Evaluation and optimization strategies of cultural ecosystem services in community parks in central urban area of Beijing

Zhong Shu; Li Fangzheng; Liu Zhicheng

doi:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220038

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2024 > 46(12): 126-137. > DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220038

Zhong Shu, Li Fangzheng, Liu Zhicheng. Evaluation and optimization strategies of cultural ecosystem services in community parks in central urban area of Beijing[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(12): 126-137. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220038

Citation:

PDF (2493 KB)

Evaluation and optimization strategies of cultural ecosystem services in community parks in central urban area of Beijing

School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

More Information

Received Date: April 06, 2023
Revised Date: June 11, 2024
Accepted Date: November 27, 2024
Available Online: November 29, 2024

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective
Community parks are an important part of urban parks and green spaces, and they are also the natural spaces closest to residents in the city. As people’s demands for urban green space become more diverse, community parks undertake more and more non-material service functions. To explore the cultural ecosystem services (CES) provided by community parks at the scale of central urban area of the city, building an evaluation index system, and proposing targeted optimization strategies will help promote the construction of an ecological and natural urban living environment.
Method
The research took Beijing’s central district as the research object, constructed a community park CES evaluation index system, and collected public perception evaluation data for 10 community parks in 4 categories and 8 sub-categories, a total of 19 indicators. The importance-performance analysis method (IPA analysis method) was used to construct an evaluation model, with the importance evaluation results corresponding to CES demand as the horizontal axis, the satisfaction evaluation results corresponding to CES supply as the vertical axis, and the importance and satisfaction evaluation of each type of CES. The results were divided into 4 quadrants as the average value. According to IPA analysis results of each index factor, the IPA analysis models of various CES were established to analyze the current supply and demand characteristics of CES in community parks in the central urban area of Beijing.
Result
The evaluation results were analyzed from two levels: (1) at the overall level, among 19 indicators, the top three index factors of performance evaluation results were: vegetation coverage (mean value of satisfaction was 4.21), the level of natural resource maintenance (mean value of satisfaction was 4.07) , hierarchy of plants (mean value of satisfaction was 4.04). The top three index factors of importance evaluation results were: site security (mean importance value was 4.54), level of environmental hygiene maintenance (mean importance value was 4.49), the completeness of logo interpretation system (mean importance value was 4.41. (2) At the classification level, we analyzed the evaluation results of four types of CES in terms of recreation and tourism value, aesthetics and aesthetic value, cultural identity value and natural education value, and pointed out the development direction of each index factor.
Conclusion
Based on CES evaluation results of 10 community parks in this study, for different types of community parks, specific optimization strategies are proposed from three aspects: adherence to environmental maintenance and site construction, enhancement of service levels and facility construction, and enhancement of theme characteristics and regional identity. It is expected to provide a reference for the optimization and improvement of CES in other similar types of community parks in the central urban area of Beijing.
- landscape architecture,
- community park,
- cultural ecosystem services,
- evaluation system,
- Beijing

FullText(HTML)

References (29)

References

[1]	吴隽宇, 江伟康, 黄钰婷. 粤港澳大湾区生态系统服务价值时空演变研究[J]. 南方建筑, 2022(6): 52−61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0232.2022.06.007 Wu J Y, Jiang W K, Huang Y T. Spatial-temporal changes of ecosystem service value in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area[J]. South Architecture, 2022(6): 52−61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0232.2022.06.007
[2]	邵明, 董宇翔, 林辰松. 基于GWR模型的成渝城市群生态系统服务时空演变及驱动因素研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(11): 118−129. Shao M, Dong Y X, Lin C S. Spatio-temporal evolution and driving factors of ecosystem services in Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration of southwestern China based on GWR model[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(11): 118−129.
[3]	姜芊孜, 梁雪原. 北方城市河流生态系统服务供需评价与优化: 以济南市兴济河为例[J]. 南方建筑, 2022(8): 73−83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0232.2022.08.008 Jiang Q Z, Liang X Y. Evaluation and optimization of urban river ecosystem service supply and demands in Northern China: a case study based on the Xingji River in Jinan[J]. South Architecture, 2022(8): 73−83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0232.2022.08.008
[4]	刘春芳, 王韦婷, 刘立程, 等. 西北地区县域生态系统服务的供需匹配: 以甘肃古浪县为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(9): 2177−2190. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200911 Liu C F, Wang W T, Liu L C, et al. Supply-demand matching of country ecosystem services in Northwest China: a case study of Gulang county[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(9): 2177−2190. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200911
[5]	Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems & human well-being: synthesis[M]. Washington: Island Press, 2005.
[6]	Braat L C. The value of the ecosystem services concept in economic and biodiversity policy[M]//Jacobs S, Dendoncker N, Keune H, et al. Ecosystem services: global issues, local practices. San Diego: Elsevier, 2013: 97–103.
[7]	毛齐正, 罗上华, 马克明, 等. 城市绿地生态评价研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(17): 5589−5600. doi: 10.5846/stxb201112141912 Mao Q Z, Luo S H, Ma K M, et al. Research advances in ecological assessment of urban greenspace[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(17): 5589−5600. doi: 10.5846/stxb201112141912
[8]	Seppelt R, Fath B, Burkhard B, et al. Form follows function? Proposing a blueprint for ecosystem service assessments based on reviews and case studies[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 21: 145−154. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.09.003
[9]	Dickinson D C, Hobbs R J. Cultural ecosystem services: characteristics, challenges and lessons for urban green space research s[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 25: 179−194. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.014
[10]	陈语娴, 戴代新. 城市公园绿地生态系统文化服务评估研究进展[J]. 中国城市林业, 2020, 18(6): 9−15. doi: 10.12169/zgcsly.2020.03.30.0002 Chen Y X, Dai D X. Research progress in cultural ecosystem service assessment of urban parks and green spaces[J]. Journal of Chinese Urban Forestry, 2020, 18(6): 9−15. doi: 10.12169/zgcsly.2020.03.30.0002
[11]	徐亚丹, 陈瑾妍, 张玉钧. 生态系统文化服务研究综述[J]. 河北林果研究, 2016, 31(2): 210−216. Xu Y D, Chen J Y, Zhang Y J. A review of cultural ecosystem service[J]. Hebei Journal of Forestry and Orchard Research, 2016, 31(2): 210−216.
[12]	董连耕, 朱文博, 高阳, 等. 生态系统文化服务研究进展[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 50(6): 1155−1162. Dong L G, Zhu W B, Gao Y, et al. Research progress in culture ecosystem services (CES) and its development trend[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2014, 50(6): 1155−1162.
[13]	霍思高, 黄璐, 严力蛟. 基于SolVES模型的生态系统文化服务价值评估: 以浙江省武义县南部生态公园为例[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(10): 3682−3691. Huo S G, Huang L, Yan L J. Valuation of cultural ecosystem services based on SolVES: a case study of the South Ecological Park in Wuyi County, Zhejiang Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(10): 3682−3691.
[14]	彭婉婷, 刘文倩, 蔡文博, 等. 基于参与式制图的城市保护地生态系统文化服务价值评价: 以上海共青森林公园为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(2): 439−448. Peng W T, Liu W Q, Cai W B, et al. Evaluation of ecosystem cultural services of urban protected areas based on public participation GIS (PPGIS): a case study of Gongqing Forest Park in Shanghai, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(2): 439−448.
[15]	李凯, 沈雯, 黄宗胜. 城市绿色空间生态系统文化服务绩效评价: 以贵阳市黔灵山公园为例[J]. 城市问题, 2019(3): 44−50. Li K, Shen W, Huang Z S. Performance evaluation of culture ecosystem services of urban green space: a case study of Qianlingshan Park of Guiyang Ctiy[J]. Urban Problems, 2019(3): 44−50.
[16]	郑善文, 马默衡, 李海龙, 等. 居民福祉视角下城市中心区生态空间文化服务评价: 以北京为例[J]. 城市发展研究, 2021, 28(4): 21−27. Zheng S W, Ma M H, Li H L, et al. Evaluation of eco-spatial culture ecosystem service in urban central district: case study of Beijing[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2021, 28(4): 21−27.
[17]	北京市人民政府. 北京城市总体规划(2016—2035年) [EB/OL]. (2017−09−29)[2022−10−08]. https://www.beijing.gov.cn/gongkai/guihua/wngh/cqgh/201907/t20190701_100008.html. The People’s Government of Beijing Municipality. Beijing’s urban master plan(2016-2035) [EB/OL]. (2017−09−29)[2022−10−08]. https://www.beijing.gov.cn/gongkai/guihua/wngh/cqgh/201907/t20190701_100008.html.
[18]	住房和城乡建设部. 城市绿地分类标准: CJJ/T 85-2017[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2018. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. Standard for classification of urban green space: CJJ/T 85-2017[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2018.
[19]	北京市园林绿化局. 2019年城市绿化资源情况[EB/OL]. (2020−04−23)[2022−10−08]. https://yllhj.beijing.gov.cn/zwgk/tjxx/202206/P020220615516946546673.pdf. Beijing Municipal Forestry and Parks Bureau. Urban Greening Resources in 2019 [EB/OL]. (2020−04−23)[2022−10−08]. https://yllhj.beijing.gov.cn/zwgk/tjxx/202206/P020220615516946546673.pdf.
[20]	Costanza R, D’arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387(5): 253−260.
[21]	de Groot R S, Wilson M A, Boumans R M. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services[J]. Ecological Economics, 2002, 41(3): 393−408.
[22]	Mónica H M, Tobias P. An empirical review of cultural ecosystem service indicators[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2013(29): 434−444.
[23]	Martilla J A, James J C. Importance-performance analysis[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1997, 41(1): 77–79.
[24]	王敏, 邱明, 汪洁琼, 等. 基于重要性—绩效表现分析的上海苏州河滨水空间文化性生态系统服务供需关系分析与优化[J]. 风景园林, 2019, 26(10): 107−112. Wang M, Qiu M, Wang J Q, et al. The supply-demand relation analysis and improvements based on importance-performance analysis of cultural ecosystem services in waterfront areas along the Suzhou Creek in Shanghai[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2019, 26(10): 107−112.
[25]	田里, 李柏文, 周小坤. 旅游目的地竞争力: 重要性–绩效分析[J]. 人文地理, 2009, 24(6): 79−81, 54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2398.2009.06.015 Tian L, Li B W, Zhou X K. Tourist destination competitiveness: perspective from importance-performance analysis[J]. Human Geography, 2009, 24(6): 79−81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2398.2009.06.015
[26]	董享帝, 欧静. 基于IPA分析法的龙架山森林公园科普景观规划设计评价[J]. 林业勘查设计, 2020, 49(2): 16−20, 51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4505.2020.02.005 Dong X D, Ou J. Planning and design evaluation of popular science landscape in Longjiashan Forest Park based on IPA analysis[J]. Forest Investigation Design, 2020, 49(2): 16−20, 51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4505.2020.02.005
[27]	梁晨, 曾坚. 基于重要性–绩效分析的历史文化街区步行环境优化研究: 以天津五大道地区为例[J]. 现代城市研究, 2019 (2): 54−59. Liang C, Zeng J. Research on optimization of walking environment in historical district based on importance-performance analysis: a case study of the Five Avenues, Tianjin[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2019(2): 54−59.
[28]	于冰沁, 谢长坤, 杨硕冰, 等. 上海城市社区公园居民游憩感知满意度与重要性的对应分析[J]. 中国园林, 2014, 30(9): 75−78. Yu B Q, Xie C K, Yang S B, et al. Correspondence analysis on residents’ perceived recreation satisfaction and importance in Shanghai Urban Community Park[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2014, 30(9): 75−78.
[29]	风笑天. 社会调查中的问卷设计[M]. 天津: 天津人民出版社, 2002: 165−167. Feng X T. Questionnaire design in social surveys [M]. Tianjin: Tianjin People’s Publishing House, 2002: 165−167.

[1]	Zhou Dezhi, Guan Yinghui, Zhang Bingbin, Chen Rong, Wang Xiuru. Spatial-temporal evolution of habitat quality in northern Shaanxi Province of northwestern China based on land use change and its driving factors[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(6): 85-95. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210437
[2]	Wang Meng, Ti Yang, Wang Jiadong, Zhao Qiulu, Hu Zhiliang, Luan Xiaofeng. Ecosystem services, trade-offs and synergy analysis in Tianjin under different land use scenarios[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(5): 77-85. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210008
[3]	Zhao Xin, Zhang Jie, Zhong Lindong. Evaluation and analysis on ecosystem service value of Fenglin National Nature Reserve in Heilongjiang Province of northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(7): 100-110. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210041
[4]	Shao Ming, Dong Yuxiang, Lin Chensong. Spatio-temporal evolution and driving factors of ecosystem services in Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration of southwestern China based on GWR model[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(11): 118-129. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200217
[5]	Liu Xiao, Zhang Xuexia, Xu Xinliang, Chen Dechao. Impacts of land use change on ecosystem service value in Bashang Area of Hebei Province, northern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(8): 94-104. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180244
[6]	ZHANG Ting, SHI Hao, XU Yan-nan, XUE Jian-hui, CHU Jun, GENG Qing-hong. Quantitative evaluation on the impact of the Sloping Land Conversion Program on landscape pattern of land use in Karst area[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(3): 34-43. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140312
[7]	LI Yi-qiu, , FENG Zhong-ke, Ma Jun-ji. Structure and form evolution of urban land use and its driving factors in Mianyang City, southwest China.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30(增刊1): 238-243.
[8]	WANG Jia, , XIONG Ni-na, DONG Bin, YAN Xiu-jing, SUI Hong-da, FENG Zhong-ke. Land-use and landscape pattern changes in Beijing in recent 20 years based on remote sensing.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30(增刊1): 83-88.
[9]	WANG Sheng-ping, ZHANG Zhi-qiang, SUN Ge, ZHANG Man-liang, YU Xin-xiao. Effects of land use change on hydrological dynamics at watershed scale in the Loess Plateau-A case study in the Lüergou watershed, Gansu Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2006, 28(1): 48-54.
[10]	WANG Xiao-dan, CHEN Bin-ru, GAO Pan, CHENG Gen-wei. Changes of land use and landscape patterns of the Gongga Mountain area on the eastern edge of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2005, 27(3): 40-45.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(6)

1.	林鸿裕，卢桂宁. 基于模糊逻辑综合评判的垃圾处理厂选址仿真. 计算机仿真. 2024(01): 513-517 .
2.	刘子晴，葛韵宇. 北京第二道绿化隔离地区空间潜力分析及郊野公园选址研究. 北京规划建设. 2024(01): 40-45 .
3.	黄友慧，辛儒鸿，李凯. 红枫湖镇生态环境质量评价及修复优先区识别研究. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学). 2024(04): 64-72 .
4.	王菲，孙晨，姜雁林，马晓燕，冯丽. 北京市第二道绿化隔离带地区生态敏感性评价. 北京农学院学报. 2023(02): 105-110 .
5.	刘烨琪. 基于情景规划的杭州郊野公园选址研究. 现代园艺. 2023(19): 99-102 .
6.	葛韵宇，李雄. 基于碳汇和游憩服务协同提升的北京市第二道绿化隔离地区郊野公园环空间布局优化. 北京林业大学学报. 2022(10): 142-154 . 本站查看

Other cited types(8)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (232) PDF downloads (57) Cited by(14)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Evaluation and optimization strategies of cultural ecosystem services in community parks in central urban area of Beijing