• Scopus
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD)
  • A Guide to the Core Journal of China
  • CSTPCD
  • F5000 Frontrunner
  • RCCSE
Advanced search
ZHANG Ying, YANG Gui-hong, LI Zhuo-wei. Analysis of input-output efficiency of forestry in Beijing based on DEA model[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(2): 105-112. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150334
Citation: ZHANG Ying, YANG Gui-hong, LI Zhuo-wei. Analysis of input-output efficiency of forestry in Beijing based on DEA model[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(2): 105-112. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150334
shu

Analysis of input-output efficiency of forestry in Beijing based on DEA model

  • School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, P. R. China.

More Information
  • Received Date: September 12, 2015
  • Revised Date: October 20, 2015
  • Published Date: February 28, 2016
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • The ecological and environmental safety in the capital city is an issue always highly concerned by the government of China. In recent years, Beijing has greatly increased investment in forestry, and also attracted a wealthy of social funds to uplift the overall level of forestry and the forest ecosystem services. In order to improve the forestry input-output efficiency and to achieve the effective allocation of forestry resources and economies of scale, we selected six forestry input-output indexes, i.e., forestry investment in fixed assets, number of employees at the end of the year in forestry sectors, planting area, proportion of forestry industrial structure, output value of forestry industry and the rate of woody plant cover, and used DEA model which considers the return and scale (BC2-DEA model) to calculate the forestry input-output efficiency in Beijing from 1993 to 2013. The results show that the comprehensive efficiency of forestry input and output in Beijing is relatively high from 1993 to 2013. The average value of comprehensive efficiency is 0.966 in 21 years. As for the change of comprehensive efficiency of forestry input and output, the condition of forestry input-output in Beijing is good since 1993, and its efficiency is generally stable with small fluctuations. In the 21 years, 14 are in a state of DEA efficiency, and 7 in the state of DEA inefficiency. We also analyzed the main factors affecting the forestry input-output efficiency in Beijing, and point out that the change of the forestry investment in fixed assets is presently the main factor while the proportion of forestry industrial structure has little impact. In addition, factors like forestry investment management and production management also have an impact on the production efficiency. We propose that forestry investment in fixed assets in Beijing should keep stability in the future development and the industrial structure for forestry should be adjusted. Furthermore, the level of forestry investment and production management should be raised gradually and constantly in Beijing. Our study may bring important meanings to promote the coordinated development of forestry ecological economy, and improve the forestry input-output efficiency and forestry sustainable development in Beijing.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (50)
  • [1]
    国家林业局. 中国林业统计年鉴(2013)[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2014:46-48.
    [1]
    State Forestry Administration, P.R.China. China forestry statistical yearbook (2013) [M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2014: 46-48.
    [2]
    LKEWILLE A, BREDEMEIER M, ULRICH B. Input-output relations of major ions in European forest ecosystems [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems Environment, 1993, 47(2):175-184.
    [2]
    CHANG J F, PAN J P. Thinking about forestry input [J]. Forestry Construction, 2001(1):2-4.
    [3]
    HUSSAIN A. Inter-industry linkages, resource use and structural change: an input/output analysis of Minnesotas forest-based industries [D].Twin Cities: University of Minnesota, 1996: 22-48.
    [3]
    XU W L. Study on the efficiency of China’s forestry input-output and policy[D]. Hefei: Anhui University, 2013.
    [4]
    L J F, JIN S, LIU J C, et al. A review on forestry input-output analysis [J]. Issues of Forestry Economics , 2006, 26 (2):129-132.
    [4]
    HAMILTON C. The sustainability of logging in Indonesias tropical forests: a dynamic input-output analysis [J]. Ecological Economics, 1997, 21(3):183-195.
    [5]
    CARLEN O, MATTEEON L, ATLEGRIM O, et al. Cost efficiency in pursuing environmental objectives in forestry[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 1999, 55:111-125.
    [5]
    CHEN T Y, QIU D H, HUANG S D. Input and output model and its application in forestry organizations[J]. Journal of Fujian College of Forestry, 1993,13 (1):53-59.
    [6]
    LAI Z Q, ZHANG Z H. The DEA analysis of Guangdong forestry input-output efficiency [J]. Issues of Forestry Economics, 2008, 28(4):323-326.
    [6]
    CLINCHU P J. Assessing the social efficiency of temperate-zone commercial forestry programmes, Ireland as a case study [J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2000, 17(7):225-241.
    [7]
    LEE J Y. Using DEA to measure efficiency in forest and paper companies [J]. Forest Products Society, 2005, 55(1):58-66.
    [7]
    TIAN S Y, XU W L. Evaluation of China’s forestry input-output efficiency based on DEA modeling[J]. Resources Science, 2012, 34(10): 1944-1950.
    [8]
    常继锋,潘家坪.对林业投入的思考[J].林业建设,2001(1):2-4.
    [8]
    DENG Y H, NING Y L, ZHAO R, et al. Comparative analysis of the Sino-US forestry investment [J]. Forest Resources Management, 2013(5): 41-46.
    [9]
    TIAN S Y,ZHANG C,XU W L. On the assessment of Anhui forestry input-output ratio based on the super-ratio model DEA[J]. Journal of Hefei University (Social Sciences), 2013,30(2):111-115.
    [9]
    许文立. 中国林业投入产出的效率与政策研究[D].合肥:安徽大学,2013.
    [10]
    吕金飞,金笙,刘俊昌,等.林业投入产出分析综述[J].林业经济问题, 2006, 26 (2):129-132.
    [10]
    MI F, LIU Z D, LI Z W, et al. The analysis of Gansu Province forestry input and output efficiency and every index’s influence: empirical study based on DEA model [J]. Forestry Economics, 2013, 21(12):100-104.
    [11]
    陈同英,邱登鸿,黄世典.林业系统投入产出模型及其应用[J].福建林学院学报,1993,13 (1):53-59.
    [11]
    WEI Q L. Evaluate the relative effectiveness of DEA method [M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 1998.
    [12]
    LI M J, CHEN G H. A review on the research and application of DEA [J]. Engineering Sciences, 2003, 5(6):88-94.
    [12]
    赖作卿,张忠海. 基于DEA方法的广东林业投入产出效率分析[J].林业经济问题,2008, 28(4):323-326.
    [13]
    田淑英,许文立.基于DEA模型的中国林业投入产出效率评价[J].资源科学,2012, 34(10):1944-1950.
    [13]
    State Forestry Administration, P.R.CHINA. China forestry statistical yearbook(1993-2013)[EB/OL]. (2014-10-30)[2015-01-08]. http:∥www.forestry.gov.cn/main/243/content-714099.html.
    [14]
    邓永辉,宁攸凉,赵荣,等.中美政府林业投入产出效率比较[J].林业资源管理, 2013(5):41-46.
    [14]
    Beijing Statistics Bureau. Beijing statistical yearbook(1993-2013)[EB/OL].(2014-08-10)[2014-10-16]. http:∥www.bjstats.gov.cn.
    [15]
    田淑英,张琛,许文立. 安徽省林业投入产出效率评价:基于超效率DEA模型[J]. 合肥学院学报(社会科学版), 2013,30(2):111-115.
    [15]
    National Bureau of Statistics of China. Integrated system of statistics reports on agricultural output and prices[EB/OL]. (2014-01-05)[2014-12-16]. http:∥www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjzd/gjtjzd/201501/t20150105_663501.html.
    [16]
    米锋,刘智丹,李卓蔚, 等.甘肃省林业投入产出效率及其各指标影响力分析:基于DEA模型的实证研究[J].林业经济,2013,21(12):100-104.
    [16]
    WEI Q L. The data envelopment analysis [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2004:78-100.
    [17]
    MA Z X. The model and method of data envelopment analysis [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2010.
    [17]
    魏权龄.评价相对有效性的DEA方法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1998.
    [18]
    FARRELL M J. The measurement of productive efficiency [J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 1957, 120: 125-281.
    [18]
    WU Y, GU M Y. The summary of DEA methods [J]. Value Engineering, 2003(Suppl.1):129-132.
    [19]
    李美娟,陈国宏.数据包络分析法(DEA)的研究与应用[J].中国工程科学,2003, 5(6):88-94.
    [19]
    WU F. The research on the assessment of the benefits from school-running and the cost inputs in higher education institutions [D] .Chongqing: Third Military Medical University,2007.
    [20]
    国家林业局.中国林业统计年鉴(1993—2013)[EB/OL]. (2014-10-30)[2015-01-08]. http:∥www.forestry.gov.cn/main/243/content-714099.html .
    [20]
    WU Y H, FAN Y C, SONG J W. Research about a general projection of DEA model [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 1996,11 (4):50-57.
    [21]
    LIU M. Forestry investment research [J]. Forestry Economics, 2011(4):43-49.
    [21]
    北京市统计局. 北京统计年鉴(1993—2013)[EB/OL].(2014-08-10)[2014-10-16]. http:∥www.bjstats.gov.cn.
    [22]
    国家统计局. 农业产值和价格综合统计报表制度[EB/OL]. (2014-01-05)[2014-12-16]. http:∥www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjzd/gjtjzd/201501/t20150105_663501.html.
    [23]
    魏权龄. 数据包络分析[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2004:78-100.
    [24]
    马占新.数据包络分析模型与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
    [25]
    吴越,谷明玉.DEA分析方法研究综述[J].价值工程,2003(增刊1):129-132.
    [26]
    吴峰. 高等院校教育成本投入与办学效益DEA评价研究[D]. 重庆: 第三军医大学, 2007.
    [27]
    吴育华,范贻昌,宋继旺.DEA模型的一般投影研究[J].系统工程学报,1996, 11(4):50-57.
    [28]
    CHAPARRO P. SALINAS-JIMENEZ F J, SMITH P. On the quality of data envelopment analysis [J]. J of Operational Res Six, 1999, 50:636-644.
    [29]
    刘珉.林业投资研究[J].林业经济,2011(4):43-49.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]Gao Yonglong, Sun Yanli, Xu Mingze, Liu Shan. Variation characteristics in leaf functional traits of woody plants in deciduous broadleaved forest community in Baihua Mountain of Beijing[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(4): 40-51. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220462
    [2]Xie Shuwen, Jin Guangze, Liu Zhili. Variations and trade-offs of twig-leaf traits for Betula platyphylla with different diameter classes in Xiaoxing’an Mountains of northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(12): 32-40. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210463
    [3]Wang Yongteng, Huang Zhihao, Wang Jun, Zhang Tong, Lang Lihua, Sun Guoming, Cui Guofa. Survival pressure of endangered species Phellodendron amurense[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(1): 49-57. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200130
    [4]Wei Liping, Han Yanying, Dabuqiong, Gong Wenfeng, Deng Gongfu, Hu Jie. Analysis on phenotypic variation and germplasm resource selection of wild Amygdalus mira in Tibet of southwestern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(7): 48-57. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190422
    [5]Li Jinhang, Zhu Jiyou, Catherine Mhae B. Jandug, Zhao Kai, Xu Chengyang. Relationship between leaf functional trait variation of Cotinus coggygria seedling and location geographical-climatic factors under drought stress[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(2): 68-78. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190079
    [6]DU Qing-xin, LIU Pan-feng, QING Jun, WEI Yan-xiu, DU Hong-yan.. Variation and probability grading of main quantitative traits of male flowers for Eucommia ulmoides germplasm.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(11): 42-49. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160031
    [7]ZHANG Zi-jie, YANG Shan-xun, ZENG Yan-jiang, WANG Rong-gang, WANG Li-ming, PANG Xiao-ming, LI Yue. Variation within clones and families and superior individual selection in different cultivars of Camellia oleifera‘Ruanzhi’.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(10): 59-68. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160104
    [8]LIANG De-yang, JIN Yun-zhe, ZHAO Guang-hao, DONG Yuan-hai, LENG Wei-wei, CHEN Chang-lin, WANG Huan, ZHAO Xi-yang. Variance analyses of growth and wood characteristics of 50 Pinus koraiensis clones[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(6): 51-59. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150465
    [9]ZHANG Zhen, ZHANG Han-guo, ZHOU Yu, LIU Ling, YU Hong-ying, WANG Xu, FENG Wan-ju. Variation of seed characters in Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis ) multi-clonal populations[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(2): 67-78. DOI: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2015.02.020
    [10]HUANG Jia-cong, HE Jun, YIN Rui-ping, WAN Xiao-jun, GUO Jun, XIN Cheng-lian, GONG Fa-ping, LI Yue. Variations of fruit and seed traits of natural and artificial populations in Camellia reticulata L[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(5): 94-101.

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(14)

    1. 李一，潘立本，赵雯，穆立蔷，韩文静. 蒙古栎叶片功能性状变化特征及影响因素. 东北林业大学学报. 2024(03): 10-15 .
    2. 白岩松，张雨鉴，秦倩倩，孙兴悦，刘艳红. 大兴安岭典型灌木叶片功能性状对环境因子的响应. 生态学杂志. 2024(01): 131-139 .
    3. 郭文芳，陈艳梅，高飞，王佳乐. 太行山7种药用植物性状特征及其对土壤因子的响应. 环境工程技术学报. 2024(02): 612-621 .
    4. 欧芷阳，郑威，庞世龙，何峰，申文辉，谭一波，陈始贵. 广西猫儿山优势木本植物叶功能性状关联性沿海拔梯度的变化规律. 生态科学. 2024(02): 95-101 .
    5. 周会萍，姜金矜，黄艳丽，庄静静. 两种生活型木本植物叶功能性状变异特征研究. 沈阳农业大学学报. 2024(03): 298-305 .
    6. 冯浩育，陈思帆，索奥丽，龚俊伟，陈锋，刘晓东. 不同火烈度下山西太岳山油松林灌木层物种多样性和叶功能性状. 北京林业大学学报. 2024(06): 38-47 . 本站查看
    7. 谢立红，黄庆阳，曹宏杰，杨帆，王继丰，杨立宾. 五大连池火山黑桦叶性状对生境因子的响应. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2024(05): 112-124 .
    8. 谢立红，黄庆阳，曹宏杰，王继丰，王建波，倪红伟. 五大连池火山蒙古栎种群空间分布格局. 生态与农村环境学报. 2023(07): 896-906 .
    9. 黄庆阳，谢立红，曹宏杰，王立民，杨帆，王继丰，刘赢男，倪红伟. 细菌对五大连池火山森林凋落物早期分解的影响. 应用生态学报. 2023(07): 1941-1948 .
    10. 刘爱林，张往祥，刘陈妤，高亮，杨晓倩，周婷，崔珺. 7种樟科植物叶功能性状及其对土壤因子的响应. 福建农业学报. 2023(12): 1428-1436 .
    11. 杨巧，朱润军，杨畅宇，李仕杰，程希平. 基于树形结构的木棉叶功能性状差异性研究. 生态学报. 2022(07): 2834-2842 .
    12. 王佳欢，刘彦林，曹鹤，杨新兵，赵迎雪，陈一凡，史宝胜. 采石场高陡岩壁坡向对葛藤叶形态及光合特征的影响. 东北林业大学学报. 2022(05): 47-51+75 .
    13. 顾泽，王博，陈思帆，王忆文，索奥丽，刘晓东，陈锋. 不同火烈度火烧迹地内油松叶功能性状的变化. 应用生态学报. 2022(06): 1497-1504 .
    14. 谢立红，黄庆阳，曹宏杰，杨帆，王继丰，王建波，倪红伟. 五大连池火山蒙古栎种群结构及动态特征. 浙江农林大学学报. 2022(05): 960-970 .

    Other cited types(6)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (2112) PDF downloads (26) Cited by(20)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles

    Copyright © 2013 《北京林业大学学报》编辑部

    Address：North-Star Times Tower, No.8 Beichendong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China China Pos：100083

    Tel：010-62337673 Email：bldxed@bjfu.edu.cn 京ICP备05066833号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return