多杀菌素对舞毒蛾保护酶及几丁质酶的影响
Effects of spinosad on the activity of protective enzymes and chitinase in Lymantria dispar.
-
摘要: 为进一步揭示多杀菌素的杀虫活性及作用机理，采用生化方法测定了多杀菌素对舞毒蛾3龄和5龄幼虫体内几种保护酶活性的影响。结果表明：多杀菌素处理舞毒蛾3龄和5龄幼虫后，其体内的过氧化氢酶（CAT）活性无明显变化，而酚氧化酶（PO）的活性表现为先激活后抑制作用。多杀菌素对舞毒蛾3龄幼虫体内超氧化物歧化酶（SOD）、过氧化物酶(POD)同样表现为先激活后抑制作用，其中在处理3~6 h时，对酶的激活作用达到最高（P 0.01）；但对5龄幼虫体内这两种酶具有明显的激活作用，其中在处理3 h时，对酶的激活作用最强，分别为同期对照的1.543和1.716倍，差异极显著（P 0.01），6 h后无明显差异。多杀菌素对舞毒蛾幼虫体内几丁质酶也存在影响，其中对处理3~12 h 3龄幼虫体内该酶具有激活作用，处理12~24 h对5龄幼虫体内该酶具有明显抑制作用。因此，多杀菌素能有效干扰舞毒蛾幼虫正常的生理代谢，从而起到毒杀作用。Abstract: In order to better understand the insecticidal activity and mode of action of spinosad，its effect on the activity of protective enzymes and chitinase of 3rd and 5th instar larvae of Lymantria dispar was assayed in this study. The results showed that spinosad had no effect on catalase (CAT) activity, but significantly changed phenoloxidase (PO) activity in an activationinhibition fashion for both 3rd and 5th instar larvae. The same significant “activationinhibition” effect was also found on the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) in the 3rd instar larvae (P001), with the maximum enzyme activations occurred 3-6 hours after spinosad treatment. Whereas the POD and SOD activity in the 5th instar larvae was significantly increased within 3 hours after the treatment (P001; with treatment/CK ratios being 1.543 and 1.716, respectively), and no significant treatment effects were detected after 3-6 hours. The chitinase activity in the 3rd instar larvae was significantly activated 3-12 hours after spinosad treatment, while it was strongly inhibited in the 5th instar larvae 12-24 hours after the treatment. In conclusion, spinosad shows a significant effect on the activity of most protective enzymes and chitinase, and can interrupt normal metabolism of L. dispar larvae, therefore, has a potential to be an effective pesticide against this serious defoliator pest.
-
Keywords:
- spinosad /
- Lymantria dispar /
- protective enzymes /
- chitinase
-
-
期刊类型引用(13)
1. 黄婷，左忠，范金鑫. 基于灰色关联分析法的7种耐盐绿化树种综合评价. 浙江农业科学. 2024(10): 2443-2446 . 
百度学术
2. 张颖. 春季催花牡丹观赏价值综合评价. 现代园艺. 2023(13): 78-81+85 . 百度学术
3. 司宝华，罗建让，张延龙. 基于专用目标的紫斑牡丹单株评价与筛选. 北方园艺. 2023(10): 65-73 . 百度学术
4. 李婷，乔琦，李剑峰，郭幸飞，侯小改. 油用凤丹的杂交授粉丰产技术研究. 河南农业科学. 2021(02): 105-114 . 百度学术
5. 罗浩，成仿云. 牡丹切花技术研究进展. 现代园艺. 2020(11): 11-13 . 百度学术
6. 于玲，陈博，宋阳，吴晓云. 牡丹鲜切花产业化生产技术研究现状及发展对策. 安徽农业科学. 2020(12): 35-37 . 百度学术
7. 罗浩，成仿云，郭鑫，陶熙文，王旭. 基于灰色关联度分析法评价筛选紫斑牡丹切花品种. 园艺学报. 2020(11): 2169-2180 . 百度学术
8. 杨祎凡，周婷，范俊俊，穆茜，张晶，张往祥，于忠明. 基于切花应用的观赏海棠品种评价与筛选. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2019(04): 70-76 . 百度学术
9. 李浩，周惠瑜. 滇中地区牡丹品种引种适应性的综合评价. 四川林业科技. 2019(04): 70-73 . 百度学术
10. 李争艳，李薇，余河川，苏彩晴，梅朋森，高本旺. 40个牡丹品种在宜昌地区的观赏价值评价. 黑龙江农业科学. 2018(07): 81-88 . 百度学术
11. 丁品，张建军，杨兰廷，李晶，武建荣. 灰色关联度在甜高粱材料筛选中的应用. 甘肃科学学报. 2017(02): 35-39 . 百度学术
12. 王上伟，吴桂容，卢云天，苏德生，张萍. 福建政和县6种名优牡丹品种的引种适宜性综合评价. 贺州学院学报. 2016(04): 148-151 . 百度学术
13. 熊亚运，夏文通，王晶，刘燕，潘万春. 基于观赏价值和种球再利用的郁金香品种综合评价与筛选. 北京林业大学学报. 2015(01): 107-114 . 本站查看
其他类型引用(5)
计量
- 文章访问数: 1882
- HTML全文浏览量: 236
- PDF下载量: 43
- 被引次数: 18
下载:
