• Scopus
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD)
  • A Guide to the Core Journal of China
  • CSTPCD
  • F5000 Frontrunner
  • RCCSE
Advanced search
CUI Wei, MU Chang-cheng, LU Hui-cui, BAO Xu, WANG Biao. Effects of draining for forestation on carbon storage of wetland ecosystem in Daxing'an Mountains of northeastern China.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35(5): 28-36.
Citation: CUI Wei, MU Chang-cheng, LU Hui-cui, BAO Xu, WANG Biao. Effects of draining for forestation on carbon storage of wetland ecosystem in Daxing'an Mountains of northeastern China.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35(5): 28-36.

Effects of draining for forestation on carbon storage of wetland ecosystem in Daxing'an Mountains of northeastern China.

More Information
  • Received Date: December 31, 1899
  • Revised Date: December 31, 1899
  • Published Date: September 29, 2013
  • The distribution pattern of ecosystem carbon storage ( vegetation, litter, soil) and net carbon sequestration of wetland larch plantation along the wetland ecotone environmental gradients (0-400 m) were studied by transect measuring and comparison methods in Daxing'an Mountains of northeastern China, further compared with the corresponding habitats of natural wetlands so as to reveal the effects of wetland draining for forestation on its carbon storage and net carbon sequestration. The results showed that: 1)the carbon storage of vegetation from larch plantation and the natural wetland (6.49-59.95, 3.24-78.97 t/ hm2 ) both took on an increasing trend along the ecotone environmental gradients, and draining for forestation made it increase by 43.9%~241.0% at 100-300 m habitats significantly (P 0.05), but decrease by 24.1% at 300-400 m habitat remarkably (P 0.05); 2)the carbon storage of litter from both (1.61-4.69, 1.51-4.34 t/ hm2 ) also took on an increasing trend, and draining for forestation made it increase by 84.1% at the 100-200 m habitat remarkably (P 0.05); 3)the carbon storage of soil (163.03-308.68, 192.09-382.91 t/ hm2 ) was higher at the 0.100 m habitat, lower at 第5 期崔巍等: 排水造林对大兴安岭湿地生态系统碳储量的影响 300-400 m habitat on the wetland larch plantation ecotone and took on a decreasing trend on the natural wetland ecotone respectively, and draining for forestation made it decrease by 19.4%~43.4% significantly at 0.300 m habitats relative to the natural wetland (P 0.05); 4)the carbon storage of ecosystem (227.68-316.78, 275.40-387.67 t/ hm2) was higher at 0.100 m habitat, lower at 100-400 m habitats on the wetland larch plantation ecotone and higher at 0.300 m habitats, lower in 300-400 m habitat on the natural wetland ecotone respectively, and draining for forestation made it decrease by 18.3%-31,0% at the 0.300 m habitats remarkably relative to the natural wetland (P 0.05); 5)the net primary productivity and annual carbon sequestration (3.67-10.34, 8.03-10.77 t/ (hm2·a); 1.59-4.87, 3.24-5.07 t/ (hm2·a)) took on an increasing trend and constant trend along the ecotone environmental gradients respectively, and draining for forestation made both decrease by 54.3% and 50.9% significantly at 0-100 m habitat of the ecotones (P 0.05), but had no remarkable influences at other habitats ( -19.3%~18.7% and -20.1%~17.3%, P 0.05). Therefore draining for forestation lowers the carbon storage of wetland ecosystem remarkably, but has relatively weak effects on carbon sequestration.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Xu Xinghua, Huang Qilun, Li Shanwen, Meng Xianwei, Li Zongtai, Qiao Yanhui, Dong Yufeng, Zhang Zhiyi. Creation and comprehensive evaluation of Populus deltoides germplasm resources[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(8): 79-86. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220101
    [2]Du Kang, Wang Jiahuan, Li Junheng, Li Chao, Zhang Pingdong, Kang Xiangyang. Genetic identification and evaluation of cold-resistant germplasm resources in Populus tomentosa[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(12): 59-67. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220363
    [3]Wang Lina, Wu Junwen, Dong Qiong, Shi Zhuogong, Hu Haocheng, Wu Danzi, Li Luping. Effects of tending and thinning on non-structural carbon and stoichiometric characteristics of Pinus yunnanensis[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(8): 70-82. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210115
    [4]Li Wei, Wang Pan, Qiqige, Zhang Qichang, Huang Bingjun, Xiao Zejun. Phenotypic diversity analysis of blueberry germplasm resources[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(2): 124-134. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190279
    [5]Zhang Yichi, Guo Sujuan, Sun Chuanhao. Effects of growth retardants on anatomy and non-structural carbohydrates of chestnut leaves[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(1): 46-53. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20180437
    [6]MIAO Yu-bo, ZHU Xiao-mei, LI Zhi-juan, JIA Feng-ling, LI Wei. Genetic evaluation of breeding resources of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica from different improved generations[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(12): 71-78. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170194
    [7]HU Jia-hang, JI Xiao-di Xiao-di, LI Feng-long, GUO Ming-hui. Assessment of embodied environmental impact on log wooden wall member.[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(6): 116-122. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160307
    [8]JI Meng-cheng, SHAN Xiao-bin, ZHANG Yin-li. Investigation on Clematis resources in Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30(5): 66-72.
    [9]ZHENG Xiao-xian. Theory research of forest resource transformation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2007, 29(6): 185-189. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2007.06.024
    [10]LIU Jin-fu, HONG Wei, LI Jun-qing. Characteristics of gaps renewal in Castanopsis kawakamii forests[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2006, 28(3): 14-19.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 程世平,姚鹏强,耿喜宁,刘春洋,谢丽华. 高温诱导牡丹产生未减数花粉. 园艺学报. 2022(03): 581-589 .
    2. 李琳,刘德旺,田野,黄林芳. 激光共聚焦显微镜技术在中药研究中的应用. 中成药. 2017(05): 1038-1041 .

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Article views (1519) PDF downloads (87) Cited by(4)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return