• Scopus
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD)
  • A Guide to the Core Journal of China
  • CSTPCD
  • F5000 Frontrunner
  • RCCSE
Advanced search
WANG Jing-hong, CAI Ti-jiu, GE Shu-sheng, LIU Jing-xu, QU Cun-yong, SUN Xiao-xin. Effects of Mohe-Daqing oil pipeline project construction on typical forest ecosystems in Daxing'an Mountains.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(10): 58-66. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150086
Citation: WANG Jing-hong, CAI Ti-jiu, GE Shu-sheng, LIU Jing-xu, QU Cun-yong, SUN Xiao-xin. Effects of Mohe-Daqing oil pipeline project construction on typical forest ecosystems in Daxing'an Mountains.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(10): 58-66. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150086
shu

Effects of Mohe-Daqing oil pipeline project construction on typical forest ecosystems in Daxing'an Mountains.

  • 1.

    1 College of Landscape, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150040, P. R. China;

  • 2.

    2 School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150040, P. R. China;

  • 3.

    3 China Petroleum Daqing Oilfield Engineering Co., Ltd., Daqing, Heilongjiang, 163712, P. R. China.

More Information
  • Received Date: March 23, 2015
  • Published Date: October 30, 2015
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • Mohe-Daqing section of the China-Russia oil pipeline project runs through Daxing’an Mountains and the Songnen Plain. Project construction would disturb vegetation and soil of the forests. In this study, we measured soil properties, plant biomass and species biodiversity in the operational region of the oil pipeline and the non-operational region in theRhododendron dauricum--Betula platyphylla forest, Vaccinum vitis-idaea--Larix gmelini forest and Lespedeza bicolor--Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica forest. The results showed that: 1) Pipeline construction had no effects on soil pH; however, total P concentration decreased significantly (P＜0.05). Total N concentration decreased significantly (P＜0.05) in the soil layer of 0--10 cm; however, it increased in the soil layers of 10--20 cm and 20--30 cm in all of the three forests. Total K concentration decreased significantly (P＜0.05) in the soil layers of 0--10 cm and 10--20 cm in R. dauricum--B. platyphylla forest; however, there was no change in the total K concentration (P0.05) after pipeline construction in V. vitis-idaea--L. gmelini forest and L. bicolor--P. sylvestris var. mongolica forest. 2) Tree biomass decreased significantly (P＜0.05) in R. dauricum--B. platyphylla forest. However, shrub and herb biomass did not change significantly (P0.05) in this forest. Tree and shrub biomass decreased significantly (P＜0.05) in V. vitis-idaea--L. gmelini forest and L. bicolor--P. sylvestris var. mongolica forest. In contrast, herb biomass increased significantly (P0.05) in these two forests. 3) Oil pipeline project construction had more effects on tree and shrub species diversity than on the herb species diversity. Tree and shrub species biodiversity decreased at all sites after construction except for shrub species biodiversity in the V. vitis-idaea--L. gmelini forest. Herb species biodiversity increased in L. bicolor--P. sylvestris var. mongolica forest; however, it decreased in R. dauricum--B. platyphylla forest and V. vitis-idaea--L. gmelini forest. Our results indicated that restoration of the vegetation was difficult after oil pipeline project construction due to the damage to both vegetation and soil. More artificial measures are necessary to restore the vegetation. Otherwise, the degraded ecosystem would be harmful to the pipeline at sites with poor soil textures.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (58)
  • [1]
    PU M, MA J G. Progress of China’s oil and gas pipeline development in 2010[J]. International Petroleum Economics, 2011,19(3):26-34.
    [1]
    TUBB R. Pipeline and gas journal’s 2010 international pipeline construction report[J]. Pipeline Gas Journal, 2010,237(2):46-49.
    [2]
    LI G Y, JIN H J, SHENG Y, et al. Recent advances in frozen ground engineering geology survey along the China-Russia crude oil pipeline route (Mo’he-Daqing section) [J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2008,30(1):170-175.
    [2]
    蒲明, 马建国. 2010年我国油气管道新进展[J]. 国际石油经济, 2011,19(3):26-34.
    [3]
    CHEN L D, GAO Q C. Chance and challenge for China on ecosystem management: lessons from the west-to-east pipeline project construction[J]. Ambio, 2006,35:91-93.
    [3]
    YANG S Z, JIN H J, JI Y J, et al.Revegetation in permafrost regions along a linear project[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2008,30(5):875-882.
    [4]
    LAURANCE W F. New pipeline threatens Ecuadorian rainforest[J]. Trends in Ecology Evolution, 2001,16:429-430.
    [4]
    CHEN H, LI S C, ZHENG D. Features of ecosystems alongside Qinghai-Xizang highway and railway and the impacts of road construction on them[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2003,21(5):559-567.
    [5]
    WEI J F. Study of vegetation restoration and revegetation during the constructing of the Qinghai-Tibet railway[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2003,25(Suppl.1):195-198.
    [5]
    YU X, WANG G, ZOU Y, et al. Effects of pipeline construction on wetland ecosystems: Russia-China oil pipeline project (Mohe-Daqing section)[J]. Ambio, 2010,39:447-450.
    [6]
    ZHOU Y L. Vegetation of Da Hinggan Ling in China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1991.
    [6]
    NAETH M A, MCGILL W B, BAILEY A W. Persistence of changes in selected soil chemical and physical properties after pipeline installation in solonetzic native rangeland[J]. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 1987,67:747-763.
    [7]
    SOON Y K, ARSHAD M A, RICE W A, et al. Recovery of chemical and physical properties of boreal plain soils impacted by pipeline burial[J]. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 2000,80(3):489-497.
    [7]
    LU R K.Soil and agricultural chemistry analysis[M]. Beijing: Chinese Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 1999.
    [8]
    XU Q X. Effect of thinng on soil physicochemical property and carbon storage of the natural Larix gmelinii forest in Great Xing’an Mountains[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2013.
    [8]
    OLSON E R, DOHERTY J M. The legacy of pipeline installation on the soil and vegetation of southeast Wisconsin wetlands[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2012,39(7):53-62.
    [9]
    KNOTT D M, WENNER E L, WENDT P H. Effects of pipeline construction on the vegetation and macrofauna of two South Carolina, USA salt marshes[J]. Wetlands, 1997,17(1):65-81.
    [9]
    WANG C, GAO H Z, ZANG Y Q. Study on the biomass of Betula platyphylla forest tree[J]. Forestry Science Technology, 2010,35(1):7-9.
    [10]
    XIAO J, WANG Y, SHI P, et al. Potential effects of large linear pipeline construction on soil and vegetation in ecologically fragile regions[J]. Environmental Monitoring Assessment, 2014,186(11):8037-8048.
    [10]
    NING B. Study on stand structure dynamic and biomass for Mongolian scots pine in plantation[D].Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2007.
    [11]
    OLANDER L P, SCATENA F N, SILVER W L. Impacts of disturbance initiated by road construction in a subtropical cloud forest in the Luquillo Experimental Forest, Puerto Rico[J]. Forest Ecology Management, 1998,109:33-49.
    [11]
    MA K P, HUANG J H, YU S L, et al. Plant community diversity in Dongling Mountain, Beijing, China Ⅱ: species richness, evenness and species diversities[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1995,15(3):268-277.
    [12]
    李国玉, 金会军, 盛煜, 等. 中国—俄罗斯原油管道工程(漠河—大庆段)冻土工程地质考察与研究进展[J]. 冰川冻土,2008,30(1):170-175.
    [12]
    CUI J, CAI T J, YANG Y, et al.Effects of Mohe-Daqing oil pipeline project on soil nutrient in the areas along the line[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013,27(3):143-149.
    [13]
    GU H Y, JIN J B, CHEN X W, et al. Effects of logging disturbance on soil chemical properties of Larix gmelini forests in the northern slope on Greater Hinggan Mountains[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2009,40(2): 272-275.
    [13]
    REID N B, NAETH M A. Establishment of a vegetation cover on tundra kimberlite mine tailings 2: a field study[J]. Restoration Ecology, 2005,13(4):602-608.
    [14]
    杨思忠, 金会军, 吉延峻, 等. 寒区线性工程沿线冻土区的植被恢复[J]. 冰川冻土, 2008,30(5):875-882.
    [14]
    SHEN W S, ZHANG H, ZOU C X, et al.Effects of the Qinghai-Tibet railway construction on ecosystems and the prediction methods for restoration[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2004,49(9):909-914.
    [15]
    YU L F, ZHU S Q, YE J Z, et al. Dynamics of a degraded karst forest in the process of natural restoration[J]. Scientia Silvea Sinicae, 2002,38(1):1-7.
    [15]
    陈辉, 李双成, 郑度. 青藏公路铁路沿线生态系统特征及道路修建对其影响[J]. 山地学报, 2003,21(5):559-567.
    [16]
    WANG X G, LI X Z, KONG F H, et al.Model of vegetation restoration under natural regeneration and human interference in the burned area of northern Daxinganling[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2003,22(5): 30-34.
    [16]
    JORGENSON M T, JOYCE M R. Six strategies for rehabilitating land disturbed by oil development in Arctic Alaska[J]. Arctic, 1994,47(4):374-390.
    [17]
    WU X Y, LU H, WANG X J. Changes of plant diversity, biomass, and soil nutrients in cutting slash of artificial sand-fixation forest after fallowing and natural restoration[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2007,26(7): 978-982.
    [17]
    魏建方. 青藏铁路建设中高寒草原植被恢复与再造技术的研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2003,25(增刊1):195-198.
    [18]
    XIANG W H, TIAN D L, YAN W D, et al. Biomass dynamic and nutrient accumulation of natural restoration at early stage after fallow in clear-cutting forestland of Chinese fir plantation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003,23(4):695-702.
    [18]
    JIN H, YU Q, LU L, et al. Degradation of permafrost in the Xing'anling Mountains, northeastern China[J]. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, 2007,18:245-258.
    [19]
    周以良. 中国大兴安岭植被[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1991.
    [19]
    GUAN K Z, ZHANG D J. Effects of fire on vegetation in Daxing'an Mountains [J]. Environmental Science,1990,11(5):82-88.
    [20]
    鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1999.
    [20]
    WANG X G, LI X Z, HE H S, et al.Postfire succession of larch forest in the northern slope of Daxinganling[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2004,23(5):35-41.
    [21]
    ZHANG Y H, TAN B X, SUN M L, et al.Impact of forest fire on understory vegetation and soil in typical forest types of Daxing’an Mountains, northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2012,34(2):8-14.
    [21]
    徐庆祥. 抚育间伐对大兴安岭兴安落叶松天然林碳储量的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2013.
    [22]
    王超, 高红真, 臧永琪.白桦林木单株生物量的研究[J]. 林业科技, 2010,35(1):7-9.
    [23]
    宁波. 樟子松人工林结构动态及生物量的研究[D]. 哈尔滨:东北林业大学, 2007.
    [24]
    马克平, 黄建辉, 于顺利, 等. 北京东灵山地区植物群落多样性的研究Ⅱ: 丰富度、均匀度和物种多样性指数[J]. 生态学报, 1995,15(3):268-277.
    [25]
    崔婧, 蔡体久, 杨业, 等. 漠河—大庆输油管道工程对沿线地区土壤养分的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2013,27(3):143-149.
    [26]
    谷会岩, 金靖博, 陈祥伟, 等. 采伐干扰对大兴安岭北坡兴安落叶松林土壤化学性质的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2009,40(2): 272-275.
    [27]
    沈渭寿, 张慧, 邹长新, 等. 青藏铁路建设对沿线高寒生态系统的影响及恢复预测方法研究[J]. 科学通报, 2004,49(9):909-914.
    [28]
    喻理飞, 朱守谦, 叶镜中, 等. 退化喀斯特森林自然恢复过程中群落动态研究[J]. 林业科学, 2002,38(1):1-7.
    [29]
    王绪高, 李秀珍, 孔繁花, 等. 大兴安岭北坡火烧迹地自然与人工干预下的植被恢复模式初探[J]. 生态学杂志, 2003,22(5): 30-34.
    [30]
    NAGAIKE T, KAMITANI T, NAKASHIZUKA T. Effects of different forest management systems on plant species diversity in a Fagus crenata forested landscape of central Japan[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2005,35(12): 2832-2840.
    [31]
    吴祥云, 卢慧, 王晓娇. 固沙林采伐迹地撂荒后自然恢复的植物多样性、生物量与土壤养分含量的变化[J]. 生态学杂志, 2007,26(7): 978-982.
    [32]
    SANTANA J, PORTO M, REINO L, et al. Long-term understory recovery after mechanical fuel reduction in Mediterranean cork oak forests[J]. Forest Ecology Management, 2011,261(3): 447-459.
    [33]
    项文化, 田大伦, 闫文德, 等. 杉木林采伐迹地撂荒后植被恢复早期的生物量与养分积累[J]. 生态学报, 2003,23(4):695-702.
    [34]
    关克志, 张大军. 大兴安岭森林火灾对植被影响分析[J]. 环境科学,1990,11(5):82-88.
    [35]
    王绪高, 李秀珍, 贺红士, 等. 大兴安岭北坡落叶松林火后植被演替过程研究[J]. 生态学杂志, 2004,23(5):35-41.
    [36]
    张玉红, 覃炳醒, 孙铭隆, 等. 林火对大兴安岭典型林型林下植被与土壤的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2012,34(2):8-14.
    [37]
    AUERBACH N A, WALKER M D, WALKER D A. Effects of roadside disturbance on substrate and vegetation properties in arctic tundra[J]. Ecological Applications, 1997,7(1):218-235.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]Ma Jiaxin, Sun Yujun, Zhu Zhaoting. Impact of two types of competition indices on the growth and biomass assessment of Cunninghamia lanceolata[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230230
    [2]Li Hui, Liu Dongchao, Xu Ruirui, Hou Lina, Wang Tianqi, Liu Zhonghua, Fu Xiao, Li Shengbo. Development and identification of SSR markers based on RAD-seq of Lonicera japonica[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(6): 108-117. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200337
    [3]Liu Feng, Xi Benye, Dai Tengfei, Yu Jinglin, Li Guangde, Chen Yushan, Wang Jie, Jia Liming. Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on soil nitrogen, fine root distribution and biomass of Populus tomentosa[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(1): 75-83. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190222
    [4]LIU Kun, CAO Lin, WANG Gui-bin, CAO Fu-liang. Biomass allocation patterns and allometric models of Ginkgo biloba[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(4): 12-20. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160374
    [5]WANG Ling, ZHAO Guang-liang, HUANG Jin. Microbial biomass and enzyme activity of the rhizosphere soil under different grafted Xanthoceras sorbifolia cultivars[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(8): 69-75. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150013
    [6]DONG Dian, LIN Tian-xi, TANG Jing-yi, LIU Jing-chen, SUN Guo-wen, YAO Jie, CHENG Yan-xia. Biomass allocation patterns and allometric models of Tilia amurensis[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014, 36(4): 54-63. DOI: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2014.04.013
    [7]DONG Li-hu, LI Feng-ri, JIA Wei-wei.. Effects of tree competition on biomass and biomass models of Pinus koraiensis plantation.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35(6): 14-22.
    [8]CHU Xu, DI Xue-ying, YANG Guang. Impacts of forest fire on root biomass, carbon and nitrogen concentration of Larix gmelinii.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35(2): 10-16.
    [9]XU Fei, GUO Wei-hua, XU Wei-hong, WANG Ren-qing. Effects of water stress on morphology, biomass allocation and photosynthesis in Robinia pseudoacacia seedlings[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(1): 24-30.
    [10]ZHANG Guo-jun, ZHANG Guo-jun, LI Yun, LI Yun, LI Fang-ping, LI Fang-ping, XU Zhao-he, XU Zhao-he, SUN Yu-han, SUN Yu-han. Effects of root age on biomass and leaf nutrition in tetraploid Robinia pseudoacacia. [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2009, 31(3): 37-41.

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(18)

    1. 黄鑫，徐国祺，马耀辉. 制备具有荧光示踪功能的硼掺杂银杏叶碳量子点木材防腐剂. 北京林业大学学报. 2025(01): 116-125 . 本站查看
    2. 张景朋，邵闯，蒋明亮. 高效液相色谱法测定防腐材中嘧菌酯含量的方法研究. 木材科学与技术. 2025(01): 64-70 .
    3. 吴喆虹，王文志，罗玲卓，袁超峰，苏勇，朱万泽. 贡嘎山健康与腐朽峨眉冷杉径向生长分异及其气候响应. 生态学报. 2024(23): 10897-10905 .
    4. 储炜，徐明，许琪，李婷，崔兆彦. 加速腐朽环境下重组竹力学及耐腐性能研究. 建筑科学与工程学报. 2023(03): 30-39 .
    5. 宋丽琴，宋太泽，祝席文，程芳超，孙建平. 木材花斑真菌对木材的影响及应用研究进展. 应用与环境生物学报. 2022(03): 805-812 .
    6. 谢启芳，张保壮，张利朋，苗壮. 自然干裂木柱受力性能试验与退化模型研究. 建筑结构学报. 2022(12): 210-222 .
    7. 常旭东，金光泽. 地形和土壤因子对红松活立木腐朽的影响. 林业科学. 2022(11): 71-82 .
    8. 张景朋，蒋明亮，马星霞，张斌. 甲氧基丙烯酸酯类制剂的木材防腐性能研究. 北京林业大学学报. 2021(03): 131-137 . 本站查看
    9. 王玉娇，彭尧，曹金珍. 褐腐初期南方松木材微观形貌与化学成分分析. 北京林业大学学报. 2021(03): 138-144 . 本站查看
    10. 王湘茹，曾飞扬，吕嘉宇，乔宇欣，闫丽. 硅烷偶联剂对水杨酸/二氧化硅微胶囊改性杨木耐腐性的影响. 林产工业. 2021(05): 54-59 .
    11. 贾茹，孙海燕，王玉荣，汪睿，赵荣军，任海青. 杉木无性系新品种‘洋020’和‘洋061’10年生幼龄材微观结构与力学性能的相关性. 林业科学. 2021(05): 165-175 .
    12. 赵艳，张泽宇，金宇乔，庞久寅，孙耀星. 木材表面仿制类玫瑰花超疏水结构研究. 林产工业. 2020(12): 32-34+39 .
    13. 赵博识，于志明，漆楚生，唐睿琳，张扬. 木材微生物变色与调控研究现状和展望. 林产工业. 2019(08): 1-4 .
    14. 郭宇，李超，李英洁，王哲，姚利宏. 木材细胞壁与木材力学性能及水分特性之间关系研究进展. 林产工业. 2019(08): 14-18 .
    15. 徐华东，狄亚楠，邢涛，徐群. 褐腐对白杨木材固碳量的影响规律及机理. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2019(11): 104-109 .
    16. 孙恒，冀晓东，赵红华，杨茂林，丛旭. 人工林刺槐木材物理力学性质研究. 北京林业大学学报. 2018(07): 104-112 . 本站查看
    17. 孙海燕，苏明垒，王玉荣. 木材细胞壁力学性能与细胞壁组分和构造的相关性研究. 林产工业. 2018(10): 22-27 .
    18. 陈继超，姜维娜，曹文静，周徐亮，周晓燕，徐莉. 杨木纤维/Si-B复合材料制备及其防腐性能研究. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2018(05): 206-210 .

    Other cited types(18)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (1801) PDF downloads (27) Cited by(36)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles

    Copyright © 2013 《北京林业大学学报》编辑部

    Address：North-Star Times Tower, No.8 Beichendong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China China Pos：100083

    Tel：010-62337673 Email：bldxed@bjfu.edu.cn 京ICP备05066833号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return