• Scopus
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD)
  • A Guide to the Core Journal of China
  • CSTPCD
  • F5000 Frontrunner
  • RCCSE
Advanced search
ZHANG Ying, YANG Gui-hong, LI Zhuo-wei. Analysis of input-output efficiency of forestry in Beijing based on DEA model[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(2): 105-112. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150334
Citation: ZHANG Ying, YANG Gui-hong, LI Zhuo-wei. Analysis of input-output efficiency of forestry in Beijing based on DEA model[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(2): 105-112. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150334

Analysis of input-output efficiency of forestry in Beijing based on DEA model

More Information
  • Received Date: September 12, 2015
  • Revised Date: October 20, 2015
  • Published Date: February 28, 2016
  • The ecological and environmental safety in the capital city is an issue always highly concerned by the government of China. In recent years, Beijing has greatly increased investment in forestry, and also attracted a wealthy of social funds to uplift the overall level of forestry and the forest ecosystem services. In order to improve the forestry input-output efficiency and to achieve the effective allocation of forestry resources and economies of scale, we selected six forestry input-output indexes, i.e., forestry investment in fixed assets, number of employees at the end of the year in forestry sectors, planting area, proportion of forestry industrial structure, output value of forestry industry and the rate of woody plant cover, and used DEA model which considers the return and scale (BC2-DEA model) to calculate the forestry input-output efficiency in Beijing from 1993 to 2013. The results show that the comprehensive efficiency of forestry input and output in Beijing is relatively high from 1993 to 2013. The average value of comprehensive efficiency is 0.966 in 21 years. As for the change of comprehensive efficiency of forestry input and output, the condition of forestry input-output in Beijing is good since 1993, and its efficiency is generally stable with small fluctuations. In the 21 years, 14 are in a state of DEA efficiency, and 7 in the state of DEA inefficiency. We also analyzed the main factors affecting the forestry input-output efficiency in Beijing, and point out that the change of the forestry investment in fixed assets is presently the main factor while the proportion of forestry industrial structure has little impact. In addition, factors like forestry investment management and production management also have an impact on the production efficiency. We propose that forestry investment in fixed assets in Beijing should keep stability in the future development and the industrial structure for forestry should be adjusted. Furthermore, the level of forestry investment and production management should be raised gradually and constantly in Beijing. Our study may bring important meanings to promote the coordinated development of forestry ecological economy, and improve the forestry input-output efficiency and forestry sustainable development in Beijing.
  • [1]
    国家林业局. 中国林业统计年鉴(2013)[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2014:46-48.
    [1]
    State Forestry Administration, P.R.China. China forestry statistical yearbook (2013) [M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2014: 46-48.
    [2]
    LKEWILLE A, BREDEMEIER M, ULRICH B. Input-output relations of major ions in European forest ecosystems [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems Environment, 1993, 47(2):175-184.
    [2]
    CHANG J F, PAN J P. Thinking about forestry input [J]. Forestry Construction, 2001(1):2-4.
    [3]
    HUSSAIN A. Inter-industry linkages, resource use and structural change: an input/output analysis of Minnesotas forest-based industries [D].Twin Cities: University of Minnesota, 1996: 22-48.
    [3]
    XU W L. Study on the efficiency of China’s forestry input-output and policy[D]. Hefei: Anhui University, 2013.
    [4]
    L J F, JIN S, LIU J C, et al. A review on forestry input-output analysis [J]. Issues of Forestry Economics , 2006, 26 (2):129-132.
    [4]
    HAMILTON C. The sustainability of logging in Indonesias tropical forests: a dynamic input-output analysis [J]. Ecological Economics, 1997, 21(3):183-195.
    [5]
    CARLEN O, MATTEEON L, ATLEGRIM O, et al. Cost efficiency in pursuing environmental objectives in forestry[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 1999, 55:111-125.
    [5]
    CHEN T Y, QIU D H, HUANG S D. Input and output model and its application in forestry organizations[J]. Journal of Fujian College of Forestry, 1993,13 (1):53-59.
    [6]
    LAI Z Q, ZHANG Z H. The DEA analysis of Guangdong forestry input-output efficiency [J]. Issues of Forestry Economics, 2008, 28(4):323-326.
    [6]
    CLINCHU P J. Assessing the social efficiency of temperate-zone commercial forestry programmes, Ireland as a case study [J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2000, 17(7):225-241.
    [7]
    LEE J Y. Using DEA to measure efficiency in forest and paper companies [J]. Forest Products Society, 2005, 55(1):58-66.
    [7]
    TIAN S Y, XU W L. Evaluation of China’s forestry input-output efficiency based on DEA modeling[J]. Resources Science, 2012, 34(10): 1944-1950.
    [8]
    常继锋,潘家坪.对林业投入的思考[J].林业建设,2001(1):2-4.
    [8]
    DENG Y H, NING Y L, ZHAO R, et al. Comparative analysis of the Sino-US forestry investment [J]. Forest Resources Management, 2013(5): 41-46.
    [9]
    TIAN S Y,ZHANG C,XU W L. On the assessment of Anhui forestry input-output ratio based on the super-ratio model DEA[J]. Journal of Hefei University (Social Sciences), 2013,30(2):111-115.
    [9]
    许文立. 中国林业投入产出的效率与政策研究[D].合肥:安徽大学,2013.
    [10]
    吕金飞,金笙,刘俊昌,等.林业投入产出分析综述[J].林业经济问题, 2006, 26 (2):129-132.
    [10]
    MI F, LIU Z D, LI Z W, et al. The analysis of Gansu Province forestry input and output efficiency and every index’s influence: empirical study based on DEA model [J]. Forestry Economics, 2013, 21(12):100-104.
    [11]
    陈同英,邱登鸿,黄世典.林业系统投入产出模型及其应用[J].福建林学院学报,1993,13 (1):53-59.
    [11]
    WEI Q L. Evaluate the relative effectiveness of DEA method [M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 1998.
    [12]
    LI M J, CHEN G H. A review on the research and application of DEA [J]. Engineering Sciences, 2003, 5(6):88-94.
    [12]
    赖作卿,张忠海. 基于DEA方法的广东林业投入产出效率分析[J].林业经济问题,2008, 28(4):323-326.
    [13]
    田淑英,许文立.基于DEA模型的中国林业投入产出效率评价[J].资源科学,2012, 34(10):1944-1950.
    [13]
    State Forestry Administration, P.R.CHINA. China forestry statistical yearbook(1993-2013)[EB/OL]. (2014-10-30)[2015-01-08]. http:∥www.forestry.gov.cn/main/243/content-714099.html.
    [14]
    邓永辉,宁攸凉,赵荣,等.中美政府林业投入产出效率比较[J].林业资源管理, 2013(5):41-46.
    [14]
    Beijing Statistics Bureau. Beijing statistical yearbook(1993-2013)[EB/OL].(2014-08-10)[2014-10-16]. http:∥www.bjstats.gov.cn.
    [15]
    田淑英,张琛,许文立. 安徽省林业投入产出效率评价:基于超效率DEA模型[J]. 合肥学院学报(社会科学版), 2013,30(2):111-115.
    [15]
    National Bureau of Statistics of China. Integrated system of statistics reports on agricultural output and prices[EB/OL]. (2014-01-05)[2014-12-16]. http:∥www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjzd/gjtjzd/201501/t20150105_663501.html.
    [16]
    米锋,刘智丹,李卓蔚, 等.甘肃省林业投入产出效率及其各指标影响力分析:基于DEA模型的实证研究[J].林业经济,2013,21(12):100-104.
    [16]
    WEI Q L. The data envelopment analysis [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2004:78-100.
    [17]
    MA Z X. The model and method of data envelopment analysis [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2010.
    [17]
    魏权龄.评价相对有效性的DEA方法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1998.
    [18]
    FARRELL M J. The measurement of productive efficiency [J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 1957, 120: 125-281.
    [18]
    WU Y, GU M Y. The summary of DEA methods [J]. Value Engineering, 2003(Suppl.1):129-132.
    [19]
    李美娟,陈国宏.数据包络分析法(DEA)的研究与应用[J].中国工程科学,2003, 5(6):88-94.
    [19]
    WU F. The research on the assessment of the benefits from school-running and the cost inputs in higher education institutions [D] .Chongqing: Third Military Medical University,2007.
    [20]
    国家林业局.中国林业统计年鉴(1993—2013)[EB/OL]. (2014-10-30)[2015-01-08]. http:∥www.forestry.gov.cn/main/243/content-714099.html .
    [20]
    WU Y H, FAN Y C, SONG J W. Research about a general projection of DEA model [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 1996,11 (4):50-57.
    [21]
    LIU M. Forestry investment research [J]. Forestry Economics, 2011(4):43-49.
    [21]
    北京市统计局. 北京统计年鉴(1993—2013)[EB/OL].(2014-08-10)[2014-10-16]. http:∥www.bjstats.gov.cn.
    [22]
    国家统计局. 农业产值和价格综合统计报表制度[EB/OL]. (2014-01-05)[2014-12-16]. http:∥www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjzd/gjtjzd/201501/t20150105_663501.html.
    [23]
    魏权龄. 数据包络分析[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2004:78-100.
    [24]
    马占新.数据包络分析模型与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
    [25]
    吴越,谷明玉.DEA分析方法研究综述[J].价值工程,2003(增刊1):129-132.
    [26]
    吴峰. 高等院校教育成本投入与办学效益DEA评价研究[D]. 重庆: 第三军医大学, 2007.
    [27]
    吴育华,范贻昌,宋继旺.DEA模型的一般投影研究[J].系统工程学报,1996, 11(4):50-57.
    [28]
    CHAPARRO P. SALINAS-JIMENEZ F J, SMITH P. On the quality of data envelopment analysis [J]. J of Operational Res Six, 1999, 50:636-644.
    [29]
    刘珉.林业投资研究[J].林业经济,2011(4):43-49.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Wang Zhongcheng, Yang Na, Li Jiulin. Correlations between nondestructive testing indicators and local transverse compressive strength as well as wood density[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(5): 136-142. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230367
    [2]Lei Xiangdong. Forest ecosystem service multi-functionality: definitions, indicators and simulation models for forest management[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(5): 1-11. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230327
    [3]YIN Da-chuan, YANG Li-bin, DENG Xun, Ilan Chet, SONG Rui-qing. How Trichoderma virens affects growth indicators, physiological and biochemical parameters of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica seedlings.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(1): 78-91. DOI: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2015.01.012
    [4]LI Ting-ting, LU Yuan-chang, ZHANG Xian-qiang, WANG Xia, PANG Li-feng, LIU Xian-zhao, JIANG Jun. Quantitative indices to identify succession stages of managed Pinus massoniana forest[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014, 36(3): 9-17. DOI: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2014.03.002
    [5]ZHANG Ying, SONG Wei-ming. Policy effect evaluation and analysis of the ecological environment impacts for forest property right reform in China based on household survey[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2012, 34(3): 124-129.
    [6]JIANG Xi-bing, SONG Yue-peng, MA Kai-feng, GUO Bin, AN Xinmin, ZHANG Zhi-yi, SHI Zhi-wei, XU Lan-li, ZHANG You-hui. Changes of several physiological indices in hybrid clones of Populus deltoides Bartr. ×P. ussuriensis Kom. under low temperature stress.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2012, 34(1): 58-63.
    [7]LI Qing-jian, CHEN Zhi-qiang, SHI Rui-ting, ZHANG Jian-qiu, WANG Guo-zhu, ZHANG Yu-Ling, LI Yue. Alkaline-salt tolerance indices of Ulmus pumila L. seedling and family evaluation on alkaline-salt tolerance[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(5): 74-81.
    [8]GAO Yang, GAO Jia-rong, FENG Ze-shen, YANG Hai-long.. Selection of indicators for ecological assessment on small water bodies of northern mountainous area of Beijing.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2009, 31(1): 100-105.
    [9]MAO Jun-juan, WANG Sheng-hua, CHEN Fang. Changes of physiological indices of Jatropha curcas to aluminum stress under different temperatures and exogenous calcium[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2007, 29(6): 201-205. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2007.06.026
    [10]CHENG Zhan-hong. Calculation of indices in weighing the impacts of tourism on vegetation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2006, 28(3): 26-31.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(33)

    1. 陈思,黄伟伦. 森林食品价值链的可持续发展研究. 林业经济问题. 2024(06): 583-590 .
    2. 郑旭媛,贺鹏莉,林庆林. 林业政策演进中的林业生产技术效率及其地域分异特征. 林业经济问题. 2023(02): 113-124 .
    3. 曾杰杰,陶宇沁. 江苏省林业三次产业互动的时变影响. 林业经济问题. 2023(02): 125-134 .
    4. 宋江浩,张伟,庄影星. 循环经济视角下中国林业投入产出效率研究——基于省际面板数据的实证分析. 湖北农业科学. 2022(08): 144-150+157 .
    5. 万志芳,史艺. 黑龙江国有林区林业生态建设效率分析. 林业经济问题. 2022(04): 363-370 .
    6. 侯建,刘青,陈建成,李明月. 北京市林业产业高质量发展影响机理分析. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版). 2022(03): 37-45 .
    7. 印慧,伍海泉. 脱贫攻坚视角下森林生态产品供给有效路径选择——基于黑龙江省的实证分析. 资源开发与市场. 2021(02): 136-140+145 .
    8. 杨铭慧,谢煜. 基于超效率DEA-Malmquist的林业投入产出效率测度研究. 中国林业经济. 2021(06): 7-10 .
    9. 程留贝,杨思崟,刘秋金,张瑞琛. 基于产业关联模型的中国林业产业的经济贡献研究. 中国乡镇企业会计. 2021(12): 7-11 .
    10. 金哲丽,曹冰玉. 基于DEA模型的湖南省林业投资效率分析. 中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2020(02): 89-95 .
    11. 周越,梁小珍. 中国林业全要素生产率及其收敛性分析. 中国林业经济. 2020(04): 48-52 .
    12. 蓝以信,陈烺,李婵. 基于网络DEA模型的我国省域林业系统经营效率评价研究. 南方林业科学. 2020(03): 47-52+78 .
    13. 贺茉莉,黄丽旋. 基于DEA模型的林业经济投入产出滞后期确定与效率测度. 林产工业. 2020(12): 108-112 .
    14. 李宇佳,刘笑冰. 北京市林业产业关联和结构升级研究. 林业经济问题. 2019(02): 218-224 .
    15. 张颖. 中国与巴西农产品贸易安全及其驱动力的动态比较分析. 世界农业. 2019(07): 69-75 .
    16. 卞纪兰,赵桂燕. 基于DEA的黑龙江省林业产业投入产出效率评价研究. 林业经济. 2019(06): 63-68 .
    17. 王海洁,丁胜,曹福亮,吕柳. 福建省林业总产值的灰色关联度分析. 物流工程与管理. 2019(10): 116-118 .
    18. 吴远征,张智光. 林业产业生态安全效率的SBM-Malmquist测度与时空特征分析. 科技管理研究. 2019(24): 259-267 .
    19. GAO Hong-jie,ZHENG Xiao-wen,ZHANG Mei. Influencing factors of forestry economic growth in Guangdong province. Ecological Economy. 2019(04): 267-272 .
    20. 刘书群. 重庆林业投入产出效率评价. 合作经济与科技. 2018(11): 12-14 .
    21. 郭建平,常菁,黄海滨. 产业发展视角下高新技术企业效率评价——基于DEA模型的实证研究. 科技管理研究. 2018(12): 67-72 .
    22. 朱颖,张滨,倪红伟,吕洁华. 基于公共产品供给理论的森林生态产品产出效率比较分析. 林业经济问题. 2018(02): 25-32+102 .
    23. 廖文梅,童婷,秦克清,高雪萍. 中国林地投入产出效率理论、测度与影响因素:综述与展望. 农林经济管理学报. 2018(05): 545-552 .
    24. 张洪瑞,吕洁华. 森林生态产品供给的投入产出效率分析——以东北重点国有林区为例. 经济问题. 2017(09): 87-94 .
    25. 张滨,吕洁华,刘艳迪. 黑龙江省林业经济增长问题研究——基于产业结构与要素投入视角. 林业经济. 2017(12): 31-37 .
    26. 姜钰,管时一. 中国林业全要素生产率的时空差异及空间收敛性分析. 林业经济问题. 2017(02): 86-91+111 .
    27. 赵铁蕊,赵荣,陈绍志. 基于DEA-Malmquist的杜仲栽培模式投入产出效率分析. 林业经济问题. 2017(04): 92-95+112 .
    28. 韩哲英. 黑龙江省林业产业变动趋势与DEA效率测度. 林业科技. 2017(01): 58-62 .
    29. 杨冬梅,刘滨,雷显凯. 江西省林业全要素生产率评价——基于2004-2015年数据. 三峡论坛(三峡文学·理论版). 2017(05): 86-90 .
    30. 杨仙艳,邓思宇,刘伟平. 基于DEA方法的福建林业投入产出效率分析——以福建省10县210户农户调研数据为例. 中国林业经济. 2017(02): 1-5 .
    31. 刘涛,顾令爽,金英淑,霍静娟. 中国林业经济效率:格局、动因与优化. 中国林业经济. 2017(04): 1-5 .
    32. 张芮菱,余吉安. 中国林产工业企业R&D投入—产出效率分析——基于DEA模型的比较研究. 资源开发与市场. 2017(08): 991-995 .
    33. 蒲冰. 我国现行林业财政投入分析、政策效率评价及其实现机制研究. 中国农业资源与区划. 2016(07): 171-176 .

    Other cited types(26)

Catalog

    Article views (2110) PDF downloads (26) Cited by(59)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return