Susceptibility zoning of different types of mountain torrent disasters in the Yangtze River Basin of sourthern China

ZHOU Jian-qin; PANG Zhan-long; CAI Qiang-guo; YU Xin-xiao; ZHANG Ke-bin; SUN Li-ying

doi:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170169

Journal of Beijing Forestry University > 2017 > 39(11): 56-64. > DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170169

ZHOU Jian-qin, PANG Zhan-long, CAI Qiang-guo, YU Xin-xiao, ZHANG Ke-bin, SUN Li-ying. Susceptibility zoning of different types of mountain torrent disasters in the Yangtze River Basin of sourthern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(11): 56-64. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170169

Citation:

PDF (5346 KB)

Susceptibility zoning of different types of mountain torrent disasters in the Yangtze River Basin of sourthern China

1.
School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, P. R. China
2.
Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, P. R. China

More Information

Received Date: May 07, 2017
Revised Date: July 29, 2017
Published Date: October 31, 2017

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

The Yangtze River Basin has become the most intensive area of mountain torrent disasters in China because of its complex geological topography and climatic conditions. Susceptibility zoning of the mountain torrent disasters is of significance to the integrated disaster prevention system. The study on the susceptibility of mountain torrent disasters in view of the large-scale(inter-provincial) region of the Yangtze River Basin can provide scientific basis for the study of planning, deployment and implementation of mountain torrent disaster prevention in the Yangtze River Basin and similar areas. The assessment indices were established for the susceptibility evaluation of three kinds of mountain torrent disasters in the Yangtze River Basin, based on the affecting mechanism of natural geographical factors on the formation of the mountain torrent with county as assessment unit. The susceptible indicators for three kinds of mountain torrent disasters were calculated based on the method of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) using Matlab. The Yangtze River Basin was classified into four susceptibility degrees of areas for three kinds of the mountain torrent disasters, i.e. highly-susceptible area, medium-susceptible area, lowly-susceptible area and insusceptible area, using classification scheme by ArcGIS natural spacing. The river flood disaster showed a tendency to decrease gradually from east to west, and centered in the middle and eastern basin. The highly-susceptible area of landslide disaster is mainly in the middle of the basin and certain areas like northern Yunnan and the mountains of Longnan, southern Gansu in the upstream of the river, with the most concentrated area in the east of Sichuan Basin. The highly-susceptible area of debris flow disaster is mainly in the west of the basin, and happened most frequently on fault zones in the first and second ladder transition districts. The results showed obvious differences in the distribution of different mountain torrent disasters in the basin. Over 80% of historical disasters were located in the assessed highly-susceptibility area for all three types of mountain torrent disasters. The assessment results can well indicate the regional distributions of different types of mountain torrents.
- mountain torrent disaster,
- susceptible zone,
- assessment index,
- analytic hierarchy process (AHP),
- disaster prevention

FullText(HTML)

References (22)

References

[1]	张平仓, 赵健, 胡维忠, 等.中国山洪灾害防治区划[M].武汉:长江出版社, 2009. ZHANG P C, ZHAO J, HU W Z, et al. Chinese mountain torrent disaster prevention regionalization[M]. Wuhan: The Yangtze River Press, 2009.
[2]	张平仓, 任洪玉, 胡维忠, 等.中国山洪灾害防治区划初探[J].水土保持学报, 2006, 20(6):196-200. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2006.06.047 ZHANG P C, REN H Y, HU W Z, et al. An elementary study on Chinese mountain torrents disaster prevention regionalization[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006, 20(6): 196-200. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2006.06.047
[3]	王哲, 易发成.基于层次分析法的绵阳市地质灾害易发性评价[J].自然灾害学报, 2009, 18(1): 14-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4574.2009.01.003 WANG Z, YI F C. AHP-based evaluation of occurrence easiness of geological disasters in Mianyang City[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2009, 18(1): 14-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4574.2009.01.003
[4]	唐余学, 廖向花, 李晶, 等.基于GIS的重庆市山洪灾害区划[J].气象科技, 2011, 39(4): 423-427. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6345.2011.04.006 TANG Y X, LIAO X H, LI J, et al. Regionalization of torrential flood disasters in Chongqing based on GIS[J]. Meteorological Science and Technology, 2011, 39(4): 423-427. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6345.2011.04.006
[5]	柳金峰, 黄江成, 欧国强, 等.甘肃陇南武都区泥石流易发性评价[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2010, 21(4): 8-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8035.2010.04.002 LIU J F, HUANG J C, OU G Q, et al.Susceptibility evaluation of debris flow in the Wudu District, Longnan City, Gansu Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2010, 21(4): 8-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8035.2010.04.002
[6]	王威, 何志芸.长江流域防御山洪灾害对策浅探[J].人民长江, 2003, 34(10): 14-15, 18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4179.2003.10.007 WANG W, HE Z Y. Briefly explore the defensive countermeasures of mountain torrent disasters in the Yangtze River Basin[J]. Yangtze River, 2003, 34(10): 14-15, 18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4179.2003.10.007
[7]	蔡道明, 肖翔, 孙金伟.区域山洪灾害预警难度评价:以长江流域为例[J].长江科学院院报, 2015, 32(3): 84-88, 94. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2015.03.017 CAI D M, XIAO X, SUN J W. Assessment of the difficulty of warning mountain torrent disasters: case study of the Yangtze River Basin[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2015, 32(3): 84-88, 94. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2015.03.017
[8]	赵成, 张永军, 赵玉红.层次分析法在甘肃省地质灾害易发性评价中的应用[J].冰川冻土, 2009, 31(1): 182-188. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/bcdt200901026 ZHAO C, ZHANG Y J, ZHAO Y H. Application of the hierarchical analytical methods to evaluating geological hazard tendency in Gansu Province[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2009, 31(1): 182-188. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/bcdt200901026
[9]	郑乾墙.滑坡危险性的模糊综合评判[J].江西地质, 1999, 13(4): 300-303. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jxdz199904011 ZHENG Q Q. Fuzzy multidisciplinary assessment of landslide danger[J]. Jiangxi Geology, 1999, 13(4): 300-303. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jxdz199904011
[10]	韩娟, 张永伟, 祁娟, 等.综合危险性指数法在苍山县地质灾害易发区划分中的应用[J].山东国土资源, 2007, 23(6-7): 36-40. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/sddz200706008 HAN J, ZHANG Y W, QI J, et al. Application of synthetic hazards index method in classifying geological hazards easy-happening areas in Cangshan County[J]. Shandong Land and Resources, 2007, 23(6-7): 36-40. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/sddz200706008
[11]	乔伟.综合危险性指数法在泰山区地质灾害易发区划分中的应用[J].防灾科技学院学报, 2015, 17(1): 53-58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8047.2015.01.009 QIAO W.Application of synthetic risk index method in division of areas vulnerable to geo-hazards in Taishan District[J]. Journal of Institute of Disaster Prevention, 2015, 17(1): 53-58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8047.2015.01.009
[12]	刘艳芳, 方佳琳, 陈晓慧, 等.基于确定性系数分析方法的秭归县滑坡易发性评价[J].自然灾害学报, 2014, 23(6): 209-217. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zrzhxb201406026 LIU Y F, FANG J L, CHEN X H, et al. Evaluation of landslide susceptibility in Zigui County based on certainty factor method[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2014, 23(6): 209-217. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zrzhxb201406026
[13]	李永红.基于ArcGIS的陕西山洪灾害易发程度区划[J].灾害学, 2008, 23(1): 37-42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-811X.2008.01.009 LI Y H. Susceptible degree zoning of mountain torrent disasters in Shaanxi based on ArcGIS[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2008, 23(1): 37-42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-811X.2008.01.009
[14]	杨秀梅, 梁收运.基于模糊层次分析法的泥石流危险度评价[J].地质灾害与环境保护, 2008, 19(2): 73-78. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4362.2008.02.015 YANG X M, LIANG S Y. Application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method to debris flow dangerous assessment[J]. Journal of Geological Hazards and Environment Preservation, 2008, 19(2): 73-78. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4362.2008.02.015
[15]	韦方强, 谢洪, 钟敦伦.四川省泥石流危险度区划[J].水土保持学报, 2000, 14(1): 59-63. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2000.01.012 WEI F Q, XIE H, ZHONG D L. Risk factors zoning of debris flow in Sichuan Province[J]. Journal of Soil Water Conservation, 2000, 14(1): 59-63. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2000.01.012
[16]	金艳珠, 谈树成, 虎雄岗, 等.基于层次分析法与GIS相结合的岩溶塌陷地质灾害易发性分区评估:以云南省师宗县为例[J].热带地理, 2012, 32(2): 173-178. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5221.2012.02.010 JIN Y Z, TAN S C, HU X G, et al. Geo-hazard susceptibility zoning evaluation of karst collapse based on the combination of AHP and GIS:a case study of Shizong, Yunnan[J]. Tropical Geography, 2012, 32(2): 173-178. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5221.2012.02.010
[17]	许冲, 戴福初, 姚鑫, 等.基于GIS与确定性系数分析方法的汶川地震滑坡易发性评价[J].工程地质学报, 2010, 18(1): 15-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2010.01.003 XU C, DAI F C, YAO X, et al. GIS platform and certainty factor analysis method based Wenchuan earthquake-induced landslide susceptibility evaluation[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2010, 18(1): 15-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2010.01.003
[18]	黄晓凤, 张丹茜, 李静芝, 等.中国国家地理地图[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社, 2013:20. HUANG X F, ZHANG D Q, LI J Z, et al. China national geographic map[M]. Beijing: Encyclopedia of China Publishing House, 2013: 20.
[19]	国家防汛抗旱总指挥部办公室.全国山洪灾害防治规划[R].北京: 国家防汛抗旱总指挥, 2009. National Flood Control and Drought Relief Headquarters Office. National mountain torrent disaster prevention and control planning[R]. Beijing: National Flood Control and Drought Relief Command, 2009.
[20]	卢翔.湖南省山洪灾害成因分析[J].人民长江, 2003, 34(6): 52-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4179.2003.06.019 LU X. Causes analysed of mountain torrent disasters in Hunan Province[J]. Yangtze River, 2003, 34(6): 52-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4179.2003.06.019
[21]	任洪玉, 邹翔, 张平仓.我国山洪灾害成因分析[J].中国水利, 2007(14):18-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1123.2007.14.010 REN H Y, ZOU X, ZHANG P C. Analysis on the causes of mountain torrent disasters in China[J]. China Water Resources, 2007(14):18-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1123.2007.14.010
[22]	长江岩土工程总公司(武汉).长江流域地质灾害及防治[M].武汉:长江出版社, 2007. Changjiang Geotechnical Engineering Corporation (Wuhan).Prevention and control of geological disasters in the Yangtze River[M]. Wuhan: The Yangtze River Press, 2007.

[1]	Ma Jiaxin, Sun Yujun, Zhu Zhaoting. Impact of two types of competition indices on the growth and biomass assessment of Cunninghamia lanceolata[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230230
[2]	Li Hui, Liu Dongchao, Xu Ruirui, Hou Lina, Wang Tianqi, Liu Zhonghua, Fu Xiao, Li Shengbo. Development and identification of SSR markers based on RAD-seq of Lonicera japonica[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(6): 108-117. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200337
[3]	Liu Feng, Xi Benye, Dai Tengfei, Yu Jinglin, Li Guangde, Chen Yushan, Wang Jie, Jia Liming. Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on soil nitrogen, fine root distribution and biomass of Populus tomentosa[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(1): 75-83. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190222
[4]	LIU Kun, CAO Lin, WANG Gui-bin, CAO Fu-liang. Biomass allocation patterns and allometric models of Ginkgo biloba[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(4): 12-20. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160374
[5]	WANG Ling, ZHAO Guang-liang, HUANG Jin. Microbial biomass and enzyme activity of the rhizosphere soil under different grafted Xanthoceras sorbifolia cultivars[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(8): 69-75. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150013
[6]	DONG Dian, LIN Tian-xi, TANG Jing-yi, LIU Jing-chen, SUN Guo-wen, YAO Jie, CHENG Yan-xia. Biomass allocation patterns and allometric models of Tilia amurensis[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014, 36(4): 54-63. DOI: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2014.04.013
[7]	DONG Li-hu, LI Feng-ri, JIA Wei-wei.. Effects of tree competition on biomass and biomass models of Pinus koraiensis plantation.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35(6): 14-22.
[8]	CHU Xu, DI Xue-ying, YANG Guang. Impacts of forest fire on root biomass, carbon and nitrogen concentration of Larix gmelinii.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35(2): 10-16.
[9]	XU Fei, GUO Wei-hua, XU Wei-hong, WANG Ren-qing. Effects of water stress on morphology, biomass allocation and photosynthesis in Robinia pseudoacacia seedlings[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(1): 24-30.
[10]	ZHANG Guo-jun, ZHANG Guo-jun, LI Yun, LI Yun, LI Fang-ping, LI Fang-ping, XU Zhao-he, XU Zhao-he, SUN Yu-han, SUN Yu-han. Effects of root age on biomass and leaf nutrition in tetraploid Robinia pseudoacacia. [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2009, 31(3): 37-41.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(18)

1.	黄鑫，徐国祺，马耀辉. 制备具有荧光示踪功能的硼掺杂银杏叶碳量子点木材防腐剂. 北京林业大学学报. 2025(01): 116-125 . 本站查看
2.	张景朋，邵闯，蒋明亮. 高效液相色谱法测定防腐材中嘧菌酯含量的方法研究. 木材科学与技术. 2025(01): 64-70 .
3.	吴喆虹，王文志，罗玲卓，袁超峰，苏勇，朱万泽. 贡嘎山健康与腐朽峨眉冷杉径向生长分异及其气候响应. 生态学报. 2024(23): 10897-10905 .
4.	储炜，徐明，许琪，李婷，崔兆彦. 加速腐朽环境下重组竹力学及耐腐性能研究. 建筑科学与工程学报. 2023(03): 30-39 .
5.	宋丽琴，宋太泽，祝席文，程芳超，孙建平. 木材花斑真菌对木材的影响及应用研究进展. 应用与环境生物学报. 2022(03): 805-812 .
6.	谢启芳，张保壮，张利朋，苗壮. 自然干裂木柱受力性能试验与退化模型研究. 建筑结构学报. 2022(12): 210-222 .
7.	常旭东，金光泽. 地形和土壤因子对红松活立木腐朽的影响. 林业科学. 2022(11): 71-82 .
8.	张景朋，蒋明亮，马星霞，张斌. 甲氧基丙烯酸酯类制剂的木材防腐性能研究. 北京林业大学学报. 2021(03): 131-137 . 本站查看
9.	王玉娇，彭尧，曹金珍. 褐腐初期南方松木材微观形貌与化学成分分析. 北京林业大学学报. 2021(03): 138-144 . 本站查看
10.	王湘茹，曾飞扬，吕嘉宇，乔宇欣，闫丽. 硅烷偶联剂对水杨酸/二氧化硅微胶囊改性杨木耐腐性的影响. 林产工业. 2021(05): 54-59 .
11.	贾茹，孙海燕，王玉荣，汪睿，赵荣军，任海青. 杉木无性系新品种‘洋020’和‘洋061’10年生幼龄材微观结构与力学性能的相关性. 林业科学. 2021(05): 165-175 .
12.	赵艳，张泽宇，金宇乔，庞久寅，孙耀星. 木材表面仿制类玫瑰花超疏水结构研究. 林产工业. 2020(12): 32-34+39 .
13.	赵博识，于志明，漆楚生，唐睿琳，张扬. 木材微生物变色与调控研究现状和展望. 林产工业. 2019(08): 1-4 .
14.	郭宇，李超，李英洁，王哲，姚利宏. 木材细胞壁与木材力学性能及水分特性之间关系研究进展. 林产工业. 2019(08): 14-18 .
15.	徐华东，狄亚楠，邢涛，徐群. 褐腐对白杨木材固碳量的影响规律及机理. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2019(11): 104-109 .
16.	孙恒，冀晓东，赵红华，杨茂林，丛旭. 人工林刺槐木材物理力学性质研究. 北京林业大学学报. 2018(07): 104-112 . 本站查看
17.	孙海燕，苏明垒，王玉荣. 木材细胞壁力学性能与细胞壁组分和构造的相关性研究. 林产工业. 2018(10): 22-27 .
18.	陈继超，姜维娜，曹文静，周徐亮，周晓燕，徐莉. 杨木纤维/Si-B复合材料制备及其防腐性能研究. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2018(05): 206-210 .

Other cited types(18)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views PDF downloads Cited by(36)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Susceptibility zoning of different types of mountain torrent disasters in the Yangtze River Basin of sourthern China