patent 5, 916, 356 [P]. 1999−01−29.
[8]	席丽霞, 蒋明亮, 马星霞. 三唑制剂及其铜唑制剂处理材的防腐性能[J]. 木材工业, 2015, 29(3):14−17. Xi L X, Jiang M L, Ma X X. Decay resistance of wood treated with triazole and copper triazole preservative[J]. China Wood Industry, 2015, 29(3): 14−17.
[9]	张景朋, 王朝晖, 马星霞, 等. 木结构覆板用胶合板的防腐处理工艺及性能评价[J]. 木材工业, 2020, 34(3):18−21. Zhang J P, Wang Z H, Ma X X, et al. Evaluation of processing technology and performance of preservative-treated plywood for wood-frame structures[J]. China Wood Industry, 2020, 34(3): 18−21.
[10]	鲍敏振, 于文吉, 陈玉和, 等. 铜唑防腐剂对杨木重组木防腐性能及物理力学性能的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2020, 37(1):165−170. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2020.01.022 Bao M Z, Yu W J, Chen Y H, et al. Effects of CuAz preservative on the antiseptic performance and physical and mechanical properties of poplar scrimber[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2020, 37(1): 165−170. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2020.01.022
[11]	王卿平, 曹金珍, 张景朋, 等. 含三唑复合防腐剂及其竹处理材的金属腐蚀性能[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(10):128−136. Wang Q P, Cao J Z, Zhang J P, et al. Metal corrosion performance of triazole-containing compound preservatives and treated bamboo[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(10): 128−136.
[12]	赵培亮. 新型Strobilurins衍生物的设计、合成及生物活性研究[D]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2008. Zhao P L. Design synthesis and bioactivity of novel strobilurin derivatives[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Normal University, 2008.
[13]	Bartlett D W, Clough J M, Godwin J R, et al. The strobilurin fungicides[J]. Pest Management Science, 2002, 58(7): 649−662. doi: 10.1002/ps.520
[14]	Hansen J. IPBC: a new fungicide for wood protection[J]. Modern Paint and Coatings, 1984, 74(11): 50−56.
[15]	顾学斌, 王磊, 马振瀛. 抗菌防霉技术手册[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2018. Gu X B, Wang L, Ma Z Y. Technical manual of antifungal[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2018.
[16]	Williams T M. The mechanism of action of isothiazolone biocides[J]. Power Plant Chemistry, 2007, 9(1): 14−22.
[17]	张俊博. 异噻唑啉酮类化合物在黄瓜灰霉病及菌核病防治中的应用[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2012. Zhang J B. The study of isothiazolinones applied in controlling gray gould and sclerotinia on cucumber[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2012.
[18]	Frazer F W. Compositions for the treatment of timber and other wood substrates: U. S. Patent 8, 927, 063 [P]. 2015−01−06.
[19]	国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典[M]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2020. State Pharmacopeia Committee of China. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China[M]. Beijing: China Medical Science and Technology Press, 2020.
[20]	蒋明亮, 李晓文, 张景朋, 等. 一种木竹材防腐防霉改性组合剂及处理木竹材的方法: 中国, CN201810820686.7[P]. 2018−12−18. Jiang M L, Li X W, Zhang J P, et al. The combination modifier of preservative and mildew resistant and method for treating wood and bamboo materials: China, CN201810820686.7[P]. 2018−12−18.
[21]	中华人民共和国国家林业局. 木材防腐剂对腐朽菌毒性实验室试验方法: LY/T 1283−2011[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2011. National Forestry Administration of the People ’s Republic of China. Method of laboratory test for toxicity of wood preservatives to decay fungi: LY/T 1283−2011[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2011.
[22]	席丽霞, 马星霞, 蒋明亮. 三唑制剂的防腐及防白蚁性能[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(7):123−128. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20130718 Xi L X, Ma X X, Jiang M L. Decay and termite resistant performance of triazole preservatives[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2013, 49(7): 123−128. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20130718
[23]	刘一星, 赵广杰. 木材学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2012. Liu Y X, Zhao G J. Wood science[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2012.
[24]	汪亮, 曹金珍, 姜卸宏. 蒙脱土–DDAC 复合防腐剂处理杨木的性能及表征[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2010, 32(4):242−246. Wang L, Cao J Z, Jiang X H. Properties and characterization of poplar wood treated with the montmorillonite-DDAC compound preservative[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(4): 242−246.
[25]	Highley T L. Influence of type and amount of lignin on decay by Coriolus versicolor[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1982, 12(2): 435−438. doi: 10.1139/x82-065
[26]	Highley T L, Murmanis L L. Micromorphology of degradation in western hemlock and sweetgum by the white-rot fungus Coriolus versicolor[J]. Holzforschung, 1987, 41(2): 67−71. doi: 10.1515/hfsg.1987.41.2.67

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(9)

1.	马耀辉，徐国祺，黄鑫. 新型IPBC/β-环糊精复合防霉剂的研制. 北京林业大学学报. 2025(01): 126-134 . 本站查看
2.	黄鑫，徐国祺，马耀辉. 制备具有荧光示踪功能的硼掺杂银杏叶碳量子点木材防腐剂. 北京林业大学学报. 2025(01): 116-125 . 本站查看
3.	张景朋，蒋明亮，张斌. 嘧菌酯高效液相色谱分析方法及防腐材抗流失性能研究. 浙江农林大学学报. 2025(01): 185-192 .
4.	邢宏楠. 丙烯酸酯阻尼乳液聚合水性车用涂料制备及粘附性能研究. 粘接. 2024(08): 13-16 .
5.	马星霞，乔云飞，黎冬青，王艳华. 古建筑木构件生物危害预防性保护体系框架构建. 木材科学与技术. 2023(01): 83-90 .
6.	孙振炳，李晓宝，姚曜，李晓平，孙雷，Jeffrey J.Morrell. 果胶预处理对杉木耐久性的影响. 西部林业科学. 2022(01): 84-88 .
7.	张景朋，张卿硕，吴玉章，蒋明亮. 防腐木材中戊唑醇和丙环唑的高效液相色谱分析方法. 林业工程学报. 2022(05): 99-105 .
8.	王磊，赵晓琪，王雅梅. 环境响应型纳米载体材料的缓控释特性及其木材保护领域应用前景. 林产工业. 2022(09): 19-24 .
9.	张景朋，张卿硕，韩利平，蒋明亮. 高效液相色谱测定防腐木中IPBC含量的方法研究. 木材科学与技术. 2022(05): 71-77 .

Other cited types(6)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (1183) PDF downloads (57) Cited by(15)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Wood decay performance of strobilurins preservatives

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(9)

Other cited types(6)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content