• Scopus
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD)
  • A Guide to the Core Journal of China
  • CSTPCD
  • F5000 Frontrunner
  • RCCSE
Advanced search
Zhang Yongzhuo, Liu Yalin, Lu Hai, Li Hui. Transcriptome analysis of gene expression profiling in the suspension cells of Populus tomentosa treated by histone deacetylase inhibitor TSA[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2018, 40(9): 1-14. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180158
Citation: Zhang Yongzhuo, Liu Yalin, Lu Hai, Li Hui. Transcriptome analysis of gene expression profiling in the suspension cells of Populus tomentosa treated by histone deacetylase inhibitor TSA[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2018, 40(9): 1-14. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180158

Transcriptome analysis of gene expression profiling in the suspension cells of Populus tomentosa treated by histone deacetylase inhibitor TSA

More Information
  • Received Date: May 15, 2018
  • Revised Date: July 20, 2018
  • Published Date: August 31, 2018
  • Histone deacetylase (HDAC), which regulates cell proliferation, cell diferentiation and apoptosis, is one of the hot topics in biology in recent years, but rarely reported in woody plants.
    ObjectiveIn this study, the change of gene expression profile was investigated by treating the poplar suspension cells with TSA to change the level of histone acetylation in cells.
    MethodThe suspension cells were treated with 0.5 μmol/L TSA for ten days and were collected for RNA-Seq analysis. Then the gene expression differences were compared between TSA-treated cells and control group suspension cells.
    ResultThe cells in the control group were homogeneous and oval, while the cells after TSA treatment were round and elongated by microscope observation. 4 465 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were obtained by the transcriptome analysis, of which 2 363 genes were up-regulated and 2 102 genes were down-regulated. Differentially expressed genes were mainly enriched in cell cycle, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, cell wall structure and acetylation.
    ConclusionBy analyzing the difference of gene expression between TSA-treated and control group suspension cells, our results suggest that TSA can directly or indirectly affect genes that regulate cell growth, cell wall structure and lignin synthesis pathway through affecting the level of histone acetylation, which provide evidence for understanding of histone acetylation on plant growth and development.
  • [1]
    钟理, 杨春燕, 吴佳海.组蛋白去乙酰化酶(HDACs)及其调控的研究进展[J].中国农学通报, 2014, 30(21):1-8. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2014-0697

    Zhong L, Yang C Y, Wu J H. The progress of histone deacetylases and its regulation [J].China Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(21): 1-8. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2014-0697
    [2]
    Kuo M H, Allis C D. Roles of histone acetyltransferases and deacetylases in gene regulation [J]. Bio Essays, 1998, 20(8):615-626.
    [3]
    Lehrmann H, Pritchard L L, Harelbellan A. Histone acetyltransferases and deacetylases in the control of cell proliferation and differentiation [J]. Advances in Cancer Research, 2002, 86:41-65. doi: 10.1016/S0065-230X(02)86002-X
    [4]
    Li C, Huang L, Xu C, et al. Altered levels of histone deacetylase OsHDT1 affect differential gene expression patterns in hybrid rice [J]. PLoS One, 2011, 6(7): e21789[2017-12-10]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021789.
    [5]
    Wu K Q, Tian L N, Malik K, et al. Functional analysis of HD2 histone deacetylase homologues in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. The Plant Journal, 2000, 22(1):19-27. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00711.x
    [6]
    Xu C R, Liu C, Wang Y L, et al. Histone acetylation affects expression of cellular atterning genes in the Arabidopsis root epidermis [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 2005, 102(40): 14469-14474. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503143102
    [7]
    Nelissen H, Flemy D, Bruno L, et al. The elongate mutants identify a functional elongator complex in plants with a role in cell proliferation during organ growth [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 2005, 102(21):7754-7759. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502600102
    [8]
    Huang L, Sun Q, Qin F, et al. Down-regulation of a SILENT INFORMATION REGULATOR2-related histone deacetylase gene, OsSRT1, induces DNA fragmentation and cell death in rice [J]. Plant Physiology, 2007, 144(3): 1508-1519. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.099473
    [9]
    Bourque S, Dutartre A, Hammoudi V, et al. Type-2 histone deacetylases as new regulators of elicitor-induced cell death in plants [J]. New Phytologist, 2011, 192(1): 127-139. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03788.x
    [10]
    Sridha S, Wu K. Identification of AtHD2C as a novel regulator of abscisic acid responses in Arabidopsis [J]. The Plant Journal, 2006, 46(1): 124-133.
    [11]
    Luo M, Wang Y Y, Liu X, et al. HD2C interacts with HDA6 and is involved in ABA and salt stress response in Arabidopsis[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2012, 63(8): 3297-3306. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers059
    [12]
    Hu Y, Zhang L, Zhao L, et al. Trichostatin A selectively suppresses the cold-induced transcription of the ZmDREB1 gene in maize [J]. PLoS One, 2011, 6(7): e22132(2011-06-21)[2017-12-10]. https: //doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022132.
    [13]
    Blackwell L, Norris J, Suto C M, et al. The use of diversity profiling to characterize chemical modulators of the histone deacetylases [J]. Life Sciences, 2008, 82(22): 1050-1058.
    [14]
    Bolden J E, Peart M J, Johnstone R W. Anticancer activities of histone deacetylase inhibitors [J]. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2006, 5(9): 769-784. doi: 10.1038/nrd2133
    [15]
    Kruhlak M J, Hendzel M J, Fischle W, et al. Regulation of global acetylation in mitosis through loss of histone acetyltransferases and deacetylases from chromatin [J]. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2001, 276(41): 38307-38319. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=307ea3d862e159003ba4b32ffe4d3d1c
    [16]
    Li H, Soriano M, Cordewener J, et al. The histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A promotes totipotency in the male gametophyte [J]. The Plant Cell, 2014, 26(1): 195-209. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.116491
    [17]
    Su L C, Deng B, Liu S, et al. Isolation and characterization of an osmotic stress and ABA induced histone deacetylases in Arachis hygogaea[J]. Front Plant Science, 2015, 6:512-522.
    [18]
    Zhu Z, Guo H. Derepression of ethylene-stabilized transcription factors (EIN3/EIL1) mediates jasmonate and ethylene signaling synergy in Arabidopsis [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 2011, 108(30):12539-12544. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103959108
    [19]
    Murphy J P, Mcaleer J P, Uglialoro A, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors and cell proliferation in pea root meristems [J]. Phytochemistry, 2000, 55(1):11-18. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=2361eaca16bf01fb3380f8e1ec5362f5
    [20]
    Jasencakova Z, Meister A, Walter J, et al. Histone H4 acetylation of euchromatin and heterochromatin is cell cycle dependent and correlated with replication rather than with transcription [J]. The Plant Cell, 2000, 12(11):2087-2100. doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.11.2087
    [21]
    Belyaev N D, Houben A, Baranczewski P, et al. Histone H4 acetylation in plant heterochromatin is altered during the cell cycle [J]. Chromosoma, 1997, 106(3):193-197. doi: 10.1007/s004120050239
    [22]
    Jasencakova Z, Meister A, Schubert I. Chromatin organization and its relation to replication and histone acetylation during the cell cycle in barley [J]. Chromosoma, 2001, 110(2):83-92. doi: 10.1007/s004120100132
    [23]
    Wako T, Fukuda M, Furushima-Shimogawara R, et al. Cell cycle-dependent and lysine residue-specific dynamic changes of histone H4 acetylation in barley [J]. Plant Molecular Biology, 2002, 49(6):645-653. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=aaf08c3ba7cf4bd4be3f0f9c71d5a53a
    [24]
    Li Y, Butenko Y, Grafi G. Histone deacetylation is required for progression through mitosis in tobacco cells [J]. The Plant Journal, 2005, 41(3): 346-352.
    [25]
    袁力勇, 李绍清, 李阳生, 等.水稻悬浮细胞系的建立[J].云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 25(4): 373-376. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0258-7971.2003.04.022

    Yuan L Y, Li S Q, Li Y S, et al. Establishment of rice suspension cell line [J]. Journal of Yunnan University (Natural Science Edition), 2003, 25(4): 373-376. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0258-7971.2003.04.022
    [26]
    雷振东, 赵华, 雷三林, 等.曲古抑菌素A对结肠癌细胞细胞周期影响的机制研究[J].中南药学, 2010, 8(11):869-872. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2981.2010.11.021

    Lei Z D, Zhao H, Lei S L, et al. Mechanism of the effect of trichostatin A on cell cycle of human colon cancer cell lines [J]. Central South Pharmacy, 2010, 8(11): 869-872. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2981.2010.11.021
    [27]
    罗深秋.医用细胞生物学[M].上海:第二军医大学出版社, 2004:140-143.

    Luo S Q. Medical cell biology [M]. Shanghai:Second Military Medical University Press, 2004:140-143.
    [28]
    Yang M, Ma H. Male meiotic spindle lengths in normal and mutant Arabidopsis cells [J]. Plant Physiologyogy, 2001, 126(2): 622-630. doi: 10.1104/pp.126.2.622
    [29]
    Benhamed M, Bertrand C, Servet C, et al. Arabidopsis Gcn5, hd1, and taf1/haf2 interact to regulate histone acetylation required for light-responsive gene expression [J]. The Plant Cell, 2006, 18(11): 2893-2903. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.043489
    [30]
    Kemp M G, Sancar A. DNA excision repair [J]. Cell Cycle, 2012, 11(16): 2997-3002. doi: 10.4161/cc.21126
    [31]
    Hoffmann L, Besseau S, Geoffroy P, et al. Silencing of hydroxycinnamoyl-Coenzyme A shikimate/quinate hydroxycinna-moyltransferase affects phenylpropanoid biosynthesis [J]. The Plant Cell, 2004, 16(6): 1446-1465. doi: 10.1105/tpc.020297
    [32]
    Ramkumar R, Richa G, Marijia K, et al. Sirtuins: molecular traffic lights in the crossroad of oxidative stress, chromatin remodeling, and transcription [J]. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, 2011, 2011: 368276-368293. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jcyxylc201407028
    [33]
    Siino J S, Yau P M, Imai B S, et al. Effect of DNA length and H4 acetylation on the thermal stability of reconstituted nucleosome particles [J]. Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications, 2003, 302(4):885-891.
    [34]
    Dorigo B, Schalch T, Bystricky K, et al. Chromatin fiber folding: requirement for the histone H4 N-terminal tail [J]. Journal of Molecular Biology, 2003, 327(1):85-96. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00025-1
    [35]
    Pazin M J, Kadonaga J T. What's up and down with histone deacetylation and transcription? [J]. Cell, 1997, 89(3):325-328. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80211-1
    [36]
    Horn P J, Peterson C L. Chromatin higher order folding: wrapping up transcription [J]. Science, 2002, 297:1824-1827. doi: 10.1126/science.1074200
    [37]
    Cress W D, Seto E. Histone deacetylases, transcriptional control, and cancer [J]. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 2000, 184(1):1-16. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/NSTLQK/NSTL_QKJJ028955867/
    [38]
    Luo M, Yu C W, Chen F F, et al. Histone deacetylase HDA6 is functionally associated with AS1 in repression of KNOX genes in Arabidopsis [J]. PloS Genetics, 2012, 8(12): e1003114[2017-12-11]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003114.
    [39]
    Li Y, Butenko Y, Grafi G. Histone deacetylation is required for progression through mitosis in tobacco cells [J]. The Plant Journal, 2005, 41(3):346-352.
    [40]
    Murphy J P, Mcaleer J P, Uglialoro A, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors and cell proliferation in pea root meristems [J]. Phytochemistry, 2000, 55(1):11-18. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=2361eaca16bf01fb3380f8e1ec5362f5
    [41]
    Noh E J, Lee J S. Functional interplay between modulation of histone deacetylase activity and its regulatory role in G2-M transition [J]. Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications, 2003, 310(2):267-273.
    [42]
    Li H, Torres-Garcia J, Latrasse D, et al. Plant-specific histone deacetylases HDT1/2 regulate GIBBERELLIN 2-OXIDASE 2 expression to control Arabidopsis root meristem cell number [J]. The Plant Cell, 2017, 29(9):2183-2196. doi: 10.1105/tpc.17.00366
    [43]
    Nguyen H N, Kim J H, Chan Y J, et al. Inhibition of histone deacetylation alters Arabidopsis root growth in response to auxin via PIN1 degradation [J]. The Plant Cell Reports, 2013, 32(10):1625-1636. doi: 10.1007/s00299-013-1474-6
    [44]
    Desprez T, Juraniec M, Crowell E F, et al. Organization of cellulose synthase complexes involved in primary cell wall synthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 2007, 104(39):15572-15577. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706569104
    [45]
    Kumar M, Campbell L, Turner S. Secondary cell walls: biosynthesis and manipulation [J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2016, 67(2):515-531. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv533
    [46]
    Kurdistani S K, Tavazoie S, Grunstein M. Mapping global histone acetylation patterns to gene expression [J]. Cell, 2004, 117(6):721-733. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.05.023
  • Related Articles

    [1]Wen Wenjie, Zhang Jianjun, Li Yixuan, Huang Xiaoqing, He Pei. A simple method for estimating runoff sediment concentration[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(11): 155-162. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180246
    [2]Guo Yingli, Zhang Shouhong, Chen Mingxiu, Anaer, Jiang Yuchen, Cao Shuning, Xie Chaoshuai. Experimental study on runoff control performances for impervious area disconnection system of sandy loam soil green space in West Mountains of Beijing[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(6): 111-119. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180262
    [3]Gao Shumin, Yang Muhan, Zhu Yuanyuan, Zhou Yan. Role of CMLs in regulating the competition of plant pollen pollination[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(3): 143-150. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180375
    [4]YANG Gui-yan, ZHAO Zhen, ZHAO Yu-lin, ZHANG Feng-jiao, GAO Cai-qiu. Upstream regulators of ThVHAc1.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(12): 1-6. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140486
    [5]GAO Qiong, NIU Shi-hui, LI Wei, CHEN Xiao-yang. Regulation of low temperature stress on gibberellin metabolism[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014, 36(6): 135-141. DOI: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2014.06.025
    [6]DU Yu-liang, CHEN Ye, LIU Cai-hong, YIN Zeng-fang. Molecular regulation mechanism of vascular pattern formation in plant[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014, 36(3): 142-150. DOI: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2014.03.023
    [7]KONG Ying, SUN Ming, PAN Hu-tang, ZHANG Qi-xiang. Advances in metabolism and regulation of floral scent.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2012, 34(2): 146-154.
    [8]SUN Qing-yan, YU Xin-xiao, HU Shu-ping, XIAO Yang. SWAT model-based runoff simulation in Banchengzi Reservoir Catchment,Beijing[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30(supp.2): 148-154.
    [9]SUN Jing-shuang, ZHENG Hong-juan, JIA Gui-xia, SUN Chang-zhong, WEN Lei. Effects of different substrates, growth regulators, grades of cuttings and metabolism regulator on cutting propagation of Juniperus squamata‘Blue Star’[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30(1): 67-73.
    [10]LI Fa-dong, SONG Xian-fang, LIU Chang-ming, YU Jing-jie, YANG Cong, LIU Xiang-chao, HU Kun, TANG Chang-yuan. Discharge recession from runoff plots in representative mountain area in North China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2006, 28(2): 79-84.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(16)

    1. 谢微,尹若勇,温梦玲,张宝津,邓小梅. 诗琳通木兰对干旱胁迫的生理响应. 林业与环境科学. 2025(01): 111-118 .
    2. 冯柳俊,陈志强,陈志彪,罗立津,王健. 南方红壤侵蚀区芒萁对聚乙二醇6000模拟干旱胁迫的响应. 安徽农业科学. 2023(20): 66-69+108 .
    3. 梁青兰,韩友吉,乔艳辉,谢孔安,李双云,董玉峰,李善文,张升祥. 干旱胁迫对黑杨派无性系生长及生理特性的影响. 北京林业大学学报. 2023(10): 81-89 . 本站查看
    4. 张忠辉,王文涛,包广道,刘婷,罗也,刘志越. 我国杨树抗旱性研究进展. 吉林林业科技. 2023(06): 35-41 .
    5. 苑正赛,乔艳辉,王丽,王相娥,姚俊修,李善文,韩友吉,董玉峰. 镉胁迫对黑杨派无性系生物量及镉离子含量的影响. 北京林业大学学报. 2021(12): 38-46 . 本站查看
    6. 黄海霞,连转红,王亮,杨琦琦,魏振艳,马彦军,张金霞. 裸果木渗透调节物质和抗氧化酶活性对干旱的响应. 干旱区研究. 2020(01): 227-235 .
    7. 姚俊修,乔艳辉,杨庆山,仲伟国,李庆华,董玉峰,李善文,吴德军. 重金属镉胁迫对黑杨派无性系光合生理及生长的影响. 西北林学院学报. 2020(02): 40-46+107 .
    8. 姚俊修,陈甘牛,李善文,乔艳辉,仲伟国,李庆华,董玉峰,吴德军. 镉胁迫对黑杨派无性系生理生化特性及生长的影响. 北京林业大学学报. 2020(04): 12-20 . 本站查看
    9. 郑涛,樊军锋,高建社,周永学. 美洲黑杨无性系抗旱性综合评价研究. 西北林学院学报. 2019(02): 98-104 .
    10. 郑涛,樊军锋,高建社,周永学. 11个白杨派无性系抗旱性综合评价. 西北林学院学报. 2019(04): 101-106 .
    11. 张文婷,王子邦. 6种常见彩叶灌木对干旱胁迫的生理响应. 江苏农业科学. 2018(08): 123-126 .
    12. 王曦,胡红玲,胡庭兴,张城浩,王鑫,刘丹. 干旱胁迫对桢楠幼树渗透调节与活性氧代谢的影响及施氮的缓解效应. 植物生态学报. 2018(02): 240-251 .
    13. 苏丹,殷小琳,董智,慕德宇,张晓晓,贾淑友. 白榆无性系生长特性及离子分布对NaCl胁迫的响应. 北京林业大学学报. 2017(05): 48-57 . 本站查看
    14. 杨传宝,孙超,李善文,姚俊修,刘敬国,矫兴杰. 白杨派无性系苗期耐盐性综合评价及筛选. 北京林业大学学报. 2017(10): 24-32 . 本站查看
    15. 邓辉茗,龙聪颖,蔡仕珍,苏明洁,王小梅. PEG-6000模拟干旱协迫对大蓟叶片生理特性的影响. 西北植物学报. 2017(05): 959-964 .
    16. 崔博文,乔光,范付华,丁贵杰,文晓鹏. 不同种源马尾松种质耐低磷的主成分与灰色关联度分析. 西南大学学报(自然科学版). 2017(08): 49-56 .

    Other cited types(15)

Catalog

    Article views (12796) PDF downloads (507) Cited by(31)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return