Site quality evaluation of natural spruce-fir and broadleaf mixed stands.

XU Luo; KANG Xin-gang; GUO Wei-wei; ZHANG Jia-wei; CHEN Ri-dong; LIAO Qing-wen; KONG Lei

doi:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140126

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2016 > 38(5): 11-12. > DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140126

XU Luo, KANG Xin-gang, GUO Wei-wei, ZHANG Jia-wei, CHEN Ri-dong, LIAO Qing-wen, KONG Lei. Site quality evaluation of natural spruce-fir and broadleaf mixed stands.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(5): 11-12. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140126

Citation:

PDF (994 KB)

Site quality evaluation of natural spruce-fir and broadleaf mixed stands.

1.
1 Ecological Engineering Department, Guangdong Ecological Engineering Career College, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510520, P.R.China;
2.
2 College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, P.R.China;
3.
3 School of Administrative Officials, State Forestry Administration, Beijing, 102699, P. R. China;
4.
4 Kunming Survey and Design Institute of the State Forestry Administration, Kunming, Yunnan, 650216, P.R.China.

More Information

Received Date: April 10, 2014
Revised Date: April 10, 2014
Published Date: May 30, 2016

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

To establish a scientific, suitable and accurate site quality evaluation system of natural forest, we used 123 analytic fir trees for simulating the optimal competitive index of the natural spruce-fir and broadleaf mixed stands among 6 competitive indexes. Eligible firs from 26 clear cutting plots and analytic trees were picked out to simulate the height growth curve of dominant trees and the height growth curve of worst trees. Then the suitable site index of competition (SIC) table was built by using the height growth curve of dominant trees and height growth curve of worst trees as guide curves. The optimal multiple regression prediction models for height growth were selected to analyze the height difference caused by competition. Then, the site quality of two site types was evaluated by using SIC. The results indicated: 1) The optimal competition index of natural spruce-fir and broadleaf mixed stands is CI1. Statistics of CI1 shows that different age grades have marked differences in competition. The pressure of competition decreases with aging. 2) Building competition tables with 2m class interval, a standard age of 60 years and 7 levels of site indexes is more reasonable. 3) The power exponent model of two site types is most precise in three multiple regression prediction models for height growth. 4) Evaluation of two site types using site indexes of the competition table shows that site type 1 belongs to 17m site index of competition, and site type 2 belongs to 15m site index of competition. The site type 1 is superior in site quality to site type 2.
- site index of competition,
- height of dominant tree,
- height of worst tree,
- height growth,
- multiple regression prediction model

FullText(HTML)

References (35)

References

[1]	郭艳荣,吴保国,刘洋,等. 立地质量评价研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究,2012(5): 47-52.
[1]	GUO Y R,WU B G,LIU Y, et al. Research progress of site quality evaluation[J]. World Forestry Research, 2012(5): 47-52.
[2]	郭晋平, 张浩宇, 张芸香. 森林立地质量评价的可变生长截距模型与应用[J]. 林业科学, 2007, 43(10): 8-14.
[2]	GUO J P,ZHANG H Y,ZHANG Y X.Variable growth intercept models for forest site evaluation and its application[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2007, 43(10): 8-14.
[3]	孙晓梅, 张守攻, 孔凡斌, 等. 日本落叶松家系对树高生长模型参数的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2005, 41(1): 78-84.
[3]	SUN X M,ZHANG S G,KONG F B,et al.Analyzing parameters of height-age models for open-pollinated Japanese larch families[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2005, 41(1): 78-84.
[4]	VANCLAY J K. Assessing site productivity in tropical moist forests: a review[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 1992, 54(1): 257-287.
[4]	QIN J D.A Study in respect of making of the site index for natural forest of Korean pine ( Pnius koraiensis ) [J].Journal of North-eastern Forestry Institute, 1979(2): 23-35.
[5]	ZOU D M.Estimation for the site quality of Pinus massoniana natural forest [J]. Journal of Forestry Science and Technology, 2001, 28(1): 76-78.
[5]	秦家鼎. 红松( Pnius koraiensis )天然林立地指数表编制的研究[J]. 东北林学院学报,1979(2): 23-35.
[6]	邹得棉. 马尾松天然林立地质量评价[J]. 福建林业科技, 2001, 28(1): 76-78.
[6]	MENG X Y,CHEN D L.Study on constructive method of site index table for poplar secondary forest[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2001, 23(3): 47-51.
[7]	孟宪宇, 陈东来. 山杨次生林地位指数表编制方法的研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2001, 23(3): 47-51.
[7]	CHEN Y F, YANG Y C, ZHANG H Q, et al. A study on site quality evaluation of natural tropical mountainous rain forest in Hainan isiand[J].Forest Research, 2000, 13(2): 134-140.
[8]	ZHAO J H.Growth modeling for Spruce-fir forest in Changbai Mountains [D].Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2010.
[8]	LAMSON N I. Estimating northern red oak site-index class from total height and diameter of dominant and codominant trees in Central Appalachian hardwood stands[M]. Delaware: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, 1987.
[9]	GE H L,MENG X Y,TANG X X. Growth model system for continuous forest inventory[J]. Forest Research, 2004, 17(4): 413-419.
[9]	HUANG S, TITUS S J. An index of site productivity for uneven-aged or mixed-species stands[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,1993, 23(3): 558-562.
[10]	MENG X Y, GE H L.A new quantitalive measure for evaluating site quality of uneven-aged picea stands[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 1995, 17(1): 1-9.
[10]	陈永富,杨彦臣,张怀清,等. 海南岛热带天然山地雨林立地质量评价研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2000, 13(2): 134-140.
[11]	LIU Y,KANG X G,GUO Y R,et al. Multiple regression prediction model for diameter growth of dominant tree species in changbai mountains: a case study of Picea koraiensis [J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2012,40(2): 1-4.
[11]	TEMESGEN H, GADOW V K. Generalized height-diameter models-an application for major tree species in complex stands of interior British Columbia[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2004, 123(1): 45-51.
[12]	GEOFF W G. Is height of dominant trees at a reference diameter an adequate measure of site quality?[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 1998, 112(1-2): 49-54.
[12]	MA L Y,WANG X Q. Growth space competition index (GSCI) and application in the individual intraspecies competition of Pinus tabulaeformis and Platycladus orientalis forests[J].Ecologic Science, 2006, 25(5): 385-389.
[13]	ZHANG Y X. Application and improvement of the neighborhood interference model [J].Acta Phytoecologica et Geobanica Sinica, 1993, 17(4): 352-357.
[13]	赵俊卉. 长白山云冷杉混交林生长模型的研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2010.
[14]	葛宏立, 孟宪宇, 唐小明. 应用于森林资源连续清查的生长模型系统[J]. 林业科学研究, 2004, 17(4): 413-419.
[14]	NING J K, ZHEN X X, GAO J R, et al. Application of interference index in water conservation forest of Platycladus orientalis in Miyun County[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2004, 25(6): 15-19.
[15]	孟宪宇, 葛宏立. 云杉异龄林立地质量评价的数量指标探讨[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 1995, 17(1): 1-9.
[16]	LEI X, LU Y, PENG C, et al. Growth and structure development of semi-natural larch-spruce-fir( Larix olgensis-Picea jezoensis-Abise nephrolepis ) forests in northeast China: 12-year results after thinning[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2007, 240(1): 165-177.
[17]	刘洋, 亢新刚, 郭艳荣, 等.长白山主要树种直径生长的多元回归预测模型: 以云杉为例[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2012, 40(2): 1-4.
[18]	HEGYI F. A simulation model for managing jack-pine stands [J]. Growth Models for Tree and Stand Simulation, 1974,30: 74-90.
[19]	马履一, 王希群. 生长空间竞争指数及其在油松、侧柏种内竞争中的应用研究[J]. 生态科学, 2006, 25(5): 385-389.
[20]	张跃西. 邻体干扰模型的改进及其在营林中的应用[J]. 植物生态学与地植物学学报, 1993, 17(4): 352-357.
[21]	宁金魁, 郑小贤, 高甲荣, 等. 干扰指数在密云县侧柏水源涵养林中的应用[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2004, 25(6): 15-19.

[1]	Gao Yonglong, Sun Yanli, Xu Mingze, Liu Shan. Variation characteristics in leaf functional traits of woody plants in deciduous broadleaved forest community in Baihua Mountain of Beijing[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(4): 40-51. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220462
[2]	Xie Shuwen, Jin Guangze, Liu Zhili. Variations and trade-offs of twig-leaf traits for Betula platyphylla with different diameter classes in Xiaoxing’an Mountains of northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(12): 32-40. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210463
[3]	Wang Yongteng, Huang Zhihao, Wang Jun, Zhang Tong, Lang Lihua, Sun Guoming, Cui Guofa. Survival pressure of endangered species Phellodendron amurense[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(1): 49-57. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200130
[4]	Wei Liping, Han Yanying, Dabuqiong, Gong Wenfeng, Deng Gongfu, Hu Jie. Analysis on phenotypic variation and germplasm resource selection of wild Amygdalus mira in Tibet of southwestern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(7): 48-57. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190422
[5]	Li Jinhang, Zhu Jiyou, Catherine Mhae B. Jandug, Zhao Kai, Xu Chengyang. Relationship between leaf functional trait variation of Cotinus coggygria seedling and location geographical-climatic factors under drought stress[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(2): 68-78. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190079
[6]	DU Qing-xin, LIU Pan-feng, QING Jun, WEI Yan-xiu, DU Hong-yan.. Variation and probability grading of main quantitative traits of male flowers for Eucommia ulmoides germplasm.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(11): 42-49. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160031
[7]	ZHANG Zi-jie, YANG Shan-xun, ZENG Yan-jiang, WANG Rong-gang, WANG Li-ming, PANG Xiao-ming, LI Yue. Variation within clones and families and superior individual selection in different cultivars of Camellia oleifera‘Ruanzhi’.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(10): 59-68. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160104
[8]	LIANG De-yang, JIN Yun-zhe, ZHAO Guang-hao, DONG Yuan-hai, LENG Wei-wei, CHEN Chang-lin, WANG Huan, ZHAO Xi-yang. Variance analyses of growth and wood characteristics of 50 Pinus koraiensis clones[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(6): 51-59. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150465
[9]	ZHANG Zhen, ZHANG Han-guo, ZHOU Yu, LIU Ling, YU Hong-ying, WANG Xu, FENG Wan-ju. Variation of seed characters in Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis ) multi-clonal populations[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(2): 67-78. DOI: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2015.02.020
[10]	HUANG Jia-cong, HE Jun, YIN Rui-ping, WAN Xiao-jun, GUO Jun, XIN Cheng-lian, GONG Fa-ping, LI Yue. Variations of fruit and seed traits of natural and artificial populations in Camellia reticulata L[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(5): 94-101.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(14)

1.	李一，潘立本，赵雯，穆立蔷，韩文静. 蒙古栎叶片功能性状变化特征及影响因素. 东北林业大学学报. 2024(03): 10-15 .
2.	白岩松，张雨鉴，秦倩倩，孙兴悦，刘艳红. 大兴安岭典型灌木叶片功能性状对环境因子的响应. 生态学杂志. 2024(01): 131-139 .
3.	郭文芳，陈艳梅，高飞，王佳乐. 太行山7种药用植物性状特征及其对土壤因子的响应. 环境工程技术学报. 2024(02): 612-621 .
4.	欧芷阳，郑威，庞世龙，何峰，申文辉，谭一波，陈始贵. 广西猫儿山优势木本植物叶功能性状关联性沿海拔梯度的变化规律. 生态科学. 2024(02): 95-101 .
5.	周会萍，姜金矜，黄艳丽，庄静静. 两种生活型木本植物叶功能性状变异特征研究. 沈阳农业大学学报. 2024(03): 298-305 .
6.	冯浩育，陈思帆，索奥丽，龚俊伟，陈锋，刘晓东. 不同火烈度下山西太岳山油松林灌木层物种多样性和叶功能性状. 北京林业大学学报. 2024(06): 38-47 . 本站查看
7.	谢立红，黄庆阳，曹宏杰，杨帆，王继丰，杨立宾. 五大连池火山黑桦叶性状对生境因子的响应. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2024(05): 112-124 .
8.	谢立红，黄庆阳，曹宏杰，王继丰，王建波，倪红伟. 五大连池火山蒙古栎种群空间分布格局. 生态与农村环境学报. 2023(07): 896-906 .
9.	黄庆阳，谢立红，曹宏杰，王立民，杨帆，王继丰，刘赢男，倪红伟. 细菌对五大连池火山森林凋落物早期分解的影响. 应用生态学报. 2023(07): 1941-1948 .
10.	刘爱林，张往祥，刘陈妤，高亮，杨晓倩，周婷，崔珺. 7种樟科植物叶功能性状及其对土壤因子的响应. 福建农业学报. 2023(12): 1428-1436 .
11.	杨巧，朱润军，杨畅宇，李仕杰，程希平. 基于树形结构的木棉叶功能性状差异性研究. 生态学报. 2022(07): 2834-2842 .
12.	王佳欢，刘彦林，曹鹤，杨新兵，赵迎雪，陈一凡，史宝胜. 采石场高陡岩壁坡向对葛藤叶形态及光合特征的影响. 东北林业大学学报. 2022(05): 47-51+75 .
13.	顾泽，王博，陈思帆，王忆文，索奥丽，刘晓东，陈锋. 不同火烈度火烧迹地内油松叶功能性状的变化. 应用生态学报. 2022(06): 1497-1504 .
14.	谢立红，黄庆阳，曹宏杰，杨帆，王继丰，王建波，倪红伟. 五大连池火山蒙古栎种群结构及动态特征. 浙江农林大学学报. 2022(05): 960-970 .

Other cited types(6)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (2055) PDF downloads (40) Cited by(20)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Site quality evaluation of natural spruce-fir and broadleaf mixed stands.

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(14)

Other cited types(6)

Catalog

Site quality evaluation of natural spruce-fir and broadleaf mixed stands.

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(14)

Other cited types(6)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content