高级检索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

油松×云南松杂种与亲本种和高山松的光合特性比较

高琼 王维有 孟景祥 刘灏 邢震 毛建丰 王晓茹 李悦

高琼, 王维有, 孟景祥, 刘灏, 邢震, 毛建丰, 王晓茹, 李悦. 油松×云南松杂种与亲本种和高山松的光合特性比较[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(2): 37-43. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140477
引用本文: 高琼, 王维有, 孟景祥, 刘灏, 邢震, 毛建丰, 王晓茹, 李悦. 油松×云南松杂种与亲本种和高山松的光合特性比较[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(2): 37-43. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140477
GAO Qiong, WANG Wei-you, MENG Jing-xiang, LIU Hao, XING Zhen, MAO Jian-feng, WANG Xiao-ru, LI Yue. Comparison of the photosynthetic characteristics of hybrid and parental species of Pinus tabuliformis×P. yunnanensis and P. densata[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(2): 37-43. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140477
Citation: GAO Qiong, WANG Wei-you, MENG Jing-xiang, LIU Hao, XING Zhen, MAO Jian-feng, WANG Xiao-ru, LI Yue. Comparison of the photosynthetic characteristics of hybrid and parental species of Pinus tabuliformis×P. yunnanensis and P. densata[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(2): 37-43. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140477

油松×云南松杂种与亲本种和高山松的光合特性比较

doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140477
基金项目: 

林业公益性行业科研专项(201104022)、国家自然科学基金项目(C161001)、国家基础科学人才培养基金项目(J1103516)。

详细信息
    作者简介:

    高琼,博士,副教授。主要研究方向:森林遗传学。Emai:bjfugq@bjfu.edu.cn 地址:100083北京市海淀区清华东路35号北京林业大学162信箱。责任作者: 李悦,教授,博士生导师。主要研究方向:生物技术与林木遗传育种。Email:liyue@bjfu.edu.cn 地址:同上。

    高琼,博士,副教授。主要研究方向:森林遗传学。Emai:bjfugq@bjfu.edu.cn 地址:100083北京市海淀区清华东路35号北京林业大学162信箱。责任作者: 李悦,教授,博士生导师。主要研究方向:生物技术与林木遗传育种。Email:liyue@bjfu.edu.cn 地址:同上。

Comparison of the photosynthetic characteristics of hybrid and parental species of Pinus tabuliformis×P. yunnanensis and P. densata

  • 摘要: 为从光合生理角度探究高山松是油松及云南松高世代杂交后代的证据,以油松、云南松、油松×云南松杂种子一代为材料,以天然高山松为对照,利用Li-6400光合仪对亲本、杂交后代和对照的光合速率、气孔导度、蒸腾速率等光合性能指标进行测定,并对它们的光饱和点和光补偿点进行估算。结果表明:1)高山松以及油松×云南松杂种对光强的利用范围比油松、云南松更广;2)与亲本的最大净光合速率相比,油松×云南松表现出杂种优势;3)与亲本相比,高山松和油松×云南松的气孔导度均偏低,且下降相对缓慢;4)油松×云南松的蒸腾速率受父本遗传影响明显,且与高山松表现相似。5)油松×云南松不同杂交组合的生长指标有一定幅度变异,但平均生长水平与云南松和高山松接近。

     

  • [1] MAO J F,LI Y,LIU Y J,et al. Cone and seed characteristics of Pinus densata and their adaptive fitness implications [J]. Journal of Plant Ecology,2007,31(2):291-299.
    [1] 毛建丰,李悦,刘玉军,等. 高山松种实性状与生殖适应性[J]. 植物生态学报,2007,31(2):291-299.
    [2] MAO J F,WANG X R. Distinct niche divergence characterizes the homoploid hybrid speciation of Pinus densata on the Tibetan Plateau [J]. The American Naturalist,2011,177(4):424-439.
    [2] LIU Y L,MAO J F,WANG X R, et al. Geographic isolation between the homoploid hybrid Pinus densata and its parental Pinus yunnanensis [J]. Plant Diversity and Resources,2011,33(3):269-274.
    [3] ZHANG L S,DAI J F,GAO Q,et al. Seedling adaptation of hybrid pine Pinus densata and its parental species in the high elevation habitat [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2012,34(5):15-24.
    [3] WANG X R,SZMIDT A E,SAVOLAINEN O. Genetic composition and diploid hybrid speciation of a high mountain pine, Pinus densata, native to the Tibetan Plateau [J]. Genetics,2001,159(1):337-346.
    [4] YE Z P,YU Q. Comparison of new and several classical models of photosynthesis in response to irradiance [J]. Journal of Plant Ecology,2008,32(6):1356-1361.
    [4] WU Z L. The taxonomic revision and phytogeographical study of Chinese pines [J]. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica,1956,5(3):131-163.
    [5] 刘永良,毛建丰,王晓茹,等.同倍杂交种高山松与亲本种云南松的地理隔离研究[J]. 植物分类与资源学报,2011,33(3):269-274.
    [5] YU S W. Plant physiology and molecular biology [M]. Beijing:Science Press,1992.
    [6] 张立沙,代剑峰,高琼,等.高山松与亲本种多种群在高海拔生境下的苗期适应性研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2012,34(5):15-24.
    [6] ZHENG Y X,PENG X M,WU J C. Light response characteristics of Azadirachta indica provenances in different growing seasons within crowns [J]. Forest Research,2011,24(2):176-183.
    [7] BASSMAN J H,ZWIER J C. Gas exchange characteristics of Populus trichocarpa,Populus deltoids and Populus trichocarpa×P. deltoids clones [J]. Tree Physiology,1991,8(2):145-159.
    [7] ZHOU Y B,MA X W,YAO P,et al. Physiological characteristics of photosynthesis in different poplar varieties [J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University,2007,38(3):336-339.
    [8] 叶子飘,于强.光合作用光响应模型的比较[J]. 植物生态学报,2008,32(6):1356-1361.
    [8] HE L H,HE L J,LIANG H,et al. Comparisons of the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in different Ginkgo biloba varieties [J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University,2006,27(4):43-46.
    [9] MA F. Ecophysiological differences in adaptive mechanisms between diploid hybrid species and its parental species[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University,2010.
    [9] 余叔文.植物生理与分子生物学[M].北京:科学出版社,1992.
    [10] 郑益兴,彭兴民,吴疆翀.印楝种源不同生长季节冠层间的光响应特征[J]. 林业科学研究,2011,24(2):176-183.
    [10] XU C L,SUN X M,ZHANG S G. Comparison in photosynthetic characteristics of Larix kaempferi, L.olgensis and their hybrids [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2012,34(4):62-66.
    [11] ADAM P, DEKI P. The matrilineal inheritance of land in Bhutan [J]. Contemporary South Asia, 2004, 4(13):49-56.
    [11] JIANG Y F,YAN R,SU X,et al. Molecular enidence for bidirectional hybrid origin and Hippophae rhamnoides ssp. sinesis as the mainly maternal plant of the diploid hybrid H. goniocarpa (Elaeagnaceae)[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research,2014,34(1):32-36.
    [12] 周永斌,马学文,姚鹏,等. 不同生长速度杨树品种的光合生理特性研究[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报,2007,38(3):336-339.
    [13] 贺立红,贺立静,梁红,等. 银杏不同品种叶绿素荧光参数的比较[J]. 华南农业大学学报,2006,27(4):43-46.
    [14] LAWLOR D W. Photosynthesis,production and environment [J]. Journal of Experimental Botany,1995,46:1389-1396.
    [15] 马飞.二倍体杂交物种与亲本种的生理生态适应差异[D].兰州:兰州大学,2010.
    [16] 许晨璐,孙晓梅,张守攻.日本落叶松与长白落叶松及其杂种光合特性比较[J].北京林业大学学报,2012,34(4):62-66.
    [17] BURKE J M,CARNEY S E,ARNOLD M L. Hybrid fitness in the Louisiana Irises: analysis of parental and F1 performance [J]. Evolution,1998,52(1):37-43.
    [18] 蒋严妃,严容,苏雪,等.二倍体杂交种棱果沙棘双向杂交起源及其母本主要来源于中国沙棘的分子证据[J].植物研究,2014,34(1):32-36.
    [19] WANG B S,MAO J F,GAO J,et al. Colonization of the Tibetan Plateau by the homoploid hybrid pine Pinus densata [J]. Molecular Ecology,2011,20:3796-3811.
    [20] CAMPBELL D R,GALEN C,WU C A. Ecophysiology of first second generation hybrids in a natural plant hybrid zone [J]. Oecologia,2005,144:214-225.
    [21] WHITNEY K D,RANDELL R A,RIESEBERG L H. Adaptive introgression of abiotic tolerance traits in the sunflower Helianthus annuus [J]. New Phytologist,2010,187:230-239.
    [22] ARNOLD M L. Natural hybridization and evolution [M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1997.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1165
  • HTML全文浏览量:  178
  • PDF下载量:  16
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2014-12-25
  • 修回日期:  2015-02-02
  • 刊出日期:  2016-02-29

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回