• Scopus
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD)
  • A Guide to the Core Journal of China
  • CSTPCD
  • F5000 Frontrunner
  • RCCSE
Advanced search
JIANG Ze鄄hui, CHEN Fu鄄ming, WANG Ge, LIU Xing鄄e, CHENG Hai鄄tao.. Surface energy characterization of bamboo fiber determined by dynamic contact angle analysis.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35(3): 143-148.
Citation: JIANG Ze鄄hui, CHEN Fu鄄ming, WANG Ge, LIU Xing鄄e, CHENG Hai鄄tao.. Surface energy characterization of bamboo fiber determined by dynamic contact angle analysis.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35(3): 143-148.

Surface energy characterization of bamboo fiber determined by dynamic contact angle analysis.

More Information
  • Received Date: December 31, 1899
  • Revised Date: December 31, 1899
  • Published Date: May 29, 2013
  • In regards to the characteristics of uneven thickness and a larger variability of natural plant fibers, average wetting perimeter and dynamic contact angle of bamboo fiber were determined by using Whihelmy technique. Surface energy, dispersion and polar components of fiber were characterized under 11 types of wetting speed by Owens-Wendt method. Also, the relationships between wetting speed and dynamic contact angle, wetting speed and surface energy were investigated with the help of marginal mean. The results showed that: the method of using average wetting perimeter of 30 fibers to estimate the circumference and dynamic contact angle was feasible, with a smaller relative error of 0.69%. As the testing rate increased, dynamic advancing contact angles imitated the molecular dynamics model, rapid rising at initial stage and then gradually level off, while surface energy showed a non鄄linear decreasing trend. Surface energy of bamboo fiber was calculated as 41.71 -43.61 mN / m when testing speed was set as 1 -3 mm/ min. Consistent subset analysis represented that marginal mean of dynamic contact angle at 11 levels can be divided into 7 groups, and each group can be considered as a subset. Dynamic contact angle was significantly increased under the high testing speed compared with the low one. Correlation and partial correlation analysis showed that 14.11% degree of correlation between dynamic contact angle and testing speed determined from synergies effect of testing liquid. It has a negative linear relation between the value of bamboo fiber'surface energy and marginal mean of dynamic advancing contact angle.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Wang Lei, Xu Jiachen, Zhen Yaxing, Zhang Heng. Pyrolysis kinetics of major landscape tree species in Hohhot of northern China based on thermogravimetric analysis[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(2): 87-95. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190280
    [2]WANG Zhen-yu, QIU Shu, HE Zheng-bin, YI Song-lin. Heat transfer in the process of pyrolysis of garden waste[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(6): 116-122. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150335
    [3]ZHANG Xiao-teng, XUE Lei, ZHANG Yu, CHU De-miao, MU Jun. Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of poplar treated by compound N-P flame retardant[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(1): 112-117. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000--1522.20150173
    [4]ZHANG Yu, MU Jun, LI Si-jin, ZHAO Yang. The effect of boric acid-borax on the pyrolysis characteristics of poplar oriented strand board.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015, 37(1): 127-138. DOI: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2015.01.003
    [5]ZHANG Yu, MU Jun, LI Si-jin, ZHAO Yang. Influence of UF resin and MUF resin on eucalyptus pyrolysis characteristics[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014, 36(3): 130-135. DOI: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2014.03.021
    [6]CHEN Shi-hua, LI Si-jin, MU Jun.. Conversion characteristics of urea formaldehyde resin adhesive in fiberboard through pyrolysis into solid product.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35(4): 123-127.
    [7]CHEN Shi-hua, FENG Yong-shun, MU Jun, LV Zhao-lin, ZHANG Yi-lan. Bacteriostatic characteristics of disused woodbased board pyrolysis condensate liquid[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2012, 34(6): 131-136.
    [8]FENG Yong-shun, HUANG Zhi-yi, MU Jun. Pyrolysis characteristics of poplar particleboards containing UF resins[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2012, 34(1): 119-122.
    [9]MU Jun, YU Zhi-ming, ZHANG De-rong, JIN Xiao-juan. Pyrolysis characteristics of disused composite panels and properties of its products[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2011, 33(1): 125-128.
    [10]WU Shu-bin, XIANG Bing-lian, LIU Jiang-yan, , GUO Yi-li, SUN Run-cang. Pyrolysis characteristics of technical alkali lignin.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30(5): 143-147.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(34)

    1. 王明怀,崔芳科,吴泽鹏,许秀玉,欧世坤,陈景欢,马胜杰,蔡志全. 森林火烧迹地林下植物多样性与土壤理化性质变化格局. 林业与环境科学. 2024(04): 1-8 .
    2. 罗冠枝,罗敏玄,陈全明,方琼. 森林火灾对泥石流孕灾环境及成灾机制的影响分析. 矿产勘查. 2024(08): 1517-1523 .
    3. 兰越,王云琦,王玉杰,崔芯蕊,郑永林,申航,姚璐,司洪涛,李满意. 林火对重庆缙云山典型林分土壤细菌群落及酶活性的短期影响. 中国水土保持科学(中英文). 2023(03): 60-68 .
    4. 赵蔓,张晓曼,杨明洁. 林火干扰对栓皮栎-辽东栎混交林植物多样性与土壤理化性质的影响. 生态环境学报. 2023(10): 1732-1740 .
    5. 张文文,闫想想,王秋华,龙腾腾,李晓娜,普俊,丁宗达. 计划烧除对云南松林地表可燃物火行为的影响. 北京林业大学学报. 2022(05): 69-76 . 本站查看
    6. 张亚,张文静,杨礼通,雷应雪,杨丽,蔡晓林,梁清,肖玖金. 火烧迹地不同植被恢复下土壤团聚体酶活性特征. 四川农业大学学报. 2021(01): 79-85 .
    7. 田荣,陈奇伯,黎建强,赵雨田,杨建光,杨关吕. 计划烧除对云南松林土壤理化性质及可蚀性的影响. 西北林学院学报. 2021(02): 11-16 .
    8. 王炎,齐麟,周莉,周旺明,毛诚瑞,朱琪,赵福强. 兴安落叶松(Larix gmelinii)火后种子萌发影响因子. 生态学报. 2021(07): 2835-2844 .
    9. 张扬,铁牛,刘洋,张晨. 大兴安岭火烧迹地土壤有机质含量的Meta分析. 中国林副特产. 2021(05): 1-4 .
    10. 曾素平,刘发林,赵梅芳,王光军,陈小伟. 火干扰强度对亚热带四种森林类型土壤理化性质的影响. 生态学报. 2020(01): 233-246 .
    11. 何潇,李海奎,曹磊,徐胜林,刘晓彤. 退化森林生态系统中林分碳储量的驱动因素——以内蒙古大兴安岭为例. 林业科学研究. 2020(02): 69-76 .
    12. 杨振,吴凯,李智,吴明晶,马祥庆,吴鹏飞. 炼山后27年生杉木人工林生长及生物量分配格局. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版). 2019(03): 344-349 .
    13. 何潇,曹磊,徐胜林,李海奎. 内蒙古大兴安岭林区不同恢复阶段森林生物量特征与影响因素. 北京林业大学学报. 2019(09): 50-58 . 本站查看
    14. 鞠传龙,韩晓弟,于智洲,李锡杰,李强,苗杨,袁丽萍,于荣舵. 威海市里口山火烧迹地植被恢复特征研究. 山东林业科技. 2018(01): 40-42+46 .
    15. 胡卸文,王严,杨瀛. 火后泥石流成灾特点及研究现状. 工程地质学报. 2018(06): 1562-1573 .
    16. 刘晓东,王博. 森林燃烧主要排放物研究进展. 北京林业大学学报. 2017(12): 118-124 . 本站查看
    17. 刘学,刘延坤,王琪瑶,邵英男,李云红. 小兴安岭原始椴树红松林中幼龄林与成熟林土壤的理化性质. 贵州农业科学. 2017(02): 130-133 .
    18. 林宝平,何宗明,胡欢甜,邱岭军,林宇. 林火对尾巨桉人工林草本层生物多样性和C、N密度的影响. 亚热带农业研究. 2017(02): 115-120 .
    19. 闫东锋,吴桂藏,郭丹丹,张振,杨喜田. 中度火干扰对林草地土壤理化特性的短期影响. 中国水土保持科学. 2017(04): 96-103 .
    20. 囤兴建,李锡杰,许景伟,李士美,胡丁猛,吴德军,韩景,张广峰,王月海,韩友吉. 威海市里口山不同烧死木清理方式对人工促进植被天然更新的研究. 山东林业科技. 2017(05): 11-16+21 .
    21. 张水锋,张思玉. 火烧对土壤团聚体的影响. 湖南林业科技. 2016(01): 33-37 .
    22. 王竞红,蔡体久,葛树生,刘敬旭,琚存勇,孙晓新. 中俄输油管道工程建设对大兴安岭典型森林生态系统的影响. 北京林业大学学报. 2015(10): 58-66 . 本站查看
    23. 曹慧,白晋华,王建让,郭晋平,贺薇,师爱华. 火烧对油松天然林林下植被及土壤的影响. 防护林科技. 2015(10): 3-6+21 .
    24. 李士美,囤兴建. 青岛市三标山林火迹地早期恢复植被特征研究. 林业调查规划. 2015(05): 67-71 .
    25. 张水锋,张思玉,张金池,毛丽君,刁娇娇,李卫正,刘鑫. 两种立地土壤水分物理性质对火烧的即时响应. 林业科技开发. 2015(04): 22-26 .
    26. 胡海清,李莹,张冉,吴畏,孙龙. 火干扰对小兴安岭两种典型林型土壤养分和土壤微生物生物量的影响. 植物研究. 2015(01): 101-109 .
    27. 曹慧,白晋华,王建让,郭晋平,贺薇,王振忠. 不同强度的火烧对土壤化学性质的影响. 天津农业科学. 2015(08): 21-23 .
    28. 刘慧娟,王宗永,刘君昂,周国英,何苑皞,谭益民. 杉木人工幼林固氮植被的林间生态经营研究. 湖北农业科学. 2014(24): 5978-5983 .
    29. 朱喜,何志斌,杜军,杨军军,陈龙飞. 林下植被组成和功能研究进展. 世界林业研究. 2014(05): 24-30 .
    30. 任乐,马秀枝,李长生. 林火干扰对土壤性质及温室气体通量的影响. 生态学杂志. 2014(02): 502-509 .
    31. 王丽红,辛颖,赵雨森,陈璐,雷雨雨. 大兴安岭重度火烧迹地植被恢复过程中土壤入渗特征研究. 水土保持学报. 2014(04): 13-17+22 .
    32. 王俊峰,欧光龙,陈金龙,陈洁,焦志伟. 基于理论生长方程的云南松火烧迹地幼龄林林分直径结构. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2014(03): 49-52 .
    33. 刘立强,周光益,赵厚本,李力,邱治军. 模拟林冠损伤对藜蒴栲群落林下植被生物多样性的影响. 林业科学研究. 2013(03): 305-311 .
    34. 杨健,孔健健,刘波. 林火干扰对北方针叶林林下植被的影响. 植物生态学报. 2013(05): 474-480 .

    Other cited types(39)

Catalog

    Article views (1570) PDF downloads (103) Cited by(73)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return