中国红树林天然分布北缘区不同起源秋茄热值特征研究
Characteristics of caloric values of Kandelia obovata among different origins in north marginal region of natural mangrove,eastern China.
-
摘要: 在测定红树林天然分布北缘区不同起源秋茄各器官干质量热值(GCV)的基础上,分析了不同起源秋茄红树 林热值器官差异和滩位差异、秋茄天然林热值的径级变化和纬度变化。结果表明:秋茄天然林各器官热值均高于 人工林,且各器官能量分配趋于均等,不同起源各器官热值顺序呈现出高度一致性,高低排序依次为叶、花、枝、树 墩、干、粗根、细根、中根。秋茄热值随滩位向外延伸呈现上升趋势,天然林热值对滩位的响应比人工林更为敏感。 从径级差异看,大致为径级越大,热值越高,径级郁热值 径级芋 径级玉 径级域,另外径级变化对秋茄不同器 官的影响程度不一。与其他纬度相比,红树林天然分布北缘区秋茄热值较其他纬度秋茄热值低,并且各器官间热 值差异不显著。
-
关键词:
- 秋茄 /
- 不同起源 /
- 热值 /
- 红树林天然分布北缘区
Abstract: Based on determining the gross caloric values(GCV)of Kandelia obovata from different origins in north marginal region of natural mangrove wetlands, eastern China, the paper makes an analysis of the difference in caloric value among each organ and different intertidal positions of varied original K. obovata, and the changing law of caloric value with diameter class and latitude in natural forest. It came to conclusions that GCV among each organ of the K. obovata natural forests, trending to equal, was higher than that of plantation. High consistency in the order of caloric value of the various organs was emerged between natural and plantation K. obovata, which was leaf, flower, branch, stump, trunk, coarse root, fine root, medium root from the high to the low. Caloric value of K. obovata appeared upward trend with the extending outward of beach, and the trend of natural forests was more sensitive than that of plantations. In diameter class, the lager the diameter was, the higher the caloric value was(diameter ⅣⅢⅠⅡ). In addition, the change of diameter class made varying degrees of impact on each organ of K. obovata. Compared with latitudes in other region, the caloric value of natural K. obovata in north marginal region was lower, and also, the change of caloric value among various organs was not significant. -
-
期刊类型引用(12)
1. 段泽伟，胡凌霞，毛巫甲，陈付康，鲁弘清. 甘洛县古树名木资源调查与保护对策. 中国林副特产. 2025(01): 73-75 . 
百度学术
2. 郑华英，刘云鹏，解春霞，徐丽丽，孟子翔. 江苏地区古树健康评价体系构建研究. 江苏林业科技. 2023(05): 17-23+52 . 百度学术
3. 晁永娟. 湟源县古树调查评价及保护对策研究. 宁夏农林科技. 2019(04): 41-42+45 . 百度学术
4. 李永良. 青海省乐都区古树名木资源调查与评价. 安徽农业科学. 2019(12): 132-133 . 百度学术
5. 张富强. 互助县古树名木资源调查及其保护对策. 陕西林业科技. 2019(03): 88-90 . 百度学术
6. 吴晓丽，李瑞军. 黔东南州古树名木的资源现状及其保护利用. 内蒙古林业调查设计. 2019(04): 42-45 . 百度学术
7. 张富强. 民和县古树名木资源调查评价及保护对策. 林业调查规划. 2019(05): 186-189 . 百度学术
8. 史生慧. 大通县古树调查评价及保护对策研究. 南方农业. 2019(26): 78-80 . 百度学术
9. 兰宇翔，乔雨轩，郭真真，余鹏飞，朱志鹏，董建文. 闽西闽东古树名木危险度权重评估. 长江大学学报(自科版). 2017(22): 15-18+3 . 百度学术
10. 肖瑾瑜，谭慧芳，陈俊友，汪爱民. 古树名木风险评估模型初步研究. 湖南林业科技. 2016(01): 61-65+79 . 百度学术
11. 朱志鹏，傅伟聪，陈梓茹，许春如，丁国昌，董建文. 闽东城乡古树危险度评估及保护措施——以闽侯县为例. 四川农业大学学报. 2015(04): 364-370 . 百度学术
12. 谢兴刚，石红旗. 城市生态环境中古树保护应对策略研究. 中国园艺文摘. 2015(10): 79-82 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(6)
计量
- 文章访问数: 1524
- HTML全文浏览量: 190
- PDF下载量: 82
- 被引次数: 18
下载:
