• Scopus
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD)
  • A Guide to the Core Journal of China
  • CSTPCD
  • F5000 Frontrunner
  • RCCSE
Advanced search
ZUO Qiang, HE Huai-jiang, ZHANG Chun-yu, ZHAO Xiu-hai, ZHANG Jun, LI Jin-gong. Effects of cutting on soil respiration in a mixed broadleaf-Korean pine forest in western foothill of Changbai Mountain, northeast China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(4): 71-76. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160055
Citation: ZUO Qiang, HE Huai-jiang, ZHANG Chun-yu, ZHAO Xiu-hai, ZHANG Jun, LI Jin-gong. Effects of cutting on soil respiration in a mixed broadleaf-Korean pine forest in western foothill of Changbai Mountain, northeast China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(4): 71-76. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160055

Effects of cutting on soil respiration in a mixed broadleaf-Korean pine forest in western foothill of Changbai Mountain, northeast China

More Information
  • Received Date: January 19, 2016
  • Published Date: April 29, 2016
  • The objective of this study was to explore the difference in soil respiration rate under different intensities of cutting as well as the effects of soil temperature and moisture content on soil respiration rate. We measured soil respiration using infrared gas exchange analyzer of Li-Cor 8100 in the daytime during the growing seasons (May-October) of 2013-2015 in a mixed broadleaf-Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) forest with heavy (50%), medium (25%) and light (15%) intensity cutting and uncut control (0%) plots in Jiaohe, Jilin Province in northeast China. We found that with cutting intensity increasing, soil temperature increased, and soil moisture reduced. Cutting significantly affected soil respiration and soil temperature, while there were no significant differences in soil moisture under different cutting intensities. During the growing seasons, a positive correlation was found between soil respiration and soil temperature at all sites. The best fitting model with temperature explained 73% of the variation in soil respiration in the heavy cutting treatment, 65% in the light cutting treatment,58% in the control sites, and 43% in medium cutting treatment during the measuring periods.In order to predict both soil moisture and soil temperature dependency, four two-variable linear/non-linear models were developed and evaluated.By use of those models it is possible to predict the soil respiration as a function of both temperature and moisture, with R values ranging from 45%-74%. The Q10 values were increased in the treatments of medium (2.46), heavy (2.44) and light (2.39) intensity cutting relative to the control (2.39). Our findings suggest that in order to reduce the forest soil surface CO2 emission after cutting, a reasonable cutting intensity about 15% should be adopted.
  • [1]
    WANG X Y, MA L Y, JIA Z K, et al. Effect of forest management measures on soil respiration and its mechanism[J]. World Forestry Research, 2012, 25(1): 7-12.
    [1]
    王西洋, 马履一, 贾忠奎, 等.森林经营措施对土壤呼吸的影响机理[J].世界林业研究,2012, 25(1): 7-12.
    [2]
    CHENG X Q, HAN H R, KANG F F, et al. Short-term effects of thinning on soil respiration in a pine (Pinus tabulaeformis) plantation[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2014, 50(2): 357-367.
    [2]
    LU Y, HUANG C D, LI H T, et al. Diurnal variation of soil respiration in the summer at Cryptomeria fortune forest with different intensity of cut[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology,2009, 29(2): 19-23.
    [3]
    鲁洋, 黄从德, 李海涛, 等.不同采伐强度柳杉人工林的夏季土壤呼吸日变化[J].浙江林业科技, 2009, 29(2): 19-23.
    [3]
    SHEN W, WANG L H. Influence of forest operation on forest soil respiration[J]. Forest Engineering,2005, 21(5): 12-14.
    [4]
    YANG Y S, DONG B, XIE J S, et al. Soil respiration of forest ecosystems and its respondence to global change[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,24(3): 583-591.
    [4]
    PONDER J F. Effect of soil compaction and biomass removal on soil CO2 efflux in a Missouri forest[J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2005, 36(9-10): 1301-1311.
    [5]
    CLOSA I, GOICOECHEA N. Seasonal dynamics of the physicochemical and biological properties of soils in naturally regenerating, unmanaged and clear-cut beech stands in northern Spain[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2010, 46(3): 190-199.
    [5]
    MENG C, WANG L H, SHEN W. Effect of selective cutting on soil partitioning respiration in a conifer-broadleaved forest during growing season[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2008, 44(8): 23-28.
    [6]
    沈微, 王立海. 森林作业对林地土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 森林工程, 2005, 21(5): 12-14.
    [6]
    GUO H, DONG X B, JIANG F. Impact of cutting intensity on soil carbon flux in low-quality forest stands of Lesser Khingan Range[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2010, 46(2): 110-115.
    [7]
    MENG C, WANG L H, SHEN W. Effects of selective cutting on soil respiration in conifer-broadleaved mixed forests in Xiao xing an ling[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2008, 19(4): 729-734.
    [7]
    MCCARTHY D R, BROWN K J. Soil respiration responses to topography, canopy cover, and prescribed burning in an oak-hickory forest in southeastern Ohio[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006, 237(1): 94-102.
    [8]
    KIM C. Soil CO2 efflux in clear-cut and uncut red pine (Pinus densiflora S. et Z.) stands in Korea[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008, 255(8): 3318-3321.
    [8]
    LIU K, HAN H R, KANG F F, et al. Responses of soil respiration to selective cutting intensity in Pinus tabulaeformis plantationin Taiyue Mountain of China during growing season[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2013, 32(12): 3173-3181.
    [9]
    VESTERDAL L, ELBERLING B, CHRISTIANSEN J R, et al. Soil respiration and rates of soil carbon turnover differ among six common European tree species[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2012, 264: 185-196.
    [9]
    MENG C, WANG L H, SHEN W. Effect of sensitivity of soil respiration to soil temperature in a conifer-broad leave forest in Xiaoxingan lingmountain after select cutting[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2011, 47(3): 102-106.
    [10]
    CHEN W J, JIA X, ZHA T S, et al.Soil respiration in a mixed urban forest in China in relation to soil temperature and water content[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2013, 54: 63-68.
    [10]
    WANG X G, ZHU B, WANG Y Q, et al. Soil respiration and its sensitivity to temperature under different land use conditions[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2007, 27(5):1960-1968.
    [11]
    WANG Z, JI L, HOU X, et al. Soil respiration in semiarid temperate grasslands under various land management[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(1): e0147987.
    [12]
    WEBER M G. Forest soil respiration after cutting and burning in immature aspen ecosystems[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 1990, 31(1): 1-14.
    [13]
    杨玉盛, 董彬,谢锦升,等. 森林土壤呼吸及其对全球变化的响应[J]. 生态学报,2004, 24(3): 583-591.
    [14]
    孟春, 王立海,沈微. 择伐对生长季针阔混交林土壤分室呼吸的影响[J]. 林业科学,2008, 44(8): 23-28.
    [15]
    郭辉, 董希斌,姜帆. 采伐强度对小兴安岭低质林分土壤碳通量的影响[J]. 林业科学,2010, 46(2): 110-115.
    [16]
    孟春, 王立海,沈微. 择伐对小兴安岭针阔混交林土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2008, 19(4): 729-734.
    [17]
    BLOEMEN J, TESKEY R O, MCGUIRE M A, et al. Root xylem CO2 flux: an important but unaccounted-for component of root respiration[J]. Trees, 2016,30(2): 343-352.
    [18]
    TANG J W, QI Y, XU M, et al.Forest thinning and soil respiration in a ponderosa pine plantation in the Sierra Nevada[J]. Tree Physiology, 2005, 25(1): 57-66.
    [19]
    OHASHI M, GYOKUSEN K, SAITO A. Contribution of root respiration to total soil respiration in a Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) artificial forest[J]. Ecological Research, 2000, 15(3): 323-333.
    [20]
    GORDON A M, SCHLENTNER R E, CLEVE K V. Seasonal patterns of soil respiration and CO2 evolution following harvesting in the white spruce forests of interior Alaska[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1987, 17(4): 304-310.
    [21]
    刘可, 韩海荣, 康峰峰, 等. 山西太岳山油松人工林生长季土壤呼吸对择伐强度的响应[J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(12): 3173-3181.
    [22]
    孟春, 王立海, 沈微. 择伐对小兴安岭地区针阔混交林土壤呼吸温度敏感性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(3): 102-106.
    [23]
    王小国, 朱波, 王艳强, 等. 不同土地利用方式下土壤呼吸及其温度敏感性[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(5):1960-1968.
    [24]
    WU J J, GROLDBERG S D, MORTIMER P E, et al.Soil respiration under three different land use types in a tropical mountain region of China[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2016, 13(3): 416-423.
    [25]
    ZHANG X B, XU M G, SUN N,et al. Modelling and predicting crop yield, soil carbon and nitrogen stocks under climate change scenatios with fertliser management in the North China Plain[J]. Geoderma, 2016, 256:176-186.
    [26]
    CONCILIO A, MA S, LI Q,et al. Soil respiration response to prescribed burning and thinning in mixed-conifer and hardwood forests[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2005, 35(7): 1581-1591.
    [27]
    WANG Q K, HE T X, WANG S L,et al. Carbon input manipulation affects soil respiration and microbial community composition in a subtropical coniferous forest[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2013, 178: 152-160.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Wang Yuning, Feng Tianjiao, Sun Long, Liu Xiru, Liu Yabo, Wang Ping. Differences and influencing factors of understory vegetation species diversity between typical plantations and natural forests in the loess area of western Shanxi Province, northern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20240228
    [2]Zhang Zixuan, Meng Xiaoqian, Zhang Xinna, Xu Chengyang, Chen Tao, Wang Wenxue, Ning Qiuling. Responses of phyllosphere microbial communities in understory vegetation under plant life form and light intensity[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20250088
    [3]Gao Minglei, Man Xiuling, Duan Beixing. Short-term effects of understory vegetation and litter on soil CO2 flux of natural forests in cold temperate zone of China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(3): 55-65. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200249
    [4]Jiang Jun, Liu Xianzhao, Jia Hongyan, Ming Angang, Chen Beibei, Lu Yuanchang. Effects of stand density on understory species diversity and soil physicochemical properties after close-to-nature transformation management of Chinese fir plantation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(5): 170-177. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20190022
    [5]Wei Anqi, Wei Tianxing, Liu Haiyan, Wang Sha. PLFA analysis of soil microorganism under Robinia pseudoacacia and Pinus tabuliformis plantation in loess area[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(4): 88-98. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180287
    [6]SUN Cao-wen, JIA Li-ming, YE Hong-lian, GAO Yuan, XIONG Chen-yan, WENG Xue-huang. Geographic variation evaluating and correlation with fatty acid composition of economic characters of Sapindus spp. fruits.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(12): 73-83. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160143
    [7]LIU Hai-yan, WEI Tian-xing, WANG Xian. Soil microbial community structure and functional diversity in typical plantations marked by PLFA in hilly loess region[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(1): 28-35. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000--1522.20150262
    [8]ZHOU Xiao-jing, LI Ke, FAN Hang, LIU Tong, LI Chun-fang, MA Chao, LIU Yu-jun. Composition and amounts of fatty acids in Perilla frutescens seed oils of different varieties and areas.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(1): 98-114. DOI: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2015.01.005
    [9]LI Guo-lei, LIU Yong, L Rui-heng, YU Hai-qun, LI Rui-sheng. Responses of understory vegetation development to regulation of tree density in Larix principisrupprechtii plantations.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2009, 31(1): 19-24.
    [10]LU Shao-wei, WANG Xiong-bin1, YU Xin-xiao1, LU Shao-bo1, 3, LI Jin-hai4, WU Jun4. Influence of closing hillsides on vegetation diversity restoration in artificial coniferous forests.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30(supp.2): 121-126.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(22)

    1. 陈子川,潘国营,陈灿,徐云鹏,林晗,陈煜,谢安强,范海兰. 光强对木麻黄幼苗根系形态、解剖结构及其碳氮含量的影响. 生态学报. 2024(10): 4377-4387 .
    2. 陈静航,叶蕊蕊,孙建喜,罗利华,李灿,吴勇,胡田田. 滴灌施肥周期和毛管布设方式对苹果树细根直径时空分布的影响. 干旱地区农业研究. 2023(01): 101-110 .
    3. 吴小健,李秉钧,颜耀,李明,吴鹏飞,马祥庆. 不同种源杉木细根解剖性状的差异分析. 森林与环境学报. 2023(03): 232-239 .
    4. 吴义远,董文渊,浦婵,钟欢,夏莉,袁翎凌,陈新. 土壤水分和养分对筇竹竹鞭解剖特征及其适应可塑性的影响. 竹子学报. 2023(01): 1-10 .
    5. 张家豪,王根绪,王文志,孙守琴. 大气氮沉降增加对树木生长和水碳利用的影响. 西部林业科学. 2023(03): 145-151+159 .
    6. 韩梦豪,李俊杰,王磊,刘晴廙,关庆伟. 间伐对马尾松不同根序细根化学组分的影响. 森林与环境学报. 2023(04): 337-345 .
    7. 张玉慧,谢芳,闫国永. 不同乔木树种根系养分吸收策略的维度性差异. 林业科技. 2023(04): 16-22 .
    8. 刘逸潇,王传宽,上官虹玉,臧妙涵,梁逸娴,全先奎. 兴安落叶松不同径级根碳氮磷钾化学计量特征的种源差异. 应用生态学报. 2023(07): 1797-1805 .
    9. 周诚,刘彤,王庆贵,韩士杰. 长期氮添加对阔叶红松林细根形态、解剖结构和化学组分的影响. 北京林业大学学报. 2022(11): 31-40 . 本站查看
    10. 郝龙飞,郝文颖,刘婷岩,张敏,许吉康,斯钦毕力格. 氮添加及接种处理对1年生樟子松苗木根系形态及养分含量的影响. 北京林业大学学报. 2021(04): 1-7 . 本站查看
    11. 焦海珍,邵陈禹,陈建姣,张晨禹,陈佳豪,李云飞,沈程文. 重度遮阴及复光条件下茶树根系的生理响应及抗氧化酶活性动态变化. 茶叶科学. 2021(05): 695-704 .
    12. 洪梓明,邢亚娟,闫国永,张军辉,王庆贵. 长白山白桦山杨次生林细根形态特征和解剖结构对氮沉降的响应. 生态学报. 2020(02): 608-620 .
    13. 吴义远,董文渊,刘培,张孟楠,谢泽轩,田发坤. 不同土壤水分和养分条件下筇竹竹秆解剖特征及其适应可塑性. 北京林业大学学报. 2020(04): 80-90 . 本站查看
    14. 李秉钧,颜耀,王小虎,孙雪莲,马祥庆. 环境因子对林木细根功能性状的影响研究进展. 福建林业科技. 2020(02): 125-132 .
    15. 张俪予,张军辉,张蕾,陈伟,韩士杰. 兴安落叶松和白桦细根形态对环境变化的响应. 北京林业大学学报. 2019(06): 15-23 . 本站查看
    16. 陈旭,刘洪凯,赵春周,王强,王延平. 山东滨海盐碱地11个造林树种叶解剖特征对土壤条件的响应. 植物生态学报. 2019(08): 697-708 .
    17. 杨阳,熊远兵,郝晓泳. 干旱胁迫对耧斗菜根解剖结构及生理特性的影响. 北方园艺. 2018(17): 82-89 .
    18. 王建宇,胡海清,邢亚娟,闫国永,王庆贵. 大兴安岭兴安落叶松林树木生物量对氮沉降的响应. 林业科学研究. 2018(03): 88-94 .
    19. 杨阳,熊远兵,郝晓泳. 干旱胁迫对耧斗菜根解剖结构及生理特性的影响. 内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版). 2018(03): 1-7 .
    20. 钟悦鸣,董芳宇,王文娟,王健铭,李景文,吴波,贾晓红. 不同生境胡杨叶片解剖特征及其适应可塑性. 北京林业大学学报. 2017(10): 53-61 . 本站查看
    21. 毛晋花,邢亚娟,马宏宇,王庆贵. 氮沉降对植物生长的影响研究进展. 中国农学通报. 2017(29): 42-48 .
    22. 张鑫,邢亚娟,贾翔,王庆贵. 北方森林细根对氮沉降和二氧化碳浓度升高的响应. 中国农学通报. 2017(30): 84-90 .

    Other cited types(33)

Catalog

    Article views (1556) PDF downloads (25) Cited by(55)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return