Effects of artificial promotion measures on seed germination and early growth of <i>Larix principis-rupprechtii</i>

Li Longjie; Wang Jie; Ren Yunmao; Zhan Jiping; Liu Yanqing; Wang Lidong; Lu Jingxing; Jia Zhongkui

doi:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210486

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2023 > 45(4): 24-35. > DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210486

Li Longjie, Wang Jie, Ren Yunmao, Zhan Jiping, Liu Yanqing, Wang Lidong, Lu Jingxing, Jia Zhongkui. Effects of artificial promotion measures on seed germination and early growth of Larix principis-rupprechtii[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(4): 24-35. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210486

Citation:

PDF (1047 KB)

Effects of artificial promotion measures on seed germination and early growth of Larix principis-rupprechtii

1.
School of Forestry, Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education,Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
2.
Suzhou Shangfangshan Forest Zoo, Suzhou 215009, Jiangsu, China
3.
Beijing Xishan Experimental Forest Farm Management Office, Beijing 100083, China
4.
Beijing Badaling Forestry Management Office, Beijing 100083, China
5.
Yinhe Branch of Saihanba Mechanical Forest Farm of Hebei Province, Weichang 068466, Hebei, China

More Information

Received Date: November 21, 2021
Revised Date: December 18, 2021
Accepted Date: December 16, 2022
Available Online: December 19, 2022
Published Date: April 24, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective In order to solve the problem of understory regeneration of Larix principis-rupprechtii plantation in Saihanba Area of Hebei Province, northern China and realize the near-natural management of plantation, it is necessary to study the effects of artificial promotion measures (hereinafter referred to as “promotion”) on understory regeneration.
Method This study took 31 years old L. principis-rupprechtii plantation in Saihanba Area as the research object, we adopted the split plot design and other methods. The experiments of promotion were carried out from four aspects: stand density, litter treatment, seed source and seed treatment. This paper discusses the response of understory regeneration to different promotion measures.
Result The results showed that the regeneration can appear among the treatments and the regeneration frequency was about 100%. The ground diameter and seedling height of seedlings with different densities at the same period had little difference at the end of growth (P > 0.05), while the ground diameter of seedlings had significant differences in two years (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in survival rate between different treatments (P >0.05), and the overall survival rate remained in the range of 43.68%−87.87%. However, the regeneration density and germination rate of seeds were significantly different among litter treatments (P < 0.05). The regeneration density of 8 633.33 plant/ha of sulcate cleaning (SC) was the highest under artificial sowing, and seed germination rate of 1.79% was also the highest. In addition, the dynamic of regeneration changed with sowing time. When the seeds were sown naturally, the regeneration dynamics among the treatments were relatively consistent, and the peak of seedling germination was at the end of July. When the seeds were sown artificially in the middle of June, only the seeds in SC treatment germinated in large quantities at the end of July.
Conclusion The artificial interference with litter layer and seeding are effective to promote the regeneration of L. principis-rupprechtii plantations. The promotion measures mainly affect the effects of regeneration by affecting the number of seedlings rather than the seedling quality. The sowing time and seed treatments affect the renewal dynamics of seedlings, and artificial sowing of untreated seeds in mid-June can cause the delay of renewal dynamics in the current years. The best way to promote the regeneration of L. principis-rupprechtii plantations is as follows: the first way is to sulcate clean the litter layer and spread the seeds manually before mid-June, the second way is comprehensively clean the litter layer and spread the seeds in early November of the previous year.
- Larix principis-rupprechtii,
- natural regeneration,
- promoting regeneration,
- litter,
- clearance way,
- regenerated seedling

FullText(HTML)

References (34)

References

[1]	高润梅, 石晓东, 郭跃东, 等. 文峪河上游华北落叶松林的种子雨、种子库与幼苗更新[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(11): 3588−3597. Gao R M, Shi X D, Guo Y D, et al. Seed rain, soil seed bank and regeneration of Larix principis-rupprechtii stands in the upper reaches of Wenyuhe[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(11): 3588−3597.
[2]	孙国龙, 李文博, 黄选瑞, 等. 华北落叶松人工林天然更新及与土壤因子的关系[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2017, 44(6): 1047−1051. doi: 10.13610/j.cnki.1672-352x.20171214.026 Sun G L, Li W B, Huang X R, et al. Natural regeneration of the Larix principis-rupprechtii plantation and its relation to the soil factors[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 2017, 44(6): 1047−1051. doi: 10.13610/j.cnki.1672-352x.20171214.026
[3]	高润梅, 郭晋平, 郭跃东. 山西文峪河上游河岸林的土壤种子库与树种更新特征[J]. 植物科学学报, 2011, 29(5): 580−588. Gao R M, Guo J P, Guo Y D. Characteristics of soil seed bank and tree regenerations of riparian forests in the upper reach of Wenyuhe Watershed in Shanxi Province[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2011, 29(5): 580−588.
[4]	董伯骞, 黄选瑞, 徐学华, 等. 退化华北落叶松人工林林隙更新特征[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2014, 34(8): 1−8. Dong B Q, Huang X R, Xu X H, et al. Recruitment characteristics of gaps in degraded Larix pricipis-rupprechtii plantation[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2014, 34(8): 1−8.
[5]	罗梅, 郑小贤. 金沟岭林场落叶松人工林天然更新动态研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2016, 36(9): 7−11. Luo M, Zheng X X. Dynamic study of natural regeneration of Larix olgensis plantation in Jingouling Forest Farm[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2016, 36(9): 7−11.
[6]	王雯雯, 欧景莉, 刘晓, 等. 秦岭华北落叶松林乔木种群结构与更新[J]. 生态科学, 2011, 30(6): 618−623. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8873.2011.06.010 Wang W W, Ou J L, Liu X, et al. A survey on regeneration of trees in Larix pricipis-rupprechtii forest[J]. Ecological Science, 2011, 30(6): 618−623. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8873.2011.06.010
[7]	程中倩, 吴水荣, 刘世荣. 我国森林天然更新及人工促进天然更新的现状与展望[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 38(10): 71−76. doi: 10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-8151.201807003 Cheng Z Q, Wu S R, Liu S R. Current status and future perspectives of both natural and assisted natural forest regeneration in China[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 38(10): 71−76. doi: 10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-8151.201807003
[8]	连相汝, 鲁法典, 刘成杰, 等. 我国人工林天然更新研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2013, 26(6): 52−58. doi: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2013.06.015 Lian X R, Lu F D, Liu C J, et al. Research progress of natural regeneration of forest plantation in China[J]. World Forestry Research, 2013, 26(6): 52−58. doi: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2013.06.015
[9]	姜祛寒. 辽西油松人工促进天然更新技术模式研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2018. Jiang Q H. Research on the technology of artificial promotion of the natural regeneration for Pinus tabuliformis in western Liaoning[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2018.
[10]	刘铁岩, 毕君, 王超, 等. 冀北山地油松人工林天然更新研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2017, 37(7): 55−58, 65. doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2017.07.008 Liu T Y, Bi J, Wang C, et al. Study on the natural regeneration of Pinus tabuliformis plantation in the northern mountain of Hebei Province[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2017, 37(7): 55−58, 65. doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2017.07.008
[11]	赵总, 贾宏炎, 蔡道雄, 等. 红椎天然更新及其影响因子研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2018, 40(11): 76−83. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180190 Zhao Z, Jia H Y, Cai D X, et al. Natural regeneration and its influencing factors of Castanopsis hystrix[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2018, 40(11): 76−83. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180190
[12]	李玉航, 袁春良, 刘淑玲, 等. 章古台固沙林更新造林中天然更新的结合与利用[J]. 防护林科技, 2008(5): 35−37. doi: 10.13601/j.issn.1005-5215.2008.05.028 Li Y H, Yuan C L, Liu S L, et al. Combination & utilization of natural regeneration of regeneration planting on fixing sand forest in Zhanggutai Region[J]. Protection Forest Science and Technology, 2008(5): 35−37. doi: 10.13601/j.issn.1005-5215.2008.05.028
[13]	唐继新, 贾宏炎, 曾冀, 等. 南亚热带米老排人工林皆伐迹地天然更新研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2018, 38(3): 59−63. doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2018.03.010 Tang J X, Jia H Y, Zeng J, et al. Natural regeneration on clearcut land of Mytilaria laosensis plantation in south subtropical area of China[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2018, 38(3): 59−63. doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2018.03.010
[14]	陈永富. 森林天然更新障碍机制研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2012, 25(2): 41−45. doi: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2012.02.013 Chen Y F. Research progress of natural regeneration barrier of forest[J]. World Forestry Research, 2012, 25(2): 41−45. doi: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2012.02.013
[15]	李小双, 彭明春, 党承林. 植物自然更新研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2007, 26(12): 2081−2088. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.2007.0364 Li X S, Peng M C, Dang C L. Research progress on natural regeneration of plants[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2007, 26(12): 2081−2088. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.2007.0364
[16]	朱教君, 刘足根, 王贺新. 辽东山区长白落叶松人工林天然更新障碍分析[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(4): 695−703. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2008.0213 Zhu J J, Liu Z G, Wang H X. Obstacles for natural regeneration of Larix olgensis plantations in montane regions of eastern Liaoning Province, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(4): 695−703. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2008.0213
[17]	张树梓, 李梅, 张树彬, 等. 塞罕坝华北落叶松人工林天然更新影响因子[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(16): 5403−5411. Zhang S Z, Li M, Zhang S B, et al. Factors affecting natural regeneration of Larix principis-rupprechtii plantations in Saihanba of Hebei, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(16): 5403−5411.
[18]	张小鹏, 王得祥, 杜江涛, 等. 微生境对华山松人工林天然更新的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(1): 39−45. Zhang X P, Wang D X, Du J T, et al. Effects of microhabitat on natural regeneration of artificial Pinus armandii plantation[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 46(1): 39−45.
[19]	喻方圆, 周景莉. 林木种苗质量检验技术[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2008: 20−38. Yu F Y, Zhou J L. Quality inspection techniques of forest tree seedlings[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2008: 20−38.
[20]	刘足根, 朱教君, 袁小兰, 等. 辽东山区长白落叶松天然更新调查[J]. 林业科学, 2007, 43(1): 42−49. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2007.01.007 Liu Z G, Zhu J J, Yuan X L, et al. Investigation and analysis of the natural regeneration of Larix olgensis in mountain regions of eastern Liaoning Province, China[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2007, 43(1): 42−49. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2007.01.007
[21]	杨秀清. 影响关帝山华北落叶松天然更新与幼苗存活的微生境变量分析[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 30(6): 542−547. doi: 10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-8151.2010.06.017 Yang X Q. Analysis on micro-habitat variables affecting natural regeneration and survial of Larix principis-rupprechtii seedlings in Guandi Mountain[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2010, 30(6): 542−547. doi: 10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-8151.2010.06.017
[22]	Zerbe S. Restoration of natural broad-leaved woodland in Central Europe on sites with coniferous forest plantations[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2002, 167(1−3): 27−42. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00686-7
[23]	崔丽红, 孙海静, 张曼, 等. 华北落叶松和油松混交林林隙特征及更新研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2015, 30(1): 14−19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2015.01.03 Cui L H, Sun H J, Zhang M, et al. Forest gap characteristics and regeneration of Larix principis-rupprechtii and Pinus tabulaeformis mixed forest[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2015, 30(1): 14−19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2015.01.03
[24]	张树梓. 塞罕坝华北落叶松人工林种群更新特征及影响因素[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2014. Zhang S Z. Analysis on regeneration characteristics and factors affecting natural regeneration of Larix principis-rupprechtii plantations in Saihanba Forest Farm [D]. Baoding: Heibei Agricultural University, 2014.
[25]	郭晋平, 李海波, 刘宁, 等. 华北落叶松和白杄幼苗对光照和竞争响应的差异比较[J]. 林业科学, 2009, 45(2): 53−59. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2009.02.010 Guo J P, Li H B, Liu N, et al. Comparison of responses of Larix principis-rupprechtii and Picea meyeri seedling growth to light availability and planting density under controlled environment[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2009, 45(2): 53−59. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2009.02.010
[26]	Aussenac G. Interactions between forest stands and microclimate: ecophysiological aspects and consequences for silviculture[J]. Annals of Forest Science, 2000, 57(3): 287−301. doi: 10.1051/forest:2000119
[27]	李进, 石晓东, 高润梅, 等. 华北落叶松天然次生林更新及影响因素[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2020, 40(6): 588−596. Li J, Shi X D, Gao R M, et al. Regeneration and affecting factors of Larix principis-rupprechtii natural secondary forests[J]. Journal of Forest and Environment, 2020, 40(6): 588−596.
[28]	刘忠玲, 刘建明, 胡伟, 等. 不同密度胡桃楸次生林枯落物和土壤持水特性的研究[J]. 森林工程, 2021, 37(3): 52−59,66. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8023.2021.03.007 Liu Z L, Liu J M, Hu W, et al. Water-holding characteristics of litter and soil of Juglans mandshurica natural secondary forest with different densities[J]. Forestry Engineering, 2021, 37(3): 52−59,66. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8023.2021.03.007
[29]	梁文俊. 华北土石山区典型林分健康经营技术基础研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2013. Liang W J. Basic research on typical forest health management technology in rocky mountain area of northern China[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2013.
[30]	Vitale M, Savi F, Baldantoni D, et al. Modeling of early stage litter decomposition in Mediterranean mixed forests: functional aspects affected by local climate[J]. iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry, 2014, 8(4): 517−525.
[31]	罗梅, 郑小贤. 北京十三陵林场人工侧柏林天然更新研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 40(12): 73−78. doi: 10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2012.12.031 Luo M, Zheng X X. Natural regeneration of artifical Platycladus orientalis stands in Shisanling Forest Farm, Beijing[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition), 2012, 40(12): 73−78. doi: 10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2012.12.031
[32]	Cintra R. Leaf litter effects on seed and seedling predation of the palm Astrocaryum murumuru and the legume tree Dipteryx micrantha in Amazonian forest[J]. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 1997, 13(5): 709−725. doi: 10.1017/S0266467400010889
[33]	罗桂生, 马履一, 贾忠奎, 等. 油松人工林林隙天然更新及与环境相关性分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(9): 59−68. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180416 Luo G S, Ma L Y, Jia Z K, et al. Correlation analysis between natural regeneration and environment in canopy gap of Chinese pine (Pinus tabuliformis) plantation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(9): 59−68. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180416
[34]	董伯骞. 华北落叶松林更新过程与枯落物蓄水功能对经营措施的响应[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2011. Dong B Q. The response of regeneration process and litter water storage function of Larix principis-rupprechtii on management measures[D]. Baoding: Heibei Agricultural University, 2011.

[1]	Fan Shuxin, Li Kun, Zhang Mengyuan, Xie Yafen, Dong Li. Effects of micro scale underlying surface type and pattern of urban residential area on microclimate: taking Beijing as a case study[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(10): 100-109. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200256
[2]	Geng Hongkai, Wei Xiao, Zhang Mingjuan, Li Qingwei. Influence of vegetation and architecture on microclimate based on Envi-met: a case study of Nanjing Agricultural University[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(12): 115-124. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190418
[3]	WEN Yi-bo, CHANG Ying, FAN Wen-yi. Algorithm for leaf area index inversion in the Great Xing'an Mountains using MISR data and spatial scaling for the validation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(5): 1-10. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150204
[4]	WANG Hui, HE Kang-ning, XU Te, LIU Yu-juan, LIU Ying, ZHANG Xue. Characteristics and simulation of the canopy conductance of Hippophae rhamnoides in Qaidam Region of northwestern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(8): 1-7. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140457
[5]	ZHAN Hui-juan, XIE Wei-jia, SUN Hao, HUANG Hua-guo. ENVI-met model; sensitivity analysis; three-dimensional temperature field of vegetated scenes[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014, 36(4): 64-74.
[6]	LI Zi-wei, HUAI Yong-jian, FU Hui.. Virtual plant growth simulation based on illumination model.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35(4): 81-86.
[7]	SONG Fu-qiang, KANG Mu-yi, YANG Peng, CHEN Ya-ru, LIU Yang, XING Kai-xiong.. Comparison and validation of GIMMS, SPOT-VGT and MODIS global NDVI products in the Loess Plateau of northern Shaanxi Province, northwestern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(4): 72-80.
[8]	SUN Qing-yan, YU Xin-xiao, HU Shu-ping, XIAO Yang. SWAT model-based runoff simulation in Banchengzi Reservoir Catchment，Beijing[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30(supp.2): 148-154.
[9]	ZHOU Rui, GE Jian-ping, YU Bo, LIU Li-juan, WU Ji-gui. Simulation of forest dynamics at Songshan Mountain, Beijing[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2007, 29(1): 19-25. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2007.01.004
[10]	XU Xiang-zhou, LIU Da-qing, ZHANG Hong-wu, DONG Zhan-di, ZHU Ming-dong. Laboratory rainfall simulation with controlled rainfall intensity and drainage[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2006, 28(5): 52-58.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(7)

1.	蔡志勇，孙龙，孙家宝. 大兴安岭森林可燃物燃烧危险性评估. 东北林业大学学报. 2025(01): 73-78 .
2.	李维伟，杨雪清，张一鸣，冯昕，王博，杜建华，陈锋，刘晓东. 基于小班尺度的北京市密云区森林火灾危险性评价. 北京林业大学学报. 2024(02): 75-86 . 本站查看
3.	莫凡，郭慧，裴顺祥，吴迪，吴莎，辛学兵. 野外-城市界域森林火险时空演变趋势及火险等级划分. 生态学报. 2024(14): 6232-6242 .
4.	鲜明睿，马敏杰，杨志林，彭永俊，李继品. 云南红河州森林火灾风险评估研究. 森林防火. 2024(04): 26-30 .
5.	刘嘉雷，田晓瑞，宗学政，彭玉娴，赵文太. 大兴安岭森林火灾风险评估. 陆地生态系统与保护学报. 2023(03): 77-88 .
6.	刘金龙，岳彩荣，汤明华，阳丽. 基于昭通市森林火灾风险普查数据的阔叶林可燃物载量分析. 消防界(电子版). 2023(05): 150-152 .
7.	韩喜越，王晓迪，崔晨曦，单延龙，于渤，尹赛男，曹丽丽. 内蒙古大兴安岭根河林业局主要可燃物类型地表细小可燃物特征及其影响因素. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2023(12): 94-103 .

Other cited types(2)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (600) PDF downloads (117) Cited by(9)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Effects of artificial promotion measures on seed germination and early growth of Larix principis-rupprechtii