• Scopus
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD)
  • A Guide to the Core Journal of China
  • CSTPCD
  • F5000 Frontrunner
  • RCCSE
Advanced search
Liang Qinglan, Han Youji, Qiao Yanhui, Xie Kongan, Li Shuangyun, Dong Yufeng, Li Shanwen, Zhang Shengxiang. Effects of drought stress on the growth and physiological characteristics of Sect. Aigeiros clones[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(10): 81-89. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220266
Citation: Liang Qinglan, Han Youji, Qiao Yanhui, Xie Kongan, Li Shuangyun, Dong Yufeng, Li Shanwen, Zhang Shengxiang. Effects of drought stress on the growth and physiological characteristics of Sect. Aigeiros clones[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(10): 81-89. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220266
shu

Effects of drought stress on the growth and physiological characteristics of Sect. Aigeiros clones

  • 1.

    College of Forestry, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, Shandong, China

  • 2.

    Shandong Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory for Genetic Improvement in Forest Trees ofShandong Province, Jinan 250014, Shandong, China

  • 3.

    Shanxian Forestry Bureau, Shanxian 274300, Shandong, China

More Information
  • Received Date: July 03, 2022
  • Revised Date: September 05, 2022
  • Available Online: August 03, 2023
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • Objective 

    In this study, 10 Sect. Aigeiros clones of Populus were used as experimental materials to study the changes of growth, physiological and biochemical characteristics under drought stress, analyze the drought resistance ability of different clones, and screen out excellent clones with strong drought resistance, with the aim of providing basis for the selection of poplar varieties on dry sites.

    Method 

    The drought stress was simulated by pot experiment, and four water gradients were set up to measure the changes of nine indexes of ten clones under different degrees of water deficiency, to investigate the effects of different degrees of drought stress on the growth and physiological indexes of each clone.

    Result 

    Under continuous drought stress, the differences in seedling height increment, ground diameter increment and biomass increment among the 10 clones were significant, among which the clones 1733 and 1627 were significantly different from the control 2025. The chlorophyll content of clones, except for clone 1716, showed a trend of increasing and then decreasing, with a small increase in mild drought and a decrease in moderate and severe drought. The cell membrane permeability of the leaves in each clone showed an increasing trend with the continuation of drought time, and under severe drought stress, the cell membrane permeability increased to the maximum, with the largest increase in clones 1716 and 1722, and the smallest increase in clones 1733 and 1641. The malondialdehyde content showed a pattern of change, in which it first increased and then decreased, and was the highest content in moderate drought; the superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) activities first increased and then decreased, and the activities were the highest under moderate drought, and compared with normal water supply, clones 1627 and 1733 showed the greatest elevation of SOD activity, and clones 1733 and 1641 showed the greatest elevation of POD activity. The accumulation of osmoregulatory substances gradually increased with increasing drought severity, and under severe drought, the clones 1627 and 1733 had the highest free proline (Pro) content and the highest increase, which were significantly different from the control 2025. Principal component analysis showed that under severe drought stress conditions, the 10 clones were 1733, 1627, I-107, 1641, 1640, 1725, 1723, 2025, 1716 and 1722 in order of their drought resistance.

    Conclusion 

    The variation of each index of the 10 clones under drought stress is different. Based on the result of principal component analysis, it is tentatively concluded that the clones 1733 and 1627 have strong drought tolerance and can be used as test materials for further studies in arid site.

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (30)
  • [1]
    Pyngrope S, Bhoomika K, Dubey R S. Reactive oxygen species, ascorbate-glutathione pool, and enzymes of their metabolism in drought-sensitive and tolerant indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings subjected to progressing levels of water deficit[J]. Protoplasma, 2013, 250(2): 585−600. doi: 10.1007/s00709-012-0444-0
    [2]
    He F, Wang H L, Li H G, et al. PeCHYR1, a ubiquitin E3 ligase from Populus euphratica, enhances drought tolerance via ABA-induced stomatal closure by ROS production in Populus[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2018, 16(8): 1514−1528. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12893
    [3]
    赖金莉, 李欣欣, 薛磊, 等. 植物抗旱性研究进展[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(17): 23−27.

    Lai J L, Li X X, Xue L, et al. Advances in plant drought resistance research[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Science, 2018, 46(17): 23−27.
    [4]
    Sun W J, Nie Y X, Gao Y, et al. Exogenous cinnamic acid regulates antioxidant enzyme activity and reduces lipid peroxidation in drought-stressed cucumber leaves[J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2012, 34(2): 641−655. doi: 10.1007/s11738-011-0865-y
    [5]
    高建社, 王军, 周永学, 等. 5个杨树无性系抗旱性研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 33(2): 112−116.

    Gao J S, Wang J, Zhou Y X, et al. A study on the drought resistance of five poplar clones[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition), 2005, 33(2): 112−116.
    [6]
    王磊. 十个杨树无性系叶片旱生结构与抗寒性比较研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2021.

    Wang L. Comparative study on xerophytic structure and cold resistance of leaves from ten poplar clones[D]. Yangling: Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, 2021.
    [7]
    刘建华. 干旱胁迫对杨树幼苗生长的影响[J]. 防护林科技, 2016(6): 8−11.

    Liu J H. Effects of drought stress on the growth of seedlings for poplar[J]. Protected Forest Sicence and Technology, 2016(6): 8−11.
    [8]
    张江涛, 晏增, 杨淑红, 等. 干旱胁迫对杨树品种2025及其2个芽变品种叶片光合生理特征的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2017, 37(3): 17−23, 78.

    Zhang J T, Yan Z, Yang S H, et al. Effects of leaf photosynthetic characteristics of poplar 2025 and its two bud mutation varieties under drought stress[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2017, 37(3): 17−23, 78.
    [9]
    晏增, 张江涛, 赵蓬晖, 等. 持续淹水胁迫对美洲黑杨幼苗生长及生理生化的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2019, 39(12): 16−23.

    Yan Z, Zhang J T, Zhao P H, et al. Effects of continuous waterlogging stress on growth, physiology and biochemistry of Populus deltoides seedlings[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2019, 39(12): 16−23.
    [10]
    潘昕, 邱权, 李吉跃, 等. 干旱胁迫对青藏高原6种植物生理指标的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(13): 3558−3567.

    Pan X, Qiu Q, Li J Y, et al. Physiological indexes of six plant species from the Tibetan Plateau under drought stress[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(13): 3558−3567.
    [11]
    李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.

    Li H S. Principles and techniques of plant physiological and biochemical experiments[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000.
    [12]
    Zhang X, Yang Z, Li Z, et al. De novo transcriptome assembly and co-expression network analysis of Cynanchum thesioides: identification of genes involved in resistance to drought stress[J]. Gene, 2019, 710: 375−386. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2019.05.055
    [13]
    Guo Y Y, Yu H Y, Kong D S, et al. Effects of drought stress on growth and chlorophyll fluorescence of Lycium ruthenicum Murr. seedlings[J]. Photosynthetica, 2016, 54(4): 524−531. doi: 10.1007/s11099-016-0206-x
    [14]
    罗彬莹, 刘卫东, 吴际友, 等. 干旱胁迫对樟树幼苗光合特性和水分利用的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2019, 39(5): 49−55.

    Luo B Y, Liu W D, Wu J Y, et al. Effect of drought stress on photosynthetic characteristics and water use of Cinnamomum camphora seedlings[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2019, 39(5): 49−55.
    [15]
    马成侠, 杨桑吉, 李强峰. 干旱胁迫对不同小叶杨无性系生理特性的影响[J]. 青海大学学报, 2019, 37(5): 15−19.

    Ma C X, Yang S J, Li Q F. Effects of drought stress on physiological characteristics of different Populus simonii clones[J]. Journal of Qinghai University, 2019, 37(5): 15−19.
    [16]
    杨传宝, 姚俊修, 李善文, 等. 白杨派无性系苗期对干旱胁迫的生长生理响应及抗旱性综合评价[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(5): 58−66.

    Yang C B, Yao J X, Li S W, et al. Growth and physiological responses to drought stress and comprehensive evaluation on drought tolerance in Leuce clones at nursery stage[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(5): 58−66.
    [17]
    邱兴, 吕小锋, 李晓东, 等. 4个杨树新无性系的抗旱性研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2015, 30(4): 99−108.

    Qiu X, Lü X F, Li X D, et al. Research on drought resistance of four new poplar clones[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2015, 30(4): 99−108.
    [18]
    杨淑红, 宋德才, 刘艳萍, 等. 土壤干旱胁迫和复水后3个杨树品种叶片部分生理指标变化及抗旱性评价[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2014, 23(3): 65−73.

    Yang S H, Song D C, Liu Y P, et al. Changes of some physiological indexes in leaf of three cultivars of Populus after drought stress in soil and rewatering and evaluation on their drought resistance[J]. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 2014, 23(3): 65−73.
    [19]
    王罗霞, 赵志光, 王锁民. 一氧化氮对水分胁迫下小麦叶片活性氧代谢及膜脂过氧化的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2006, 15(4): 104−108.

    Wang L X, Zhao Z G, Wang S M. Effect of nitric oxide on reactive oxygen metabolism and membrane lipid peroxidation in wheat leaves under water stress[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2006, 15(4): 104−108.
    [20]
    鲁俊倩, 武舒, 钟姗辰, 等. ‘84K’杨组氨酸激酶基因PaHK3a的表达及功能分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2021, 43(2): 46−53.

    Lu J Q, Wu S, Zhong S C, et al. Expression and function analysis of histidine kinase gene PaHK3a of poplar ‘84K’[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(2): 46−53.
    [21]
    Devi R, Kaur N, Gupta A K. Potential of antioxidant enzymes in depicting drought tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)[J]. Indian Journal of Biochemistry & Biophysics, 2012, 49(4): 257−265.
    [22]
    Kong J, Dong Y, Xu L, et al. Role of exogenous nitricoxide inalleviating iron deficiency-induced peanut chlorosis on calcareous soil[J]. Journal of Plant Interactions, 2014, 9(1): 450−459. doi: 10.1080/17429145.2013.853327
    [23]
    井大炜. 杨树苗叶片光合特性和抗氧化酶对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 核农学报, 2014, 28(3): 532−539.

    Jing D W. Photosynthetic properties and antioxidant enzymes of poplar seedling leaves in response to drought stress[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 28(3): 532−539.
    [24]
    刘建民, 李美芹, 刘永光, 等. ‘鲁硕红’蔷薇的抗旱性研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 2013, 45(9): 33−35.

    Liu J M, Li M Q, Liu Y G, et al. Study on drought resistance of Rosa multiflora var.lushuohong[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 45(9): 33−35.
    [25]
    王霞, 侯平, 尹林克, 等. 土壤水分胁迫对柽柳体内膜保护酶及膜脂过氧化的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2002, 19(3): 17−20.

    Wang X, Hou P, Yin L K, et al. Effects of soil water stress on membrane protective enzymes and membrane lipid peroxidation in Tamarix tamarisk[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2002, 19(3): 17−20.
    [26]
    付士磊, 周永斌, 何兴元, 等. 干旱胁迫对杨树光合生理指标的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(11): 2016−2019.

    Fu S L, Zhou Y B, He X Y, et al. Effects of drought stress on photosyn thesis physiology of Populus pseudo-simonii[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2006, 17(11): 2016−2019.
    [27]
    Boriboonkaset T, Theerawitaya C, Yamada N, et al. Regulation of some carbohydrate metabolism-related genes, starch and soluble sugar contents, photosynthetic activities and yield attributes of two contrasting rice genotypes subjected to salt stress[J]. Protoplasma, 2013, 250(5): 1157−1167. doi: 10.1007/s00709-013-0496-9
    [28]
    Fang Y J, Xiong L Z. General mechanisms of drought response and their application in drought resistance improvement in plants[J]. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 2015, 72(4): 673−689. doi: 10.1007/s00018-014-1767-0
    [29]
    Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, et al. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management[J]. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2009, 29(1): 185−212. doi: 10.1051/agro:2008021
    [30]
    李敏, 马金龙. 盐胁迫及干旱胁迫对三种杨树脯氨酸含量的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2013, 43(1): 105−107, 110. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-060X.2013.01.029

    Li M, Ma J L. Influences of salt and drought stress on proline content in three poplar varieties[J]. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 43(1): 105−107, 110. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-060X.2013.01.029
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]Yang Dongye, Yu Xinxiao, Li Xuhong, Jiang Tao, Jia Guodong. Characteristics of sap flow of degraded Populus simonii in Bashang Area, Hebei Province of northern China and its response to environmental factors[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(7): 36-43. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230332
    [2]Zheng Dongsheng, Liu Qijing. Effects of environmental factors on forest community distribution in Changbai Mountain Nature Reserve of northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(8): 57-64. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220086
    [3]Ma Jing, Guo Jianbin, Liu Zebin, Wang Yanhui, Zhang Ziyou. Diurnal variations of stand transpiration of Larix principis-rupprechtii forest and its response to environmental factors in Liupan Mountains of northwestern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(5): 1-11. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190468
    [4]LI Xin-yu, LI Yan-ming, SUN Lin, XU Rui, ZHAO Song-ting, GUO Jia. Characteristics of transpiration water consumption and its relationship with environmental factors in Ginkgo biloba[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014, 36(4): 23-29. DOI: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2014.04.008
    [5]CHI Bo, CAI Ti-jiu, MAN Xiu-ling, LI Yi.. Effects of influencing factors on stem sap flow in Larix gmelinii in northern Da Hinggan Mountains, northeastern China.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35(4): 21-26.
    [6]WANG Xiu-wei, MAO Zi-jun. Effects of conducting tissue structure on sap flow density and stem CO2 efflux.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35(4): 9-15.
    [7]WANG Lian-chun, , ZHAI Ming-pu, LIU Dao-ping, ZHOU Zhi-feng. Relationship between stock sap flow rate of Zizyphus acidojujuba Hu and environmental factors.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2009, 31(6): 134-138.
    [8]CHEN Chong, LI Ji-yue, , WANG Yu- tao. Variation of stem sap flow of Salix matsudana and its impact factors.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30(4): 82-88.
    [9]DONG Bai_li, WANG Miao, JIANG Ping, JI Lan-zhu. Relations between water beetle diversity and environmental factors in northern slope of Changbai Mountain, northeastern China.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30(1): 74-78.
    [10]TIAN Jing-hui, HE Kang-ning, WANG Bai-tian, ZHANG Wei-qiang, YIN Jing. Relationship between transpiration of Platycladus orientalis and environmental factors in semi-arid region on Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2005, 27(3): 53-56.

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(27)

    1. 杨佳悦，丁国玉，田秀君. 最大熵模型在物种生境预测中的应用研究进展. 应用生态学报. 2025(02): 614-624 .
    2. 杨福成，洪兆春，丁红秀，邵明勤. 基于最大熵模型的鸳鸯潜在越冬分布区预测. 湿地科学. 2024(01): 60-71 .
    3. 陈飞，张杰京，王利繁，熊朝永，樊辉. 中国和老挝跨境区域亚洲象生境时空变化及保护成效. 生态学报. 2024(22): 10222-10233 .
    4. 刘夫仁，赛罕，贺伟，张正一，冯中华，张梓琪，鲍伟东. 内蒙古赛罕乌拉自然保护区马鹿夏季肠道菌群多样性. 野生动物学报. 2023(01): 90-97 .
    5. 张洁，王凯，张翼，严如玉，杨军飞，刘星辰，计勇. 潦河中源段水生条背萤生境适宜性评价. 安徽农业科学. 2023(03): 52-56+61 .
    6. 宋慧芳，党晓宏，高永，蒙仲举，孙艳丽. 基于MaxEnt模型的内蒙古自治区樟子松潜在分布研究. 四川农业大学学报. 2023(02): 203-208+248 .
    7. 张杰京，陈飞，谢菲，张鑫，尹文萍，樊辉. 亚洲象生境长时序变化及其对人象冲突的影响——基于融合MaxEnt与HSI模型的生境适宜性评价方法. 生态学报. 2023(09): 3807-3818 .
    8. 张旭，王玲玲，黄峰，田玉清，杨涛，张玉铭，刘亚恒. 长江中游地区麋鹿生境适宜性分析与生态廊道构建. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(03): 404-411 .
    9. 刘伟，李旭琴，李忠伦，李英，油志远，蒋勇，阮光华，鲁碧耕，杨楠. 四川贡嘎山中华斑羚和中华鬣羚的时空分布及重叠性. 应用生态学报. 2023(06): 1630-1638 .
    10. 申立泉，吴佳忆，周鑫，吕青昕，王燕群，袁乃秀，孟秀祥. 基于MaxEnt模型的北京周边山区野生狍(Capreolus pygargus)的生境适宜性评价. 生态学杂志. 2023(10): 2555-2560 .
    11. 吕环鑫，夏少霞，顾婧婧，苏常红，王春晓，崔鹏. 基于MaxEnt模型的仙居县大型兽类和珍稀鸟类栖息地适宜性评价. 生态学杂志. 2023(11): 2797-2805 .
    12. 邹珮雯，徐昉. 生态安全格局构建及景观生态风险预测——以赛罕乌拉国家级自然保护区为例. 生态学报. 2023(23): 9981-9993 .
    13. 杨超，范韦莹，蔡晓斌，王学雷，张玉铭，李鹏飞. 基于MaxEnt模型的湖北石首麋鹿国家级自然保护区散养麋鹿夏季生境适宜性评价. 长江流域资源与环境. 2022(02): 336-344 .
    14. 秦委，张虹，杨明霞，罗汉，江素萍，刘守金. 基于MaxEnt模型和ArcGIS的东南茜草潜在分布研究. 中国中医药信息杂志. 2022(05): 1-4 .
    15. 刘红彩，赵纳勋，庄钰琪，杨梅玲，赵惠茹，叶新平. 基于MaxEnt模型的秦岭山地斑羚生境适宜性评价. 生态学报. 2022(10): 4181-4188 .
    16. 滕扬，张沼，张书理，杨永昕，贺伟，王娜，张正一，鲍伟东. 大兴安岭南段马鹿生境适宜性分析与生态廊道构建. 生态学报. 2022(14): 5990-6000 .
    17. 王金凤，徐基良，李建强，周春发，邓文洪. 基于动物适宜栖息地的北京市自然保护地保护成效评估. 生态学报. 2022(19): 7807-7817 .
    18. 刘艳华，李卫东，张子栋，梁卓，杨娇，牛莹莹，周绍春. 黑龙江省老爷岭南部野猪种群现状及栖息地适宜性. 生态学杂志. 2022(11): 2208-2215 .
    19. 刘夫仁，贺伟，赛罕，冯中华，杨永昕，张正一，鲍伟东. 同域分布马鹿与中华斑羚的冬夏季食物构成比较. 动物学杂志. 2022(06): 845-854 .
    20. 孙珊，齐增湘，周敏，白瑾瑾，吕婧玮，刘鑫. 野生哺乳动物生态廊道构建——以云豹为例. 安徽农业科学. 2021(07): 81-84+96 .
    21. 陈智强，赵增辉，王远飞，韦力，丁国骅，林植华. 基于红外相机技术和MaxEnt模型的黑麂(Muntiacus crinifrons)活动节律分析和潜在适生区预测. 生态学报. 2021(09): 3535-3547 .
    22. 钟雪，杨楠，张龙，程跃红，冯茜，胡强，金义国. 卧龙国家级自然保护区绿尾虹雉种群分布和生境质量评价. 四川动物. 2021(05): 509-516 .
    23. 郭飞龙，徐刚标，卢孟柱，孟艺宏，袁承志，郭恺琦. 基于MaxEnt模型分析胡杨潜在适宜分布区. 林业科学. 2020(05): 184-192 .
    24. 龚旭，付强，王磊，杨彪，张全建，张远彬. 四川鞍子河保护地水鹿和羚牛栖息地适宜性评价与重叠性分析. 生态学报. 2020(14): 4842-4851 .
    25. 李响，张成福，贺帅，王雨晴，苗林. MaxEnt模型综合应用研究进展分析. 绿色科技. 2020(14): 14-17 .
    26. 张晓晨，邵长亮，葛炎，陈晨，徐文轩，杨维康. 新疆卡拉麦里山有蹄类野生动物自然保护区夏季蒙古野驴适宜生境与种群数量评估. 应用生态学报. 2020(09): 2993-3004 .
    27. Jing Yang，Guo-Fen Zhu，Jian Jiang，Chang-Lin Xiang，Fu-Li Gao，Wei-Dong Bao. Non-invasive genetic analysis indicates low population connectivity in vulnerable Chinese gorals:concerns for segregated population management. Zoological Research. 2019(05): 439-448 .

    Other cited types(24)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (410) PDF downloads (55) Cited by(51)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles

    Copyright © 2013 《北京林业大学学报》编辑部

    Address：North-Star Times Tower, No.8 Beichendong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China China Pos：100083

    Tel：010-62337673 Email：bldxed@bjfu.edu.cn 京ICP备05066833号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return