Interactions between environment and traits and analysis of stability in new triploid clones of <i>Populus tomentosa</i>

Zhang Pingdong; Zhang Feng; Sun Jing; Song Lianjun; Kang Xiangyang

doi:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20190106

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2019 > 41(7): 31-38. > DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20190106

Zhang Pingdong, Zhang Feng, Sun Jing, Song Lianjun, Kang Xiangyang. Interactions between environment and traits and analysis of stability in new triploid clones of Populus tomentosa[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(7): 31-38. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20190106

Citation:

PDF (701 KB)

Interactions between environment and traits and analysis of stability in new triploid clones of Populus tomentosa

1.
National Engineering Laboratory for Tree Breeding, Beijing Forestry University, Bejing 100083, China
2.
National Nursery of Guanxian County, Guanxian 252500, Shandong, China
3.
Nursery of Weixian County, Weixian 054700, Hebei, China

More Information

Received Date: February 27, 2019
Revised Date: May 11, 2019
Available Online: July 04, 2019
Published Date: June 30, 2019

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

ObjectiveBetter understand genetic variations, clone × interaction and stability for growth traits and wood properties of pulpwood in new triploid clones of Populus tomentosa can provide specific information for developing new varieties in planting area.
MethodGrowth traits and wood basic density of 7-year-old pulpwood of new triploid clones of P. tomentosa at five clonal trials located at Shanxi Province, Shandong Province and Henan Province were investigated. Then, genetic variations and stability parameters were also estimated.
ResultThe results indicated that the site and clonal effects were highly significant for the growth traits, wood basic density and trunk dry mass. Site × clone interactions were also highly significant for growth traits and trunk dry mass. However, it did not have significant effect on wood basic density. Clonal repeatability of wood basic density in triploid clones of P. tomentosa was 0.92, slightly higher than DBH (0.90), tree height (0.84), individual volume (0.86) and trunk dry mass (0.80). Triploid clone B303 with high yield and higher stability and two triploid clones B331, B302 with higher wood basic density and stability were developed. The results of stability evaluation in growth traits were not consistent with the results in wood basic density owing to the negative correlations between the growth traits and wood basic density. It is suggested that trunk dry mass is considered as a reasonable index to develop new pulpwood varieties.
ConclusionOur findings strengthen recognition of wood properties and its factors, and provide technique reference for developing new pulpwood varieties. It also plays an important role in guiding the popularization of new varieties.
- triploid clones of Populus tomentosa,
- growth trait,
- wood basic density,
- genetic variation,
- stability

FullText(HTML)

References (19)

References

[1]	Zhang P D, Wu F, Kang X Y. Genotypic variation in wood properties and growth traits of triploid hybrid clones of Populus tomentosa at three clonal trials[J]. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 2012, 8(5): 1041−1050.
[2]	Zhang P D, Wu F, Kang X Y. Gentic control of fiber properties and growth in triploid hybrid clones of Populus tomentosa[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2013, 28(7): 621−630. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2013.829868
[3]	Zhang P D, Wu F, Kang X Y. Chemical properties of wood are under stronger genetic control than growth traits in Populus tomentosa Carr.[J]. Annals of Forest Science, 2015, 72: 89−97. doi: 10.1007/s13595-014-0401-5
[4]	Wu F, Zhang P D, Pei J C, et al. Genotypic parameters of wood density and fiber traits in triploid hybrid clones of Populus tomentosa at five clonal trials[J]. Annals of Forest Science, 2013, 70: 751−759. doi: 10.1007/s13595-013-0307-7
[5]	Wu F, Zhang P D, Pei J C, et al. Within-stem variation in wood properties of triploid hybrids of Populus tomentosa at three clonal trials[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2014, 29(1): 71−76. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2013.861923
[6]	陈章水. 杨树二元立木材积表的编制[J]. 林业科学研究, 1989, 2(1):78−83. Chen Z S. The establishment of binomial stock volume tables of poplar[J]. Forest Research, 1989, 2(1): 78−83.
[7]	Smith D M. Maximum moisture content method for determining specific gravity of small wood samples: rept. No. 2014[R]. Wisconsin: Forest Products Laboratory, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture, 1954.
[8]	张天真. 作物育种学总论[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2004. Zhang T Z. General discussion on crop breeding[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2004.
[9]	Pliura A, Zhang S Y, Mackay J, et al. Genotypic variation in wood density and growth traits of poplar hybrids at four clonal trails[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2007, 238: 92−106. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.082
[10]	Yanchuk A D, Dancik B P, Micko M M. Intraclonal variation in wood density of trembling aspen in Alberta[J]. Wood Fiber Science, 1983, 15: 387−394.
[11]	Yu Q, Pulkinen P, Rautio M, et al. Genetic control of wood physiochemical properties, growth and phenology in hybrid aspen clones[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2001, 31: 1348−1356. doi: 10.1139/x01-066
[12]	Zhang S Y, Yu Q, Chauret G, et al. Selection for both growth and wood properties in hybrid poplar clones[J]. Forest Science, 2003, 49: 901−908.
[13]	李善文, 姜岳忠, 王桂岩, 等. 黑杨派无性系生长与材性联合选择[J]. 林业科学, 2005, 41(2):53−58. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2005.02.009 Li S W, Jiang Y Z, Wang G Y, et al. Joint selection for growth and wood properties in Aigeiros clones[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2005, 41(2): 53−58. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2005.02.009
[14]	Seyed M S, Mohsen F, Kahrizi D, et al. Genetic variability of some morphological traits in poplar clones[J]. American Journal of Science Research, 2011, 13: 113−117.
[15]	宋婉, 张志毅, 续九如.毛白杨无性系木材基本密度遗传变异研究[J].林业科学, 2000, 36(专刊1):125−130. Song W, Zhang Z Y, Xu J R. Study on inheritance and variation of wood basic density of Populus tomentosa Carr. clones[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 36(Spec. 1):125−130.
[16]	邢新婷, 张志毅. 三倍体毛白杨无性系木材密度变异研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2000, 22(6):16−20. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2000.06.005 Xing X T, Zhang Z Y. Genetic variation in wood density of triploid clones of Populus tomentosa[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2000, 22(6): 16−20. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2000.06.005
[17]	张平冬, 吴峰, 康向阳. 三倍体白杨杂种无性系木材的基本密度与化学成分变异[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2014, 42(4):26−31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2014.04.006 Zhang P D, Wu F, Kang X Y. Genetic variations in wood basic density and chemical components of triploid hybrid clones of white poplar[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2014, 42(4): 26−31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2014.04.006
[18]	Francis T R, Kanneberg L W. Yield stability studies in short season maize. (1): a descriptive method for grouping genotypes[J/OL]. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 1978, 58: 1029−1034 [2019−02−13]. http://pubs.aic.ca/doi/abs/10.4141/cjps78-157.
[19]	Finlay K W, Wilkinson G N. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding program[J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1963, 14: 742−754. doi: 10.1071/AR9630742

[1]	Cui Tingting, Zhu Liying, Zhang Litian, Ye Yongxiang, Lin Qinlan, Yan Minlong. Analysis of spatial vitality characteristics and influencing factors of Wuyi Mountain National Park from online and offline perspectives[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20240278
[2]	Yu Xiao, Ouyang Xunzhi, Pan Ping, Deng Wenping, Peng Songli, Zang Hao, Hu Rongrong. Spatial structure characteristics and its evaluation of evergreen broadleaved forest at different growth stages in Lushan Mountain, Jiangxi Province of eastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(12): 32-40. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210450
[3]	Sun Qiaoyun, Bao Menghan, Huang Hanwen, Zhang Yujun. Boundary delimitation of the proposed Songnen Plain National Park of northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(1): 103-112. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210418
[4]	Tang Weilu, Jin Kun. Preliminary study on night lodging habitat selection of Nomascus hainanus in Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park, southern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(2): 113-126. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200185
[5]	YU Jia-lin, ZHANG Wei-guo, TIAN Kun, SONG Wei-hong, LI Qiu-ping, YANG Rong, ZHANG Yun. Response of radial growth of three conifer trees to climate change at their upper distribution limits in Potatso National Park, Shangri-La, southwestern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(1): 43-51. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160184
[6]	ZHAO Wen-xia, ZOU Bin, ZHENG Jing-ming, LUO Jiu-fu. Correlations between leaf, stem and root functional traits of common tree species in an evergreen broad-leaved forest[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(6): 35-41. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160087
[7]	WANG Yong, QIAO Yong, SUN Xiang-yang. Soil taxonomy in Jiufeng National Forest Park, Beijing[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(3): 217-220.
[8]	CUI Li-juan, ZHANG Man-yin, LI Wei, WANG Yi-fei, SHANG Xiao-jing.. Management and assessment of national wetland parks.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2009, 31(5): 102-107.
[9]	SHI Qiang, HE Qing-tang. The best tourism environmental capacity of Zhangjiajie National Forest Park, southern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2007, 29(4): 143-147. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2007.04.029
[10]	WANG Qing-kui, WANG Si-long, FENG Zong-wei. Comparison of active soil organic carbon pool between Chinese fir plantations and evergreen broadleaved forests[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2006, 28(5): 1-6.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(36)

1.	张瑜，徐子棋，陈光明，张志军，杨献坤，崔斌，王大中，芦贵君. 不同林草治沙模式对盐碱沙地沉积物粒度特征的影响. 中国水土保持. 2024(03): 29-33 .
2.	田震，高凡，赛硕，杨之恒，丁国栋. 清水河县森林生态系统碳储量、碳密度分布特征. 干旱区资源与环境. 2024(06): 166-173 .
3.	董鹏，任悦，高广磊，丁国栋，张英. 呼伦贝尔沙地樟子松枯落物和土壤碳、氮、磷化学计量特征. 干旱区研究. 2024(08): 1354-1363 .
4.	包润泽，张星，姚庆智. 接种褐环乳牛肝菌对樟子松及油松根际土壤细菌群落的影响. 安徽农业科学. 2023(06): 148-151+162 .
5.	拓卫卫，范家伟，周雅洁，杨京，张延文，佟小刚，吴发启，姚冲. 毛乌素沙地樟子松林植物-土壤生态化学计量特征演变关系. 水土保持研究. 2023(06): 177-186 .
6.	刘明慧，柳叶，任悦，高广磊，丁国栋，张英，赵珮杉，刘轩. 科尔沁沙地樟子松人工林土壤真菌共现网络及其与土壤因子的关系. 生态学报. 2023(23): 9912-9924 .
7.	邹星晨，王欣苗，左亚凡，张泽鑫，贺康宁. 青海云杉不同演替阶段林下草本多样性特征及其环境解释. 生态学报. 2023(24): 10285-10294 .
8.	阿拉萨，王陇，高广磊，张英，曹红雨，杜宇佳，刘雪锋. 乌兰布和沙漠沿黄段风沙土有机质和碳酸钙含量特征. 中国水土保持科学(中英文). 2022(01): 41-47 .
9.	刘轩，赵珮杉，高广磊，赵媛媛，丁国栋，糜万林. 沙地樟子松（Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica）物候特征及其对气候的响应. 中国沙漠. 2022(02): 25-35 .
10.	张恒宇，孙树臣，吴元芝，安娟，宋红丽. 黄土高原不同植被密度条件下土壤水、碳、氮分布特征. 生态环境学报. 2022(05): 875-884 .
11.	阿拉萨，高广磊，丁国栋，张英，曹红雨，杜宇佳. 土壤微生物膜生理生态功能研究进展. 应用生态学报. 2022(07): 1885-1892 .
12.	王辉丽，于树学，郭立，梁海龙，李伟. 樟子松优树群体遗传多样性评价及指纹图谱构建. 甘肃农业大学学报. 2022(03): 103-110 .
13.	王学林，高广磊，丁国栋，曹红雨. 沙地樟子松人工林土壤酶活性研究. 干旱区资源与环境. 2021(01): 114-120 .
14.	徐畅，雷泽勇，周凤艳，毛禹. 沙地樟子松人工林生长对非降雨季节土壤水分的影响. 生态学杂志. 2021(01): 58-66 .
15.	曹怡立. 章古台沙地樟子松人工林衰退的原因以及可持续经营措施. 农业与技术. 2021(03): 75-77 .
16.	韦睿，罗玉亮，兰岚，于宏影，裴晓娜，刘亭亭. 截顶及遗传因素对樟子松无性系种子园种实差异的影响. 温带林业研究. 2021(02): 32-37 .
17.	王雨，郭米山，高广磊，曹红雨，丁国栋，梁海军，赵珮杉. 三种外生菌根真菌对沙地樟子松幼苗生长的影响. 干旱区资源与环境. 2021(10): 135-140 .
18.	李嘉珞，郭米山，高广磊，阿拉萨，杜凤梅，殷小琳，丁国栋. 沙地樟子松菌根化幼苗对干旱胁迫的生理响应. 干旱区研究. 2021(06): 1704-1712 .
19.	黄艳章，信忠保. 不同生态恢复模式对黄土残塬沟壑区深层土壤有机碳的影响. 生态学报. 2020(03): 778-788 .
20.	王一佩，孙美美，程然然，关晋宏，李国庆，杜盛. 黄土高原中西部人工针叶林浅层土壤有机碳积累及影响因素. 水土保持研究. 2020(03): 30-36 .
21.	林雅超，高广磊，丁国栋，王学林，魏晓帅，王陇. 沙地樟子松人工林土壤理化性质与微生物生物量的动态变化. 生态学杂志. 2020(05): 1445-1454 .
22.	白晓霞，艾海舰. 榆林沙地樟子松人工林土壤养分变化特征. 西部林业科学. 2020(03): 80-85 .
23.	周磊，吴慧，王树力. 不同林分红皮云杉针叶养分含量及生态化学计量特征研究. 植物资源与环境学报. 2020(03): 19-25+33 .
24.	白晓霞，鱼慧利，张静，艾海舰. 榆林沙地樟子松人工林可持续经营措施研究. 榆林学院学报. 2020(04): 46-49 .
25.	魏晓帅，郭米山，高广磊，任悦，丁国栋，张英. 呼伦贝尔沙地樟子松根内真菌群落结构与功能群特征. 北京大学学报(自然科学版). 2020(04): 710-720 .
26.	赵珮杉，郭米山，高广磊，丁国栋，张英. 科尔沁沙地樟子松根内真菌群落结构和功能群特征. 林业科学. 2020(09): 87-96 .
27.	李佳文，赵珮杉，高广磊，任悦，丁国栋，张英，郭米山，魏晓帅. 陕西榆林沙区樟子松根内真菌群落结构和功能群特征. 菌物学报. 2020(10): 1854-1865 .
28.	王家源，殷小琳，任悦，高广磊，丁国栋，张英，赵珮杉，郭米山. 毛乌素沙地樟子松外生菌根真菌多样性特征. 微生物学通报. 2020(11): 3856-3867 .
29.	任悦，高广磊，丁国栋，张英，郭米山，曹红雨，苏敏. 沙地樟子松人工林叶片-枯落物-土壤氮磷化学计量特征. 应用生态学报. 2019(03): 743-750 .
30.	曲杭峰，董希斌，佘光宇，杨兰，何山. 大兴安岭蒙古栎天然次生林不同改培模式对枯落物持水性的影响. 温带林业研究. 2019(01): 31-38 .
31.	陈宇轩，丁国栋，高广磊，张英，赵洋，王陇. 呼伦贝尔沙地风沙土有机质和碳酸钙含量特征. 中国水土保持科学. 2019(04): 104-111 .
32.	张宁宁，谭凯亮，亢福仁，刘普灵. 毛乌素沙地樟子松林恢复过程的土壤有机质含量变化特征. 水土保持研究. 2019(05): 95-99 .
33.	阎雄飞，曹存宏，袁小琴，张增强，郭荣，陈巧燕，刘永华. 截冠处理对种子园樟子松壮龄母树结实的影响. 北京林业大学学报. 2019(08): 48-56 . 本站查看
34.	曹红雨，高广磊，丁国栋，张英，赵媛媛，任悦，陈宇轩，郭米山. 呼伦贝尔沙区4种生境土壤真菌群落结构和多样性. 林业科学. 2019(08): 118-127 .
35.	阎雄飞，刘永华，冯永宏，张增强，袁小琴，陈巧燕，郭荣，曹存宏，杨涛. 2种截冠处理对种子园樟子松幼龄母树生长的影响. 农学学报. 2019(10): 42-47 .
36.	王树力，郝玉琢，周磊，吴慧. 水曲柳人工林树木叶片营养元素及其化学计量特征的季节动态. 北京林业大学学报. 2018(10): 24-33 . 本站查看

Other cited types(22)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (2150) PDF downloads (64) Cited by(58)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Interactions between environment and traits and analysis of stability in new triploid clones of Populus tomentosa