Material quality assessment and trade-off synergies of forest ecological service in Xianrendong National Nature Reserve, Liaoning Province of northeastern China

Li Lianqiang; Yang Huixia; Ding Guoquan; Li Hongyu; Bai Rongfen; Wang Pin

doi:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220055

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2023 > 45(9): 83-94. > DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220055

Li Lianqiang, Yang Huixia, Ding Guoquan, Li Hongyu, Bai Rongfen, Wang Pin. Material quality assessment and trade-off synergies of forest ecological service in Xianrendong National Nature Reserve, Liaoning Province of northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(9): 83-94. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220055

Citation:

PDF (734 KB)

Material quality assessment and trade-off synergies of forest ecological service in Xianrendong National Nature Reserve, Liaoning Province of northeastern China

Liaoning Research Institute of Forest Management, Liaodong Peninsula Forest Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station in Liaoning, Dandong 118003, Liaoning, China

More Information

Received Date: February 08, 2022
Revised Date: July 16, 2022
Accepted Date: August 23, 2023
Available Online: August 25, 2023
Published Date: September 24, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to clarify the material quality of forest ecological multi-functions in Xianrendong National Nature Reserve in Liaoning Province of northeastern China, which can effectively improve the regional environmental quality and enhance the regional ecological service function.
Method Taking the forest ecosystem in the nature reserve as the research object, according to the 2018 observation data of the Liaodong Peninsula Forest Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station in Liaoning and survey data of the forests, using the methods of model quantification, distributed calculation and correlation analysis, three major service categories and six functional categories of support, regulation and supply were selected to study the material quality of forest ecological services in nature reserves and their trade-offs and synergies.
Result (1) The material quantity of forest ecological service function was as follows: support service 644.42 × 10³ t/year, including conservation soil volume 644.10 × 10³ t/year, tree nutrient accumulation 323.85 t/year. Regulation service 41.61 × 10³ t/year, including carbon sequestration and oxygen release of 40.16 × 10³ t/year, and the air purification amount of 1 454.87 t/year. Among the material amount of the supply service, the amount of water supply was 148.27 × 10⁷ m³/year, and the amount of negative ions supplied was 274.97 × 10²⁰ year⁻¹, showing as soil conservation > carbon fixation and oxygen release > air purification > forest nutrient fixation. (2) Substances of each evaluation index: the amount of forest conservation soil was 555.15 × 10³ t/year for soil consolidation and 88.95 × 10³ t/year for fertilizer retention; the accumulation of nutrients in forests was in the order of nitrogen retention (291.02 t/year) > potassium retention (25.33 t/year) > phosphorus retention (7.50 t/year); forest absorb carbon of 28.56 × 10³ t/year and release oxygen of 11.60 × 10³t/year; forest absorb gas pollutants from large to small was sulfur dioxide (817.50 t/year) > nitrogen oxidation compound (255.80 t/year) > fluoride (242.00 t/year), blocking TSP, PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 were 82.3 t/year, 46.7 t/year and 10.6 t/year, respectively. (3) The dominant tree species (groups) with larger amounts of ecological service function substances included natural secondary oak forests, red pine forests and larch forests. The material quality of service function was significantly positively correlated with stand area and stock volume (r > 0, P < 0.05), and positively correlated with DBH, tree height and canopy density (r > 0). (4) The quality of ecological service functions in the administrative division of the protected area was the highest in the administrative department, while the lowest in Sanjiashan Village; there was a trade-off between support and adjustment services, synergy between support and supply services, and synergy and trade-off between adjustment and supply services.
Conclusion The forest ecosystem has outstanding quality of soil conservation, carbon sequestration and nutrient release, water supply and negative oxygen ion supply. Forest area and stock volume play an important role in the quality of ecological service. Synergies and trade-offs are common among ecological services. In terms of space, closing mountains for afforestation and preventing the loss of forestry land; on the stand, protect rare tree species, increase tree species types, promote forest regeneration and succession, and combine on-site protection with afforestation. Taking multiple measures and following natural laws is an effective measure to improve ecological services.

FullText(HTML)

References (39)

References

[1]	Zhou B, Zhu J W, Lu P, et al. The service function value assessment analysis of urban wetland ecosystem: a case study of Xi’an Chan-Ba wetland[J/OL]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2018, 191(1): 012114[2022−01−19]. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/191/1/012114.
[2]	王亚锋, 王亚磊, 黄茹, 等. 气候变化下生物交互作用对树线生态过程的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(10): 3724−3732. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202110.006 Wang Y F, Wang Y L, Huang R, et al. Effects of biotic interactions on ecological processes of treeline ecotone under climate change[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(10): 3724−3732. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202110.006
[3]	Ochoa-Hueso R, Munzi S, Alonso R, et al. Ecological impacts of atmospheric pollution and interactions with climate change in terrestrial ecosystems of the Mediterranean Basin: current research and future directions[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2017, 227: 194−206. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.062
[4]	黄龙生, 王兵, 牛香, 等. 济南市森林生态系统服务功能空间格局研究[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(17): 6477−6486. Huang L S, Wang B, Niu X, et al. Spatial pattern of the ecosystem service function of forests in Jinan City[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(17): 6477−6486.
[5]	Zhang B, Li W, Xie G. Ecosystem services research in China: progress and perspective[J]. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69(7): 1389−1395. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.009
[6]	Tallis H, Mooney H A, Andelman S, et al. A global system for monitoring ecosystem service change[J]. Bioscience, 2012, 62(11): 977−986. doi: 10.1525/bio.2012.62.11.7
[7]	赵士洞, 张永民. 生态系统与人类福祉: 千年生态系统评估的成就、贡献和展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(9): 895−902. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.2006.09.002 Zhao S D, Zhang Y M. Ecosystems and human well-being: the achievements, contributions and prospects of the millennium ecosystem assessment[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2006, 21(9): 895−902. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.2006.09.002
[8]	贾毅, 张松林. 南水北调中线工程途经区生态服务价值的时空变化[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(18): 7226−7237. Jia Y, Zhang S L. Spatio-temporal changes of static and dynamic ecosystem service values in the passing area of the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Transfer Diversion Project[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(18): 7226−7237.
[9]	Shimada M, Itoh T, Motooka T, et al. New global forest/non-forest maps from ALOS PALSAR data (2007–2010)[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2014, 155: 13−31. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.04.014
[10]	Parson E A, Haas P M, Levy M A. A summary of the major documents signed at the earth summit and the global forum [J]. Environment Science & Policy for Sustainable Development, 1992, 34(8): 12−36.
[11]	Lambini C K, Nguyen T T, Abildtrup J, et al. Are ecosystem services complementary or competitive? An econometric analysis of cost functions of private forests in Vietnam[J]. Ecological Economics, 2018, 147: 343−352. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.029
[12]	Jian Z A, Xzz A, Rui Z B, et al. Labor force transfer, vegetation restoration and ecosystem service in the Qilian Mountains-ScienceDirect[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 288: 112387. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112387
[13]	王兵, 任晓旭, 胡文. 中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评估[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(2): 145−153. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20110220 Wang B, Ren X X, Hu W. Assessment of forest ecosystem services value in China[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2011, 47(2): 145−153. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20110220
[14]	许庭毓, 牛香, 王兵, 等. 自然解决方案背景下的辽宁省森林生态系统服务主导功能评估[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021, 41(5): 191−197. doi: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.026 Xu T Y, Niu X, Wang B, et al. Evaluation on leading functions of forest ecosystem services in Liaoning Province based on nature-based solutions[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 41(5): 191−197. doi: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.026
[15]	柳嘉佳, 王普昶, 王志伟, 等. 基于InVEST模型的贵州喀斯特生态系统服务功能评估研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2021, 49(20): 25−27, 53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2021.20.007 Liu J J, Wang P C, Wang Z W, et al. Research progress of Guizhou Karst ecosystem service function evaluation based on InVEST model[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 49(20): 25−27, 53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2021.20.007
[16]	宋庆丰, 牛香, 王兵. 基于大数据的森林生态系统服务功能评估进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(10): 2914−2921. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.2015.0278 Song Q F, Niu X, Wang B. Review on forest ecosystem services assessment based on big data [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2015, 34(10): 2914−2921. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.2015.0278
[17]	宋文璐, 张华, 伏捷, 等. 辽宁仙人洞国家级自然保护区森林群落稳定性评价[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2022, 39 (3): 505−515. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210330 Song W L, Zhang H, Fu J, et al. Evaluation of forest community stability in Xianrendong National Nature Reserve, Liaoning[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2022, 39(3): 505−515. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210330
[18]	李连强, 杨会侠, 丁国泉, 等. 辽东半岛赤松和蒙古栎林降雨再分配特征及其相关性分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42 (11): 47−55. Li L Q, Yang H X, Ding G Q, et al. Precipitation redistribution characteristics and its correlation analysis of Pinus densiflora and Quercus mongolica forests in the Liaodong Peninsula of northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42 (11): 47−55.
[19]	王兵, 蒋有绪, 牛香, 等. 森林生态系统服务功能评估规范GB/T 38582—2020[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社 , 2020: 1−19. Wang B, Jiang Y X, Niu X, et al. Specifications for assessment of forest ecosystem services GB/T 38582−2020[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2020: 1−19
[20]	潘韬, 吴绍洪, 戴尔阜, 等. 基于InVEST模型的三江源区生态系统水源供给服务时空变化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(1): 183−189. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2013.0140 Pan T, Wu S H, Dai E F, et al. Spatiotemporal variation of water source supply service in Three Rivers Source Area of China based on InVEST model[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013, 24(1): 183−189. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2013.0140
[21]	罗佳, 田育新, 朱昕, 等. 湖南省公益林生态系统服务功能评估[J]. 湖南林业科技, 2020, 47(4): 26−35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5710.2020.04.004 Luo J, Tian Y X, Zhu X, et al. Evaluation of the service function of the public welfare forest ecosystem in Hunan Province[J]. Hunan Forestry Science & Technology, 2020, 47(4): 26−35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5710.2020.04.004
[22]	徐少君, 类淑桐, 曾波. 三峡库区4种库岸边坡的植被根系固土效应研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2017, 24(2): 119−123, 131. doi: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2017.02.020 Xu S J, Lei S T, Zeng B. Stability of root-fixed soil on 4 different slopes in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 24(2): 119−123, 131. doi: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2017.02.020
[23]	丛日征, 王兵, 谷建才, 等. 宁夏贺兰山国家级自然保护区森林生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(11): 136−140. doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2017.360 Cong R Z, Wang B, Gu J C, et al. Evaluation of forest ecosystem services values of Helan Mountain National Nature Reserve, Ningxia[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2017, 31(11): 136−140. doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2017.360
[24]	丛日征, 王兵, 牛香, 等. 陕西省森林生态系统净化大气环境功能价值评估[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2017, 32(5): 75−82. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2017.05.14 Cong R Z, Wang B, Niu X, et al. Assessment on the atmosphere purification function of forest ecosystem in Shaanxi Province[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2017, 32(5): 75−82. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2017.05.14
[25]	刘林馨, 刘传照, 毛子军. 丰林世界生物圈自然保护区森林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2011, 33(3): 38−44. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2011.03.020 Liu L X, Liu C Z, Mao Z J. Evaluation of forest ecosystem service functions in Fenglin Biosphere Nature Reserve, Heilongjiang Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2011, 33(3): 38−44. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2011.03.020
[26]	崔景轩, 李秀芬, 郑海峰, 等. 典型气候条件下东北地区生态系统水源涵养功能特征[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(9): 3026−3038. Cui J X, Li X F, Zheng H F, et al. Spatial analysis of water conservation function in northeast China under different climatic conditions[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(9): 3026−3038.
[27]	赵欣, 张杰, 钟林东. 黑龙江丰林国家级自然保护区生态系统服务价值评估与分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2021, 43(7): 100−110. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210041 Zhao X, Zhang J, Zhong L D. Evaluation and analysis on ecosystem service value of Fenglin National Nature Reserve in Heilongjiang Province of northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(7): 100−110. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210041
[28]	齐娜, 孙威威, 阚海明, 等. 密云水库2008—2019年水生态服务功能评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021, 41(4): 276−283, 291. Qi N, Sun W W, Kan H M, et al. Evaluation on water-related ecosystem services of Minyun Reservoir during 2008−2019[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 41(4): 276−283, 291.
[29]	Wu Y F, Zhang X, Li C, et al. Ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies under influence of climate and land cover change in an afforested semiarid basin, China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2021, 159: 106083. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.106083
[30]	Bennett E M, Peterson G D, Gordon L J. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services [J]. Ecology Letters, 2009, 12(12): 1394−1404. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x
[31]	胡秀芳, 赵军, 王蓓, 等. 黑河流域生态系统服务空间协同与权衡变化[J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41 (3): 580−588. Hu X F, Zhao J, Wang B, et al. Changes of spatial synergies or trade-offs of ecosystem services in Heihe River Basin [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2022, 41 (3): 580−588.
[32]	陈心盟, 王晓峰, 冯晓明, 等. 青藏高原生态系统服务权衡与协同关系[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(1): 18−34. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020200399 Chen X M, Wang X F, Feng X M, et al. Ecosystem service trade-off and synergy on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Geographical Research, 2021, 40(1): 18−34. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020200399
[33]	Butler J R A, Wong G Y, Metcalfe D J, et al. An analysis of trade-offs between multiple ecosystem services and stakeholders linked to land use and water quality management in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2013, 180: 176−191.
[34]	祝汉收, 翟俊, 侯鹏, 等. 生态系统服务权衡与协同视角下的重点生态功能区保护特征[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(5): 1275−1288. Zhu H S, Zhai J, Hou P, et al. The protection characteristics of key ecological functional zones from the perspective of ecosystem service trade-off and synergy[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(5): 1275−1288.
[35]	Vauhkonen J, Ruotsalainen R. Assessing the provisioning potential of ecosystem services in a Scandinavian boreal forest: suitability and tradeoff analyses on grid-based wall-to-wall forest inventory data[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2017, 389: 272−284. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.12.005
[36]	兰洁, 雷相东, 张毓涛. 天山中部雪岭云杉林多功能权衡与协同关系[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(11): 9−18. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20191102 Lan J, Lei X D, Zhang Y T, et al. Analysis on trade-offs and synergies of multiple functions of Picea schrenkiana forests in Central Tianshan Mountains[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(11): 9−18. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20191102
[37]	兰紫橙, 贾岚, 程煜. 闽江流域生态系统服务价值评估及权衡协同关系[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(12): 3909−3920. Lan Z C, Jia L, Cheng Y. The ecosystem services evaluation and trade-off synergy in Min River Basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(12): 3909−3920.
[38]	廖雨辰, 史雪威, 刘俊雁, 等. 九寨沟国家级自然保护区地震前后生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(6): 2063−2073. Liao Y C, Shi X W, Liu J Y, et al. Ecosystem service values assessment before and after earthquake in Jiuzhaigou National Nature Reserve[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(6): 2063−2073.
[39]	李左玉, 董红先, 刘雷雷, 等. 浙江乌岩岭国家级自然保护区森林生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2020, 37(5): 891−897. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20190573 Li Z Y, Dong H X, Liu L L, et al. Evaluation of forest ecosystem service value in Wuyanling National Nature Reserve of Zhejiang Province [J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2020, 37(5): 891−897. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20190573

[1]	Zhang Lingling, Ren Ruifen, Jiang Xueru, Zhou Hao, Liu Yan. Effects of ethylene on the viability of cryopreserved Dendrobium protocorm-like bodies[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(6): 101-107. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200308
[2]	Kang Xiangyang. Thoughts on tree breeding strategies[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(12): 15-22. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190412
[3]	MIAO Yu-bo, ZHU Xiao-mei, LI Zhi-juan, JIA Feng-ling, LI Wei. Genetic evaluation of breeding resources of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica from different improved generations[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(12): 71-78. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170194
[4]	ZHANG Zi-bin, CHENG Jin, YANG Mei, CUI Jing, CHEN Yun-meng, DENG Zhen-hai, ZHAO Xiu-hai. Food-deceptive pollination of Vanda concolor (Orchidaceae)[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(6): 100-106. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140020
[5]	HAN Xin, CHENG Fang-yun, XIAO Jia-jia, WANG Yue-lan, ZHANG Dong, WANG Ying, ZHONG Yuan. Crosses of Paeonia ostii Feng Dan Bai'as maternal parents and an analysis on the potential in tree peony breeding[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014, 36(4): 121-125. DOI: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2014.04.022
[6]	OUYANG Ying, LI Bing-ling, LIU Yan. Preservation of Dendrobium densiflorum pollen.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(6): 151-154.
[7]	ZHANG Yu, ZHANG Qi-xiang, ZHAO Shi-wei, LING Chun-ying. Morphological characteristics and viability testing of Cypripedium macranthos seed[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(1): 69-73.
[8]	QIAN Hua, LIU Yan, ZHENG Yong-ping, YU Ji-ying, FAN Wen-feng. Effects of applying 6-BA on the Nobiletype Dendrobium flower bud differentiation and changes of hormones.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2009, 31(6): 27-31.
[9]	LI Zhen-jian, WANG Yan, PENG Zhen-hua, MIAO Kun, WANG Cai-yun, YU Yao. Effects of plant growth regulators on controlling pseudobulb and keikis of nobile type dendrobium.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2009, 31(1): 79-83.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(11)

1.	胡梦露，李宗艳，任书娴，杨建伟，伍倩，冯尧，叶松菩. 云南26种石斛种质资源的形态分类与亲缘关系. 江苏农业科学. 2025(01): 191-200 .
2.	陈小玲，黄佳维，陈前程，杨碧云，余松金. 石斛兰遗传育种和栽培技术研究进展. 北方园艺. 2025(06): 130-135 .
3.	江荣慧，杨焱冰，颜凤霞，田凡，许志高，王莲辉. 3种杂交石斛种子无菌播种快繁技术. 贵州林业科技. 2024(03): 13-19 .
4.	刘靓，庄卫东，马晓娟，尤桂春，汤红玲，陈品品. 春石斛种质资源的表型性状及聚类分析. 热带农业科学. 2023(03): 1-10 .
5.	崔学强，黄昌艳，邓杰玲，李先民，李秀玲，张自斌. 基于SLAF-seq技术的石斛兰SNP标记开发及亲缘关系分析. 生物技术通报. 2023(06): 141-148 .
6.	彭婵，张新叶，刘宗坤，马林江，陈慧玲. 石斛属植物SSR分子标记的研究进展. 中国农学通报. 2022(13): 36-40 .
7.	刘怡，王玥瑶，杨柳青，操赛雨，燕鑫，何碧珠，郭梨锦. 天宫石斛快繁技术研究. 种子. 2022(07): 138-143+149 .
8.	崔学强，唐璇，黄昌艳，邓杰玲，李秀玲，卢家仕，张自斌. 基于iPBS标记的石斛兰种质资源遗传多样性分析及DNA指纹图谱构建. 热带作物学报. 2021(02): 317-324 .
9.	杨红旗，许兰杰，李磊，董薇，梁慧珍，郝仰坤. 我国石斛新品种选育进展、存在问题及发展对策. 中国种业. 2021(11): 26-30 .
10.	李娜，杨蕾蕾，陈朋，李凌飞. 蜻蜓石斛类原球茎的诱导与植株再生系统建立. 植物生理学报. 2021(12): 2387-2392 .
11.	李桂琳，姜艳，刘林，李泽生，高燕，郭彩留，周侯光. 5种石斛花器官特性及人工授粉研究. 热带农业科技. 2019(04): 32-37+44 .

Other cited types(2)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (504) PDF downloads (78) Cited by(13)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Material quality assessment and trade-off synergies of forest ecological service in Xianrendong National Nature Reserve, Liaoning Province of northeastern China