Forest ecosystem service multi-functionality: definitions, indicators and simulation models for forest management

Lei Xiangdong

doi:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230327

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2024 > 46(5): 1-11. > DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230327

Lei Xiangdong. Forest ecosystem service multi-functionality: definitions, indicators and simulation models for forest management[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(5): 1-11. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230327

Citation:

PDF (907 KB)

Forest ecosystem service multi-functionality: definitions, indicators and simulation models for forest management

Lei Xiangdong

State Key Laboratory of Efficient Production of Forest Resources, Key Laboratory of Forest Management and Growth Modelling, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Institute of Forest Resource Information Techniques, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China

More Information

Received Date: October 09, 2023
Revised Date: February 16, 2024
Accepted Date: April 23, 2024
Available Online: April 24, 2024

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Forest ecosystem multifunctionality (FEMF) is defined as the ability of forests to simultaneously provide multiple ecosystem functions and services. FEMF could be classified as ecosystem function multifunctionality and ecosystem service multifunctionality. In recent years, a large number of studies have been carried out in the field of ecology on the relationship between biodiversity and multifunctionality, as well as on the driving factors of multifunctionality, and have continued to be a hot topic. However, these research results are still insufficient in terms of application, especially in guiding forest management practices. Maximization of multiple functions and services has been the goal of forest management, but the involvement of FEMF in forest management is still limited, and it is urgently needed to strengthen the integration. This paper summarizes the definitions, indicators and optimization models for the FEMF linked with forest management. We concluded that the future direction will focus on the prediction of the change of forest services and FEMF, and the realization of FEMF maximization at forest management unit level. Emphasis should be given to forest management modelling and simulations to seek the most effective management strategies to mitigate trade-offs and enhance synergies of ecosystem services, and answer theoretical and practical questions on how forest management and climate change affect the balance and coordination between ecosystem services, as well as their spatiotemporal changes.

FullText(HTML)

References (93)

References

[1]	Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends: findings of the condition and trends working group [M]. Washington : Island Press, 2005.
[2]	王凯, 王聪, 冯晓明, 等. 生物多样性与生态系统多功能性的关系研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(1): 11−23. doi: 10.1016/j.chnaes.2020.11.008 Wang K, Wang C, Feng X M, et al. Research progress on the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(1): 11−23. doi: 10.1016/j.chnaes.2020.11.008
[3]	Messier C, Bauhus J, Sousa-Silva R, et al. For the sake of resilience and multifunctionality, let’s diversify planted forests![J]. Conservation Letters, 2021, 15: e12829.
[4]	Felton A, Belyazid S, Eggers J, et al. Climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies for production forests: trade-offs, synergies, and uncertainties in biodiversity and ecosystem services delivery in Northern Europe[J]. Ambio, 2024, 53(1): 1−27. doi: 10.1007/s13280-023-01909-1
[5]	Winkel G, Lovrić M, Muys B, et al. Governing Europe’s forests for multiple ecosystem services: opportunities, challenges, and policy options[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2022, 145: 102849. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102849
[6]	Thrippleton T, Blattert C, Bont L G, et al. A multi-criteria decision support system for strategic planning at the Swiss forest enterprise level: coping with climate change and shifting demands in ecosystem service provisioning[J]. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 2021, 4: 693020. doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2021.693020
[7]	王兵. 生态连清理论在森林生态系统服务功能评估中的实践[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2027, 14(1): 1−11, 151. Wang B. Practice of theory of ecological continuous inventory system in the evaluation of forest ecosystem service function[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2027, 14(1): 1−11, 151.
[8]	兰洁, 雷相东, 何潇, 等. 吉林省天然阔叶混交林生态系统多功能性及驱动因素[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(13): 5128−5141. Lan J, Lei X D, He X, et al. Multi-functionality of natural mixed broad-leaved forests and driving forces in Jilin Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(13): 5128−5141.
[9]	邹文涛, 何友均, 叶兵, 等. 基于Invest模型的森林生态系统服务功能评估研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2020, 33(4): 19−24. Zou W T, He Y J, Ye B, et al. Research advances in forest ecosystem services evaluations based on the InVEST model[J]. World Forestry Research, 2020, 33(4): 19−24.
[10]	徐炜, 井新, 马志远, 等. 生态系统多功能性的测度方法[J]. 生物多样性, 2027, 24(1): 72−84. Xu W, Jing X, Ma Z Y, et al. A review on the measurement of ecosystem multifunctionality[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2027, 24(1): 72−84.
[11]	黄小波, 郎学东, 李帅锋, 等. 生态系统多功能性的指标选择与驱动因子: 研究现状与展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(12): 2773−2786. Huang X B, Lang X D, Li S F, et al. Indicator selection and driving factors of ecosystem multifunctionality: research status and perspectives[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2021, 29(12): 2773−2786.
[12]	Yuan Z, Ali A, Ruiz-Benito P, et al. Above-and below-ground biodiversity jointly regulate temperate forest multifunctionality along a local-scale environmental gradient[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2020, 108(5): 2012−2024. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.13378
[13]	Ouyang S, Gou M, Lei P, et al. Plant functional trait diversity and structural diversity co-underpin ecosystem multifunctionality in subtropical forests[J]. Forest Ecosystems, 2023, 10: 100093. doi: 10.1016/j.fecs.2023.100093
[14]	Li S, Huang X, Lang X, et al. Cumulative effects of multiple biodiversity attributes and abiotic factors on ecosystem multifunctionality in the Jinsha River Valley of southwestern China[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2020, 472: 118281. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118281
[15]	Lan J, Lei X, He X, et al. Multiple mechanisms drive biodiversity-ecosystem service multifunctionality but the dominant one depends on the level of multifunctionality for natural forests in northeast China[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2023, 542: 121101. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121101
[16]	井新, 贺金生. 生物多样性与生态系统多功能性和多服务性的关系: 回顾与展望[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(10): 1094−1111. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2020.0154 Jing X, He J S. Relationship between biodiversity, ecosystem multifunctionality and multiserviceability: literature overview and research advances[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2021, 45(10): 1094−1111. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2020.0154
[17]	中国林业科学研究院“多功能林业”编写组. 中国多功能林业发展道路探索 [M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2010. Editorial Team of Multi-Functional Forestry of Chinese Academy of Forestry. Exploring multi-functional forestry development path of China[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2010.
[18]	曾祥谓, 樊宝敏, 张怀清, 等. 我国多功能森林经营的理论探索与对策研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2013(2): 10−27. Zeng X W, Fan B M, Zhang H Q, et al. A study on the theory and strategy of multifunctional forest management in China[J]. Forest Resources Management, 2013(2): 10−27.
[19]	陆元昌, 刘宪钊, 雷相东, 等. 人工林多功能经营技术体系[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2017, 37(7): 1−10. Lu Y C, Liu X Z, Lei X D, et al. Technical system for plantation multi-function management[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2017, 37(7): 1−10.
[20]	项文化, 雷相东. 森林生态系统多功能性及经营优化途径[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2022, 42(10): 1−8. Xiang W H, Lei X D. Forest ecosystem multifunctionality and management optimization paths[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2022, 42(10): 1−8.
[21]	Hector A, Bagchi R. Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality[J]. Nature, 2007, 448: 188−190.
[22]	Manning P, van der Plas F, Soliveres S, et al. Redefining ecosystem multifunctionality[J]. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2018, 2(3): 427−436.
[23]	Hölting L, Beckmann M, Volk M, et al. Multifunctionality assessments-more than assessing multiple ecosystem functions and services? A quantitative literature review[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 103: 226−35. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.009
[24]	Nocentini S, Travaglini D, Muys B. Managing mediterranean forests for multiple ecosystem services: research progress and knowledge gaps[J]. Current Forestry Reports, 2022, 8(2): 229−256. doi: 10.1007/s40725-022-00167-w
[25]	Irauschek F, Rammer W, Lexer M J. Evaluating multifunctionality and adaptive capacity of mountain forest management alternatives under climate change in the eastern alps[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2017, 136(5−6): 1051−1069. doi: 10.1007/s10342-017-1051-6
[26]	Peura M, Burgas D, Eyvindson K, et al. Continuous cover forestry is a cost-efficient tool to increase multifunctionality of boreal production forests in Fennoscandia[J]. Biological Conservation, 2018, 217: 104−112. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.018
[27]	Triviño M, Pohjanmies T, Mazziotta A, et al. Optimizing management to enhance multifunctionality in a boreal forest landscape[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 54(1): 61−70. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12790
[28]	Pohjanmies T, Eyvindson K, Triviño M, et al. Forest multifunctionality is not resilient to intensive forestry[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2021, 140(3): 537−549. doi: 10.1007/s10342-020-01348-7
[29]	Blattert C, Lemm R, Thees O, et al. Management of ecosystem services in mountain forests: review of indicators and value functions for model based multi-criteria decision analysis[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2017, 79: 391−409. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.04.025
[30]	Felipe-Lucia M R, Soliveres S, Penone C, et al. Multiple forest attributes underpin the supply of multiple ecosystem services[J]. Nature Communications, 2018, 9(1): 4839. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07082-4
[31]	Brandt P, Abson D J, Dellasala D A, et al. Multifunctionality and biodiversity: Ecosystem services in temperate rainforests of the Pacific Northwest, USA[J]. Biological Conservation, 2014, 279: 362−371.
[32]	Snäll T, Triviño M, Mair L, et al. High rates of short-term dynamics of forest ecosystem services[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2021, 4(11): 951−957. doi: 10.1038/s41893-021-00764-w
[33]	Jonsson M, Bengtsson J, Moen J, et al. Stand age and climate influence forest ecosystem service delivery and multifunctionality[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2020, 15(9): 0940a8. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/abaf1c
[34]	Zeng Y L, Wu H L, Ouyang S, et al. Ecosystem service multifunctionality of Chinese fir plantations differing in stand age and implications for sustainable management[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 788: 147791. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147791
[35]	Jönsson M, Snäll T, Leverkus A B. Ecosystem service multifunctionality of low-productivity forests and implications for conservation and management[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 57(4): 695−706. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13569
[36]	Gamfeldt L, Snall T, Bagchi R, et al. Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species[J]. Nature Communication, 2013, 4: 1340. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2328
[37]	Guan S Y, Lu Y C, Liu X Z. Evaluation of multiple forest service based on the integration of stand structural attributes in mixed oak forests[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(14): 8228. doi: 10.3390/su14148228
[38]	Simons N K, Felipe-Lucia M R, Schall P, et al. National forest inventories capture the multifunctionality of managed forests in Germany[J]. Forest Ecosystems, 2021, 8(1): 5. doi: 10.1186/s40663-021-00280-5
[39]	Brockerhoff E G, Barbaro L, Castagneyrol B, et al. Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services[J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2017, 26: 3005−3035. doi: 10.1007/s10531-017-1453-2
[40]	Kowalska A, Affek A, Wolski J, et al. Assessment of regulating ES potential of lowland riparian hardwood forests in Poland[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 120: 106834. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106834
[41]	Li S F, Liu W D, Lang X D, et al. Species richness, not abundance, drives ecosystem multifunctionality in a subtropical coniferous forest[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 120: 106911. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106911
[42]	Xie H T, Wang G G, Yu M K. Ecosystem multifunctionality is highly related to the shelterbelt structure and plant species diversity in mixed shelterbelts of eastern China[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2018, 27: e00470.
[43]	Huang X B, Su J R, Li S F, et al. Functional diversity drives ecosystem multifunctionality in a Pinus yunnanensis natural secondary forest[J]. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1): 6979. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43475-1
[44]	van der Plas F, Ratcliffe S, Ruiz-Benito P, et al. Continental mapping of forest ecosystem functions reveals a high but unrealized potential for forest multifunctionality[J]. Ecology Letters, 2018, 21(1): 31−42. doi: 10.1111/ele.12868
[45]	Giguere-Tremblay R, Laperriere G, de Grandpre A, et al. Boreal forest multifunctionality is promoted by low soil organic matter content and high regional bacterial biodiversity in northeastern Canada[J]. Forests, 2020, 11(2): 149. doi: 10.3390/f11020149
[46]	Creamer R E, Barel J M, Bongiorno G, et al. The life of soils: Integrating the who and how of multifunctionality[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2022, 276: 108561.
[47]	Queiroz C, Meacham M, Richter K, et al. Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape[J]. Ambio, 2015, 44(Suppl.1): S89−101.
[48]	Jing X, Prager C M, Classen A T, et al. Variation in the methods leads to variation in the interpretation of biodiversity-ecosystem multifunctionality relationships[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2020, 13(4): 431−441. doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtaa031
[49]	Byrnes J E K, Gamfeldt L, Isbell F, et al. Investigating the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality: challenges and solutions[J]. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2014, 5(2): 111−124. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12143
[50]	Byrnes J E K, Roger F, Bagchi R. Understandable multifunctionality measures using hill numbers[J]. Oikos, 2023, 2023(2): e09402. doi: 10.1111/oik.09402
[51]	Hölting L, Jacobs S, Felipe-Lucia M R, et al. Measuring ecosystem multifunctionality across scales[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2019, 14(12): 124083. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab5ccb
[52]	Mori A S, Isbell F, Seidl R. β-diversity, community assembly, and ecosystem functioning[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2018, 33(7): 549−564.
[53]	Chao A, Chiu C H, Hu K H, et al. Hill-Chao numbers allow decomposing gamma multifunctionality into alpha and beta components[J]. Ecology Letters, 2024, 27(1): e14336. doi: 10.1111/ele.14336
[54]	Hill M O. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences[J]. Ecology, 1973, 54(2): 427−432. doi: 10.2307/1934352
[55]	Chao A, Chiu C H, Jost L. Unifying species diversity, phylogenetic diversity, functional diversity, and related similarity and differentiation measures through hill numbers[J]. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2014, 45: 297−324. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091540
[56]	Chao A, Chiu C H, Villéger S, et al. An attribute-diversity approach to functional diversity, functional beta diversity, and related (dis) similarity measures[J]. Ecological Monographs, 2019, 89(2): e01343. doi: 10.1002/ecm.1343
[57]	Chao A, Henderson P A, Chiu C H, et al. Measuring temporal change in alpha diversity: a framework integrating taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity and the iNEXT. 3D standardization[J]. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2021, 12(10): 1926−1940. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13682
[58]	Manning P, Loos J, Barnes A D, et al. Transferring biodiversity-ecosystem function research to the management of ‘real-world’ecosystems[J]. Advances in Ecological Research, 2019, 61: 323−356.
[59]	le Provost G, Schenk N V, Penone C, et al. The supply of multiple ecosystem services requires biodiversity across spatial scales[J]. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2023, 7(2): 236−249.
[60]	Neyret M, Peter S, le Provost G, et al. Landscape management strategies for multifunctionality and social equity[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2023, 6(4):391−403.
[61]	Buongiorno J, Dahir J S, Lin C, et al. Tree size diversity and economic returns in uneven-aged forest stands[J]. Forest Science, 1994, 40(1): 83−103. doi: 10.1093/forestscience/40.1.83
[62]	向玮, 雷相东, 洪玲霞, 等. 落叶松云冷杉林矩阵生长模型及多目标经营模拟[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(6): 77−87. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20110612 Xiang W, Lei X D, Hong L X, et al. Matrix growth model and harvest scenario simulation for multiple uses of larch-spruce-fir forests[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2011, 47(6): 77−87. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20110612
[63]	Biber P, Felton A, Nieuwenhuis M, et al. Forest biodiversity, carbon sequestration, and wood production: modeling synergies and trade-offs for ten forest landscapes across Europe[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 2020, 8: 547696. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2020.547696
[64]	Başkent E Z, Kašpar J. Exploring the effects of management intensification on multiple ecosystem services in an ecosystem management context[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2022, 518: 120299. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120299
[65]	Mey R, Zell J, Thurig E, et al. Tree species admixture increases ecosystem service provision in simulated spruce- and beech-dominated stands[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2022, 141(5): 801−820. doi: 10.1007/s10342-022-01474-4
[66]	Lafond V, Cordonnier T, Mao Z, et al. Trade-offs and synergies between ecosystem services in uneven-aged mountain forests: evidences using Pareto fronts[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2017, 136(5−6): 997−1012. doi: 10.1007/s10342-016-1022-3
[67]	Zanchi G, Belyazid S, Akselsson C, et al. Modelling the effects of management intensification on multiple forest services: a Swedish case study[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2014, 284: 48−59. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.04.006
[68]	Pukkala T, Lahde E, Laiho O, et al. A multifunctional comparison of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management in a boreal region[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2011, 41(4): 851−862. doi: 10.1139/x11-009
[69]	Blattert C, Lemm R, Thürig E, et al. Long-term impacts of increased timber harvests on ecosystem services and biodiversity: a scenario study based on national forest inventory data[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2020, 45: 101150. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101150
[70]	Morán-Ordóñez A, Ameztegui A, de Cáceres M, et al. Future trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services in Mediterranean forests under global change scenarios[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2020, 45: 101174. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101174
[71]	Dong L B, Lu W, Li Z G. Developing alternative forest spatial management plans when carbon and timber values are considered: a real case from northeastern China[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2018, 385: 45−57. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.07.009
[72]	Deng W W, Xiang W H, Ouyang S, et al. Spatially explicit optimization of the forest management tradeoff between timber production and carbon sequestration[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022, 142: 109193. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109193
[73]	董灵波, 孙云霞, 刘兆刚. 基于碳和木材目标的森林空间经营规划研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2017, 39(1): 52−61. Dong L B, Sun Y X, Liu Z G. Integrating carbon and timber objective into forest spatial planning management[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(1): 52−61.
[74]	戎建涛, 雷相东, 张会儒, 等. 兼顾碳贮量和木材生产目标的森林经营规划研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2012, 27(2): 155−162. Rong J T, Lei X D, Zhang H R, et al. Forest management planning incorporating values of timber and carbon[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2012, 27(2): 155−162.
[75]	Eyvindson K, Duflot R, Triviño M, et al. High boreal forest multifunctionality requires continuous cover forestry as a dominant management[J]. Land Use Policy, 2021, 100: 104918. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104918
[76]	Chumachenko S, Kiseleva V, Kolycheva A, et al. Long-term forecast of forest ecosystem services under different forest use scenarios[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, 875(1): 012039. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/875/1/012039
[77]	Lundholm A, Black K, Corrigan E, et al. Evaluating the impact of future global climate change and bioeconomy scenarios on ecosystem services using a strategic forest management decision support system[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 2020, 8: 200. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2020.00200
[78]	Díaz-Yáñez O, Pukkala T, Packalen P, et al. Multifunctional comparison of different management strategies in boreal forests [J]. Forestry, 2019, 93(1): 84−95.
[79]	Schwaiger F, Poschenrieder W, Biber P, et al. Ecosystem service trade-offs for adaptive forest management[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2019, 39: 100993. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100993
[80]	Temperli C, Bugmann H, Elkin C. Adaptive management for competing forest goods and services under climate change[J]. Ecological Applications, 2012, 22(8): 2065−2077. doi: 10.1890/12-0210.1
[81]	Pang X, Nordström E M, Böttcher H, et al. Trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services under different forest management scenarios: the LEcA tool[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 28: 67−79. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.006
[82]	Irauschek F, Rammer W, Lexer M J. Can current management maintain forest landscape multifunctionality in the eastern Alps in Austria under climate change?[J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2015, 17(1): 33−48.
[83]	Langner A, Irauschek F, Perez S, et al. Value-based ecosystem service trade-offs in multi-objective management in European mountain forests[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 26: 245−257. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.001
[84]	Lagergren F, Jönsson A M. Ecosystem model analysis of multi-use forestry in a changing climate[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 26: 209−224. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.007
[85]	Härtl F H, Barka I, Hahn W A, et al. Multifunctionality in European mountain forests: an optimization under changing climatic conditions[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2016, 46(2): 163−171.
[86]	Mina M, Bugmann H, Cordonnier T, et al. Future ecosystem services from European mountain forests under climate change[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 54(2): 389−401. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12772
[87]	Caicoya A T, Vergarechea M, Blattert C, et al. What drives forest multifunctionality in central and northern Europe? Exploring the interplay of management, climate, and policies[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2023, 64: 101575. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101575
[88]	Márquez L A M, Rezende E C N, Machado K B, et al. Trends in valuation approaches for cultural ecosystem services: a systematic literature review[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2023, 64: 101572. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101572
[89]	Siwicka E, Gladstone-Gallagher R, Hewitt J E, et al. Beyond the single index: investigating ecological mechanisms underpinning ecosystem multifunctionality with network analysis[J]. Ecology and Evolution, 2021, 11(18): 12401−12412. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7987
[90]	Felipe-Lucia M R. Modelling dynamic ecosystem services[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2021, 4(11): 928−929. doi: 10.1038/s41893-021-00765-9
[91]	Başkent E Z, Kašpar J. Exploring the effects of various rotation lengths on the ecosystem services within a multiple-use management framework[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2023, 538: 120974. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2023.120974
[92]	Baskent E Z, Borges J G, Kašpar J, et al. A design for addressing multiple ecosystem services in forest management planning[J]. Forests, 2020, 11(10): 1108. doi: 10.3390/f11101108
[93]	França L C J, Júnior F W A, Silva C S J, et al. Forest landscape planning and management: a state-of-the-art review[J]. Trees, Forests and People, 2022, 8: 100275. doi: 10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100275

[1]	Zhan Siying, Liu Pengju, Li Haikui, Zhang Cong, Liu Qi. Threshold optimization for forest soil organic matter prediction model: a case study of Guangdong Province of southern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2025, 47(2): 32-39. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20240314
[2]	Zhang Biao, Kang Feng, Xu Shuting. Multi-objective path planning based on improved RRT and GA: a case study of UAV forest patrol[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20240356
[3]	Li Shuang, Zhang Xiaowei, Tan Xu, Xu Lingfei, Lü Shenghua, Wen Jian. Deep learning-based inverse identification of multi-target parameters for tree rooting ground-penetrating radar[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(4): 103-114. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230259
[4]	Ge Huishuo, Song Yuepeng, Su Xuehui, Zhang Deqiang, Zhang Xiaoyu. Optimal growth model of Populus simonii seedling combination based on Logistic and Gompertz models[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(5): 59-70. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190296
[5]	Ren Wenzi, Wang Xinjie, Alex Appiah Mensah. Medium term planning of multi-objective forest management in private forest of Ostad Estate, southern Sweden[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(2): 97-105. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180220
[6]	Wang Xiaosong, Yang Gang. A multi-objective optimization segmentation method for tree image based on fusion clustering and classification algorithm[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2018, 40(12): 124-131. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180160
[7]	DONG Ling-bo, SUN Yun-xia, LIU Zhao-gang. Integrating carbon and timber objective into forest spatial planning management[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(1): 52-61. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160166
[8]	LI Bin, YANG Xiao-tian, WANG Shu-yang.. Simulated optimization of small UAV fuselage for forest fire prevention based on FLUENT．[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(11): 115-119. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150132
[9]	LI Chong-gui, ZHAO Xian-wen. Determining the optimum sample plots for establishing canopy density estimating equation in monitoring area[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2005, 27(6): 24-28.
[10]	LI Yong-ning, MENG Xian-yu, HUANG Xuan-rui, WANG Jin-mao. Multiple-level structure of forest management system.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2005, 27(1): 99-102.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(1)

周紫晶，范付华，尚先文，覃慧娟，王聪慧，丁贵杰，谭健晖. 外源IAA对马尾松幼苗茎干次生生长的影响. 林业科学. 2021(09): 42-51 .

Other cited types(5)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (765) PDF downloads (166) Cited by(6)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Forest ecosystem service multi-functionality: definitions, indicators and simulation models for forest management

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(1)

Other cited types(5)

Catalog

Forest ecosystem service multi-functionality: definitions, indicators and simulation models for forest management

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(1)

Other cited types(5)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content