• Scopus
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD)
  • A Guide to the Core Journal of China
  • CSTPCD
  • F5000 Frontrunner
  • RCCSE
Advanced search
Wang Yuyao, Ma Erni. Effects of different pretreatment methods on the pore structure of wood cell wall[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(11): 140-151. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230158
Citation: Wang Yuyao, Ma Erni. Effects of different pretreatment methods on the pore structure of wood cell wall[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(11): 140-151. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230158

Effects of different pretreatment methods on the pore structure of wood cell wall

More Information
  • Received Date: June 24, 2023
  • Revised Date: August 29, 2023
  • Accepted Date: October 16, 2023
  • Available Online: October 22, 2023
  • Objective 

    This paper explores the changes in pore structure of wood cell walls induced by water and compares this method with the pretreatment methods such as microwave treatment and delignification, in order to provide a scientific basis for wood modification.

    Method 

    Poplar (Populus euramericana) and Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) specimens of 20 mm (radial) × 20 mm (tangential) × 5 mm (longitudinal) were treated with water soaking for 1 h and 1 month, respectively, microwave treatment at 500 W for 18 min, as well as sodium chlorite under acidic conditions. The microscopic morphology and pore structure were characterized by scanning electron microscopy and nitrogen sorption test, and the effects of different treatment methods on cell wall thickness, specific surface area, pore size distribution and pore volume were compared.

    Result 

    The cell walls of poplar and fir thickened after water treatment, and the specific surface area of the water-treated wood for 1 h increased from 1.535 and 1.154 m2/g to 2.488 and 2.336 m2/g, and that of water-treated wood for 1 month further increased to 2.822 and 2.940 m2/g, respectively. For water-treated poplar, new pores were formed in the micropore and mesopore range (pore formation), and there was an increase in pore size (pore enlargement). For water-treated Chinese fir, the change in pore volume in the micropore range mainly reflected a pore enlargement effect, and there were both pore formation and enlargement phenomena with the increase of treating time. Larger pores were generated in the mesopore range due to the removal of water-soluble extractives, which led to a redistribution of pore size. The changes in cell wall thickness and specific surface area of microwave-treated poplar and Chinese fir were similar with those of water treatment, and some micropores were produced in poplar after microwave treatment, and the pore size distribution of mesopores in poplar and both pores in Chinese fir showed enlargement. The cell wall thickness of poplar and fir treated with delignification decreased by 1.79% and 0.53%, respectively, while the specific surface area increased, the micropores in Chinese fir rose, and the other changes of pore size distribution were due to the enlargement of pore size.

    Conclusion 

    The effect of water treatment on poplar and Chinese fir for 1 h and 1 month was comparable to that of microwave treatment with mass loss percentage of 1.29% and 3.33%, and delignification treatment at removal rate of 10.94% and 8.06%, respectively, presenting a unique pore size distribution change pattern. The pore volume of three treatments varies in different pore size ranges for different tree species due to different treating mechanisms. This study provides a reference for selecting a scientific and efficient wood pretreatment method.

  • [1]
    刘一星, 赵广杰. 木材学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2012.

    Liu Y X, Zhao G J. Wood science[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2012.
    [2]
    Everett D H. Manual of symbols and terminology for physicochemical quantities and units, appendix Ⅱ: definitions, terminology and symbols in colloid and surface chemistry[J]. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 2013, 31(4): 577−638.
    [3]
    刘文静, 张玉君. 细胞壁空隙对木材性能及加工利用的影响[J]. 世界林业研究, 2021, 34(2): 44−48. doi: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2020.0101.y

    Liu W J, Zhang Y J. Effects of pore structure in cell wall on wood properties and processing utilization[J]. World Forestry Research, 2021, 34(2): 44−48. doi: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2020.0101.y
    [4]
    He X, Xiong X, Xie J, et al. Effect of microwave pretreatment on permeability and drying properties of wood[J]. BioResources, 2017, 12(2): 3850−3863.
    [5]
    Donaldson L A, Cairns M, Hill S. Comparison of micropore distribution in cell walls of softwood and hardwood xylem[J]. Plant Physiology, 2018, 178: 1142−1153.
    [6]
    Yang T, Ma E, Cao J. Dynamic moisture sorption and dimensional stability of furfurylated wood with low lignin content[J]. Holzforschung, 2019, 74(1): 68−76. doi: 10.1515/hf-2019-0033
    [7]
    Yang T, Ma E, Cao J. Synergistic effects of partial hemicellulose removal and furfurylation on improving the dimensional stability of poplar wood tested under dynamic condition[J]. Industrial Crops and Products, 2019, 139: 111550. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111550
    [8]
    Li Y, Fu Q, Yu S, et al. Optically transparent wood from a nanoporous cellulosic template: combining functional and structural performance[J]. Biomacromolecules, 2016, 17(4): 1358−1364. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.6b00145
    [9]
    Chen C, Song J, Zhu S, et al. Scalable and sustainable approach toward highly compressible, anisotropic, lamellar carbon sponge[J]. Chem, 2018, 4(3): 544−554. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2017.12.028
    [10]
    罗文圣, 赵广杰. 木材细胞壁的空隙构造及物质的输运过程[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2001, 23(2): 85−89. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2001.02.019

    Luo W S, Zhao G J. Pore structure of cell wall of wood and transport processes of substance[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2001, 23(2): 85−89. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2001.02.019
    [11]
    Hui L, Liu Z, Ni Y. Characterization of high-yield pulp (HYP) by the solute exclusion technique[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100(24): 6630−6634. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.07.055
    [12]
    仲翔, 张少军, 马尔妮. 不同含水率状态下木材细胞壁孔径分布变化[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2021, 43(11): 128−136. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210260

    Zhong X, Zhang S J, Ma E N. Variation in pore size distribution of wood cell wall under different moisture states[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(11): 128−136. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210260
    [13]
    Jang E S, Kang C W. An experimental study on efficient physical wood modification for enhanced permeability-focusing on ultrasonic and microwave treatments[J]. Wood Material Science & Engineering, 2023, 18(2): 446−453.
    [14]
    谢满华. 化学处理木材的应力松弛[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2006.

    Xie M H. Stress relaxation of chemically treated wood [D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2006.
    [15]
    杨甜甜. 湿度周期作用下糠醇改性杨木的水分吸着与变形响应机制[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2020.

    Yang T T. Moisture sorption and deformation response mechanisms of furfurylated poplar wood to cyclically changing relative humidity[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2020.
    [16]
    張文博, 徳本守彦, 武田孝志, 等. 木材のメカノソープテイブクリープ及ぼす脱リグニン处理の影响Ⅱ[J]. 木材学会志, 2006, 52(1): 29−36.

    Zhang W B, Morihiko T , Takashi T, et al. Effects of delignifying treatments on mechano-sorptive creep of wood Ⅱ[J]. Journal of the Japan Society of Wood Science and Technology, 2006, 52(1): 29−36.
    [17]
    Branaver S, Emmeff P H, Teller E. Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1938, 60(2): 309−319. doi: 10.1021/ja01269a023
    [18]
    Horvath G, Kawazoe K. Method for the calculation of effective pore size distribution in molecular sieve carbon[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 1983, 16(8): 470−475.
    [19]
    暴丽霞, 高培峰, 彭绍春. 多孔材料孔径分布测试方法的研究[J]. 材料科学, 2020, 10(2): 95−103.

    Bao L X, Gao P f, Peng S C. Analysis method of pore size distribution of porous materials[J]. Materials Science, 2020, 10(2): 95−103.
    [20]
    Barrett E P, Joyner L G, Halenda P H. The determination of pore volume and area distribution in porous substances[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1951, 73(1): 373−380. doi: 10.1021/ja01145a126
    [21]
    Jang E S, Kang C W. Delignification effects on Indonesian momala (Homalium foetidum) and Korean red toon (Toona sinensis) hardwood pore structure and sound absorption capabilities[J]. Materials, 2021, 14: 5215.
    [22]
    孙晶. 重金属影响微藻生长富集油脂的机理研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2015.

    Sun J. Influence of heavy metals on microalgal growth and lipids accumulation [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2015.
    [23]
    Dong Y, Ma E, Li J, et al. Thermal properties enhancement of poplar wood by substituting poly (furfuryl alcohol) for the matrix[J]. Polymer Composites, 2020, 41(3): 1066−1073. doi: 10.1002/pc.25438
    [24]
    曹梦丹, 张雪霞, 任文庭, 等. 干燥方式对毛竹细胞壁孔隙结构的影响[J]. 林业工程学报, 2021, 6(6): 58−65.

    Cao M D, Zhang X X, Ren W T, et al. Effect of drying methods on the cell wall pore structure of Phyllostachys edulis[J]. Journal of Forestry Engineering, 2021, 6(6): 58−65.
    [25]
    Sing K S W, Everett D H, Haul R A W, et al. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity[J]. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 1985, 57(4): 603−619. doi: 10.1351/pac198557040603
  • Related Articles

    [1]Cui Tingting, Zhu Liying, Zhang Litian, Ye Yongxiang, Lin Qinlan, Yan Minlong. Analysis of spatial vitality characteristics and influencing factors of Wuyi Mountain National Park from online and offline perspectives[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20240278
    [2]Yu Xiao, Ouyang Xunzhi, Pan Ping, Deng Wenping, Peng Songli, Zang Hao, Hu Rongrong. Spatial structure characteristics and its evaluation of evergreen broadleaved forest at different growth stages in Lushan Mountain, Jiangxi Province of eastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(12): 32-40. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210450
    [3]Sun Qiaoyun, Bao Menghan, Huang Hanwen, Zhang Yujun. Boundary delimitation of the proposed Songnen Plain National Park of northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(1): 103-112. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210418
    [4]Tang Weilu, Jin Kun. Preliminary study on night lodging habitat selection of Nomascus hainanus in Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park, southern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(2): 113-126. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200185
    [5]YU Jia-lin, ZHANG Wei-guo, TIAN Kun, SONG Wei-hong, LI Qiu-ping, YANG Rong, ZHANG Yun. Response of radial growth of three conifer trees to climate change at their upper distribution limits in Potatso National Park, Shangri-La, southwestern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(1): 43-51. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160184
    [6]ZHAO Wen-xia, ZOU Bin, ZHENG Jing-ming, LUO Jiu-fu. Correlations between leaf, stem and root functional traits of common tree species in an evergreen broad-leaved forest[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(6): 35-41. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160087
    [7]WANG Yong, QIAO Yong, SUN Xiang-yang. Soil taxonomy in Jiufeng National Forest Park, Beijing[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(3): 217-220.
    [8]CUI Li-juan, ZHANG Man-yin, LI Wei, WANG Yi-fei, SHANG Xiao-jing.. Management and assessment of national wetland parks.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2009, 31(5): 102-107.
    [9]SHI Qiang, HE Qing-tang. The best tourism environmental capacity of Zhangjiajie National Forest Park, southern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2007, 29(4): 143-147. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2007.04.029
    [10]WANG Qing-kui, WANG Si-long, FENG Zong-wei. Comparison of active soil organic carbon pool between Chinese fir plantations and evergreen broadleaved forests[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2006, 28(5): 1-6.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(36)

    1. 张瑜,徐子棋,陈光明,张志军,杨献坤,崔斌,王大中,芦贵君. 不同林草治沙模式对盐碱沙地沉积物粒度特征的影响. 中国水土保持. 2024(03): 29-33 .
    2. 田震,高凡,赛硕,杨之恒,丁国栋. 清水河县森林生态系统碳储量、碳密度分布特征. 干旱区资源与环境. 2024(06): 166-173 .
    3. 董鹏,任悦,高广磊,丁国栋,张英. 呼伦贝尔沙地樟子松枯落物和土壤碳、氮、磷化学计量特征. 干旱区研究. 2024(08): 1354-1363 .
    4. 包润泽,张星,姚庆智. 接种褐环乳牛肝菌对樟子松及油松根际土壤细菌群落的影响. 安徽农业科学. 2023(06): 148-151+162 .
    5. 拓卫卫,范家伟,周雅洁,杨京,张延文,佟小刚,吴发启,姚冲. 毛乌素沙地樟子松林植物-土壤生态化学计量特征演变关系. 水土保持研究. 2023(06): 177-186 .
    6. 刘明慧,柳叶,任悦,高广磊,丁国栋,张英,赵珮杉,刘轩. 科尔沁沙地樟子松人工林土壤真菌共现网络及其与土壤因子的关系. 生态学报. 2023(23): 9912-9924 .
    7. 邹星晨,王欣苗,左亚凡,张泽鑫,贺康宁. 青海云杉不同演替阶段林下草本多样性特征及其环境解释. 生态学报. 2023(24): 10285-10294 .
    8. 阿拉萨,王陇,高广磊,张英,曹红雨,杜宇佳,刘雪锋. 乌兰布和沙漠沿黄段风沙土有机质和碳酸钙含量特征. 中国水土保持科学(中英文). 2022(01): 41-47 .
    9. 刘轩,赵珮杉,高广磊,赵媛媛,丁国栋,糜万林. 沙地樟子松(Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica)物候特征及其对气候的响应. 中国沙漠. 2022(02): 25-35 .
    10. 张恒宇,孙树臣,吴元芝,安娟,宋红丽. 黄土高原不同植被密度条件下土壤水、碳、氮分布特征. 生态环境学报. 2022(05): 875-884 .
    11. 阿拉萨,高广磊,丁国栋,张英,曹红雨,杜宇佳. 土壤微生物膜生理生态功能研究进展. 应用生态学报. 2022(07): 1885-1892 .
    12. 王辉丽,于树学,郭立,梁海龙,李伟. 樟子松优树群体遗传多样性评价及指纹图谱构建. 甘肃农业大学学报. 2022(03): 103-110 .
    13. 王学林,高广磊,丁国栋,曹红雨. 沙地樟子松人工林土壤酶活性研究. 干旱区资源与环境. 2021(01): 114-120 .
    14. 徐畅,雷泽勇,周凤艳,毛禹. 沙地樟子松人工林生长对非降雨季节土壤水分的影响. 生态学杂志. 2021(01): 58-66 .
    15. 曹怡立. 章古台沙地樟子松人工林衰退的原因以及可持续经营措施. 农业与技术. 2021(03): 75-77 .
    16. 韦睿,罗玉亮,兰岚,于宏影,裴晓娜,刘亭亭. 截顶及遗传因素对樟子松无性系种子园种实差异的影响. 温带林业研究. 2021(02): 32-37 .
    17. 王雨,郭米山,高广磊,曹红雨,丁国栋,梁海军,赵珮杉. 三种外生菌根真菌对沙地樟子松幼苗生长的影响. 干旱区资源与环境. 2021(10): 135-140 .
    18. 李嘉珞,郭米山,高广磊,阿拉萨,杜凤梅,殷小琳,丁国栋. 沙地樟子松菌根化幼苗对干旱胁迫的生理响应. 干旱区研究. 2021(06): 1704-1712 .
    19. 黄艳章,信忠保. 不同生态恢复模式对黄土残塬沟壑区深层土壤有机碳的影响. 生态学报. 2020(03): 778-788 .
    20. 王一佩,孙美美,程然然,关晋宏,李国庆,杜盛. 黄土高原中西部人工针叶林浅层土壤有机碳积累及影响因素. 水土保持研究. 2020(03): 30-36 .
    21. 林雅超,高广磊,丁国栋,王学林,魏晓帅,王陇. 沙地樟子松人工林土壤理化性质与微生物生物量的动态变化. 生态学杂志. 2020(05): 1445-1454 .
    22. 白晓霞,艾海舰. 榆林沙地樟子松人工林土壤养分变化特征. 西部林业科学. 2020(03): 80-85 .
    23. 周磊,吴慧,王树力. 不同林分红皮云杉针叶养分含量及生态化学计量特征研究. 植物资源与环境学报. 2020(03): 19-25+33 .
    24. 白晓霞,鱼慧利,张静,艾海舰. 榆林沙地樟子松人工林可持续经营措施研究. 榆林学院学报. 2020(04): 46-49 .
    25. 魏晓帅,郭米山,高广磊,任悦,丁国栋,张英. 呼伦贝尔沙地樟子松根内真菌群落结构与功能群特征. 北京大学学报(自然科学版). 2020(04): 710-720 .
    26. 赵珮杉,郭米山,高广磊,丁国栋,张英. 科尔沁沙地樟子松根内真菌群落结构和功能群特征. 林业科学. 2020(09): 87-96 .
    27. 李佳文,赵珮杉,高广磊,任悦,丁国栋,张英,郭米山,魏晓帅. 陕西榆林沙区樟子松根内真菌群落结构和功能群特征. 菌物学报. 2020(10): 1854-1865 .
    28. 王家源,殷小琳,任悦,高广磊,丁国栋,张英,赵珮杉,郭米山. 毛乌素沙地樟子松外生菌根真菌多样性特征. 微生物学通报. 2020(11): 3856-3867 .
    29. 任悦,高广磊,丁国栋,张英,郭米山,曹红雨,苏敏. 沙地樟子松人工林叶片-枯落物-土壤氮磷化学计量特征. 应用生态学报. 2019(03): 743-750 .
    30. 曲杭峰,董希斌,佘光宇,杨兰,何山. 大兴安岭蒙古栎天然次生林不同改培模式对枯落物持水性的影响. 温带林业研究. 2019(01): 31-38 .
    31. 陈宇轩,丁国栋,高广磊,张英,赵洋,王陇. 呼伦贝尔沙地风沙土有机质和碳酸钙含量特征. 中国水土保持科学. 2019(04): 104-111 .
    32. 张宁宁,谭凯亮,亢福仁,刘普灵. 毛乌素沙地樟子松林恢复过程的土壤有机质含量变化特征. 水土保持研究. 2019(05): 95-99 .
    33. 阎雄飞,曹存宏,袁小琴,张增强,郭荣,陈巧燕,刘永华. 截冠处理对种子园樟子松壮龄母树结实的影响. 北京林业大学学报. 2019(08): 48-56 . 本站查看
    34. 曹红雨,高广磊,丁国栋,张英,赵媛媛,任悦,陈宇轩,郭米山. 呼伦贝尔沙区4种生境土壤真菌群落结构和多样性. 林业科学. 2019(08): 118-127 .
    35. 阎雄飞,刘永华,冯永宏,张增强,袁小琴,陈巧燕,郭荣,曹存宏,杨涛. 2种截冠处理对种子园樟子松幼龄母树生长的影响. 农学学报. 2019(10): 42-47 .
    36. 王树力,郝玉琢,周磊,吴慧. 水曲柳人工林树木叶片营养元素及其化学计量特征的季节动态. 北京林业大学学报. 2018(10): 24-33 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(22)

Catalog

    Article views (450) PDF downloads (56) Cited by(58)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return