Feeding choice behavior and mechanism of adult <i>Meliboeus ohbayashii primoriensis</i>

Cui Yaqin; Zong Shixiang

doi:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210172

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2021 > 43(9): 121-130. > DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210172

Cui Yaqin, Zong Shixiang. Feeding choice behavior and mechanism of adult Meliboeus ohbayashii primoriensis[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(9): 121-130. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210172

Citation:

PDF (1119 KB)

Feeding choice behavior and mechanism of adult Meliboeus ohbayashii primoriensis

Cui Yaqin^1,,
Zong Shixiang^2, ,

1.
Shanxi Academy of Forestry and Grassland Sciences, Taiyuan 030012, Shanxi, China
2.
Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

More Information

Received Date: May 07, 2021
Revised Date: July 06, 2021
Available Online: August 23, 2021
Published Date: October 14, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective By comparing differences in the selection and consumption of Meliboeus ohbayashii primoriensis to 3 kinds of plants (Juglans regia, Malus pumila and Crataegus pinnatifida), and by analyzing the composition and content of plant volatiles, this research provides a solid basis for a further development of the plant source attractant for M. ohbayashii primoriensis.
Method The leaves of three plants (J. regia, M. pumila and C. pinnatifida) were used to determine host plant choice and consumption by this insect pest. Volatile components in the branches and leaves of these three plants were collected using the dynamic headspace method and were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Furthermore, Chi-square test was used to analyze and compare the differences in behavioral responses of M. ohbayashii primoriensis adults in the volatiles emitted by these plants.
Result Significant differences were found in the selection and consumption of the three plants by M. ohbayashii primoriensis. Adults displayed high feeding selectivity for J. regia and consumed J. regia leaves. Whereas they showed low feeding selectivity for M. pumila and C. pinnatifida, without consuming their leaves. A total of 45 plant volatile compounds were identified from the branches and leaves of these three plants, including five alkanes, eight esters, three aromatic hydrocarbons, 18 terpenes, two aldehydes, four alcohols and five ketones. In the experiment of behavioral responses, both male and female adults of M. ohbayashii primoriensis were attracted by camphene in obvious tendency responses, while only males were attracted by bornyl acetate, decanal and eucalyptol in a certain attraction.
Conclusion J. regia can be used as a host plant to supplement the nutrition of adult M. ohbayashii primoriensis, whereas the leaves of M. pumila and C. pinnatifida are not suitable for consumption. Camphene, bornyl acetate, decanal and eucalyptol had a certain attraction effect on the adults M. ohbayashii primoriensis. These volatile components may play an important role during the identification and selection of host plants by adult M. ohbayashii primoriensis. These volatile components of branches and leaves may play an important role during the identification and selection of host plants by adult M. ohbayashii primoriensis.
- Meliboeus ohbayashii primoriensis,
- feeding selection,
- plant volatile,
- behavioral response

FullText(HTML)

References (33)

References

[1]	王小艺, 曹亮明, 杨忠岐. 我国五种重要吉丁虫学名订正及再描述(鞘翅目: 吉丁甲科)[J]. 昆虫学报, 2018, 61(10):1202−1211. Wang X Y, Cao L M, Yang Z Q. Revision of scientific names and re-description of five important buprestid species (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in China[J]. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 2018, 61(10): 1202−1211.
[2]	师光禄, 刘贤谦. 中国核桃害虫[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1996: 72−74. Shi G L, Liu X Q. Chinese walnut pests[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 1996: 72−74.
[3]	王瑞, 李青森. 山西省核桃害虫及防治对策[J]. 山西大学学报(自然科学版), 1993, 16(1):107−111. Wang R, Li Q S. Walnut insect pests of Shanxi and their countermeasure control[J]. Journal of Shanxi University (Natural Science Edition), 1993, 16(1): 107−111.
[4]	王奎, 刘丽君, 蔡卫东. 我国核桃虫害研究综述[J]. 绿色科技, 2015(4):68−73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9944.2015.04.030 Wang K, Liu L J, Cai W D. Summary of related research on insect attack of walnut in China[J]. Journal of Green Science and Technology, 2015(4): 68−73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9944.2015.04.030
[5]	王爱华. 翼城县核桃黑小吉丁虫综合防治技术初探[J]. 山西林业, 2014(4):47−48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-4707.2014.04.026 Wang A H. A preliminary study on the comprehensive control technology of walnut black beetle in Yicheng County[J]. Forestry of Shanxi, 2014(4): 47−48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-4707.2014.04.026
[6]	刘永善, 刘少庆. 核桃黑小吉丁虫生物学特性及防治技术[J]. 现代农村科技, 2010(24):18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5329.2010.24.017 Liu Y S, Liu S Q. Biological characteristics and control techniques of walnut black beetle[J]. Xiandai Nongcun Keji, 2010(24): 18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5329.2010.24.017
[7]	陈川, 李兴权, 杨美霞, 等. 陕西省核桃害虫种类调查及主要害虫的防治技术[J]. 农学学报, 2015, 5(9):64−68. doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.casb14110052 Chen C, Li X Q, Yang M X, et al. Investigation of pests and control technologies of major pests of Juglans regia in Shaanxi[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2015, 5(9): 64−68. doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.casb14110052
[8]	Cui Y Q, Kong S Q, Liu X H, et al. Comparison of the volatiles composition between healthy and buprestid infected Juglans regia (Juglandaceae)[J]. Revista Colombiana de Entomología, 2020, 46(1): 1−5.
[9]	Reinecke A, Ruther J, Mayer C J, et al. Optimized trap lure for male Melolontha cockchafers[J]. Journal of Applied Entomology, 2006, 130(3): 171−176. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.2006.01041.x
[10]	Crook D J, Khrimian A, Francese J A, et al. Development of a host-based semiochemical lure for trapping emerald ash borer Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae)[J]. Environmental Entomology, 2008, 37: 356−365. doi: 10.1093/ee/37.2.356
[11]	尹姣, 薛银根, 乔红波, 等. 粘虫(Mythimna separata Walker)选择产卵场所的意义及颜色在定位中的作用[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(6):2483−2489. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2007.06.042 Yin J, Xue Y G, Qiao H B, et al. The significance of oviposition site selection and effect of color in orientation by oriental army worm, Mythimna separata Walker[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007, 27(6): 2483−2489. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2007.06.042
[12]	Rudinsky J A. Host selection and invasion by the Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins, in coastal Douglas-fir forests[J]. The Canadian Entomologist, 1966, 98(1): 98−111. doi: 10.4039/Ent9898-1
[13]	Pureswaran D S, Poland T M. Host selection and feeding preference of Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) on ash (Fraxinus spp.)[J]. Environmental Entomology, 2009, 38(3): 757−765. doi: 10.1603/022.038.0328
[14]	Ikeda T, Oda K, Yamane A, et al. Volatiles from pine logs as the attractant for the Japanese pine sawyer Monochamus alternatus (Coleopetra: Cerambycidea)[J]. Journal of the Japanese Forestry Society, 1980, 62(4): 150−152.
[15]	崔晓宁. 苹果小吉丁虫对寄主植物挥发物的行为反应及嗅觉相关基因功能研究 [D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2018. Cui X N. Behavioral responses of Agrilus mali to host-plant volatiles and function of related olfactory genes[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2018.
[16]	Fan J T, Sun J H. Influences of host volatiles on feeding behavior of the Japanese pine sawyer, Monochamus alternatus[J]. Journal of Applied Entomology, 2006, 130(4): 238−244. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.2006.01045.x
[17]	袁丽芳, 谢寿安, 刘绥鹏, 等. 花椒窄吉丁对寄主挥发物的触角电位及行为反应[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 45(2):111−120. Yuan L F, Xie S A, Liu S P, et al. Electroantennogram and behavioural responses of Agrilus zanthoxylumi to volatiles form Zanthoxylum bungeanum[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 45(2): 111−120.
[18]	崔晓宁, 伊志豪, 王明, 等. 苹小吉丁成虫补充营养的偏好性及相关植物挥发物分析[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(11):96−106. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20161112 Cui X N, Yi Z H, Wang M, et al. Maturation feeding preference of adult Agrilus mali and related host plant leaf volatiles[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(11): 96−106. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20161112
[19]	Jang T, Rho M S, Koh S H, et al. Host-plant quality alters herbivore responses to temperature: a case study using the generalist Hyphantria cunea[J]. Entomologia Experimentlis et Applicata, 2015, 154(2): 120−130. doi: 10.1111/eea.12261
[20]	Suwarno S, Salmah M R C, Arshad A, et al. Oviposition preference and nutritional indices of Papilio polytes L. (Papilionidae) larvae on four rutaceous (Sapindales: Rutaceae) host plants[J]. Journal of the Lepidopterists Society, 2010, 64(4): 203−210. doi: 10.18473/lepi.v64i4.a5
[21]	Togola A, Boukar O, Belko N, et al. Host plant resistance to insect pests of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.): achievements and future prospects[J]. Euphytica, 2017, 213(11): 213−239.
[22]	卓志航, 杨伟, 徐丹萍, 等. 云斑天牛寄主核桃树皮及树叶的挥发性成分[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44(5):205−241. Zhuo Z H, Yang W, Xu D P, et al. Volatile components in bark and leaf of host plant Juglans regia L. of Batocera lineolate Chevrolat[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 44(5): 205−241.
[23]	刘亚敏, 胥耀平, 高锦明, 等. GC/MS法分析核桃叶挥发油化学成分[J]. 西北植物学报, 2004, 24(6):1100−1102. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2004.06.027 Liu Y M, Xu Y P, Gao J M, et al. Analysis of volatile components from leaves of Juglans regia by GC/MS[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2004, 24(6): 1100−1102. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2004.06.027
[24]	李欣, 白素芬. 寄主植物-植食性昆虫-天敌三重营养关系中化学生态学的研究进展[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2003, 37(3):224−232. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2340.2003.03.006 Li X, Bai S F. Advances in the studies on the chemical ecology of tritrophic interactions among host-plant, herbivore and natural enemies[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2003, 37(3): 224−232. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2340.2003.03.006
[25]	蔡晓明, 李兆群, 潘洪生, 等. 植食性害虫食诱剂的研究与应用[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2018, 34(1):8−35. Cai X M, Li Z Q, Pan H S, et al. Research and application of food-based attractants of herbivorous insect pests[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2018, 34(1): 8−35.
[26]	Wohlers P, Tjallingii W F. Electroantennogram responses of aphids to the alarm pheromone (E)-β-farnesene[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 1983, 33(1): 79−82.
[27]	王焱. 松墨天牛引诱剂和松材线虫分子检测技术研究[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2008. Wang Y. Monochamus alternatus attractant and molecular detection technique of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2008.
[28]	王紫薇. 光肩星天牛对海防林中五种植物寄主选择的行为研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学, 2016. Wang Z W. The study of behavior the host selection of Anoplophora glabripennis to five kinds of plants[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang A&F University, 2016.
[29]	Kessler A, Baldwin T. Defensive function of herbivore-induced plant volatile emissions in nature[J]. Science, 2001, 291: 2141−2144. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5511.2141
[30]	刘燕, 谢冬生, 熊焰, 等. 庚醛与桉叶油醇组合对马铃薯块茎蛾产卵选择的影响[J]. 植物保护, 2016, 42(3):99−103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0529-1542.2016.03.016 Liu Y, Xie D S, Xiong Y, et al. Effects of combination of cineole with heptanal on oviposition choices of the potato tuber moth, Phthorimaea operculella[J]. Plant Protection, 2016, 42(3): 99−103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0529-1542.2016.03.016
[31]	Hammack L. Attractiveness of synthetic corn volatiles to feral northern and western corn rootworm beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)[J]. Environmental Entomology, 1997, 26(2): 311−317. doi: 10.1093/ee/26.2.311
[32]	Hardie J, Isaacs R, Pickett J A, et al. Methyl salicylate and (-)-(1R, 5S)-myrtenal are plant-derived repellents for black bean aphid, Aphis fabae Scop (Homoptera: Aphididae)[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1994, 20(11): 2847−2855. doi: 10.1007/BF02098393
[33]	James D G. Field evaluation of herbivore-induced plant volatiles as attractants for beneficial insects: methyl salicylate and the green lacewing, Chrysopa nigricornis[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2003, 29(7): 1601−1609. doi: 10.1023/A:1024270713493

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(22)

1.	陈子川，潘国营，陈灿，徐云鹏，林晗，陈煜，谢安强，范海兰. 光强对木麻黄幼苗根系形态、解剖结构及其碳氮含量的影响. 生态学报. 2024(10): 4377-4387 .
2.	陈静航，叶蕊蕊，孙建喜，罗利华，李灿，吴勇，胡田田. 滴灌施肥周期和毛管布设方式对苹果树细根直径时空分布的影响. 干旱地区农业研究. 2023(01): 101-110 .
3.	吴小健，李秉钧，颜耀，李明，吴鹏飞，马祥庆. 不同种源杉木细根解剖性状的差异分析. 森林与环境学报. 2023(03): 232-239 .
4.	吴义远，董文渊，浦婵，钟欢，夏莉，袁翎凌，陈新. 土壤水分和养分对筇竹竹鞭解剖特征及其适应可塑性的影响. 竹子学报. 2023(01): 1-10 .
5.	张家豪，王根绪，王文志，孙守琴. 大气氮沉降增加对树木生长和水碳利用的影响. 西部林业科学. 2023(03): 145-151+159 .
6.	韩梦豪，李俊杰，王磊，刘晴廙，关庆伟. 间伐对马尾松不同根序细根化学组分的影响. 森林与环境学报. 2023(04): 337-345 .
7.	张玉慧，谢芳，闫国永. 不同乔木树种根系养分吸收策略的维度性差异. 林业科技. 2023(04): 16-22 .
8.	刘逸潇，王传宽，上官虹玉，臧妙涵，梁逸娴，全先奎. 兴安落叶松不同径级根碳氮磷钾化学计量特征的种源差异. 应用生态学报. 2023(07): 1797-1805 .
9.	周诚，刘彤，王庆贵，韩士杰. 长期氮添加对阔叶红松林细根形态、解剖结构和化学组分的影响. 北京林业大学学报. 2022(11): 31-40 . 本站查看
10.	郝龙飞，郝文颖，刘婷岩，张敏，许吉康，斯钦毕力格. 氮添加及接种处理对1年生樟子松苗木根系形态及养分含量的影响. 北京林业大学学报. 2021(04): 1-7 . 本站查看
11.	焦海珍，邵陈禹，陈建姣，张晨禹，陈佳豪，李云飞，沈程文. 重度遮阴及复光条件下茶树根系的生理响应及抗氧化酶活性动态变化. 茶叶科学. 2021(05): 695-704 .
12.	洪梓明，邢亚娟，闫国永，张军辉，王庆贵. 长白山白桦山杨次生林细根形态特征和解剖结构对氮沉降的响应. 生态学报. 2020(02): 608-620 .
13.	吴义远，董文渊，刘培，张孟楠，谢泽轩，田发坤. 不同土壤水分和养分条件下筇竹竹秆解剖特征及其适应可塑性. 北京林业大学学报. 2020(04): 80-90 . 本站查看
14.	李秉钧，颜耀，王小虎，孙雪莲，马祥庆. 环境因子对林木细根功能性状的影响研究进展. 福建林业科技. 2020(02): 125-132 .
15.	张俪予，张军辉，张蕾，陈伟，韩士杰. 兴安落叶松和白桦细根形态对环境变化的响应. 北京林业大学学报. 2019(06): 15-23 . 本站查看
16.	陈旭，刘洪凯，赵春周，王强，王延平. 山东滨海盐碱地11个造林树种叶解剖特征对土壤条件的响应. 植物生态学报. 2019(08): 697-708 .
17.	杨阳，熊远兵，郝晓泳. 干旱胁迫对耧斗菜根解剖结构及生理特性的影响. 北方园艺. 2018(17): 82-89 .
18.	王建宇，胡海清，邢亚娟，闫国永，王庆贵. 大兴安岭兴安落叶松林树木生物量对氮沉降的响应. 林业科学研究. 2018(03): 88-94 .
19.	杨阳，熊远兵，郝晓泳. 干旱胁迫对耧斗菜根解剖结构及生理特性的影响. 内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版). 2018(03): 1-7 .
20.	钟悦鸣，董芳宇，王文娟，王健铭，李景文，吴波，贾晓红. 不同生境胡杨叶片解剖特征及其适应可塑性. 北京林业大学学报. 2017(10): 53-61 . 本站查看
21.	毛晋花，邢亚娟，马宏宇，王庆贵. 氮沉降对植物生长的影响研究进展. 中国农学通报. 2017(29): 42-48 .
22.	张鑫，邢亚娟，贾翔，王庆贵. 北方森林细根对氮沉降和二氧化碳浓度升高的响应. 中国农学通报. 2017(30): 84-90 .

Other cited types(33)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (834) PDF downloads (70) Cited by(55)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Feeding choice behavior and mechanism of adult Meliboeus ohbayashii primoriensis

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(22)

Other cited types(33)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content