Analysis of inherited tendency of fruit characteristics in F1 group of reciprocal crossing between ‘Yanshanzaofeng’ and ‘Yanjing’ in <i>Castanea mollissima</i>

Liu Ningwei; Wang Lu; Zhang Zhiyong; Zhang Shuhang; Zhang Qing; Wang Guangpeng; Qin Ling; Cao Qingqin

doi:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200312

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2021 > 43(5): 75-85. > DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200312

Liu Ningwei, Wang Lu, Zhang Zhiyong, Zhang Shuhang, Zhang Qing, Wang Guangpeng, Qin Ling, Cao Qingqin. Analysis of inherited tendency of fruit characteristics in F1 group of reciprocal crossing between ‘Yanshanzaofeng’ and ‘Yanjing’ in Castanea mollissima[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(5): 75-85. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200312

Citation:

PDF (833 KB)

Analysis of inherited tendency of fruit characteristics in F1 group of reciprocal crossing between ‘Yanshanzaofeng’ and ‘Yanjing’ in Castanea mollissima

1.
Beijing Key Laboratory of Agricultural and New Technique, College of Plant Scienceand Technology, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 102206, China
2.
Changli Fruit Institute, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Changli 066600, Hebei, China

More Information

Received Date: October 18, 2020
Revised Date: November 16, 2020
Available Online: April 09, 2021
Published Date: May 26, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective This paper aims to improve the breeding efficiency of chestnut varieties by studying the genetic tendency and genetic differences of chestnut hybrid offspring.
Method Using ‘Yanshanzaofeng’ and ‘Yanjing’ as the parental crosses, 259 F1 individuals were produced as test materials. 13 traits of chestnut were measured in 2016 and 2017, including nut-related traits, bur-related traits, amylose content, amylopectin content, total starch content, and soluble sugar content, and the genetic tendency research was conducted.
Result Research on nut-related traits showed that the traits such as single nut mass, nut thickness, nut height and nut width showed a normal distribution trend, and the average value of offsprings was greater than the mid-parent value, indicating an additive effect in 2016 and 2017. The coefficient of variation of the single-nut mass traits of the offsprings of reciprocal crosses for two consecutive years was 18.5%−20.19%. The offsprings were widely separated and had high genetic diversity. It is possible to breed chestnut varieties with larger single-nut mass. The coefficient of variation of nut width, thickness and height traits were all less than 20%, and genetic transmitting ability was between 98.54%−106.55%, indicating that nut traits were less affected by the environment. The research on the bur-related traits showed that the average value of the bur mass of the progeny of reciprocal crosses was higher than mid-parent value for two consecutive years, the coefficient of variation of the reciprocal crosses was greater than 20%, and the genetic transmitting ability was between 112.0%−117.44%. It can be inherited stably and was less affected by the environment. For two consecutive years, the ultra-high parent rate of the bur width in the offsprings of reciprocal crosses reached 37.50% and 23.96%, and the genetic transmitting ability was 112.50% and 113.93%, respectively. In 2016, the average value of the progeny and the orthogonal progeny in 2017 of the prickle length were less than mid-parent value, and the genetic transmitting ability was 90.25%, 90.83% and 93.66%. The ultra-low parent rate in 2016 was 27.08% and 18.9%, respectively. Prickle length tend to become shorter. Research on fruit quality-related traits showed that the range of the coefficient of variation of starch-related traits in the offsprings of reciprocal crosses for two consecutive years was 7.82%−17.66%, and the genetic transmitting ability of amylopectin content was between 101.11% and 108.22%. The ultra-high affinity rate of the offspring of reciprocal crosses in 2016 was higher than that in 2017, which were 34.38% and 30.09%, respectively, tending to increase the content of amylopectin. Compared with 2017, the genetic transmitting ability of soluble sugar content in the offspring of reciprocal crosses in 2016 was lower, being 64.1% and 59.94%, respectively, indicating genetic instability and greater environmental impact.
Conclusion Through the study of the genetic tendency and segregation characteristics of these traits, it is concluded that nut-related traits can be inherited stably, and fruit quality traits are genetically unstable and are greatly affected by the environment. This research provides reference for the screening of the offspring of chestnut cross breeding and the prediction of target traits in the future.
- Castanea mollissima,
- inherited tendency,
- nut,
- bur,
- starch,
- soluble sugar

FullText(HTML)

References (29)

References

[1]	张宇和, 柳鎏, 梁维坚, 等. 中国果树志板栗榛子卷[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2005: 63−68. Zhang Y H, Liu L, Liang W J, et al. The Chinese fruit tree Chinese chestnut hazelnut roll[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2005: 63−68
[2]	陈在新, 雷泽湘, 刘会宁, 等. 板栗营养成分分析及其品质的模糊综合评判[J]. 果树学报, 2000(4):286−289. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9980.2000.04.011 Chen Z X, Lei Z X, Liu H N, et al. Natrient ingredients analysis on Chinese chestnut and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2000(4): 286−289. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9980.2000.04.011
[3]	柳鎏, 孙醉君. 中国重要经济树种[M]. 南京: 江苏科学技术出版社, 1986. Liu L, Sun Z J. Important economic tree species in China[M]. Nanjing: Jiangsu Science and Technology Press, 1986.
[4]	Barakat A, Diloreto D S, Zhang Y, et al. Comparison of the transcriptomes of American chestnut (Castanea dentata) and Chinese chestnut (Castanea mollissima) in response to the chestnut blight infection[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2009, 9(1): 51. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-9-51
[5]	Prospero S, Rigling D. Invasion genetics of the chestnut blight fungus Cryphonectria parasitica in Switzerland[J]. Phytopathology, 2012, 102(1): 73−81. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-02-11-0055
[6]	Huang H, Dane F, Norton J D, et al. Seguin chestnut: a precocious, dwarf chestnut species for chestnut breeding programs and food source for wildlife[J]. Northern Nut Growers Association, 1995(86): 121−123.
[7]	徐豆, 付鸿博, 杜灵敏, 等. 欧李正反交F1果实性状的遗传变异分析[J]. 山西农业科学, 2020, 48(5):696−699, 714. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2020.05.10 Xu D, Fu H B, Du L M, et al. Genetic variation analysis of fruit traits in positive and negative cross F1 generation of Chinese dwarf cherry[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(5): 696−699, 714. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2020.05.10
[8]	刘政海, 董志刚, 李晓梅, 等. ‘威代尔’与‘霞多丽’葡萄杂交F1代果实性状遗传倾向分析[J]. 果树学报, 2020, 37(8):1122−1131. doi: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20200125 Liu Z H, Dong Z G, Li X M, et al. Inheritance trend of fruit traits in F1 progenies of ‘Vidal’ and ‘Chardonnay’ of grape[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2020, 37(8): 1122−1131. doi: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20200125
[9]	武晓红, 景晨娟, 陈雪峰, 等. ‘金太阳’与‘串枝红’杏正反交后代果实性状的遗传倾向研究[J]. 江西农业学报, 2018, 30(10):13−18. doi: 10.19386/j.cnki.jxnyxb.2018.10.03 Wu X H, Jing C J, Chen X F, et al. Studies on genetic tendency of fruit characters in F1 generation of reciprocal crosses between apricot cultivars ‘Jintaiyang’ and ‘Chuanzhihong’[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2018, 30(10): 13−18. doi: 10.19386/j.cnki.jxnyxb.2018.10.03
[10]	张琦, 姜喜, 段黄金, 等. ‘库尔勒香梨’杂交后代果实石细胞特性与遗传倾向研究[J]. 果树学报, 2018, 35(增刊1):89−96. doi: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.2018.S.14 Zhang Q, Jiang X, Duang H J, et al. Studies on the characteristics and genetic tendency of the stone cell in hybrid offspring of ‘Kuerlexiangli’ pear[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2018, 35(Suppl.1): 89−96. doi: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.2018.S.14
[11]	刘月, 刘海楠, 邓宇, 等. 越橘正反交后代部分性状的遗传倾向[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2019, 41(1):35−41. doi: 10.13327/j.jjlau.2018.4101 Liu Y, Liu H N, Deng Y, et al. Genetic predisposition of some traits of blueberry in hybrid progemes[J]. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 2019, 41(1): 35−41. doi: 10.13327/j.jjlau.2018.4101
[12]	郭峰, 李钢, 王惠丽, 等. 浙江省两种典型落叶经济林生态恢复技术[J]. 浙江水利科技, 2018, 46(1):8−11. Guo F, Li G, Wang H L, et al. Ecological restoration technologies of two typical deciduous economic forests in Zhejiang Province[J]. Zhejiang Hydrotechnics, 2018, 46(1): 8−11.
[13]	王广鹏, 孔德军, 刘庆香, 等. 板栗杂交后代3个重要经济性状的遗传特点[J]. 华北农学报, 2009, 24(B12):102−104. Wang G P, Kong D J, Liu Q X, et al. Inheritance characters of three economic characteristics of crossed chestnut progeny[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2009, 24(B12): 102−104.
[14]	刘国彬, 兰彦平, 姚研武, 等. 板栗杂交后代坚果表型性状的遗传变异[J]. 华北农学报, 2011(5):117−121. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2011.05.024 Liu G B, Lan Y P, Yao Y W, et al. Genetic variation of nut morphological traits in crossed chestnut progenies[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2011(5): 117−121. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2011.05.024
[15]	纪飞扬, 张惠真, 王广鹏, 等. 板栗正反交后代坚果性状遗传倾向研究[J]. 北京农学院学报, 2018, 33(4):18−22. doi: 10.13473/j.cnki.issn.1002-3186.2018.0403 Ji F Y, Zhang H Z, Wang G P, et al. Studies on genetic tendency of nut characters in the progenies of reciprocal crosses in Castanea mollissima[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Agriculture, 2018, 33(4): 18−22. doi: 10.13473/j.cnki.issn.1002-3186.2018.0403
[16]	孟亚楠. 核桃坚果性状遗传特性与优系选择研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2010. Meng Y N. Study on inheritance of nuts and elite trees selection of walnut (Juglans regia L.)[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2010.
[17]	赵福洞. ‘绿岭’核桃杂交后代果实性状遗传及优株评价研究[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2014. Zhao F D. Study on the fruit traits genetics of hybrid offsprings and the evaluation of superior trees of ‘Lvling’ walnut[D]. Baoding: Hebei Agricultural University, 2014.
[18]	刘庆忠. 板栗种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006. Liu Q Z. Descriptors and data standard for chestnut (Castanea mollissima BL.)[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2006.
[19]	马艳弘, 钟小仙, 乔月芳, 等. 双波长法测定珍珠粟淀粉中直链和支链淀粉的含量[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(12):331−334. doi: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2016.12.103 Ma Y H, Zhong X X, Qiao Y F, et al. Determination of amylose and amylopectin in pearl millet starch by dual wavelength method[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 44(12): 331−334. doi: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2016.12.103
[20]	王广鹏, 刘庆香, 孔德军, 等. 板栗支链淀粉含量的双波长测定方法[J]. 河北农业科学, 2008, 12(1):35−37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1088-1631.2008.01.015 Wang G P, Liu Q X, Kong D J, et al. Determination of amylopectin in Castanea mollissima BL. by dual-wavelength spectrophotometry[J]. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2008, 12(1): 35−37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1088-1631.2008.01.015
[21]	任婧. 番茄果实可溶性糖含量遗传规律的研究及QTL定位[D].哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2018. Ren J. Tomato soluble sugar content genetic regularity analysis and QTL mapping[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2018.
[22]	沈德绪. 果树育种学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1997. Shen D X. Fruit tree genetics[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 1997.
[23]	黄武刚, 程丽莉, 周志军, 等. 板栗野生居群遗传多样性研究[J]. 果树学报, 2010, 27(2):227−232. Huang W G, Cheng L L, Zhou Z J, et al. SSR analysis on genetic diversity of wild Chinese chestnut populations[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2010, 27(2): 227−232.
[24]	姜凤超, 孙浩元, 杨丽, 等. ‘串枝红’ × ‘骆驼黄’ 杏F1代糖酸性状的遗传变异分析[J]. 果树学报, 2018, 35(6):625−634. doi: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20170341 Jiang F C, Sun H Y, Yang L, et al. Analysis of genetic variation of sugar and acid contents in F1 population of apricot derived from ‘Chuanzhihong’ × ‘Luotuohuang’[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2018, 35(6): 625−634. doi: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20170341
[25]	Russell B C. Chestnut breeding techniques and results[J]. Journal of Heredity, 1954, 45(3): 201−208. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a106474
[26]	Ban Y, Mitani N, Sato A, et al. Genetic dissection of quantitative trait loci for berry traits in interspecific hybrid grape (Vitis labruscana × Vitis vinifera)[J]. Euphytica, 2016, 211(3): 295−310. doi: 10.1007/s10681-016-1737-8
[27]	Bayazit S. Determination of relationships among kernel percentage and yield characteristics in some turkish walnut genotypes by correlation and path analysis[J]. Journal of Animal & Plantences, 2012, 22(2): 513−517. doi: 10.2754/avb201281010083
[28]	马玉敏, 陈学森, 何天明, 等. 中国板栗3个野生居群部分表型性状的遗传多样性[J]. 园艺学报, 2008, 35(12):1717−1726. Ma Y M, Chen X S, He T M, et al. Genetic diversity of morphological traits in wild populations of Castanea mollissima Blume[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2008, 35(12): 1717−1726.
[29]	江锡兵, 龚榜初, 汤丹, 等. 中国部分板栗品种坚果表型及营养成分遗传变异分析[J]. 西北植物学报, 2013, 33(11):2216−2224. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2013.11.2216 Jiang X B, Gong B C, Tang D, et al. Genetic variation of nut phenotype and nutrient of some of Chinese chestnut cultivars[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2013, 33(11): 2216−2224. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2013.11.2216

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(4)

1.	许卓凡，苏毅，孙喆，贺鼎，王思思. 我国长城生态环境研究30年：趋势、脉络与特征. 北京规划建设. 2023(03): 111-116 .
2.	陈心曲，丁忠义，杨俊，陈晓东，陈媚楠. 沛北矿城复合区景观生态风险评价及驱动力分析. 生态学杂志. 2022(09): 1796-1803 .
3.	李少玲，谢苗苗，李汉廷，王回茴，许萌，周伟. 资源型城市景观生态风险的时空分异：以乌海市为例. 地学前缘. 2021(04): 100-109 .
4.	杨丽花，白翠玲，和文征. 基于生态文明视角下河北省长城旅游资源开发研究. 河北地质大学学报. 2017(06): 135-140 .

Other cited types(11)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (917) PDF downloads (50) Cited by(15)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Analysis of inherited tendency of fruit characteristics in F1 group of reciprocal crossing between ‘Yanshanzaofeng’ and ‘Yanjing’ in Castanea mollissima

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(4)

Other cited types(11)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content